Down to the year 1784 so unproductive were the
Philippines to the Spanish revenues, that the treasury deficit was
supplied by an annual grant of 250,000 dollars provided by the Mexican
government. A capitation tax was irregularly collected from the
natives; also a custom-house duty (almojarifango) on
the small trade which existed, and an excise (alcabala) on interior sales. Even to the beginning of the
present century the Spanish American colonies furnished the funds for
the military expenses of Manila. In 1829 the treasury became an
independent branch of administration. Increase of tribute-paying
population, the tobacco and wine monopoly, permission given to
foreigners to establish themselves as merchants in the capital, demand
for native and consumption of foreign productions, and a general
tendency towards a more liberal policy, brought about their
usual beneficial results; and, though slowly moving, the Philippines
have entered upon a career of prosperity susceptible of an enormous
extension.
The capitation tax, or tribute paid by the natives, is the
foundation of the financial system in the Philippines. It is the only
direct tax (except for special cases), makes no distinction of persons
and property, has the merit of antiquity, and is collected by a
machinery provided by the Indians themselves. Originally it was levied
in produce, but compounded for by the payment of a dollar (eight
reales), raised afterwards to a dollar and a quarter, and finally the
friars have managed to add to the amount an additional fifty per cent.,
of which four-fifths are for church, and one-fifth for commercial
purposes.
The tribute is now due for every grown-up individual of a family, up
to the age of sixty; the local authorities (cabezas de
barangay), their wives and eldest or an adopted son, excepted. A
cabeza is charged with the collection of the tribute of his cabaceria,
consisting generally of about fifty persons. There are many other
exceptions, such as discharged soldiers and persons claiming exemptions
on particular grounds, to say nothing of the uncertain collections from
Indians not congregated in towns or villages, and the certain
non-collections from the wilder races. Buzeta estimates that only five
per cent. of the whole population pay the tribute. Beyond the
concentrated groups of natives there is little control; nor is the most
extended of existing influences—the ecclesiastical—at all
disposed to aid the revenue collector at the price of public
discontent, especially if the claims of the convent are recognized and
the wants of the church sufficiently provided for, which they seldom
fail to be. The friar frequently stands between
the fiscal authority and the Indian debtor, and, as his great object is
to be popular with his flock, he, when his own expectations are
satisfied, is naturally a feeble supporter of the tax collector. The
friar has a large direct interest in the money tribute, both in the
sanctorum and the tithe; but the Indian has many means of conciliating
the padre and does not fail to employ them, and the padre’s
influence is not only predominant, but it is perpetually present, and
in constant activity. There is a decree of 1835 allowing the Indians to
pay tribute in kind, but at rates so miserably low that I believe there
is now scarcely an instance of other than metallic payments. The
present amount levied is understood to be—
| For the Government |
10 |
rials of plate. |
| For the tithe |
1 |
|
| Community Fund (Caja de
Comunidad) |
1 |
|
| Sanctorum (Church) |
3 |
|
|
15
rials, or 1⅞ dollar. |
Which at 4s. 6d. per dollar makes a capitation tax of
about 8s. 6d. per head.
The Sangleys (mestizos of Chinese origin) pay 20 rials
government tribute, or 25 rials in all, being about 14s.
sterling.
There are some special levies for local objects, but they are not
heavy in amount.
The Chinese have been particularly selected to be the victims of the
tax-gatherer, and, considering the general lightness of taxation, and
that the Chinese had been invited to the Philippines with every
assurance of protection, and as a most important element for
the development of the resources of the country, the decree of 1828
will appear tolerably exacting. It divides Chinese settlers into three
classes:—
| Merchants who are to pay a monthly tax of
10 dollars |
£27 |
0 |
per annum. |
| Shopkeepers who are to pay a monthly tax of 4
dollars |
10 |
16 |
|
| All others who have to pay a monthly
tax of 2 dollars |
5 |
8 |
|
Not consenting to this, and if unmarried, they might quit the
country in six months, or pay the value of their tribute in labour, and
they were, after a delay of three months in the payment of the tax, to
be fineable at 2 rials a day. At the time of issuing the decree there
were 5,708 Chinese in the capital, of whom immediately 800 left for
China, 1,083 fled to the mountains and were kindly received and
protected by the natives, 453 were condemned to the public works, and
the rest left in such a condition of discontent and misery that in 1831
the intendente made a strong representation to the government in their
favour, and in 1834 authority was given to modify the whole fiscal
legislation as regarded the Chinese.
The Chinese, on landing in Manila, whether as sailors or intending
settlers, are compelled to inhabit a public establishment called the
Alcaiceria de San Fernando, for which payment is
exacted, and there is a revenue resulting to the State from the profits
thereof.