Ib. p. 45.
I see not what one thing there is of so many as are to be found in the
whole world, wherein there is need of a greater courage than to treat
of committing treason against a king, and to know that he knows it
well, and yet never to go out of his presence. For howsoever it be
very true that we are always in the presence of God; yet methinks that
they who converse with him in prayer are in his presence after a more
particular manner; for they are seeing then that he sees them; whereas
others may, perhaps, remain some days in his presence, yet without
remembering that he looks upon them.
A very pretty and sweet remark: truth in new feminine beauty!
In fine
.
How incomparably educated was Teresa for a mystic saint, a mother of
transports and fusions of spirit!
-
A woman;
-
Of rank, and reared delicately;
-
A Spanish lady;
-
With very pious parents and sisters;
-
Accustomed in early childhood to read "with most believing heart" all
the legends of saints, martyrs, Spanish martyrs, who fought against the
Moors;
-
In the habit of privately (without the knowledge of the superstitious
Father) reading books of chivalry to her mother, and then all night to
herself.
-
Then her Spanish sweet-hearting, doubtless in the true Oroondates
style—and with perfect innocence, as far as appears; and this giving of
audience to a dying swain through a grated window, on having received a
lover's messages of flames and despair, with her aversion at fifteen or
sixteen years of age to shut herself up for ever in a strict nunnery,
appear to have been those mortal sins, of which she accuses herself,
added, perhaps to a few warm fancies of earthly love;
-
A frame of exquisite sensibility by nature, rendered more so by a
burning fever, which no doubt had some effect upon her brain, as she was
from that time subject to frequent fainting fits and deliquia:
-
Frightened at her Uncle's, by reading to him Dante's books of Hell
and Judgment, she confesses that she at length resolved on nunhood
because she thought it could not be much worse than Purgatory— and that
purgatory here was a cheap expiation for Hell for ever;
-
Combine these (and I have proceeded no further than the eleventh
page of her life) and think, how impossible it was, but that such a
creature, so innocent, and of an imagination so heated, and so well
peopled should often mistake the first not painful, and in such a frame,
often pleasurable approaches to deliquium for divine raptures;
and join the instincts of nature acting in the body of a mind
unconscious of them, in the keenly sensitive body of a mind so loving
and so innocent, and what remains to be solved which the stupidity of
most and the roguery of a few would not simply explain?
-
One source it is almost criminal to have forgotten, and which p. 12.
of the first Part brought back to my recollection; I mean, the
effects—so super-sensual that they may easily and most venially pass
for supernatural, so very glorious to human nature that, though in truth
they are humanity itself in the contradistinguishing sense of that awful
word, it is yet no wonder that, conscious of the sore weaknesses united
in one person with this one nobler nature we attribute them to a
divinity out of us, (a mistake of the sensuous imagination in its
misapplication of space and place, rather than a misnomer of the thing
itself, for it is verily Greek: ho theòs en haemin ho oikeios theós,)
the effects, I mean, of the moral force after conquest, the state of the
whole being after the victorious struggle, in which the will has
preserved its perfect freedom by a vehement energy of perfect obedience
to the pure or practical reason, or conscience. Thence flows in upon and
fills the soul that peace which passeth understanding, a state
affronted and degraded by the name of pleasure, injured and
mis-represented even by that of happiness, the very corner stone of that
morality which cannot even in thought be distinguished from religion,
and which seems to mean religion as long as the instinctive craving, dim
and dark though it may be, of the moral sense after this unknown state
(known only by the bitterness where it is not) shall remain in human
nature! Under all forms of positive or philosophic religion, it has
developed itself, too glorious an attribute of man to be confined to any
name or sect; but which, it is but truth and historical fact to say, is
more especially fostered and favoured by Christianity; and its frequent
appearance even under the most selfish and unchristian forms of
Christianity is a stronger evidence of the divinity of that religion,
than all the miracles of Brahma and Veeshnou could afford, even though
they were supported with tenfold the judicial evidence of the Gospel
miracles2.
