Chapter XXXIV

Peace and Prosperity

Unexampled material prosperity has come to the islands, partly as a result of the establishment of peace, and the improvement in means of communication; partly from a very different cause.

Among other dire calamities which he says have befallen the Philippines Blount includes “tariff-wrought poverty,”1 and he roundly scores the Congress of the United States for its attitude toward the suffering Filipino.

As a simple matter of fact, tariff legislation enacted by Congress has been the commercial salvation of the islands. The tariff law of 1909, known as the Payne Bill, was passed August 5, 1909, and went into effect sixty days thereafter. In order to make the effect of this act more apparent, the figures from July 1, 1909, in the following statistical tables are printed in bold-faced type. These tables speak for themselves, very loudly.

Internal-Revenue Statistics

Fiscal Year Total Collections Increase (+) or Decrease (-)
Per Cent
19062 $4,434,364
1907 4,729,515 + 7
1908 5,542,022 +17
1909 5,871,267 + 6
1910 $7,160,810 +22
1911 7,922,787 +11
1912 8,389,929 + 6
1913 9,035,922 + 8

Trade with the United States

Fiscal Year Imports from the United States Exports to the United States Total
1899 $1,150,613 $3,540,894 $4,691,507
1900 1,656,469 3,635,160 5,291,629
1901 2,666,930 2,572,021 5,238,951
1902 4,035,243 7,871,743 11,906,986
1903 3,944,082 13,863,059 17,807,141
1904 4,843,207 11,102,860 15,946,067
1905 5,839,512 15,678,875 21,518,387
1906 4,333,917 11,580,569 15,914,486
1907 5,155,478 12,082,364 17,237,842
1908 5,079,670 10,332,116 15,411,786
1909 4,693,831 10,154,087 14,847,918
1910 10,775,301 18,703,083 29,478,384
1911 19,483,658 16,716,956 36,200,614
1912 20,970,536 21,619,686 42,390,222
1913 (at the rate of) 26,264,218 23,573,865 49,838,0833

Total Trade, including that with the United States

Fiscal Year Imports Exports Total Customs Collections Foreign Tonnage
Value Increase (+) or Decrease (-) Value Increase (+) or Decrease (-) Value Increase (+) or Decrease (-)
Per Cent Per Cent Per Cent
1899 $13,116,567 $14,640,162 $3,106,380 336,550
1900 20,601,436 +57 19,821,347 +35 5,542,289 636,034 +89
1901 30,276,200 +47 23,222,348 +17 8,982,813 987,094 +55
1902 32,029,357 + 6 24,544,858 + 6 8,528,938 1,104,968 +12
1903 32,978,445 + 3 33,150,120 +35 9,540,706 1,542,200 +40
1904 33,221,251 + 1 30,226,127 - 9 8,493,868 1,542,138
1905 30,879,048 - 7 32,355,865 + 7 8,263,444 1,417,396 - 8
1906 25,799,290 -16 31,918,542 - 1 7,553,206 1,455,055 + 3
1907 28,786,063 +12 33,721,767 + 6 8,194,708 1,293,266 -11
1908 30,918,745 + 7 32,829,816 - 3 8,318,020 1,464,448 +13
1909 27,794,482 -10 31,044,458 - 5 8,539,098 1,392,333 - 5
1910 37,067,630 +33 39,717,960 +28 8,286,073 1,715,268 +23
1911 49,833,722 +34 39,778,629 +0.2 8,678,810 1,808,308 +15
1912 54,549,980 + 9 50,319,836 +26 9,363,296 1,939,079 + 7
1913 56,327,533 +11 56,683,326 +17 8,246,026 1,868,811 - 4

Fiscal Year Receipts from Percentage Tax on Business Amounts of Business on which Percentage Tax is Collected Increase (+) or Decrease (-)
Per Cent
1906 $666,996 $200,098,983
1907 677,847 203,354,298 + 2
1908 643,707 193,112,160 - 5
1909 631,877 189,563,361 - 2
1910 759,718 227,915,673 +20
1911 885,804 265,741,443 +17
1912 951,775 285,532,500 + 7
1913 1,110,000 333,000,000 +17

The Philippine government collects as internal revenue one-third of one per cent of the gross business done by merchants and manufacturers in the islands. The fiscal year ending June 30, 1909, was the last before the opening of free trade with the United States. The figures for the four subsequent years therefore show the resulting stimulus to business.

The gross business on which the percentage tax was collected in 1909 was $190,000,000 (₱380,000,000). The increases over that year have been:—

Year Increases over 1909 Percentage of Increase
United States Currency Philippine Currency
1910 $38,000,000 ₱76,000,000 20.0
1911 76,000,000 152,000,000 40.0
1912 96,000,000 192,000,000 50.5
1913 143,000,0004 286,000,000 75.3
$353,000,0004 ₱706,000,000

The gross business increased by a fifth in one year; by two-fifths in two years; by more than a half in three years; and by more than three-quarters in four years.

