Prof. Pack’s conclusions were as follows:
There have of course been many notable instances of high scholarship and prodigious mental achievement by heavy smokers. Such exceptions, however, do not affect conclusions derived from the study of average groups.
Hitherto figures on smoking and athletics have been open to question because comparisons were made between groups that are not of necessity of the same physical and mental type, having no important difference except in the use of tobacco. But Prof. Pack has sought to avoid this objection. As he points out, the football squad is probably as nearly a homogeneous group as it is possible to find. It seems reasonable to account for the inferior physical and mental work of these particular groups of smokers on the theory that in the main the well known toxic effects of tobacco are sufficient to create this difference.
Dr. George J. Fisher,[47] in a series of careful tests found:
Bush,[48] in a series of tests on each of 15 men in several different psychic fields found the following conditions among smoking students immediately after the period of smoking was completed:
Bush ascribed these effects to pyridin, claiming that his experiments failed to reveal nicotin in the tobacco smoke, except in a very small proportion in that of cigarets.
Tests for nicotin in smoke are beset with many difficulties and possible fallacies which have in the past misled investigators into apparently determining that tobacco smoke contained no nicotin, but simply decomposition products.
Pyridin is unquestionably present in tobacco smoke, and is a poisonous substance, although less so than nicotin. It is not found, however, in chewing tobacco, and as the clinical effects of chewing tobacco are apparently identical with those of smoking tobacco, very strong and universally accepted chemical proof of the absence of nicotin from tobacco smoke must be awaited before accepting such a conclusion. (See [41], [42], [43] in bibliography.)
Cigaret smoking is a time waster; that is, it breaks up the power of attention, as few smokers are satisfied with one cigaret and the mere physical act of lighting a fresh cigaret disturbs the continuity of thought and work. Dr. W. J. Mayo[49] calls attention to the fact that according to his observations research scholars who smoke cigarets have not done well.
Only one insurance company, the New England Mutual,[50] has published any experience on tobacco users. This covered a period of 60 years and a body of 180,000 policyholders, as follows:
| Abstainers. | Rarely Use. | Temperate. | Moderate. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco, 59% | 71% | 84% | 93% |
| Alcohol, 57% | 72% | 84% | 125% |
[Q] The standard here used is the American Experience Table, which is largely an artificial table upon which premiums are based, but which provides for a much higher mortality than the average companies sustain. For example, the actual mortality of the New England Mutual in 1913 was 57 per cent. of the expected.
Fifty-nine per cent. of the expected mortality means that where, according to the premium tables, 100 were expected to die, only 59 actually died.
The general class of risks in this company were of excellent quality, as the figures show. Nevertheless, the abstainers exhibited a far lower mortality than that experienced by the general class.
Dr. Edwin Wells Dwight, who presented the figures, urged caution in their interpretation, suggesting that the low mortality among abstainers, both from alcohol and tobacco, might well be due to a more conservative habit of living. Furthermore, as the abstainers from alcohol were not separated from the abstainers from tobacco in this analysis a perfect comparison can not be made; but our knowledge of the toxic effects of both these narcotics and the preceding statistics of Doctor Pack justify us in assigning to tobacco a positively unfavorable effect.
Experiments on animals with nicotin extracts from tobacco and inhalation of tobacco smoke have produced hardening of the large arteries. Clinical observation by some of the world’s best authorities indicates that the same conditions are brought about in man by heavy smoking.[51]
Disturbance of the blood pressure, rapid heart action, shortness of breath, palpitation of the heart, pain in the region of the heart, are important effects. Tobacco heart is often lightly spoken of because the abandonment of the habit will often restore the heart to its normal condition, but tobacco heart sometimes causes death, especially under severe physical strain or in the course of acute disease, such as typhoid or pneumonia. Surgeons[52] have noted failure to rally after operation in tobacco users, who are, of course, deprived of their accustomed indulgence immediately before and after operation. It is probable that many such cases pass unrecognized, although the alcoholic is usually supplied the narcotic his system demands.
