The Project Gutenberg eBook of Finger prints
Title: Finger prints
Author: Francis Galton
Release date: August 5, 2011 [eBook #36979]
Most recently updated: January 8, 2021
Language: English
Credits: Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive.)
FINGER PRINTS
FINGER PRINTS
BY
FRANCIS GALTON, F.R.S., ETC.
London
MACMILLAN AND CO.
AND NEW YORK
1892
All rights reserved
CONTENTS
| PAGE | |
| CHAPTER I | |
| Introduction | 1 |
| Distinction between creases and ridges | 1 |
| Origin of the inquiry | 2 |
| Summaries of the subsequent chapters | 3-21 |
| Viz. of ii., 3; iii., 4; iv., 5; | |
| v., 5; vi., 8; vii., 10; | |
| viii., 12; ix., 13; x., 14; | |
| xi., 16; xii., 17; xiii., 19; | |
| CHAPTER II | |
| Previous Use of Finger Prints | 22 |
| Superstition of personal contact | 22 |
| Rude hand-prints | 23 |
| Seals to documents | 23 |
| Chinese finger marks | 24 |
| The tipsahi of Bengal | 24 |
| Nail-marks on Assyrian bricks | 25 |
| Nail-mark on Chinese coins | 25 |
| Ridges and cheiromancy—China, Japan, and by negroes | 26 |
| Modern usage—Bewick, Fauld, Tabor, and G. Thompson | 26 |
| Their official use by Sir W. J. Herschel | 27 |
| CHAPTER III | |
| Methods of Printing | 30 |
| Impression on polished glass or razor | 30 |
| The two contrasted methods of printing | 31 |
| General remarks on printing from reliefs—ink; low relief of ridges; layer of ink; drying due to oxidisation | 32-34 |
| Apparatus at my own laboratory—slab; roller; benzole (or equivalent); funnel; ink; cards | 35-38 |
| Method of its manipulation | 38-40 |
| Pocket apparatus | 40 |
| Rollers and their manufacture | 40 |
| Other parts of the apparatus | 41 |
| Folders—long serviceable if air be excluded | 42 |
| Lithography | 43 |
| Water colours and dyes | 44 |
| Sir W. Herschel’s official instructions | 45 |
| Printing as from engraved plates—Prof. Ray Lankester; Dr. L. Robinson | 45 |
| Methods of Dr. Forgeot | 46 |
| Smoke prints—mica; adhesive paper, by licking with tongue | 47-48 |
| Plumbago; whitening | 49 |
| Casts—sealing-wax; dentist’s wax; gutta-percha; undried varnish; collodion | 49-51 |
| Photographs | 51 |
| Prints on glass and mica for lantern | 51 |
| Enlargements—photographic, by camera lucida, pantagraph | 52-53 |
| CHAPTER IV | |
| The Ridges and their Uses | 54 |
| General character of the ridges | 54 |
| Systems on the palm—principal ones; small interpolated systems | 54-55 |
| Cheiromantic creases—their directions; do not strictly correspond with those of ridges | 56-57 |
| Ridges on the soles of the feet | 57 |
| Pores | 57 |
| Development:—embryology; subsequent growth; disintegration by age, by injuries | 58-59 |
| Evolution | 60 |
| Apparent use as regards pressure—theoretic; experiment with compass points | 60-61 |
| Apparent use as regards rubbing—thrill thereby occasioned | 62-63 |
| CHAPTER V | |
| Patterns: their Outlines and Cores | 64 |
| My earlier failures in classifying prints; their causes | 64-66 |
| The triangular plots | 67 |
| Outlines of patterns—eight sets of ten digits given as examples | 69-70 |
| Supplies of ridges to pattern | 71 |
| Letters that read alike when reversed | 71 |
| Magnifying glasses, spectacles, etc. | 72 |
| Rolled impressions, their importance | 73 |
| Standard patterns, cores, and their nomenclature | 74-77 |
| Direction of twist, nomenclature | 78 |
| Arches, loops, whorls | 78 |
| Transitional cases | 79 |
| The nine genera | 80 |
| Measurements—by ridge-intervals; by aid of bearings like compass | 82-84 |
| Purkenje—his Commentatio and a translation of it in part | 84-88 |
| CHAPTER VI | |
| Persistence | 89 |
| Evidence available | 89 |
| About thirty-five points of reference in each print | 90 |
| Photo-enlargement; orientation; tracing axes of ridges | 90-91 |
| Ambiguities in minutiæ | 91 |
| V. H. Hd. as child and boy, a solitary change in one of the minutiæ | 92 |
| Eight couplets from other persons | 93 |
| One from Sir W. G. | 95 |
| Summary of 389 comparisons | 96 |
| Ball of a thumb | 96 |
| Results as to persistence | 97 |
| CHAPTER VII | |
| Evidential Value | 100 |
| Method of rough comparison | 100 |
| Chance against guessing a pattern | 101 |
| Number of independent elements in a print—squares respectively of one, six, and five ridge-intervals in side | 101-103 |
| Interpolation, three methods of | 103-105 |
| Local accidents inside square | 107 |
| Uncertainties outside it | 109 |
| Compound results | 110 |
| Effect of failure in one, two, or more prints | 111 |
| Final conclusions—Jezebel | 112-113 |
| CHAPTER VIII | |
| Peculiarities of the Digits | 114 |
