Footnote 1:
A Proclamation appeared the day before this Paper,
ordaining a Thanksgiving for King George's Accession to be observed on
the 20th of January.
Contents
Contents, p. 8
|
Friday, December 10, 1714 |
|
I had occasion to go a few Miles out of Town, some Days since, in a
Stage-Coach, where I had for my Fellow-Tavellers a dirty Beau, and a
pretty young Quaker-Woman. Having no Inclination to Talk much at that
time, I placed my self backward, with a design to survey them, and pick
a Speculation out of my two Companions. Their different Figures were
sufficient of themselves to draw my Attention. The Gentleman was dressed
in a Suit, the Ground whereof had been Black, as I perceived from some
few Spaces, that had escaped the Powder,
was Incorporated with the
greatest part of his Coat: His Perriwig, which cost no small Sum
,
was after so slovenly a manner cast over his Shoulders, that it seemed
not to have been combed since the Year 1712; his Linnen, which was not
much concealed, was daubed with plain
Spanish
from the Chin to the
lowest Button, and the Diamond upon his Finger (which naturally dreaded
the Water) put me in Mind how it sparkled amidst the Rubbish of the
Mine, where it was first discovered. On the other hand, the pretty
Quaker appeared in all the Elegance of Cleanliness. Not a Speck was to
be found on her. A clear, clean oval Face, just edged about with little
thin Plaits of the purest Cambrick, received great Advantages from the
Shade of her black Hood; as did the Whiteness of her Arms from that
sober-coloured Stuff, in which she had Cloathed her self. The Plainness
of her Dress was very well suited to the Simplicity of her Phrases; all
which put together, though they could not give me a great Opinion of her
Religion, they did of her Innocence.
This Adventure occasioned my throwing together a few hints upon
Cleanliness
, which I shall consider as one of the
Half-Virtues
, as
Aristotle
calls them, and shall recommend it under the three following
Heads, As it is a Mark of Politeness; As it produces Love; and As it
bears Analogy to Purity of Mind.
First
, It is a Mark of Politeness. It is universally agreed upon, that
no one, unadorn'd with this Virtue, can go into Company without giving a
manifest Offence. The easier or higher any one's Fortune is, this Duty
arises proportionably. The different Nations of the World are as much
distinguished by their Cleanliness, as by their Arts and Sciences. The
more any Country is civilized, the more they consult this part of
Politeness. We need but compare our Ideas of a Female
Hottentot
and an
English
Beauty, to be satisfied of the Truth of what hath been
advanced.
In the next Place, Cleanliness may be said to be the Foster-Mother of
Love. Beauty indeed most commonly produces that Passion in the Mind, but
Cleanliness preserves it. An indifferent Face and Person, kept in
perpetual Neatness, had won many a Heart from a pretty Slattern. Age it
self is not unamiable, while it is preserved clean and unsullied: Like a
piece of Metal constantly kept smooth and bright, we look on it with
more Pleasure than on a new Vessel that is canker'd with Rust.
I might observe farther, that as Cleanliness renders us agreeable to
others, so it makes us easie to our selves; that it is an excellent
Preservative of Health; and that several Vices, destructive both to Mind
and Body, are inconsistent with the Habit of it. But these Reflections I
shall leave to the Leisure of my Readers, and shall observe in the Third
Place, that it bears a great Analogy with Purity of Mind, and naturally
inspires refined Sentiments and Passions.
We find from Experience, that through the Prevalence of Custom, the most
vicious Actions lose their Horror, by being made familiar to us. On the
contrary, those who live in the Neighbourhood of good Examples, fly from
the first Appearances of what is shocking. It fares with us much after
the same Manner, as to our Ideas. Our Senses, which are the Inlets to
all the Images conveyed to the Mind, can only transmit the Impression of
such things as usually surround them. So that pure and unsullied
Thoughts are naturally suggested to the Mind, by those Objects that
perpetually encompass us, when they are beautiful and elegant in their
kind.
