[336] Gilbert v. Berkeley, Skin. 648. And see Scarfe v. Morgan, 4 M. & W. 270; and Somes v. B. Emp. Ell. Bl. & Ell. 353.

[337] Westbrooke v. Griffith, Moor. 876; Jones v. Thurloe, 8 Mod. 172; Mulliner v. Florence, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 489.

[338] Westbrooke v. Griffith, supra.

[339] Idem.

[340] Jones v. Pearle, Str. 556; Thames I. W. Co. v. Pat. Derrick Co. 1 Johns. & W. 97; 27 L. J. C. 714; Mulliner v. Florence, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 484.

[341] Wharton on Innk. 122; Cross on Lien, 345 n.

[342] Fox v. McGregor, 4 Barb. 41; Hickman v. Thomas, 16 Ala. 666; Miller v. Marston, 85 Me. 153.

[343] York v. Grenaugh, 2 Ld. Raym. 866; Robinson v. Walker, Pop. 127.

[344] Turrill v. Crawley, 13 Ad. & E. (N. S.) 197; Manning v. Hollenbeck. 27 Wis. 202.

[345] See, also, Johnson v. Hill, 3 Stark. 172.

[346] Wharton, p. 120; Stirt v. Drungold, 3 Bulst. 289. But see Mulliner v. Florence, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 484.

[347] Burns v. Pigot, 9 C. & P. 208.

[348] Grinnell v. Cook, 3 Hill, (N. Y.) 486.

[349] Dixon v. Dalby, 9 U. C. Q. B. 79.

[350] Grammell v. Schley, 41 Ga. 112.

[351] Judson v. Etheridge, 1 C. & M. 743; Anderson v. Bell, 2 C. & M. 304; Parsons on Contracts, vol. 3, p. 250.

[352] Kinlock v. Craig, 3 L. R. 119; Taylor v. Robinson, 8 Taunt. 648; Jackson v. Cummins, 5 M. & W. 342.

[353] Orchard v. Rackstraw, 9 C. B. 698; Hickman v. Thomas, 16 Ala. 666; Thickstein v. Howard, 8 Blackf. 535.

[354] Mason v. Thompson, 9 Pick. 280.

[355] Smith v. Dearlove, 6 C. B. 132.

[356] Wallace v. Woodgate, 1 Ryan & M. 193.

[357] Jacobs v. Latour, 2 M. & P. 20; 5 Bing. 130; Jackson v. Cummins, 5 M. & W. 342; Harris v. Woodruff, 124 Mass. 205.

[358] Sunbolf v. Alford, 3 M. & W. 254; Parsons on Contracts, vol. 3, p. 250.

[359] Ibid.

[360] Bacon’s Abr. Inns. D.

[361] Newton v. Trigg, 1 Shower, 269.

[362] Sunbolf v. Alford, 3 Mees. & W. 248.

[363] Mulliner v. Florence, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 485.

[364] Drope v. Thaire, Latch, 127; Grinstone v. Innkeeper, Hetl. 49; Pollock v. Landis, 36 Iowa, 651; Hursh v. Byers, 29 Mo. 469; Ewart v. Stark, 8 Rich. (S. C.) 423.

[365] Wintermute v. Clarke, 5 Sandf. 242.

[366] Wharton, p. 123.

[367] Berkshire Co. v. Proctor, 7 Cush. 417.

[368] Trelfall v. Borwick, 41 Law J. Q. B. 266; affirmed, L. R. 10 Q. B. (Exch.) 210.

[369] Bennett v. Mellor, 5 T. R. 273.

[370] Allen v. Smith, 12 Com. B. N. S. 638; Peet v. McGraw, 25 Wend. 654.

[371] Johnson v. Hill, 3 Stark. 172; Kent v. Shuckard, 2 Barn. & Adol. 805.

[372] Johnson v. Hill, supra.

[373] Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. Walters, 50 Ga. 573.

[374] Broadwood v. Granara, 10 Ex. 423. See, also, Carlisle v. Quattlebaum, 2 Bail. 452; Fox v. McGregor, 11 Barb. 41.