Cannon, Aub, and Binger[53] have also shown that nicotin stimulates the adrenal glands, small organs adjacent to the kidneys, which secrete a substance that in excess powerfully affects the blood vessels, constricting them and temporarily increasing the blood pressure. This influence may be partly responsible for the change in the blood vessels noted in heavy smokers.
Excessive smoking is often an important factor in causing insomnia.
Blindness or tobacco amblyopia, a form of neuritis, is not an uncommon affection among smokers. There is also often an irritant effect on the mucous membranes of eyes from the direct effect of the smoke.
Catarrhal conditions of the nose, throat and ear have also been noted.
Acid dyspepsia is a common affection among smokers.
Few people realize that so many ingredients in tobacco and tobacco smoke are deadly poisons. Few people know that one drop of nicotin on the unbroken skin of a rabbit will produce death.[54] Two drops on the tongue of a dog or cat will prove fatal; moreover, fatal poisonings have occurred in man from swallowing tobacco and even from external application of strong solutions. A case was recently reported from New Haven of fatal poisoning in a baby,[55] who had been fed from a milk bottle and milk-mixture in which some tobacco had been accidentally spilled.
From the mass of evidence and opinion with which medical literature is loaded, a few salient facts stand out:
First: Tobacco and its smoke contain powerful narcotic poisons.
Second: It has never been shown to exert any beneficial influence on the human body in health, and it is not even included in the United States Pharmacopœia as a remedy for disease, notwithstanding the claims that are made for its sedative effects and its value as a solace to mankind. If these benefits are real and dependable, they should be made available in exact dosage and applied therapeutically. If they are not real and dependable in a medical sense, they are not real and safe as a mere drug indulgence.
Third: The symptoms following tobacco-smoking are identical with the effects of tobacco-chewing among those not accustomed to its use; hence, any collateral psychic effect, such as the sight of smoke, the surrounding, etc., are of minor importance in establishing the habit. The main charm to the smoker is the drug effect, as in any other similar indulgence. Nicotinless tobacco is not popular, notwithstanding the efforts of the French and Austrian Governments to make it so.
Fourth: Fortunately, the sedative drug effect is so slight, as compared to that of other narcotics—opium, alcohol, cocaine, etc.—that the tobacco habit is less seductive and may be broken with comparative ease and is therefore less harmful morally. Men who have smoked or chewed steadily for 40 years have been known to give up the habit without experiencing much physical discomfort. Like any other habit, however, there is a tendency to increasing indulgence, and this is a risk that the smoker takes, just as does the alcohol user or the opium habitué who begins with so-called moderate indulgence.
Fifth: The well-known effects of tobacco on the heart and circulation should lead one to pause and consider the possible cost of this indulgence, especially as—
Sixth: It is difficult to determine, years in advance, whether or not one is endowed with sufficient resistance to render so-called moderate smoking comparatively harmless.
Seventh: The vital statistics show that diseases of the heart and circulation are rapidly increasing in this country in which—
Eighth: The per capita consumption has rapidly increased in recent years, while—
Ninth: In the United Kingdom, where these diseases are decreasing, there has been no material increase in the use of tobacco, and the per capita consumption is less than one-third that of the United States.
In 1880 the annual per capita consumption of tobacco in the United States was about 5 lbs., while in 1914 it had risen to more than 7 lbs. In the United Kingdom the per capita consumption is about 2 lbs., and there has been no material increase in recent years.