| Frequency per cent of arches, loops, and whorls generally, and on the several digits | 114-115 |
| Characteristic groups of digits | 116-118 |
| Relationships between the digits | 119 |
| Centesimal scale of relationship | 124-126 |
| Digits of same and of different names | 130 |
| CHAPTER IX | |
| Methods of Indexing | 131 |
| Use of an index | 131 |
| Method of few conspicuous differences in many fingers | 131 |
| Specimen index | 133 |
| Order in which the digits are noted | 134 |
| Examples of indexing | 135 |
| Effect of regarding slopes | 135 |
| Number of index-heads required for 100 sets in each of twelve different methods | 136-138 |
| i and o in forefingers only | 138 |
| List of commonest index-headings | 140 |
| Number of headings to 100 sets, according to the digits that are noted | 142 |
| Transitional cases; sub-classifications | 143-144 |
| Symbols for patterns | 144 |
| Storing cards | 145 |
| Number of entries under each head when only the first three fingers are noted | 146 |
| CHAPTER X | |
| Personal Identification | 147 |
| Printers and photographers | 147 |
| Use of means of identification to honest persons; in regard to criminals | 148-149 |
| Major Ferris, Mr. Tabor, N. Borneo | 149-153 |
| Best digits for registration purposes | 153 |
| Registration of criminals—M. Bertillon | 154 |
| Details of Bertillonage; success attributed to it; a theoretic error | 155-158 |
| Verification on a small scale | 158-162 |
| Experiences in the United States | 163 |
| Body marks; teeth | 165-166 |
| Value of finger prints for search in a register | 166 |
| Identification by comparison | 167 |
| Remarks by M. Herbette | 168 |
| CHAPTER XI | |
| Heredity | 170 |
| Different opinions | 170 |
| Larger meaning of heredity | 170 |
| Connection between filial and fraternal relationships | 171 |
| Fraternity, a faulty word but the best available | 171 |
| A and B brothers | 172 |
| Test case of calculated randoms | 173 |
| Fraternities by double A. L. W. events | 175 |
| The C. standard patterns | 177 |
| Limitation of couplets in large fraternities | 178 |
| Test of accurate classification | 179 |
| Fraternities by double C. events | 181 |
| Centesimal scale applied | 184 |
| Twins | 185 |
| Children of like-patterned parents | 187 |
| Simple filial relationship | 190 |
| Influences of father and mother | 190 |
| CHAPTER XII | |
| Races and Classes | 192 |
| Data for races | 192 |
| Racial differences are statistical only | 193 |
| Calculations by Mr. F. H. Collins | 193 |
| Hebrew peculiarities | 194 |
| Negro peculiarities, questionable | 196 |
| Data for different classes in temperament, faculty, etc., and results | 197 |
| M. Féré | 197 |
| CHAPTER XIII | |
| Genera | 198 |
| Type, meaning of | 198 |
| Law of frequency of error | 198 |
| Discussion of three elements in the loops on either thumb | 200-207 |
| Proportions of typical loops | 209 |
| The patterns are transmitted under conditions of panmixia, yet do not blend | 209 |
| Their genera are not due to selection; inference | 210 |
| Sports; variations | 211 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES
| PAGE | ||
| Summary of evidence in favour of finger marks being persistent | 96 | |
| Interpolation of ridges | 104 | |
| I. | Percentage frequency of Arches, Loops, and Whorls on the different digits, as observed in the 5000 digits of 500 different persons | 115 |
| II. | Distribution of the A. L. W. patterns on the corresponding digits of the two hands | 116 |
| III. | Percentage frequency of Arches on the digits of the two hands | 117 |
| IV. | Percentage frequency of Loops on the digits of the two hands | 118 |
| V. | Percentage frequency of Whorls on the digits of the two hands | 118 |
| VIa. | Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in the same digits of the two hands | 120 |
| VIb. | Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in various couplets of different digits | 120 |
| VII. | Couplets of fingers of different names in the same and in the opposite hands | 121 |
| VIII. | Measures of relationship between the digits on a centesimal scale | 129 |
| IX. | Index to 100 sets of finger prints | 133 |
| X. | Number of different index-heads in 100 sets, according to the number of digits noted | 136 |
| XI. | Number of entries under the same heads in 100 sets | 139 |
| XII. | Index-headings under which more than 1 per cent of the sets were registered in 500 sets | 140 |
| XIII. | Percentage of entries falling under a single head in 100, 300, and 500 sets | 141 |
| XIV. | Number of different index-headings in 100 sets, according to the number of fingers in each set, and to the method of indexing | 142 |