In the East, where the Warmth of the Climate makes Cleanliness more
immediately necessary than in colder Countries, it is made one Part of
their Religion: The
Jewish
Law, (and the
Mahometan
, which in some
things copies after it) is filled with Bathings, Purifications, and
other Rites of the like Nature. Though there is the above-named
convenient Reason to be assigned for these Ceremonies, the chief
Intention undoubtedly was to typifie inward Purity and Cleanness of
Heart by those outward Washings. We read several Injunctions of this
Kind in the Book of
Deuteronomy
, which confirm this Truth; and which
are but ill accounted for by saying, as some do, that they were only
instituted for Convenience in the Desart, which otherwise could not have
been habitable for so many Years.
I shall conclude this Essay, with a Story which I have somewhere read in
an Account of
Mahometan
Superstitions.
A
Dervise
of great Sanctity one Morning had the Misfortune as he took
up a Chrystal Cup, which was consecrated to the Prophet, to let it fall
upon the Ground, and dash it in Pieces. His Son coming in, some time
after, he stretched out his Hands to bless him, as his manner was every
Morning; but the Youth going out stumbled over the Threshold and broke
his Arm. As the old Man wondered at these Events, a Caravan passed by in
its way from
Mecca.
The
Dervise
approached it to beg a Blessing; but
as he stroaked one of the Holy Camels, he received a Kick from the
Beast, that sorely bruised him. His Sorrow and Amazement increased upon
him, till he recollected that through Hurry and Inadvertency he had that
Morning come abroad without washing his Hands.
Footnote 1:
Duumvir's fair wig cost 40 guineas.
Tatler
, No. 54.
Contents
Contents, p. 8
|
Monday, December 13, 1714 |
|
The Love of Symmetry and Order, which is natural to the Mind of Man,
betrays him sometimes into very whimsical Fancies.
This noble
Principle,
says a
French
Author,
loves to amuse it self on the most
trifling Occasions. You may see a profound Philosopher
, says he,
walk
for an Hour together in his Chamber, and industriously treading, at
every Step, upon every other Board in the Flooring.
Every Reader will
recollect several Instances of this Nature without my Assistance. I
it was
Gregorio Leti
who had published as many Books as he was
Years old
; which was a Rule he had laid down and punctually observed
to the Year of his Death. It was, perhaps, a Thought of the like Nature
which determined
Homer
himself to divide each of his Poems into as
many Books, as there are Letters in the
Greek
Alphabet.
Herodotus
has in the same manner adapted his Books to the Number of the
Muses
,
for which Reason many a Learned man hath wished there had been more than
Nine of that Sisterhood.
Several
Epic
Poets have religiously followed
Virgil
as to the Number
of his Books; and even
Milton
is thought by many to have changed the
Number of his Books from Ten to Twelve, for no other Reason; as
Cowley
tells us, it was his Design, had he finished his
Davideis
, to have
also imitated the
Æneid
in this Particular. I believe every one will
agree with me, that a Perfection of this Nature hath no Foundation in
Reason; and, with due Respect to these great Names, may be looked upon
as something whimsical.
I mention these great Examples in Defence of my Bookseller, who
occasioned this Eighth Volume of
Spectators
, because, as he said, he
thought Seven a very Odd Number. On the other Side, several grave
Reasons were urged on this important Subject; as in particular, that
Seven was the precise Number of the Wise Men, and that the most
Beautiful Constellation in the Heavens was composed of Seven Stars. This
he allowed to be true, but still insisted, that Seven was an Odd Number;
suggesting at the same time that if he were provided with a sufficient
Stock of leading Papers, he should find Friends ready enough to carry on
the Work. Having by this means got his Vessel launched and set afloat,
he hath committed the Steerage of it, from time to time, to such as he
thought capable of conducting it.
The Close of this Volume, which the Town may now expect in a little
time, may possibly ascribe each Sheet to its proper Author.
It were no hard Task to continue this Paper a considerable Time longer,
by the Help of large Contributions sent from unknown Hands.
I cannot give the Town a better Opinion of the
Spectator's
Correspondents, than by publishing the following Letter, with a very
fine Copy of Verses upon a Subject perfectly new.
Dublin, Nov. 30, 1714.
Mr. SPECTATOR,
'You lately recommended to your Female Readers, the good old Custom of
their Grandmothers, who used to lay out a great Part of their Time in
Needle-work: I entirely agree with you in your Sentiments, and think
it would not be of less Advantage to themselves, and their Posterity,
than to the Reputation of many of their good Neighbours, if they past
many of those Hours in this innocent Entertainment, which are lost at
the Tea-Table. I would, however, humbly offer to your Consideration,
the Case of the Poetical Ladies; who, though they may be willing to
take any Advice given them by the SPECTATOR, yet can't so easily quit
their Pen and Ink, as you may imagine. Pray allow them, at least now
and then, to indulge themselves in other Amusements of Fancy, when
they are tired with stooping to their Tapestry. There is a very
particular kind of Work, which of late several Ladies here in our
Kingdom are very fond of, which seems very well adapted to a Poetical
Genius: It is the making of
Grotto's. I know a Lady who has a very
Beautiful one, composed by her self, nor is there one Shell in it not
stuck up by her own Hands. I here send you a Poem to the fair
Architect, which I would not offer to herself, till I knew whether
this Method of a Lady's passing her Time were approved of by the
British SPECTATOR, which, with the Poem, I submit to your Censure,
who am,
Your Constant Reader, and Humble Servant,
A. B.
To Mrs. — on her Grotto.
A Grotto so compleat, with such Design,
What Hands, Calypso, cou'd have form'd but Thine?
Each chequer'd Pebble, and each shining Shell,
So well proportion'd, and dispos'd so well,
Surprizing Lustre from thy Thought receive,
Assuming Beauties more than Nature gave.
To Her their various Shapes, and glossy Hue,
Their curious Symmetry they owe to You.
Not fam'd Amphion's Lute,—whose powerful Call
Made Willing Stones dance to the Theban Wall,
In more harmonious Ranks cou'd make them fall.
Not Ev'ning Cloud a brighter Arch can show,
Nor richer Colours paint the heav'nly Bow.
Where can unpolished Nature boast a Piece,
In all her Mossie Cells exact as This?
At the gay parti-color'd Scene—we start,
For Chance too regular, too rude for Art,
Charmed with the sight, my ravish'd Breast is fir'd
With Hints like those which ancient Bards inspir'd;
All the feign'd Tales by Superstition told,
All the bright Train of fabled Nymphs of Old,
Th' enthusiastick Muse believes are true,
Thinks the Spot sacred, and its Genius You.
Lost in wild Rapture, wou'd she fain disclose,
How by degrees the pleasing Wonder rose:
Industrious in a faithful Verse to trace
The various Beauties of the lovely Place;
And while she keeps the glowing Work in View,
Thro' ev'ry Maze thy Artful Hand pursue.
Oh were I equal to the bold Design,
Or cou'd I boast such happy Art as Thine!
That cou'd rude Shells in such sweet Order place,
Give common Objects such uncommon Grace!
Like them my well-chose Words in ev'ry Line,
As sweetly temper'd should as sweetly shine.
So just a Fancy shou'd my Numbers warm,
Like the gay Piece shou'd the Description charm.
Then with superior Strength my Voice I'd raise,
The echoing Grotto shou'd approve my Lays,
Pleas'd to reflect the well-sung Founder's Praise.
Footnote 1:
His boast was that he had been the author of a book and
father of a child for 20 years successively.
Contents
Contents, p. 8
|
Wednesday, December 15, 1714 |
Z. Pearce |
Omnia profecto, cum se à cœlestibus rebus referet ad humanas,
excelsius magnificentiusque et dicet et sentiet.
Cicer.
translation
The following Discourse is printed, as it came to my Hands, without
Variation.
Cambridge, Dec. 12.
'It was a very common Enquiry among the Ancients why the Number of
excellent Orators, under all the Encouragements the most flourishing
States could give them, fell so far short of the Number of those who
excelled in all other Sciences. A Friend of mine used merrily to apply
to this Case an Observation of Herodotus, who says, That the most
useful Animals are the most fruitful in their Generation; whereas the
Species of those Beasts that are fierce and mischievous to Mankind are
but scarcely continued. The Historian instances in a Hare, which
always either breeds or brings forth; and a Lioness, which brings
forth but once, and then loses all Power of Conception. But, leaving
my Friend to his Mirth, I am of Opinion, that in these latter Ages we
have greater Cause of Complaint than the Ancients had. And since that
solemn Festival is approaching, which calls for all the Power of
Oratory, and which affords as noble a Subject for the Pulpit as any
Revelation has taught us, the Design of this Paper shall be to show,
that our Moderns have greater Advantages towards true and solid
Eloquence, than any which the celebrated Speakers of Antiquity
enjoy'd.
'The first great and substantial Difference is, that their
Common-Places, in which almost the whole Force of Amplification
consists, were drawn from the Profit or Honesty of the Action, as they
regarded only this present State of Duration. But Christianity, as it
exalts Morality to a greater Perfection, as it brings the
Consideration of another Life into the Question, as it proposes
Rewards and Punishments of a higher Nature, and a longer Continuance,
is more adapted to affect the Minds of the Audience, naturally
inclined to pursue what it imagines its greatest Interest and Concern.
If Pericles, as Historians report, could shake the firmest
Resolutions of his Hearers, and set the Passions of all Greece in a
Ferment, when the present Welfare of his Country, or the Fear of
hostile Invasions, was the Subject: What may be expected from that
Orator, who warns his Audience against those Evils which have no
Remedy, when once undergone, either from Prudence or Time? As much
greater as the Evils in a future State are than these at present, so
much are the Motives to Persuasion under Christianity greater than
those which meer moral Considerations could supply us with. But what I
now mention relates only to the Power of moving the Affections. There
is another Part of Eloquence, which is indeed its Master-piece; I mean
the Marvellous or Sublime. In this the Christian Orator has the
Advantage beyond Contradiction. Our Ideas are so infinitely enlarged
by Revelation, the Eye of Reason has so wide a Prospect into Eternity,
the Notions of a Deity are so worthy and refined, and the Accounts we
have of a State of Happiness or Misery so clear and evident, that the
Contemplation of such Objects will give our Discourse a noble Vigour,
an invincible Force, beyond the Power of any human Consideration.
Tully requires in his Perfect Orator some Skill in the Nature of
Heavenly Bodies, because, says he, his Mind will become more extensive
and unconfined; and when he descends to treat of human Affairs, he
will both think and write in a more exalted and magnificent Manner.
For the same Reason that excellent Master would have recommended the
Study of those great and glorious Mysteries which Revelation has
discovered to us; to which the noblest Parts of this System of the
World are as much inferiour, as the Creature is less excellent than
its Creator. The wisest and most knowing among the Heathens had very
poor and imperfect Notions of a future State. They had indeed some
uncertain Hopes, either received by Tradition, or, gathered by Reason,
that the Existence of virtuous Men would not be determined by the
Separation of Soul and Body: But they either disbelieved a future
State of Punishment and Misery, or upon the same Account that
Apelles painted Antigonus with one Side only towards the
Spectator, that the Loss of his Eye might not cast a Blemish upon the
whole Piece; so these represented the Condition of Man in its fairest
View, and endeavoured to conceal what they thought was a Deformity to
human Nature. I have often observed, that whenever the abovementioned
Orator in his Philosophical Discourses is led by his Argument to the
Mention of Immortality, he seems like one awaked out of Sleep, rous'd
and alarm'd with the Dignity of the Subject, he stretches his
Imagination to conceive something uncommon, and with the greatness of
his Thoughts, casts, as it were, a Glory round the Sentence; Uncertain
and unsettled as he was, he seems fired with the Contemplation of it.