The cigaret bill, in particular, has grown enormously, having more than doubled in the past five years, while there has been a slight increase in the consumption of cigars, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco and snuff, as shown in the following table:[56]
| Fiscal Year | Cigars | Cigarets | Tobacco, Chewing and Smoking |
Snuff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910 | 8,213,356,504 | 7,884,748,515 | 436,608,898 | 31,969,111 |
| 1911 | 8,474,962,786 | 9,254,351,722 | 380,794,673 | 28,146,833 |
| 1912 | 8,350,119,103 | 11,239,536,803 | 393,785,146 | 30,079,482 |
| 1913 | 8,732,815,703 | 14,294,895,471 | 404,362,620 | 33,209,468 |
| 1914 | 8,707,625,230 | 16,427,086,016 | 412,505,213 | 32,766,741 |
| Total | 42,478,879,326 | 59,100,618,527 | 2,028,056,550 | 156,171,635 |
Tenth: The poetic effusions of the lovers of the weed are no safer guide than the exaggerated and intemperate denouncements of people who have idiosyncrasies against tobacco and simply hate it.
Eleventh: Those who now smoke should have a thorough physical examination to determine the condition of the heart and blood vessels. This examination should be repeated at least annually, in order to detect any adverse influence on the circulation.
[38] The Toxic Factor in Tobacco, The Lancet (London), 1912, I, p. 944.
[39] French Department of Agriculture, Compt. Rend. Acad. de Science, CLI, p. 23.
[40] Garner, W. W.: The Relation of Nicotin to the Burning Quality of Tobacco, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry, Bulletin No. 141, Sept. 30, 1909, p. 15; A New Method for the Determination of Nicotin in Tobacco, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry, Bulletin No. 102, July 6, 1907, p. 12.
[41] Lehmann, K. B.: Untersuchungen über das Tabakrauchen, Munchen, med. Wchnschr., 1908, LV, pp. 723–25; The Physiological Action of Tobacco Smoke, Med. Rec., 1908, LXXIII, pp. 738, 739.
[42] The Toxic Factor in Tobacco, The Lancet (London), 1912, II, pp. 944–947.
[43] Garner, W. W.: The Relation of Nicotin to the Burning Quality of Tobacco, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry, Bulletin No. 141, Sept. 30, 1909, p. 15.
[44] Zhebrovsky, E. A.: The Effect of Tobacco Smoke upon the Blood Vessels of Animals, Russky Vratch, 1907, VI, p. 189; 1908, VII, pp. 429–431; Med. Rec, 1908, LXXXIV, pp. 408, 409.
[45] John, H.: Editorial, Jour. A. M. A., 1914, LXII, pp. 461–2; Ueber die Beeinflussung des systolischen und diastolischen Blutdrucks durch Tabakrauchen, Ztschr. f. exper. Path. u. Therap., 1913, XIV, pp. 352–365; Pawinski, J.: Ueber den Einfluss unmassigen Rauchens (des Nikotins) auf die Gefässe und das Herz, Ztsch. f. klin. Med., Berl., 1914, LXXX, pp. 284–305.
[46] Pack, Frederick J.: Smoking and Football Men, Popular Science Monthly, 1912, LXXXI, p. 336.
[47] Fisher, George J. [Monograph not yet published.]
[48] Bush, Arthur D.: Tobacco Smoking and Mental Efficiency, N. Y. Med. Jour., 1914, XCIX, pp. 519, 529.
[49] Mayo, Wm. J.: Personal communication.
[50] Dwight, Edwin Wells: Proc. Assoc. Life Ins. Med. Dir., Oct., 1911, II, p. 474.
[51] Favarger, Heinrich: Experimentelle und klinische Beiträge zur chronischen Tabakvergiftung, Wien. klin. Wchnschr., 1914, XXVII, pp. 497–501; Experimental and Clinical Study of Chronic Tobacco Poisoning, Jour. A. M. A., 1914, LXII, p. 1764; Pekanovits. Effects of Tobacco Smoking, Jour. A. M. A., 1914, LXXII, p. 1907.
[52] Bangs, L. Bolton: Some Observations on the Effects of Tobacco in Surgical Practice, Medical Record, LXXIII, March 4, 1908, pp. 421–23–51.