| XV. | Number of entries in 500 sets, each of the fore, middle, and ring-fingers only | 146 |
| XVI. | Number of cases of various anthropometric data
that severally fell in the three classes of large, medium, and small, when certain limiting values were adopted | 159 |
| XVII. | Distribution of 500 sets of measures, each set consisting of five elements, into classes | 160 |
| XVIII. | Number of the above sets that fell under the same headings | 161 |
| XIX. | Further analysis of the two headings that contained the most numerous entries | 162 |
| XX. | Observed random couplets | 174 |
| XXI. | Calculated random couplets | 174 |
| XXII. | Observed fraternal couplets | 175 |
| XXIII. | Fraternal couplets—random, observed, and utmost feasible | 176 |
| XXIV. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets | 181 |
| XXV. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—random and observed | 182 |
| XXVI. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—resemblance measured on centesimal scale | 182 |
| XXVII. | Twins | 186 |
| XXVIII. | Children of like-patterned parents | 188 |
| XXIX. | Paternal and maternal influence | 190 |
| XXX. | Different races, percentage frequency of arches in fore-finger | 194 |
| XXXI. | Distribution of number of ridges in AH, and of other measures in loops | 203 |
| XXXII. | Ordinates to their schemes of distribution | 204 |
| XXXIII. | Comparison of the above with calculated values | 205 |
| XXXIV. | Proportions of a typical loop on the right and left thumbs respectively | 209 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES
| PAGE | ||
| I.— | Fig. 1. Chinese coin with the symbol of the nail-mark of the Empress Wen-teh | 25 |
| Fig. 2. Order on a camp sutler by Mr. Gilbert Thompson, who used his finger print for the same purpose as the scroll-work in cheques, viz. to ensure the detection of erasures | 27 | |
| II.— | Fig. 3. Form of card used at my anthropometric laboratory for finger prints. It shows the places where they are severally impressed, whether dabbed or rolled (p. 40), and the hole by which they are secured in their box | 145 |
| Fig. 4. Small printing roller, used in the pocket apparatus, actual size. It may be covered either with india-rubber tubing or with roller composition | 40 | |
| III.— | Fig. 5. Diagram of the chief peculiarities of ridges, called here minutiæ (the scale is about eight times the natural size) | 54 |
| Fig. 6. The systems of ridges and the creases in the palm, indicated respectively by continuous and by dotted lines. Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 show variations in the boundaries of the systems of ridges, and places where smaller systems are sometimes interpolated | 54 | |
| IV.— | Fig. 7. The effects of scars and cuts on the ridges: a is the result of a deep ulcer; b the finger of a tailor (temporarily) scarred by the needle; c the result of a deep cut | 59 |
| Fig. 8. Formation of the interspace: filled in (3) by a loop; in (4) by a scroll. The triangular plot or plots are indicated. In (1) there is no interspace, but a succession of arches are formed, gradually flattening into straight lines | 67 | |
| V.— | Fig. 9. Specimens of rolled thumb prints, of the natural size, in which the patterns have been outlined, p. 69, and on which lines have been drawn for orientation and charting | 68 |
| VI.— | Fig. 10. Specimens of the outlines of the patterns on the ten digits of eight different persons, not selected but taken as they came. Its object is to give a general idea of the degree of their variety. The supply of ridges from the inner (or thumb side) are coloured blue, those from the outer are red (the scale is of the natural size) | 70 |
| VII.— | Fig. 11. Standard patterns of Arches, together with some transitional forms, all with their names below | 75 |
| Fig. 12. As above, with respect to Loops | 75 | |
| VIII.— | Fig. 13. As above, with respect to Whorls | 75 |
| Fig. 14. Cores to Loops, which may consist either of single lines, here called rods, or of a recurved line or staple, while the ridges that immediately envelops them is called an envelope | 76 | |
| Fig. 15. Cores to Whorls | 77 | |
| IX.— | Fig. 15. Transitional patterns, enlarged three times, between Arches and either Loops or Whorls | 79 |
| X.— | Fig. 16. Transitional patterns, as above, but between Loops and Whorls | 79 |
| XI.— | Fig. 17. Diagram showing the nine genera formed by the corresponding combinations of the two letters by which they are expressed, each being i, j, or o as the case may be. The first two diagrams are Arches, and not strictly patterns at all, but may with some justice be symbolised by jj | 80 |