The works of the Holy Mother St. Teresa of Jesus Foundress
of the Reformation of the Discalced Carmelites. Divided into two parts.
Translated into English. MDCLXXV.
Ed
.
London 1685.
Contents / Index
Notes on Burnet's Life of Bishop Bedell1
1810.
p. 12-14.
Here I must add a passage, concerning which I am in doubt whether it
reflected more on the sincerity, or on the understanding of the
English Ambassador. The breach between the Pope and the Republic was
brought very near a crisis, &c.
These pages contain a weak and unhandsome attack on Wotton, who
doubtless had discovered that the presentation of the Premonition
previously to the reconciliation as publicly completed, but after it had
been privately agreed on, between the Court of Rome and the Senate of
Venice, would embarrass the latter: whereas, delivered as it was, it
shewed the King's and his minister's zeal for Protestantism, and yet
supplied the Venetians with an answer not disrespectful to the king.
Besides, what is there in Wotton's whole life (a man so disinterested,
and who retired from all his embassies so poor) to justify the remotest
suspicion of his insincerity? What can this word mean less or other than
that Sir H. W. was either a crypt-Papist, or had received a bribe from
the Romish party? Horrid accusations!—Burnet was notoriously rash and
credulous; but I remember no other instance in which his zeal for the
Reformation joined with his credulity has misled him into so gross a
calumny. It is not to be believed, that Bedell gave any authority to
such an aspersion of his old and faithful friend and patron, further
than that he had related the fact, and that he and the minister differed
in opinion as to the prudence of the measure recommended. How laxly too
the story is narrated! The exact date of the recommendation by Father
Paul and the divines should have been given;—then the date of the
public annunciation of the reconciliation between the Pope and Venetian
Republic; and lastly the day on which Wotton did present the book;—for
even this Burnet leaves uncertain.
p. 26
It is true he never returned and changed his religion himself, but his
son came from Spain into Ireland, when Bedell was promoted to the
Bishopric of Kilmore there, and told him, that his father commanded
him to thank him for the pains he was at in writing it. He said, it
was almost always lying open before him, and that he had heard him
say, "He was resolved to save one." And it seems he instructed his son
in the true religion, for he declared himself a Protestant on his
coming over.
Southey has given me a bad character of this son of the unhappy convert
to the Romish Church. He became, it seems, a spy on the Roman Catholics,
availing himself of his father's character among them, a crime which
would indeed render his testimony null and more than null; it would be a
presumption of the contrary. It is clear from his letters to Bedell that
the convert was a very weak man. I owe to him, however, a complete
confirmation of my old persuasion concerning Bishop Hall, whom from my
first perusal of his works I have always considered as one of the blots
(alas! there are too many) of the biography of the Church of England; a
self-conceited, coarse-minded, persecuting, vulgar priest, and (by way
of
anti-climax
) one of the first corrupters of and
epigrammatizers of our English prose style. It is not true, that Sir
Thomas Brown was the prototype of Dr. Johnson, who imitated him only as
far as Sir T. B. resembles the majority of his predecessors; that is, in
the pedantic preference of Latin derivations to Saxon words of the very
same force. In the balance and construction of his periods Dr. Johnson
has followed Hall, as any intelligent reader will discover by an
attentive comparison.
p. 158
Yea, will some man say, "But that which marreth all is the opinion of
merit and satisfaction." Indeed that is the School doctrine, but the
conscience enlightened to know itself, will easily act that part of
the Publican, who smote his breast, and said, God be merciful to me
a sinner.
Alas! so far from this being the case with ninety nine out of one
hundred in Spain, Italy, Sicily, and Roman Catholic Germany, it is the
Gospel tenets that are the true School doctrine, that is confined to
books and closets of the learned among them.
p. 161
And the like may be conceived here, since, especially, the idolatry
practised under the obedience of mystical Babylon is rather in false
and will-worship of the true God, and rather commended as profitable
than enjoined as absolutely necessary, and the corruptions there
maintained are rather in a superfluous addition than retraction in any
thing necessary to salvation.