[375] Cross on Lien, p. 30; Snead v. Watkins, 1 Com. B. N. S. 267.

[376] Byall v. ——, Atk. 165. See, also, Chapter VII.

[377] Manning v. Hollenbeck, 27 Wis. 202.

[378] Dicas v. Stockley, 7 Car. & P. 587; Bristol v. Wilsmore, 1 Barn. & C. 514.

[379] Ratcliff v. Davies, Cro. Jac. 244.

[380] Gordon v. Cox, 7 Car. & P. 172.

[381] Per Willes J., Allen v. Smith, 12 Com. B. N. S. 644.

[382] Owen v. Knight, 5 Scott, 307.

[383] Hodgson v. Loy, 7 T. R. 660.

[384] Horncastle v. Farran, 2 Barn. & Ald. 497.

[385] Case v. Fogg, 46 Mo. 66; Thames Iron W. Co. v. Patent Derrick Co. 1 Johns. & W. 97; Mulliner v. Florence L. R. 3 Q. B. 484.

[386] Proctor v. Nicholson, 7 Car. & P. 67.

[387] Watson v. Cross, 2 Duv. (Ken.) 147.

[388] Somes v. British Emp. Sh. Co. 8 H. L. Cas. 338; El. B. & E. 353. But see, in cases of horses, p. 129.

[389] Clayton v. Butterfield, 10 Rich. 423.

[390] Dansey v. Richardson, 3 El. & Bl. 144.

[391] Holder v. Soulby, 8 C. B. N. S. 254.

[392] Idem—Earle, C. J.

[393] Manning v. Wells, 9 Humph. 746.

[394] Johnson v. Reynolds, 3 Ken. 257. See, also, Chamberlain v. Masterson, 26 Ala. 371.

[395] Smith v. Reed, 6 Daly, 33.

[396] Soltan v. De Held, 2 Sim. N. S. 133.

[397] State v. Linkham, 69 N. C. 214.

[398] State v. Hughes, 72 N. C. 25.

[399] State v. Powell, 70 N. C. 67.

[400] Newton v. Harland, 1 M. & G. 644.

[401] De Witt v. Pierson, 112 Mass 8.

[402] Dansey v. Richardson, 3 El. & B. 144.

[403] Cady v. McDowell, 1 Lans. (N. Y.) 484.

[404] Pinkerton v. Woodward, 33 Cal. 557.

[405] Thompson v. Lacy, 3 Barn. & Adol. 283.

[406] Willard v. Reinhardt, 2 E. D. Smith, 148.

[407] Wharton on Innkeepers, 123.

[408] Benner v. Welburn, 7 Ga. 296, 307; Southwood v. Myers, 3 Bush, 681.

[409] Stewart v. McCready, 24 How. Pr. 62; Jones v. Merrill, 42 Barb. 623; Cross v. Wilkins, 43 N. H. 332; Nichols v. Holliday, 29 Wis. 406.

[410] Brooks v. Harrison, 41 Conn. 184.

[411] Wright v. Stewart, 29 Law J. Q. B. 161.

[412] 2 and 3 Edw. VI, chap. 19.

[413] 5 Eliz. chap. 5, sec. 15.

[414] Woodfall, Landlord and Tenant. But see Wright v. Stewart, 6 Jur. N. S. 867.

[415] Woodfall, Landlord and Tenant. But see Wright v. Stewart, 6 Jur. N. S. 867.

[416] Parsons on Contracts, vol. 1, p. 517.

[417] Baynes v. Smith, 1 Esp. 206.

[418] Bisset v. Caldwell, 1 Esp. 206, n.

[419] Woodfall, Landlord and Tenant, 384.

[420] Parsons on Contracts, vol. 1, p. 518.

[421] Archer v. Wetherell, 4 Hill (N. Y.) 112.

[422] 34 and 35 Vict. chap. 79; Phillips v. Henson, L. R. 3 C. P. D. 26.

[423] Hunter v. Hunt, 1 Com. B. 300.

[424] Mechelen v. Wallace, 7 Ad. & E. 49; Vaughan v. Hancock, 3 Com. B. 766.