[53] Cannon, Aub. Binger: Effect of Nicotin Injection on Adrenal Secretion, Jour. Pharm. and Exper. Therap., 1912, p. 381; Editorial, Nicotin and Adrenals, Jour. A. M. A., 1912, LXIII, p. 1287.
[54] Hare, Hobart Amory: Fiske Prize Dissertation, No. 34, p. 1884. Dixon, A. S.: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Nov. 11, 1884.
[55] Reynolds, H. S.: Jour. A. M. A., May 30, 1914, LXII, p. 1723.
[56] Annual Report of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1914, p. 34, Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
Bamberger, J.: Hygiene of Cigar Smoking, Abstr. Jour. A. M. A., 1904, XLIII, p. 706; Zur Hygienie des Rauchens, Munchen. med. Wchnschr., 1904, LI, pp. 1344–1345.
Current Comment: Some New Evidence on the Tobacco Question, Jour. A. M. A., 1912, LIX, p. 1798.
Editorial: The Pharmacology of Tobacco Smoke, Jour. A. M. A.. 1909, LII, p. 386.
Editorial: The Use of Tobacco, Jour. A. M. A., 1910, LX, p. 32.
Editorial: Tobacco-Smoking and Circulation, Jour. A. M. A., 1914, XLII, p. 461.
Hochwart, L. Von Frankl: Die Nervösen, Erkrankungen der Tabakraucher, Deutsch. med. Wchnschr., 1911, XXXVII, pp. 2273, 2321.
Index Catalogue of the Library of the Surgeon-General’s Office, second series, XVIII, pp. 297–306.
Larrabee, R. C.: Tobacco and the Heart, Abstr. Jour. A. M. A., 1903, XLI, p. 50. Read before the Massachusetts Medical Society, June, 1903.
Pel: Un cas de psychose tabagique, Ann. med. Chir., 1911, XIX, p. 171.
Bacteria play a part in most colds. In some cases there is a general infection, with local symptoms, as in grippe; in others there is a local infection, with mixed classes of bacteria. It is probable that these various forms of bacteria are constantly present in the nasal secretions, but do not cause trouble until the local resistance or the general resistance is in some way lowered.
In many, the susceptibility to colds is due to abnormalities in the nose or throat. Nasal obstruction is a very common condition. The nose, like the eye, is usually an imperfect organ. These obstructions are often the result of adenoids in childhood, which interfere with the proper development of the internal nasal structures. Malformation of the teeth and dental arches in childhood are frequent and often neglected causes of nasal obstruction. Such malformations are caused by the arresting of the growth of the upper jaw and nasal structures. Correction of the deformity of the arches often renders nasal surgery unnecessary. Such conditions not only predispose to colds, but increase their severity and the danger of complicating infection of the bony cavities in the skull that communicate with the nose. They also increase the liability to involvement of the middle ear and of the mastoid cells which are located in the skull just behind the ear. The importance, therefore, of having the nose and throat carefully examined, and of having any diseased condition of the mucous membrane or any obstruction corrected must be apparent. All who suffer from recurrent colds should take this precaution before winter sets in.
If the nasal passages are put in a healthy condition, strict obedience to the rules of individual hygiene will almost wholly prevent colds. In fact, except where actual nasal defects exist, the frequency of colds is usually a fair indication of how hygienically a person is living. The following points need especial emphasis, though they repeat in some cases what has already been said in the text.
It is a familiar fact that exposure and chilling will often produce a cold. This is usually due to the fact that the nerve centers controlling the circulation of the skin are over-sensitive, and exhibit a sort of hair-trigger reaction to exposure, causing a disturbance of the circulation, and of the heat-regulating machinery of the body of which the spongy shelf-like turbinated bones in the nose are an important part. Skin training, then, appears to be the first hygienic steps toward establishing a resistance to colds.
Such training for the skin may be secured by various means. One should first accustom himself to a gentle draft.