This good man's charity jarring with his love and tender recollections
of Father Paul, Fulgentio, and the Venetian divines, has led him to a
far, far too palliative statement of Roman idolatry. Not what the Pope
has yet ventured to thunder forth from his Anti-Sinai, but what he and
his satellites, the Regulars, enforce to the preclusion of all true
worship, in the actual practice, life-long, of an immense majority in
Spain, Italy, Bavaria, Austria, &c. &c.—this must determine the point.
What they are themselves,—not what they would persuade Protestants is
their essentials or Faith,—this is the main thing.
p.164
I answer, under correction of better judgments, they have the ministry
of reconciliation by the communion which is given at their Ordination,
being the same which our Saviour left in his Church:—whose sins ye
remit, they are remitted, whose sins ye retain, they are retained.
Could Bishop Bedell believe that the mere will of a priest could have
any effect on the everlasting weal or woe of a Christian! Even to the
immediate disciples and Apostles could the text (if indeed it have
reference to sins in our sense at all,) mean more than this,—Whenever
you discover, by the spirit of knowledge which I will send unto you,
repentance and faith, you shall declare remission of sins; and the sins
shall be remitted;-and where the contrary exists, your declaration of
exclusion from bliss shall be fulfilled? Did Christ say, that true
repentance and actual faith would not save a soul, unless the priest's
verbal remission was superadded?
In fine
If it were in my power I would have this book printed in a convenient
form, and distributed through every house, at least, through every
village and parish throughout the kingdom. A volume of thought and of
moral feelings, the offspring of thought, crowd upon me, as I review the
different parts of this admirable man's life and creed. Only compare his
conduct to James Wadsworth (probably some ancestral relative of my
honoured friend, William Wordsworth: for the same name in Yorkshire,
from whence his father came, is pronounced Wadsworth) with that of the
far, far too highly rated, Bishop Hall; his letter to Hall tenderly
blaming his (Hall's) bitterness to an old friend mistaken, and then his
letter to that friend defending Hall! What a picture of goodness! I
confess, in all Ecclesiastical History I have read of no man so
spotless, though of hundreds in which the biographers have painted them
as masters of perfection: but the moral tact soon feels the truth.
In one of the volumes of this work used by the Editor for
ascertaining the references, the following note is written by a former
owner.
"October 12, 1788. Begged of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary to take my
salvation on herself, and obtain it for Saint Hyacinthe's sake; to
whom she has promised to grant any thing, or never to refuse any thing
begged for his sake."
It would be very interesting to know how far the feeling expressed in
this artless effusion coexisted with a faith in the atonement and
mediation of the one Lord Jesus Christ.—
Ed
.
Contents / Index
Notes on Baxter's Life of himself1
1820.
Among the grounds for recommending the perusal of our elder writers,
Hooker—Taylor—Baxter—in short almost any of the folios composed from
Edward VI. to Charles II. I note:
-
The overcoming the habit of deriving your whole pleasure passively
from the book itself, which can only be effected by excitement of
curiosity or of some passion. Force yourself to reflect on what you read
paragraph by paragraph, and in a short time you will derive your
pleasure, an ample portion of it, at least, from the activity of your
own mind. All else is picture sunshine.
-
The conquest of party and sectarian prejudices, when you have on the
same table before you the works of a Hammond and a Baxter, and reflect
how many and momentous their points of agreement, how few and almost
childish the differences, which estranged and irritated these good men.
Let us but imagine what their blessed spirits now feel at the retrospect
of their earthly frailties, and can we do other than strive to feel as
they now feel, not as they once felt? So will it be with the disputes
between good men of the present day; and if you have no other reason to
doubt your opponent's goodness than the point in dispute, think of
Baxter and Hammond, of Milton and Taylor, and let it be no reason at
all.