[425] Ross v. Fedden, 7 Q. B. 661.

[426] Culverwell v. Lockington, 24 C. P. (Ont. 611.)

[427] Jaffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398.

[428] Kimmell v. Burfiend, 2 Daly (N. Y.), 155.

[429] Carstairs v. Taylor, L. R. 6 Ex. 223.

[430] Stapenhurst v. Am. Man. Co. 15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 355; Simonton v. Loring, 68 Me. 164.

[431] Arden v. Pullen, 10 Mees. & W. 321; Keates v. Cadogan, 10 C. B. 591; Gott v. Gandy, 2 El. & B. 845; Wiltz v. Matthews, 52 N. Y. 512; Taffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398.

[432] Scott v. Simons, 54 N. H. 426.

[433] Clancy v. Byrne, 56 N. Y. 129.

[434] Izon v. Gorton, 5 Bing. N. C. 501; 7 Scott, 537.

[435] Surplice v. Farnsworth, 7 M. & G. 576.

[436] Maclennan v. Royal Ins. Co. 39 Q. B. (Ont.) 515.

[437] Underwood v. Burrows, 7 Car. &. P. 26.

[438] Idem.

[439] Smith v. Marrable, 11 Mees. & W. 5; Add. on Con. 375-6.

[440] Hart v. Windsor, 11 Mees. & W. 68; Sutton v. Temple, Ibid. 57; Searle v. Laverick, Law R. 9 Q. B. 131; McGlasham v. Tallmadge, 37 Barb. 313.

[441] Hart v. Windsor, supra.

[442] Wilson v. Finch Hatton, L. R. 2 Ex. D. 343.

[443] Dutton v. Gerrish, 63 Mass. 94.

[444] Sutton v. Temple, supra.

[445] Westlake v. De Graw, 25 Wend. 669.

[446] Wilson v. Finch Hatton, L. R. 2 Ex. D. 336.

[447] Smith v. Marrable, 11 Mees. & W. 5.

[448] Minor v. Sharon, 112 Mass. 477.

[449] Add. on Contracts, 377.

[450] Izon v. Gorton, 5 Bing. N. C. 501; 7 Scott, 537; Parker v. Gibbons, 1 Q. B. 421; Fowler v. Payne, 49 Miss. 32.

[451] Newman v. Anderton, 2 Bos. & P. N. R. 224; Cadogan v. Kennet, Cowp. 432.

[452] Ibid.

[453] Newman v. Anderton, supra.

[454] Ernot v. Cole, Dyer, 212b; Cadogan v. Kennet, supra. But see Salmon v. Matthews, 8 Mees. & W. 827.

[455] Parry v. Hazell, 1 Esp. 64; Peacock v. Raffan, 6 Esp. 4; Doe v. Bayley, 6 East, 121; Woodfall, 8 Ed. 176.

[456] Huffell v. Armstead, 7 Car. & P. 56; Peacock v. Raffan, 6 Esp. 4; Towne v. Campbell, 3 Com. B. 94.

[457] People v. Giolet, 14 Abb. Pr. N. S. 130.

[458] Jones v. Mills, 10 Com. B. N. S. 788.

[459] Finlayson v. Bayley, 5 Car. & P. 67.

[460] Huffell v. Armistead, 7 Car. & P. 56.

[461] Walls v. Atcheson, 3 Bing. 462.

[462] Griffith v. Hodges, 2 Car. & P. 419.

[463] Bethett v. Blencome, 3 M. & G. 119.

[464] Ricket v. Tullick, 6 Car. & P. 66.

[465] Doupe v. Genin, 45 N. Y. 119.

[466] Lane v. Dixon, 3 M. G. & S. 776.

[467] Hartley v. Bloxham, 3 Q. B. 701.

[468] Lane v. Dixon, supra, per Cresswell, J.

[469] Nowlan v. Nevor, 2 Sweeny, (N. Y.) 67.

[470] Pool v. Higinson, 18 Alb. L. J. 82.

[471] Mellish, L. J. L. R. 8 Ch. 471.