Gita and gospel | Project Gutenberg

213. See the parables in Matt., 22, 2-14; and Luke, 14, 15-24.

215. Matt., 11, 13-14; Luke, 16, 16.

216. Isaiah, 42, 6; 49, 6.

217. Matt., 24, 14; 26, 13; 28, 19.

218. Matt., 11, 28-29.

219. Matt., 25, 40; 25, 45.

220. See e.g., Matt., 9, 6; 11, 19; 12, 8; 16, 13; 20, 18; 20, 28; 25, 31; 26, 64.

221. Matt., 11, 27; 16, 17; 17, 5.

222. Matt., 21, 37; 11, 10; Mark, 8, 37-38; 9, 37; Luke, 10, 16.

223. Matt., 3, 17; 17, 5; 26, 63-64; 21, 37; 22, 41-45; Luke, 10, 22.

224. Luke, 10, 23-24.

226. Matt., 9, 15; 22, 2-14.

227. Luke, 10, 22.

228. Luke, 11, 20.

229. Matt., 20, 28; Luke, 22, 20.

230. Mark, 1, 22; 1, 27.

231. Matt., 5, 17.

232. Matt., 5, 44; 15, 20.

233. Matt., 5, 32; 5, 34; 5, 39; 15, 11; 19, 7-9.

234. Matt., 5, 11; 8, 22; 10, 37-39; 11, 28-30; 16, 24-25.

235. i.e., I Corinthians.

236. For the dates of Paul’s Epistles, see the articles in Hastings’s Dictionary of the Bible, or Moffatt’s Historical New Testament, 121-137.

241. Acts, 11, 19; Galatians, 1, 21-24.

244. 11, 20-34; 10, 16-17.

245. Very frequent: cf. 1, 2; 1, 3; 1, 7; 8, 6; 12, 3; 16, 22. The Lord takes in the Epistles the place held by the Son of Man in the Gospels.

251. 5, 4; 7, 10; 14, 37; 15, 24-28.

252. 12, 12-13; 12, 27.

253. 1, 4-7; 1, 30; 3, 5; 12, 5; 16, 23.

257. 11, 23-26; 15, 3.

258. 1, 18; 1, 21; 2, 2; 15, 1; 15, 11.

263. 15, 1; 15, 2; 15, 11.

266. 1, 2; 1, 30; 3, 16; 6, 11; 6, 19.

268. 6, 15; 10, 17; 12, 12-13; 12, 27.

269. 11, 23-25. Cf. Jeremiah, 31, 31-34.

270. 15, 4 compared with 15, 14.

272. Galatians, 1, 18-2, 10.

273. See McGiffert’s Apostolic Age, 536.

274. The event is described in Matt., 26, 26-30; Mark, 14, 22-26; and Luke, 22, 14-20; as well as in 1 Corinthians, 11, 23-26.

275. Matt., 9, 15.

276. Matt., 16, 21.

277. Matt., 17, 22-23; 20, 17-19.

278. Matt., 20, 28.

279. Matt., 21, 39; 26, 2; 26, 12.

280. Matt., 26, 26, 30.

281. Now universally acknowledged.

282. Many of the wisest Indians have spoken out on this subject. The latest utterance is an article on Pseudo-Nationalism in the Indian Messenger for August 9th.

283. Many other signs of Christian influence might be noted: thus the Young Men’s Gītā is a counterblast to a Christian edition of the Song, and it is besides most evidently arranged and printed in imitation of some tasteful edition of the Imitation of Christ; while the Imitation of Sreekrishna proclaims its origin by its very name.

284. See an essay by Hirendra Nath Dutta, which originally appeared in Sāhitya, now republished as an appendix to Nobin Chundra Sen’s Kurukshetra.

288. Krishna and Krishnaism, 16.

289. Krishnacharitra, 42.

290. Pānini, his Place in Sanskrit Literature, 227.

291. Srikrishna, his Life and Teachings, vol. I, p. xxv.

292. Physical Religion, 76.

293. Pānini, his Place in Sanskrit Literature, 227.

294. It was published in 1861.

295. Macdonell, 430-431; Kaegi, 7; Max Müller, Physical Religion, 63-64; Haraprasad Sastri, A School History of India, 4-7; R. C. Dutt, Brief History of Ancient and Modern India, 17, 27; Böhtlingk’s Pānini (Leipsic, 1887); Weber, Indische Studien, V, 1-172; Hopkins, R. I., 350; Bühler in S. B. E., vol. II, pp. xxxv, xxxix-xlii; Eggeling in S. B. E., vol. xii, p. xxxvii; Bhandarkar, Early History of the Deccan, 5.

296. Max Müller, A. S. L., 311-312; Macdonell, 36, 39, 268. Cf. what Whitney says, “The standard work of Pānini, the grammarian-in-chief of Sanskrit literature, is a frightfully perfect model of the Sūtra method” (Oriental and Linguistic Studies, I, 71).

297. Max Müller, Natural Religion, 296; Macdonell, 203-4.

298. Macdonell, 205.

299. Max Müller, A. S. L., 138; Natural Religion, 297-298; Macdonell, 22-23.

301. On these texts see Kaegi, Note 77; Macdonell, 48, 50.

303. Macdonell, 268.

304. Macdonell, 269. Goldstücker (op. cit. p. 225) acknowledges that Yāska earlier than Pānini.

306. See also Bose, H. C., 33-35.

307. 13th year, 1st part.

Transcriber’s Notes:
- Footnotes have been collected at the end of the text, and are linked for ease of reference.
- While the title page included with the source files shows Neil Alexander to be the author, the original publication is attributed to John Nicol Farquhar.