Cool bathing, to a point that produces a healthy reaction, is another important feature of skin training.
Cold bathing, by those affected with kidney trouble, is not advisable, but delicate individuals, who cannot react well to the cold bath, can greatly increase their resistance by graduated cool bathing performed as follows: Standing in about a foot of hot water, one may rub the body briskly with a wash cloth wrung out of water at about 80 degrees F. and reduced day by day until it is down to 50 degrees F. Following this the cold douche or affusion may be taken (water quickly dashed from a pitcher) beginning at 90 degrees F. and daily reducing until 50 degrees F. is reached, or just before the point where an agreeable reaction ceases to follow.
The wearing of loose, porous clothing, and the air bath—exercise in a cool room without clothing—are also valuable measures in skin training. Very heavy wraps and fur coats should be worn only during unusual exposure, as in driving or motoring. Outer clothing should be adapted to the changes in the weather, and medium-weight underclothing worn throughout the winter season. Office-workers and others employed indoors are, during the greater part of the day, living in a summer temperature. The wearing of heavy underclothing under such conditions is debilitating to the skin and impairs the resisting power.
Overheated rooms should also be avoided for the same reason. In rooms where people are moving about, the temperature should not be allowed to rise above 65 degrees. In ordinary offices or dwelling rooms, the temperature should not be allowed to rise above 68 degrees and adequate ventilation should be provided.
Living out of doors, especially sleeping out, gives the skin exercise, and further keeps fresh air in the lungs. It is one of the foremost methods of prevention against colds. Army men remark that so long as they are out of doors, even if exposed to bad weather, they almost never catch cold, but do so often as soon as they resume living in houses.
Long breaths taken slowly and rhythmically, say ten at a time and ten times a day are helpful.
Constipation predisposes to colds, and should be vigorously combated by proper diet and exercise, and regular habits of attention to the bowel function.
Overeating frequently leads to nasal congestion. Eat lightly, using little meat or other high protein foods such as white of eggs, and thoroughly masticate the food.
Avoiding undue fatigue will help greatly in preventing colds.
The regular use of nasal douches is not advisable. The mucous membrane of the nose is intolerant of watery solutions, and a chronic congested condition or even infection of air cavities in the skull can be brought about by the constant use of sprays and douches. Where special conditions render it necessary, these should be used only on the advice of a physician. When the nose is clogged with soot or dust, a very gentle spray of a warm, weak solution of salt and water, in the anterior nostrils, may do no harm. Picking of the nose should be strictly avoided. This is a fertile cause of infection. In blowing the nose care should be taken to close one nostril completely and to blow through the other without undue force. Otherwise, infection may be carried into the ear passages or the cavities communicating with the nose and give rise to serious trouble. When suffering from a cold, gauze or cheese-cloth should be used instead of a handkerchief and burned after use. Sneeze into the gauze, and thus avoid spraying infection into the surrounding atmosphere.
After one has actually caught cold the rules above given for preventing a cold are in most particulars reversed. One should then avoid drafts, variable temperature and any severe “skin gymnastics.” The paradox, that exposure to drafts is preventive of colds, but is likely to add to the cold after it is caught, is not more surprizing than the paradox that exercise keeps a man well, but that when he is sick it is better to rest.
After a cold has actually been contracted, the great effort should be to keep the body thoroughly warm, especially the feet. To accomplish this it is often the wisest course for one who has a cold to remain in bed a full day at the outset.
Medical treatment by a physician can always mitigate and shorten the duration of a cold and lessen the danger of complications, the symptoms of which can not always be appreciated by the patient.
Among the most effective home remedies for a cold are the hot foot-bath, 110–115 degrees F., a hot drink (e.g. hot flaxseed tea), a thorough purge, and rubbing the neck and chest with camphorated oil. The hot foot-bath should usually last 20 minutes, and be taken in a very thorough manner, the body enveloped in a blanket. After taking the bath, the patient should go directly to bed, and not move about and neutralize its good results.