| Fig. 18. Ambiguities in minutiæ, showing that certain details in them are not to be trusted, while others are | 92 | |
| XII.— | Fig. 19. The illustrations to Purkenje’s Commentatio. They are photo-lithographed from the original, which is not clearly printed | 86 |
| XIII.— | Fig. 20. Enlarged impressions of the same two fingers of V. H. Hd., first when a child of 2½, and subsequently when a boy of 15 years of age. The lower pair are interesting from containing the unique case of failure of exact coincidence yet observed. It is marked A. The numerals indicate the correspondences | 92 |
| XIV.— | Fig. 21. Contains portions on an enlarged scale of eight couplets of finger prints, the first print in each couplet having been taken many years before the second, as shown by the attached dates. The points of correspondence in each couplet are indicated by similar numerals | 93 |
| XV.— | Fig. 22. The fore-finger of Sir W. J. Herschel as printed on two occasions, many years apart (enlarged scale). The numerals are here inserted on a plan that has the merit of clearness, but some of the lineations are thereby sacrificed | 95 |
| Fig. 23. Shows the periods of life over which the evidence of identity extends in Figs 20-22. [By an oversight, not perceived until too late for remedy, the bottom line begins at æt. 62 instead of 67] | 97 | |
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The palms of the hands and the soles of the feet are covered with two totally distinct classes of marks. The most conspicuous are the creases or folds of the skin which interest the followers of palmistry, but which are no more significant to others than the creases in old clothes; they show the lines of most frequent flexure, and nothing more. The least conspicuous marks, but the most numerous by far, are the so-called papillary ridges; they form the subject of the present book. If they had been only twice as large as they are, they would have attracted general attention and been commented on from the earliest times. Had Dean Swift known and thought of them, when writing about the Brobdingnags, whom he constructs on a scale twelve times as great as our own, he would certainly have made Gulliver express horror at the ribbed fingers of the giants who handled him. The ridges on their palms would have been as broad as the thongs of our coach-whips.
Let no one despise the ridges on account of their smallness, for they are in some respects the most important of all anthropological data. We shall see that they form patterns, considerable in size and of a curious variety of shape, whose boundaries can be firmly outlined, and which are little worlds in themselves. They have the unique merit of retaining all their peculiarities unchanged throughout life, and afford in consequence an incomparably surer criterion of identity than any other bodily feature. They may be made to throw welcome light on some of the most interesting biological questions of the day, such as heredity, symmetry, correlation, and the nature of genera and species. A representation of their lineations is easily secured in a self-recorded form, by inking the fingers in the way that will be explained, and pressing them on paper. There is no prejudice to be overcome in procuring these most trustworthy sign-manuals, no vanity to be pacified, no untruths to be guarded against.
My attention was first drawn to the ridges in 1888 when preparing a lecture on Personal Identification for the Royal Institution, which had for its principal object an account of the anthropometric method of Bertillon, then newly introduced into the prison administration of France. Wishing to treat the subject generally, and having a vague knowledge of the value sometimes assigned to finger marks, I made inquiries, and was surprised to find, both how much had been done, and how much there remained to do, before establishing their theoretical value and practical utility.
Enough was then seen to show that the subject was of real importance, and I resolved to investigate it; all the more so, as the modern processes of photographic printing would enable the evidence of such results as might be arrived at, to be presented to the reader on an enlarged and easily legible form, and in a trustworthy shape. Those that are put forward in the following pages, admit of considerable extension and improvement, and it is only the fact that an account of them seems useful, which causes me to delay no further before submitting what has thus far been attained, to the criticism of others.
I have already published the following memoirs upon this subject: