| 6. |
In the eastern lunette.—The birth of Jesus. In the background, to left, the angel appearing to the shepherds; to right, the magi beholding the star shining over the manger in which lies the Holy Child, while an ox and an ass feed in it. In the centre, Mary on a couch. In the foreground, to left, two women bathing the Holy Child; to the right, Joseph seated on the ground and gazing at the Holy Child. |
|
On the arch above the eastern lunette.—The busts (in medallions) of SS. Philemon, Leukius, Kallinikus, Thyrsus, Apollonius. |
|
| 7. |
In the western lunette.—Return of the Holy
Family from Egypt to Nazareth. |
|
In the arch above the western lunette.—The busts (in medallions) of SS. Engraphus (?), Menas, Hermogenes, Laurus, Florus, Menas, Victor, Vikentius. |
|
| 8. |
In the vault.—The baptism of Jesus; the
scenes in the temptation of Jesus. |
| 9. |
On the second transverse arch.—To the east, S. George; to the west, S. Demetrius. |
| 10. |
In the eastern lunette, over the door leading to the inner narthex.—Christ in the act of benediction. |
| 11. |
In the western lunette.—The Theotokos, in
the attitude of prayer, with the Holy Child, in a nimbus, on her
breast; the legend |
| 12. |
In the vault.—In the north-eastern corner,
the miracle of water turned into wine. The date 1303, in Arabic
numerals, is on this mosaic. In the south-eastern corner, the
miracle of the loaves. |
|
In the north-western corner.—The sacrifice of a white bullock. |
|
|
In the south-eastern corner.—The second miracle of the loaves. |
|
| 13. |
On the third transverse arch.—Two saints, not named. |
| 14. |
In the eastern lunette.—To the left, the magi, on horseback, guided by a star, on their way to Jerusalem; to the right, the magi before Herod. |
|
On the arch above.—The busts (in medallions) of SS. Abibus, Ghourias, Samonas. |
|
| 15. |
In the western lunette.—Elizabeth fleeing
with her child John from a soldier who pursues her with a drawn
sword in his hand. |
| 16. |
On the fourth transverse arch.—Two saints, not named. |
| 17. |
In the eastern lunette.—Herod inquiring of
the priests where the Christ should be born. |
| 18. |
In the western lunette.—Mothers at
Bethlehem seated on the ground, and mourning the death of their
infant children. |
| 23. |
In the vault.—In the south-western corner. Uncertain. Possibly, the fall of the idols in Egypt at the presence of the Holy Child; to the south of that scene, Zacchaeus on the sycamore tree. |
| 24. |
On the soffit of the first transverse arch.—To the east, the healing of the man with a withered arm; to the west, the healing of a leper. |
| 25. |
In the crown.—Christ the Pantokrator. |
|
In the flutings, thirty-nine figures, arranged in two tiers, representing the ancestors of Christ from Adam to Esrom, Japhet, and the eleven sons of Jacob not in the line of ancestry. |
|
| 26. |
On the south-eastern pendentive.—The healing of the woman with a bloody issue. |
| 27. |
On the north-eastern pendentive.—The healing of Peter's mother-in-law. |
| 28. |
On the south-western pendentive.—The healing of a deaf and dumb man. |
| 29. |
On the north-western pendentive.—The healing of two blind men at Jericho. |
| 30. |
On the eastern wall below the dome, colossal figures of Mary and Christ, technically named the Deësis. |
| 31. |
On the opposite wall.—Christ healing
divers diseases. |
| 39. |
In the eastern lunette.—The birth of Mary. |
| 40. |
In the western lunette.—Joseph receiving the rod which marks him the successful suitor for Mary's hand, and taking her as his bride-elect. |
| 41. |
In the vault.—To the east, Mary held in the arms of S. Joachim, receiving the blessing of three priests seated at a banquet; to the west, the child Mary caressed by her parents. This scene shows much feeling. |
| 42. |
On the soffit of the transverse arch.—To the east, Mary taking her first seven steps ἡ ἑπταβηματίζουσα; to the west, the high priest praying before the rods, one of which, by blossoming, will designate the future husband of Mary. |
| 43. |
On the eastern wall, to the north of the main entrance into the church.—The Apostle Peter with the keys in his hand. |
| 44. |
In the lunette over the main entrance to the church.—Theodore Metochites on his knees offering the church to Christ seated on a throne. The legend ὁ κτήτωρ λογοθέτης τοῦ γεννικοῦ Θεόδωρος ὁ Μετοχίτης, 544 |
Sebah and Joaillier.