A general neutral bath not above 100 or below 95 degrees is very restful to the skin and nerves as they have absolutely nothing to do to cope with temperatures above or below that of the body, since the neutral bath has the same as that of the body. One can remain in such a bath even for hours, if one has the time, but in getting out, it is very important to be in a very warm room and to dress quickly. In fact there is very considerable danger of catching cold at this time if great care is not taken.
If one does not remain in bed, it is generally safer to keep indoors. The air of the room should be kept as fresh as possible without subjecting one’s self to a draft and should also be kept humidified, especially in winter when it is apt to be exceedingly dry. Either excessive dryness or excessive moisture is a strain on the mucous membrane, which is the directly diseased organ in the case of a cold. If the day is still and sunny, being out of doors, if well protected from any chill, may help to get rid of one’s cold, but on a damp windy day the chances are one will add to the cold.
As to eating, it is sometimes wise to absolutely fast by skipping a meal or two, using nothing but water or water with agar-agar, or food which has bulk but little food value, such as green vegetables or fruit. The common idea that one should “stuff a cold and starve a fever” is most erroneous and comes apparently from a misunderstanding of the meaning of this adage which, originally, it would appear, was not meant in the imperative sense at all, but as follows: “If you stuff a cold, you will have to starve a fever.”
It should be added that whisky and heavy doses of quinine are distinctly deleterious and should be avoided, as should all quack remedies and catarrh cures; there are more effective remedies which carry no possibilities of harm.
When one is getting over a cold it is a good time to resolve to avoid catching colds altogether, which for the average person can be substantially accomplished by following the above suggestions. The tax on one’s time thus required is far less than the tax required by the colds themselves. The authors of this book know of persons who have scarcely lost a day’s work from colds or other ailments for decades at a time simply by using a little self-control and common sense at critical times.
The fact that in the United States the general death rate has steadily fallen for the past several decades, a phenomenon common to all civilized countries, is accepted by many as evidence of a steady gain in National Vitality. That there has been a gain in vitality in the younger age groups is unquestionably true, but this gain has served to mask a loss in vitality at the older age periods.
This latter phenomenon, a rising mortality in elderly life, is something almost peculiar to the United States. It is not exhibited in the mortality statistics of the leading European countries. In those countries the fall in the death rate has not been due solely to a reduction of mortality in infancy and adult life through the conquest of diseases of children, tuberculosis and other communicable diseases. England and Wales, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Prussia show improved mortality at every age period.
The charts in this section show the trend of mortality in this country during 30 years at the various ages of life, and also the trend of mortality in the two great classes of diseases: the communicable, which affect more emphatically the young lives, and the degenerative or regressive class of diseases, which affect chiefly those in middle life and old age.
It seems evident that unless this increased mortality is due to some unknown biologic influence or to the amalgamation of the various races that constitute our population, it must be ascribed, in a broad sense, to lack of adaptation to our rapidly developing civilization.
Whether or not there is one principal cause that determines the unfavorable trend of mortality in this country as compared to other civilized nations has not yet been conclusively shown.
INCREASES AND DECREASES IN DEATH RATE BY AGE PERIODS
MASS. & N.J. 1880–1910
L.E.I. Inc.
ENGLAND & WALES IN BROKEN LINE
This chart exhibits the trend of the death rate from all causes, by age periods. The decreases are below the center line and the increases above it.
It will be noted that the American decreases in the younger ages were not as great as in England and Wales, that they changed to increases about age 45 and continued to increase in each age group thereafter, while in England and Wales the decline occurred at all ages.
Note.—Massachusetts and New Jersey are used as a basis because they were the only States in 1880 where sufficiently reliable comparative statistics could be had. These records were accepted by the national government, and these States really constituted the registration area in that year. There were also fifteen cities outside these States where comparisons were possible.