In the year 1909 the total exports and imports of the Philippine Islands amounted to $59,000,000 (₱118,000,000). The increases over that year have been:—

Year Increases over 1909 Percentage of Increase
United States Currency Philippine Currency
1910 $18,000,000 ₱36,000,000 30.5
1911 31,000,000 62,000,000 52.5
1912 46,000,000 92,000,000 77.9
1913 61,000,0005 122,000,000 103.4
$156,000,000 ₱312,000,000

The total trade increased by nearly one-third in one year; by more than a half in two years; by more than three-quarters in three years; and more than doubled in four years.

United States Currency Philippine Currency
Total increase of business as above $353,000,000 ₱706,000,000
Total increase of trade as above 156,000,000 312,000,000
Total increase of business and trade $509,000,000 ₱1,018,000,000

An attempt has been made to make political capital out of one of the heavy drops in hemp values.6

It is astonishing how fully Providence sometimes squares accounts with the falsifier. Whatever may be thought of the advisability or inadvisability of the hemp duty rebate, there is no escape from the conclusion that it does not determine the price of hemp. While it is true that there has been a time during the past two years when the hemp grower received half, or less than half, the price for his product which he obtained ten years ago, it is also true that during the latter part of this same period he has received very much higher prices than either he or any of his ancestors ever before obtained. This apart from the fact that the price ten years ago was quite abnormal, due to crop shortage resulting from a bad state of public order. It is a poor rule that does not work both ways. If the hemp rebate is responsible for the recent slump in prices, it must also be responsible for their having later “kicked the beam.”

The facts set forth in the following tables are also significant of improved conditions:—

Banking

Fiscal Year Total Resources of Commercial Banks Increase (+) or Decrease (-)
Per Cent
1906 $15,351,690
1907 17,054,358 +11
1908 17,454,214 + 2
1909 18,138,425 + 4
1910 22,856,455 +26
1911 24,557,697 + 7
1912 35,885,728 +46
1913 31,210,177 -13

Postal Savings Bank

Fiscal Year Depositors in the Postal Savings Bank Total Amount Due Depositors at Close of Year
Number Increase Amount Increase
Per Cent Per Cent
19077 2,331 $254,731
1908 5,389 131 515,997 102
1909 8,782 63 724,479 40
1910 13,102 49 839,123 16
1911 28,804 120 1,049,737 25
1912 35,802 24 1,194,493 14
19138 38,075 1,252,189

Coastwise Tonnage Cleared

Fiscal Year Tonnage Increase (+) or Decrease (-)
Per Cent
1899 237,852 ——
1900 482,685 +103
1901 676,307 + 40
1902 773,243 + 14
1903 832,438 + 8
1904 905,821 + 9
1905 840,504 - 7
1906 774,032 - 8
1907 899,915 + 16
1908 978,968 + 9
1909 1,045,075 + 7
1910 1,053,426 + 1
1911 1,303,606 + 24
1912 1,362,620 + 5
1913 (at the rate of) 1,262,1369 - 7

Importations of Coal (Equal Consumption Very Nearly)10

Fiscal Year Metric Tons (2205 Pounds)
1899 30,812
1900 87,238
1901 126,732
1902 236,332
1903 268,650
1904 295,716
1905 269,666
1906 268,577
1907 295,684
1908 322,928
1909 294,902
1910 375,518
1911 413,735
1912 436,687
1913 (at the rate of) 408,11811

If possible, let us have more of this same kind of tariff-wrought poverty and commercial distress! The country needs it.

This extraordinary story of rapid increase in commercial prosperity, as well as in the volume of commerce between the Philippines and the United States, is but a faint indication of what would come about under a fixed policy which assured future adequate protection to life and property in these islands.

A Typical Cocoanut Grove.

A Typical Cocoanut Grove.

Dried cocoanut meat is one of the principal exports of the Philippines.

Specific assurance that the United States would not surrender sovereignty over the archipelago until its inhabitants had demonstrated both ability and inclination to maintain a stable, just and effective government would be followed by a steady, healthful commercial development which would bring in its wake a degree of prosperity hitherto unknown and undreamed of. The Philippines have the best tropical climate in the world; soil of unsurpassed richness; great forest wealth; promising mines; and a constantly growing population willing to work for a reasonable wage. Give assurance of a stable government, and prosperity will increase by leaps and bounds. Turn the country over now, or ten years from now, to the Filipinos to govern, and the reputable business men, mindful of Aguinaldo’s demand for his share of the war booty when Manila was taken; of the attempted confiscation of the lands of the religious orders and of Spanish citizens generally,12 of the proposal to tax foreigners13 as such, and of the torturing of friars, other Spaniards and Filipinos as well, in order to extort money from them; of the widespread brigandage, the raping, the officially authorized and directed murdering and burying alive which prevailed during the period of undisturbed Filipino rule, will fold their tents like the Arabs and quietly steal away. There will remain that peculiar class of business men who, as the Filipinos put it, love to fish in troubled waters. They will not lack good fishing grounds.