-
It will secure you from the idolatry of the present times and
fashions, and create the noblest kind of imaginative power in your soul,
that of living in past ages; wholly devoid of which power, a man can
neither anticipate the future, nor even live a truly human life, a life
of reason in the present.
-
In this particular work we may derive a most instructive lesson, that
in certain points, as of religion in relation to law, the medio
tutissimus ibis is inapplicable. There is no medium possible;
and all the attempts, as those of Baxter, though no more required than
"I believe in God through Christ," prove only the mildness of the
proposer's temper, but as a rule would be equal to nothing, at least
exclude only the two or three in a century that make it a matter of
religion to declare themselves Atheists, or else be just as fruitful a
rule for a persecutor as the most complete set of articles that could be
framed by a Spanish Inquisition.
For to 'believe,' must mean to believe aright —and 'God' must mean the
true God—and 'Christ' the Christ in the sense and with the attributes
understood by Christians who are truly Christians. An established Church
with a Liturgy is a sufficient solution of the problem de jure
magistratus. Articles of faith are in this point of view
superfluous; for is it not too absurd for a man to hesitate at
subscribing his name to doctrines which yet in the more awful duty of
prayer and profession he dares affirm before his Maker! They are
therefore in this sense merely superfluous;—not worth re-enacting, had
they ever been done away with;— not worth removing now that they exist.
-
The characteristic contradistinction between the speculative
reasoners of the age before the Revolution, and those since, is this:
—the former cultivated metaphysics, without, or neglecting, empirical
psychology; the latter cultivate a mechanical psychology to the neglect
and contempt of metaphysics. Both therefore are almost equi-distant from
pure philosophy. Hence the belief in ghosts, witches, sensible replies
to prayer, and the like, in Baxter and in a hundred others. See also
Luther's Table Talk.
-
The earlier part of this volume is interesting as materials for
medical history. The state of medical science in the reign of Charles I.
was almost incredibly low.
The saddest error of the theologians of this age is,
Greek: hos émoige dokei
, the disposition to urge the histories of the miraculous actions
and incidents, in and by which Christ attested his Messiahship to the
Jewish eye-witnesses, in fulfilment of prophecies, which the Jewish
Church had previously understood and interpreted as marks of the
Messiah, before they have shewn what and how excellent the religion
itself is including the miracles as for us an harmonious part of the
internal or self-evidence of the religion. Alas! and even when our
divines do proceed to the religion itself as to a something which no man
could be expected to receive except by a compulsion of the senses, which
by force of logic only is propagated from the eye witnesses to the
readers of the narratives in 1820—(which logic, namely, that the
evidence of a miracle is not diminished by lapse of ages, though this
includes loss of documents and the like; which logic, I say, whether it
be legitimate or not, God forbid that the truth of Christianity should
depend on the decision!)—even when our divines do proceed to the
religion itself, on what do they chiefly dwell? On the doctrines
peculiar to the religion? No! these on the contrary are either evaded or
explained away into metaphors, or resigned in despair to the next world
where faith is to be swallowed up in certainty.
But the worst product of this epidemic error is, the fashion of either
denying or undervaluing the evidence of a future state and the survival
of individual consciousness, derived from the conscience, and the holy
instinct of the whole human race. Dreadful is this:—for the main force
of the reasoning by which this scepticism is vindicated consists in
reducing all legitimate conviction to objective proof: whereas in the
very essence of religion and even of morality the evidence, and the
preparation for its reception, must be subjective;—
Blessed are they
that have not seen and yet believe
. And dreadful it appears to me
especially, who in the impossibility of not looking forward to
consciousness after the dissolution of the body (
corpus
phoenomenon
,) have through life found it (next to divine grace.) the
strongest and indeed only efficient support against the still recurring
temptation of adopting, nay, wishing the truth of Spinoza's notion, that
the survival of consciousness is the highest prize and consequence of
the highest virtue, and that of all below this mark the lot after death
is self-oblivion and the cessation of individual being. Indeed, how a
Separatist or one of any other sect of Calvinists, who confines
Redemption to the comparatively small number of the elect, can reject
this opinion, and yet not run mad at the horrid thought of an
innumerable multitude of imperishable self-conscious spirits
everlastingly excluded from God, is to me inconceivable.