DEATH RATE REGISTRATION AREA
(PER 10,000 LIVING)
ORGANIC DISEASES
L.E.I. INC
ENGLAND & WALES DOTTED LINES
This chart shows that in the United States registration area, the mortality from diseases of the heart, blood vessels and kidneys increased 41 per cent. during the period 1890–1910, while in England and Wales (shown by the dotted lines) during the same period there was a decrease in the mortality from these maladies.
OCCUPIED MALES INCREASES-DECREASES FROM CERTAIN DISEASES
OCCUPIED MALES INCREASES-DECREASES FROM CERTAIN DISEASESThis chart comparing 1900 with 1890 (1900–1910 not yet available) shows the sharp upward trend in the mortality from organic disease among males in gainful occupations, and the downward trend in the mortality from communicable disease in the same group. This heavy and increasing loss from chronic disease occurs among our most valuable lives—those of the breadwinners.
| Ages | U. S. Reg. Area 1900 P’sons | Prussia 1900–01 | France 1899–1902 | Italy 1899–1902 | Sweden 1891–00 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Fem. | Males | Fem. | Males | Fem. | Males | Fem. | ||
| Under 1 | 165.4 | 221.8 | 189.4 | ... | ... | 174.8 | 158.3 | ... | 101.6 |
| 1 | 46.6 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 2 | 20.5 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 3 | 13.2 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 4 | 9.4 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Under 5 | 52.1 | 24.3 | 23.4 | 56.9 | 48.5 | 38.4 | 39.8 | ... | 36.9 |
| 5–9 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 6.7 | ... | 5.9 |
| 10–14 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | ... | 3.6 |
| 15–19 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
| 20–24 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 5.7 |
| 25–29 | 8.6 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 6.6 | 6.1 |
| 30–34 | 9.4 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 8.5 | 7.8 | 6.7 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| 35–39 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 7.8 | 10.5 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 7.6 | 7.2 |
| 40–44 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 8.6 | 12.7 | 9.7 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 8.8 | 7.9 |
| 45–49 | 15.2 | 15.9 | 10.0 | 15.1 | 10.9 | 11.4 | 9.6 | 10.7 | 8.6 |
| 50–54 | 19.1 | 21.2 | 13.8 | 19.1 | 14.5 | 15.7 | 12.9 | 13.7 | 10.9 |
| 55–59 | 26.3 | 28.3 | 20.4 | 26.6 | 20.5 | 21.0 | 17.7 | 18.6 | 14.3 |
| 60–64 | 35.1 | 39.5 | 31.4 | 37.4 | 30.5 | 33.5 | 30.9 | 26.1 | 21.3 |
| 65–69 | 52.2 | 57.8 | 50.3 | 54.5 | 47.1 | 50.2 | 48.8 | 39.5 | 33.8 |
| 70–74 | 75.2 | 87.0 | 78.9 | 86.9 | 77.7 | 85.4 | 87.4 | 62.0 | 54.8 |
| 75–79 | 110.5 | 132.5 | 125.3 | 130.7 | 120.6 | 134.3 | 138.5 | 101.3 | 90.1 |
| 80–84 | 165.8 | 199.3 | 186.6 | ... | ... | 214.5 | 215.6 | ... | ... |
| 85–89 | 241.3 | 283.6 | 271.4 | 221.9 | 219.8 | 317.1 | 307.3 | 197.8 | 179.6 |
| 90–94 | 339.2 | 395.2 | 345.6 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 95–over | 418.9 | 404.8 | 402.1 | ... | ... | 391.7 | 369.1 | ... | ... |
Note: In 1900 or thereabouts, the death rates at the middle ages of life were heavier in the United States than in Prussia, France, Italy, and Sweden. Since then the death rates in the United States at these ages have grown even greater.
In the foreign countries the death rate by persons can be approximated by adding the rates for males and females of same age and dividing by two.