S. Saviour in the
Chora.
Mosaic Representing the Registration of Joseph and Mary at
Bethlehem.
Sebah and Joaillier.
S. Saviour in the
Chora.
Mosaic Representing Theodore Metochites Offering the Church To
Christ.
To face page 326.
Fig. 115.—Model of The Church of S. Saviour in the Chora.
The scenes represented on these mosaics are not peculiar to this church, but are a selection from cycles of subjects which from the eleventh century became favourite themes for pictorial treatment on the walls of important churches in the Byzantine world. Several of these scenes are found portrayed also at Daphni, Mistra, S. Sophia at Kiev, in the churches of Mt. Athos, on diptychs and manuscripts, 545 as well as in the chapel of the arena at Padua. The cycle of subjects taken from the life of Mary was developed mainly in Syria, and Schmitt 546 goes so far as to maintain that the mosaics of the Chora are copies of Syrian mosaics executed by a Syrian artist, when the church was restored in the ninth century by Michael Syncellus, who, it will be remembered, came from Syria.
Kondakoff assigns most of the mosaics to the Comnenian restoration of the church by Maria Ducaena in the eleventh or twelfth century. One of them at least, the Deësis, has survived; and there may be others of that period, for, as that mosaic proves, the narthex of the church was decorated when the church was restored by that benefactress of the Chora. But the testimony of Nicephorus Gregoras, 547 of Theodore Metochites, 548 and the date marked on the scene representing the miracle of the wine at Cana, on the right of the figure of Christ over the door leading from the outer to the inner narthex, prove these mosaics to be as a whole the production of the fourteenth century. And this conclusion is confirmed by their unlikeness to mosaic work in the twelfth century, and by their affinity to other work of the same character done in the fourteenth century. 549
In fact, the mosaics in the Chora represent a remarkable revival in the history of Byzantine art. They are characterised by a comparative freedom from tradition, by closer approximation to reality and nature, by a charm and a sympathetic quality, and by a scheme of colour that indicate the coming of a new age and spirit. Curiously enough, they are contemporary with the frescoes of Giotto at Padua (1303-1306). But whatever points of similarity may be detected between them and the work of the Italian artist, or between them and the Italian school before Giotto, should be explained as due to a common stock of traditions and to the simultaneous awakening of a new intellectual and artistic life in the East and the West, rather than to any direct influence of one school of art upon another. The mosaics of the Chora are thoroughly Byzantine. 550
The Frescoes in the Parecclesion:—
|
On the southern wall: |
||
| 8. |
A portion of the figure of an armed angel. Above No. 8 and at the side of the window: |
|
| 9. |
Two men carrying a bier or platform. In front of them a third person giving directions. |
|
| 10. |
In the arched recess: full-length figures of Andronicus II. and his family. In the soffit of the arch, the head of Christ in a medallion, with rays issuing from behind the aureola. |
|
| 11. |
and 12. In the spandrils above the recess: two heads in medallions. |
|
| 13. |
In the dome vault: the Last Judgment. Christ in
judgment fills the centre; behind Him are the twenty-four elders
seated on a long throne; farther back is gathered the heavenly
host. |
|
Archivolt on the South Wall of the Parecclesion, with the Epitaph in honour of Tornikes
To face page 330.
Epitaph in honour of Tornikes:—
In line 7 the inscription reads φcρωN instead of φέρων; in line 23 IIρcποN for πρέπον.
542 Diehl, Études byzantines: Les mosaïques de Kahrié Djami.
543 An English translation of the Protoevangelium is found in the Ante-Nicene Christian Library, vol. xvi.
544 The remarkable head-dress he wears was given him as a special distinction by the Emperor Andronicus II. Palaeologus. The poet Philes (ode 41 in the appendix to vol. ii. of his works, lines 117-19) says φοροῦντα χρυσῆν ἐρυθρὰν τὴν καλύπτραν ἣν δῶρον αὐτῷ συνανέχοντι κράτος Ἄναξ ὁ λαμπρὸς Ἀνδρόνικος παρέσχε.
545 A work reproducing, under the Pope's authority, the eighty-two miniatures illustrating the Life of the Madonna, which was composed by a monk James in the twelfth century (Cod. Vatic. Gr. 1162), is announced (Danesi, Editore, Roma, 1911), with a preface and descriptions of the miniatures by Cosimo Stornajolo. The miniatures are said to rival those of the Greek Codex 1028 in the National Library in Paris.
546 Op. cit. pp. 134-41.
547 i. p. 303.