Should we not stimulate the commercial development of the islands by adopting liberal provisions as to the sale of public lands, safeguarding the public interest by imposing at the same time severe conditions as to cultivation? And should not our anti-imperialist friends cease to rail at those of their countrymen who are willing to spend the money without which commercial development is impossible? Can they not grasp the fact that the influx of Americans and American capital sounds the death knell of slavery and peonage? It was Americans whose testimony enabled me to prove to the world the existence in the Philippines of these twin evils, and to bring pressure to bear which resulted in prohibitive legislation. It is Americans who are helping the poor Filipinos to become owners of land. It is Americans who are encouraging them to take contracts for cultivating cane, so that they have a direct interest in the crop.

Increasing prosperity means more money for the maintenance of order, for schools, for hospitals, for sanitary work and for public improvements. The diminution of exports which would promptly follow any serious disturbance of the peace of the country would result in the loss of much of the ground already gained.

The average business man is not a sentimentalist. So long as he can safely carry on his work, and can be sure of just treatment, he does not worry much over the nationality of the government officials who maintain such conditions, but he will not invest his money in a country where it is not reasonably certain that such conditions will continue to prevail.

The business men of the Philippines know by experience what American government of the archipelago means. Some of them know, also by experience, what Filipino rule means. The slump in real estate values and customs receipts which so promptly followed Mr. Wilson’s expression of hope that the frontiers of the United States might soon be contracted, conclusively demonstrated their opinion as to the effect of Philippine independence on the peace and prosperity of the country.

The number of Filipinos who thus far have demonstrated ability successfully to manage large commercial enterprises is exceedingly limited. Must not commercial prosperity coexist with political independence, if the latter is to be stable?

During the visit of the congressional delegation which accompanied Mr. Taft on his return to the Philippines in 1907, public sessions were held at which the Filipinos were given opportunity to make complaints. One fervid orator denounced the collection of customs dues, internal revenue taxes, the land tax and the cedula tax. A congressman asked him how he expected to get money to run the government after all taxes were abolished. He replied, “That is a detail which can be settled later.”

Would it not be well to consider, at this time, one very important detail, namely, what would be the effect on the insular government of a marked falling off in the business from the taxes on which practically all of the insular revenues are at present derived?


1 Blount, p. 571.

2 First year for which statistics are available.

3 Twelve-sevenths of the actual figures for the first seven months of the year: $15,320,794; $13,751,421; $29,072,215.

4 Estimate based on collections to March, 1913.

5 Estimate made pro rata on the basis of the figures for the first seven months.

6 “It is precisely these Americans, and their business associates in the United States, who have gotten through Congress the legislation which enables them to give the Filipino just half of what he got ten years ago for his hemp, and other like legislation, and the Filipinos know it.”—Blount, p. 118.

Also the following:—

“Apparently, Messrs. Roosevelt and Taft thought, in 1907, that granting the Filipinos a little debating society solemnly called a legislative body, but wholly without any real power, was ample compensation for deserted tobacco and cane plantations, and for the price of hemp being beaten down below the cost of production by manipulation through an Act of Congress passed for the benefit of American hemp manufacturers. If we had had a Cleveland in the White House about that time, he would have written an essay on taxation without representation, with the hemp infamy of this Philippine Tariff Act of 1902 as a text, and sent it to Congress as a message demanding the repeal of the Act. But the good-will of the Hemp Trust is an asset for the policy of Benevolent Assimilation. The Filipino cannot vote, and the cordage manufacturer in the United States can. No conceivable state of economic desolation to which we might reduce the people of the Philippine Islands being other than a blessing in disguise compared with permitting them to attend to their own affairs after their own quaint and mutually considerate fashion, the Hemp Trust’s rope, tied into a slip-knot by the Act of 1902, must not be removed from their throats. By judicious manipulation of sufficient hemp rope, you can corral much support for Benevolent Assimilation. Therefore, to this good hour, the substance of the hemp part of the Philippine Tariff Act of March 8, 1902, remains upon the statute books of the United States, to the shame of the nation.”—Blount, pp. 614–615.

7 First year of operation.

8 On December 31, 1912; increase of six months only.

9 Twelve-sevenths of the actual figure for the first seven months of the year: 736,246 tons.

10 The figures for coal importations are exclusive of the quantities imported from the United States by the federal government. These are excluded because they have been for the most part made in large quantities in alternate years, and would, therefore, while considerably increasing the average total amounts imported, give a false idea of the rate of increase of the more strictly domestic consumption.

11 Twice the actual figure for the first half of the year: 204,094 tons.

12 There were several different plans for the confiscation of the friar lands. The following shows the action taken in one instance, relative to the property of Spanish prisoners:—

“On February 2, 1899, the secretary of the treasury informed the governor of the province of Isabela that the property of all Spanish prisoners should be confiscated as booty of war.”—P. I. R., 1302. 6.

13 The following telegram was sent to the cabinet by the director of diplomacy, Manila:—

“Missed the train on account of government business. Beg of you to pardon my absence, and bear in mind my suggestion to look up an easy method of abolishing the law imposing a tax of 100 to 5000 pesos on foreigners, as not only unjust but impolitic at this time, when we seek the sympathy of the powers. I represent to the cabinet that such step is very urgent, because I have ascertained that members of the chamber of commerce have reported this tax to their respective governments in order to formulate a protest.”—P. I. R., 849.