Deeply am I persuaded of Luther's position, that no man can worthily
estimate, or feel in the depth of his being, the Incarnation and
Crucifixion of the Son of God who is a stranger to the terror of
immortality as ingenerate in man, while it is yet unquelled by the faith
in God as the Almighty Father.
Book I. Part I. p. 2.
But though my conscience would trouble me when I sinned, yet divers
sins I was addicted to, and oft committed against my conscience; which
for the warning of others I will confess here to my shame.
-
I was much addicted when I feared correction to lie, that I might
scape.
-
I was much addicted to the excessive gluttonous eating of apples
and pears, &c.
-
To this end, and to concur with naughty boys that gloried in evil,
I have oft gone into other men's orchards, and stolen their fruit,
when I had enough at home, &c.
There is a childlike simplicity in this account of his sins of his
childhood which is very pleasing.
Ib. p. 5, 6.
And the use that God made of books, above ministers, to the benefit of
my soul made me somewhat excessively in love with good books; so that
I thought I had never enough, but scraped up as great a treasure of
them as I could. * * * It made the world seem to me as a carcase that
had neither life nor loveliness; and it destroyed those ambitious
desires after literate fame which were the sin of my childhood. * * *
And for the mathematics, I was an utter stranger to them, and never
could find in my heart to divert any studies that way. But in order to
the knowledge of divinity, my inclination was most to logic and
metaphysics, with that part of physics which treateth of the soul,
contenting myself at first with a slighter study of the rest: and
there had my labour and delight.
What a picture of myself!
Ib. p. 22.
In the storm of this temptation I questioned awhile whether I were
indeed a Christian or an Infidel, and whether faith could consist with
such doubts as I was conscious of.
One of the instances of the evils arising from the equivoque between
faith and intellectual satisfaction or insight. The root of faith is in
the will. Faith is an oak that may be a pollard, and yet live.
Ib.
The being and attributes of God were so clear to me, that he was to my
intellect what the sun is to my eye, by which I see itself and all
things.
Even so with me;—but, whether God was existentially as well as
essentially intelligent, this was for a long time a sore combat between
the speculative and the moral man.
Ib. p. 23.
Mere Deism, which is the most plausible competitor with Christianity,
is so turned out of almost all the whole world, as if Nature made its
own confession, that without a Mediator it cannot come to God.
Excellent.
Ib.
All these assistances were at hand before I came to the immediate
evidences of credibility in the sacred oracles themselves.
This is as it should be; that is, the evidence
a priori
, securing
the rational probability; and then the historical proofs of its reality.
Pity that Baxter's chapters in
The Saints' Rest
should have been
one and the earliest occasion of the inversion of this process, the
fruit of which is the Grotio-Paleyan religion, or
minimum
of
faith; the maxim being,
quanto minus tanto melius
.
Ib. p. 24.
And once all the ignorant rout were raging mad against me for
preaching the doctrine of Original Sin to them, and telling them that
infants, before regeneration, had so much guilt and corruption as made
them loathsome in the eyes of God.
No wonder;—because the babe would perish without the mother's milk, is
it therefore loathsome to the mother? Surely the little ones that Christ
embraced had not been baptized. And yet
of such is the Kingdom of
Heaven
.
Ib. p. 25.