548 Carmina (ed. Treu), A. 1004, 1039-1042; B. 322-334.
549 Diehl, Études byzantines: Les mosaïques de Kahrié Djami.
550 See on the whole subject, C. Diehl, in the Gazette des Beaux-Arts, troisième période, tome 33, and in his Manuel d'art byzantin, pp. 732-41; Schmitt in his monograph on the Chora; Mühlmann, Archiv für christliche Kunst, 1886-87.
551 Alludes to his marriage with a relative of the imperial family.
552 In the translation I have been assisted by Sir W. M. Ramsay, Professor Bury, and Mr. E. M. Antoniadi. The meaning of τελευταῖοι κρότοι is not clear. Various interpretations have been suggested; to read βροτοί, mortals, instead of κρότοι, and to construe τελευταῖοι adverbially, 'finally, O mortals!'; to understand a reference to the judgment day, 'O applauses given at the final judgment'; to take the phrase as equivalent to, 'O celebrities at (or to) the very end of time'; to understand it as signifying the eulogies actually given to the deceased by the poet. Professor Tendès, of Athens, whom I thank for his courtesy in this connection, suggests that the meaning is similar to that of the phrase τὰ τελευταιά in the modern Greek form of eulogy, ἔκαμε πολλά, ἀλλὰ τὰ τελευταιά του.... 'He did many things, but his last performances!' (surpassed all his previous deeds). Here the meaning would therefore be, 'O grandest achievements that men praise!'
The dating of the Constantinople churches is a problem of great difficulty, and, in the absence of documentary evidence, we must often be contented with very indefinite suggestions. Many churches are known to have been founded at dates which are evidently earlier than the existing buildings, and have apparently been rebuilt at some later date of which the record has been lost. Other churches are known to have been 'repaired,' and here the question of how far 'repair' means 'rebuilding' is sometimes insoluble. Repair may mean simply a fresh coat of paint.
The architectural characteristics afford a certain clue, and the following chronological scheme has been drawn up by their guidance:—
The pre-Justinian period is characterised by simple construction and detail of a late Roman type. Of this we have one example—the basilica of S. John of the Studion, founded about 463. The existing building appears to be original.
The Justinian period commences with the beginning of the sixth century. It is characterised by the development of the drumless dome on pendentives. The plan is complicated, and the buildings are large in comparison with those of later date. To this period belong SS. Sergius and Bacchus (527 A.D.), the baptistery of S. Sophia, and the 'Great Church' of S. Sophia itself. S. Andrew in Krisei and S. Saviour in the Chora probably date from this period. The carved detail of the former closely resembles that of SS. Sergius and Bacchus, and the plan of the latter connects it with S. Sophia, Salonica (sixth century).
The Justinian period roughly includes the seventh century, and is followed by a long decline, marked by the great iconoclastic controversy which lasted almost until the middle of the ninth century. To this period belongs S. Irene (740 A.D.). In plan it is a double-domed cross church. In the arrangement of the dome-arches and galleries it resembles S. Theodosia, whilst in the presence of a western gallery over the narthex and in the number of columns in the 'nave arcade' it is like S. Sophia.
The accession of Basil the Macedonian (867 A.D.) marks the beginning of the second great period—the 'Basilian Renaissance.' We know that this was a period of great religious activity, and though we have, unfortunately, no known dates to guide us, the development of plan leads us to place a group of churches in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries. These are S. Mary Pammakaristos, S. Mary Panachrantos, S. Theodosia, S. Mary Diaconissa, and SS. Peter and Mark.
They are all churches of considerable size; S. Mary Diaconissa and S. Theodosia being indeed large. They are characterised by the use of the ambulatory and domed cross plans. The carving is coarse and the capitals are of the clumsy Byzantine Corinthian type. The dome is raised on a high drum in S. Mary Pammakaristos and S. Mary Panachrantos, though this may be a later addition. The domes of the other three churches seem to be Turkish. S. Mary Pammakaristos and the south church in S. Mary Panachrantos are identical in plan with S. Andrew in Krisei, and it would be possible to date them earlier had we any evidence whatsoever. Unfortunately both have been very much altered.
S. Theodosia, S. Mary Diaconissa, and SS. Peter and Mark, taken in this order, form a series showing the gradual disappearance of the galleries and the evolution of the domed cross church into the 'four columned' church of the next period.