And nothing but such a Glorious Prospect could have forced so great a
Lover of Truth, as he was, to declare his Resolution never to part
with his Persuasion of Immortality, though it should be proved to be
an erroneous one. But had he lived to see all that Christianity has
brought to Light, how would he have lavished out all the Force of
Eloquence in those noblest Contemplations which humane Nature is
capable of, the Resurrection and the Judgment that follows it? How had
his Breast glowed with Pleasure, when the whole Compass of Futurity
lay open and exposed to his View? How would his Imagination have
hurried him on in the Pursuit of the Mysteries of the Incarnation? How
would he have enter'd, with the Force of Lightning, into the
Affections of his Hearers, and fixed their Attention, in spite of all
the Opposition of corrupt Nature, upon those glorious Themes which his
Eloquence hath painted in such lively and lasting Colours?
'This Advantage Christians have; and it was with no small Pleasure I
lately met with a Fragment of Longinus, which is preserv'd, as a
Testimony of that Critick's Judgment, at the Beginning of a Manuscript
of the New Testament in the Vatican Library. After that Author has
number'd up the most celebrated Orators among the Grecians, he says,
Add to these Paul of Tarsus, the Patron of an Opinion not yet
fully proved. As a Heathen, he condemns the Christian Religion; and,
as an impartial Critick, he judges in Favour of the Promoter and
Preacher of it. To me it seems, that the latter Part of his Judgment
adds great Weight to his Opinion of St. Paul's Abilities, since,
under all the Prejudice of Opinions directly opposite, he is
constrained to acknowledge the Merit of that Apostle. And, no doubt,
such as Longinus describes St. Paul, such he appeared to the
Inhabitants of those Countries which he visited and blessed with those
Doctrines was divinely commissioned to preach. Sacred Story gives us,
in one Circumstance, a convincing Proof of his Eloquence, when the Men
of Lystra called him Mercury, because he was the chief Speaker,
and would have paid Divine Worship to him, as to the God who invented
and presided over Eloquence. This one Account of our Apostle sets his
Character, consider'd as an Orator only, above all the celebrated
Relations of the Skill and Influence of Demosthenes and his
Contemporaries. Their Power in Speaking was admired, but still it was
thought human: Their Eloquence warmed and ravished the Hearers, but
still it was thought the Voice of Man, not the Voice of God. What
Advantage then had St. Paul above those of Greece, or Rome? I
confess I can ascribe this Excellence to nothing but the Power of the
Doctrines he delivered, which may have still the same Influence on the
Hearers; which have still the Power, when preached by a skilful
Orator, to make us break out in the same Expressions, as the Disciples
who met our Saviour in their Way to Emmaus, made use of; Did not
our Hearts burn within us, when he talked to us by the Way, and while
he opened to us the Scriptures? I may be thought bold in my Judgment
by some; but I must affirm, That no one Orator has left us so visible
Marks and Footsteps of his Eloquence as our Apostle. It may perhaps be
wondered at, that in his Reasonings upon Idolatry at Athens, where
Eloquence was born and flourished, he confines himself to strict
Argument only; but my Reader may remember what many Authors of the
best Credit have assured us, That all Attempts upon the Affections and
Strokes of Oratory were expressly forbidden, by the Laws of that
Country, in Courts of Judicature. His want of Eloquence therefore
here, was the Effect of his exact Conformity to the Laws. But his
Discourse on the Resurrection to the Corinthians, his Harangue
before Agrippa upon his own Conversion and the Necessity of that of
others, are truly Great, and may serve as full Examples to those
excellent Rules for the Sublime, which the best of Criticks has left
us. The Sum of all this Discourse is, That our Clergy have no farther
to look for an Example of the Perfection they may arrive at, than to
St. Paul's Harangues; that when he, under the Want of several
Advantages of Nature (as he himself tells us) was heard, admired, and
made a Standard to succeeding Ages by the best Judge of a different
Persuasion in Religion, I say our Clergy may learn, That, however
instructive their Sermons are, they are capable of receiving a great
Addition; which St. Paul has given them a noble Example of, and the
Christian Religion has furnished them with certain Means of attaining
to.'