Some thought that the King should not at all be displeased and
provoked, and that they were not bound to do any other justice, or
attempt any other reformation but what they could procure the King to
be willing to. And these said, when you have displeased and provoked
him to the utmost, he will be your King still. * * * The more you
offend him, the less you can trust him; and when mutual confidence is
gone, a war is beginning. * * * And if you conquer him, what the
better are you? He will still be King. You can but force him to an
agreement; and how quickly will he have power and advantage to violate
that which he is forced to, and to be avenged on you all for the
displeasure you have done him! He is ignorant of the advantages of a
King that cannot foresee this.
This paragraph goes to make out a case in justification of the Regicides
which Baxter would have found it difficult to answer. Certainly a more
complete exposure of the inconsistency of Baxter's own party cannot be.
For observe, that in case of an agreement with Charles all those
classes, which afterwards formed the main strength of the Parliament and
ultimately decided the contest in its favour, would have been
politically inert, with little influence and no actual power,—I mean
the Yeomanry, and the Citizens of London: while a vast majority of the
Nobles and landed Gentry, who sooner or later must have become the
majority in Parliament, went over to the King at once. Add to these the
whole systematized force of the High Church Clergy and all the rude
ignorant vulgar in high and low life, who detested every attempt at
moral reform,—and it is obvious that the King could not want
opportunities to retract and undo all that he had conceded under
compulsion. But that neither the will was wanting, nor his conscience at
all in the way, his own advocate Clarendon and others have supplied
damning proofs.
Ib. p. 27.
And though Parliaments may draw up Bills for repealing laws, yet hath
the King his negative voice, and without his consent they cannot do
it; which though they acknowledge, yet did they too easily admit of
petitions against the Episcopacy and Liturgy, and connived at all the
clamors and papers which were against them.
How so? If they admitted the King's right to deny, they must admit the
subject's right to entreat.
Ib.
Had they endeavoured the ejection of lay-chancellors, and the reducing
of the dioceses to a narrower compass, or the setting up of a
subordinate discipline, and only the correcting and reforming of the
Liturgy, perhaps it might have been borne more patiently.
Did Baxter find it so himself—and when too he had the formal and
recorded promise of Charles II. for it?
Ib.
But when the same men (Ussher, Williams, Morton, &c.) saw that greater
things were aimed at, and episcopacy itself in danger, or their
grandeur and riches at least, most of them turned against the
Parliament.
This, and in this place, is unworthy of Baxter. Even he, good man, could
not wholly escape the jaundice of party.
Ib. p. 34.
They said to this;—that as all the courts of justice do execute their
sentences in the King's name, and this by his own law, and therefore
by his authority, so much more might his Parliament do.
A very sound argument is here disguised in a false analogy, an
inapplicable precedent, and a sophistical form. Courts of justice
administer the total of the supreme power retrospectively, involved in
the name of the most dignified part. But here a part, as a part, acts as
the whole, where the whole is absolutely requisite,—that is, in passing
laws; and again as B. and C. usurp a power belonging to A. by the
determination of A. B. and C. The only valid argument is, that Charles
had by acts of his own ceased to be a lawful King.
Ib. p. 40.
And that the authority and person of the King were inviolable, out of
the reach of just accusation, judgment, or execution by law; as having
no superior, and so no judge.
But according to Grotius, a king waging war against the lawful
copartners of the
summa potestas
ceases to be their king, and if
conquered forfeits to them his former share. And surely if Charles had
been victor, he would have taken the Parliament's share to himself. If
it had been the Parliament, and not a mere faction with the army, that
tried and beheaded Charles, I do not see how any one could doubt the
lawfulness of the act, except upon very technical grounds.
Ib. p. 41.
For if once legislation, the chief act of government, be denied to any
part of government at all, and affirmed to belong to the people as
such, who are no governors, all government will hereby be overthrown.
Here Baxter falls short of the subject, and does not see the full
consequents of his own prior, most judicious, positions. Legislation in
its high and most proper sense belongs to God only. A people declares
that such and such they hold to be laws, that is, God's will.