The Myrelaion (919-945), if the present church is of that date, is an unusually early example of this four-columned type. It is generally considered that this plan type dates at the earliest from the eleventh century. There is, however, no reason to believe that the church was rebuilt later; it is a perfectly normal example of its class, and nowhere is an early example more probable than in Constantinople. The Myrelaion may accordingly be taken as marking the commencement of the late Byzantine period in Constantinople.
The churches are now smaller; the gynecaeum, where present, is placed over the narthex; the use of patterning in the brickwork of the exterior, which occurs in some of the Basilian churches (e.g. the cornice of S. Theodosia), now becomes important, and alternate coursing in brick and stone is used with great effect. From this time onwards narthexes were frequently added to the existing churches.
S. Saviour Pantokrator (1118-1143 A.D.) is the largest late church in Constantinople, and is an unusually large church of its type. S. Saviour Pantepoptes (1081-1118), S. Theodore, and S. John in Trullo, belong to the same class. The last, with its circular dome and apse, is probably the latest of the three. S. Thekla (1057-1059) and Bogdan Serai are examples of hall churches of the same period.
The monastery of Manuel was founded in 829-842 A.D., but the building believed to be the refectory is probably much later. As part of the monastery it might, of course, have been built at any date subsequent to the foundation of the House.
The architecture of the Sanjakdar does not correspond to the date of the foundation of the monastery of the Gastria in the ninth century. The building is certainly of late date, subsequent to the eleventh century. Of the Balaban Mesjedi it is impossible to say anything. It is the remnant of some Byzantine structure.
From 1204 to 1261, during the Latin Empire, we need not look for much building in the Greek Church. Soon after the fall of that empire comes the erection of S. Mary of the Mongols (1261-1282) and Monastir Jamissi (1282-1328). In both cases the architectural character is what we should expect. Following on this we have, in the fourteenth century, the alterations made in S. Saviour in the Chora (c. 1300), and the parecclesion of the Pammakaristos (c. 1315).
This was the last effort of pure Byzantine architecture in Constantinople. During the hundred years preceding the Turkish conquest in 1453 the gradually increasing pressure from the East put a stop to all architectural schemes; the craftsmen and artists fled to Italy, and there took their part in the great revival known as 'The Renaissance.'
| Century. | |
| V. |
S. John of the Studion, 463. |
| VI. |
SS. Sergius and Bacchus, 527-36. |
|
S. Sophia, 532-37. |
|
|
S. Saviour in the Chora (the Justinian foundation). |
|
|
S. Andrew in Krisei. |
|
| VIII. |
S. Irene, 740. |
|
S. Mary Panachrantos (South Church); possibly earlier. |
|
|
S. Mary Pammakaristos; possibly earlier. |
|
| IX. |
S. Theodosia. |
|
S. Mary Diaconissa. |
|
|
SS. Peter and Mark. |
|
| X. |
The Myrelaion. |
|
S. Mary Panachrantos (South Church). |
|
| XI. |
S. Thekla. |
|
S. Saviour in the Chora (restoration in the reign of Alexius I. Comnenus). |
|
|
S. Saviour Pantepoptes. |
|
|
S. Saviour Pantokrator. |
|
| XII. |
S. Theodore. |
|
S. John in Trullo. |
|
|
Refectory of the monastery of Manuel? |
|
|
Bogdan Serai? |
|
| XIII. |
S. Mary of the Mongols. |
|
Monastir Jamissi. |
|
| XIV. |
S. Saviour in the Chora, 1306. Final restoration by Theodore Metochites. |
|
Parecclesion of the church of S. Mary Pammakaristos, c. 1315. |
|
|
Sanjakdar Mesjedi (Gastria)? |
|
|
Balaban Mesjedi? |
Basilica.—S. John of the Studion.
Octagon.—SS. Sergius and Bacchus.
Domed Basilica.—S. Saviour in the Chora.
Ambulatory.—S. Andrew in Krisei; S. Mary Panachrantos (South Church); S. Mary Pammakaristos.
Domed Cross Church.—S. Irene; S. Theodosia; S. Mary Diaconissa; SS. Peter and Mark.
Four Column Church.—Myrelaion; S. Saviour Pantepoptes; S. Saviour Pantokrator; S. John in Trullo; S. Mary Panachrantos (North Church); Parecclesion of S. Mary Pammakaristos.
Foiled Plan.—S. Mary of the Mongols.
Halls.—Bogdan Serai; Central Church of the Pantokrator; Monastir Mesjedi; Refectory of the monastery of Manuel; Parecclesion of S. Saviour in the Chora; S. Thekla.
Irregular.—Sanjakdar Mesjedi; Balaban Mesjedi.