Contents
Contents, p. 8
|
Friday, December 17, 1714 |
|
Greek: Ho elachístôn deómenos éggista theôn. Socrates apud Xen.translation
It was the common Boast of the Heathen Philosophers, that by the
Efficacy of their several Doctrines, they made Humane Nature resemble
the Divine. How much mistaken soever they might be in the several Means
they proposed for this End, it must be owned that the Design was great
and glorious. The finest Works of Invention and Imagination are of very
little Weight, when put in the Balance with what refines and exalts the
rational Mind.
Longinus
excuses
Homer
very handsomely, when he says
the Poet made his Gods like Men, that he might make his Men appear like
the Gods: But it must be allowed that several of the ancient
Philosophers acted, as
Cicero
wishes
Homer
had done; they
endeavoured rather to make Men like Gods, than Gods like Men.
According to this general Maxim in Philosophy, some of them have
endeavoured to place Men in such a State of Pleasure, or Indolence at
least, as they vainly imagined the Happiness of the Supreme Being to
consist in. On the other Hand, the most virtuous Sect of Philosophers
have created a chimerical wise Man, whom they made exempt from Passion
and Pain, and thought it enough to pronounce him All-sufficient.
This last Character, when divested of the Glare of Humane Philosophy
that surrounds it, signifies no more, than that a Good and Wise Man
should so arm himself with Patience, as not to yield tamely to the
Violence of Passion and Pain; that he should learn so to suppress and
contract his De
Sir
es as to have few Wants; and that he should cherish so
many Virtues in his Soul, as to have a perpetual Source of Pleasure in
himself.
The Christian Religion requires, that, after having framed the best
Idea, we are able, of the Divine Nature, it should be our next Care to
conform our selves to it, as far as our Imperfections will permit. I
might mention several Passages in the sacred Writings on this Head, to
which I might add many Maxims and wise Sayings of Moral Authors among
the
Greeks
and
Romans
.
I shall only instance a remarkable Passage, to this Purpose, out of
Julian's Cæsars
. The Emperor having represented all the
Roman
Emperors, with
Alexander
the Great, as passing in Review before the
Gods, and striving for the Superiority, lets them all drop, excepting
Alexander
,
Julius Cæsar
,
Augustus Cæsar
,
Trajan
,
Marcus
Aurelius
, and
Constantine
. Each of these great Heroes of Antiquity
lays in his Claim for the upper Place; and, in Order to it, sets forth
his Actions after the most advantageous Manner. But the Gods, instead of
being dazzled with the Lustre of their Actions, enquire, by
Mercury
,
into the proper Motive and governing Principle that influenced them
throughout the whole Series of their Lives and Exploits.
Alexander
tells them, That his Aim was to conquer:
Julius Cæsar
, that his was to
gain the highest Post in his Country;
Augustus
, To govern well;
Trajan
, That His was the same as that of
Alexander
, namely, To
conquer. The Question, at length, was put to
Marcus Aurelius
, who
replied, with great Modesty, That
it had always been his Care to
imitate the Gods
. This Conduct seems to have gained him the most Votes
and best Place in the whole Assembly.
Marcus Aurelius
being afterwards
asked to explain himself declares, That, by imitating the Gods, he
endeavoured to imitate them in the Use of his Understanding, and of all
other Faculties; and, in particular, That it was always his Study to
have as few Wants as possible in himself, and to do all the Good he
could to others.
Among the many Methods by which Revealed Religion has advanced Morality,
this is one, That it has given us a more just and perfect Idea of that
Being whom every reasonable Creature ought to imitate. The young Man, in
a Heathen Comedy, might justify his Lewdness by the Example of
Jupiter
; as, indeed, there was scarce any Crime that might not be
countenanced by those Notions of the Deity which prevailed among the
common People in the Heathen World. Revealed Religion sets forth a
proper Object for Imitation, in that Being who is the Pattern, as well
as the Source, of all spiritual Perfection.
While we remain in this Life, we are subject to innumerable Temptations,
which, if listen'd to, will make us deviate from Reason and Goodness,
the only Things wherein we can imitate the Supreme Being. In the next
Life we meet with nothing to excite our Inclinations that doth not
deserve them. I shall therefore dismiss my Reader with this Maxim, viz.