The Roman Catholic confessional is one of the most dangerous of ecclesiastical institutions. It puts untold power for harm into the hands of the priest. It is difficult to conceive how a husband or father could be willing for wife or daughter to make secret confession to a priest. The abuses of the confessional make a horrible chapter in human history. Not merely are things wrung out that should not be told, but evil is suggested that would never be thought of. The original form of absolution was “precatory rather than declaratory” (Plummer).

But it is a great good to the soul to open the heart and make a frank confession to the church or to the persons who have been injured. Great sorrow would be avoided if men would only have the manhood to do this thing. Tertullian (On Penance viii) well says, “Confession of sins lightens as much as concealment aggravates them.” Confession of sin was one of the cardinal tenets in the preaching of John the Baptist. The Romanists demanded penance for sins publicly confessed, and private enmity (Plummer) took advantage of it for purposes of revenge.

Then it is a good time to pray “that ye may be healed.” Then the power of God is with men to heal both soul and body. Many a revival has started in a church because those who have been estranged have buried the hatchet and seen eye to eye again. There is power in prayer when the soul is open to God, as can be true only when hate disappears from the heart. “The supplication of a righteous man availeth much in its working,” “the prayers of the righteous have a powerful effect” (Moffatt).

This short sentence is clearer in the Greek than in any of the English renderings. Plummer suggests, “Great is the strength of a righteous man’s supplication, in its earnestness.” The word for “supplication” is more specific than the usual term and suggests a sense of need. But the crucial word is the participle, which may be either middle or passive.[97] Our word “energetic” is derived from the verbal adjective. The notion of energy is present, at any rate. The great word in modern science is this very word “energy,” which is made luminous by electricity and radium. The only prayer worthwhile is one with energy in it, whether inwrought (taking the participle as passive) by the Spirit of God or at work (middle voice) through the spiritual passion of the man’s own soul. Such a prayer has much force in it and is not a mere ceremony or rattle of meaningless words.

The emphasis on “a righteous man” here does not mean that God will not hear the cry of a sinner for mercy but probably that a righteous man is more likely to put the proper energy into his prayer. We may reflect sadly that our prayers often have no power with God because they have no energy when said. There is no power in the dynamo; the engine has gone dead; the steam is not high enough to move the driving wheel. Oesterley quotes aptly the words of Rabbi Ben Zakkai in Berachoth, 34b, when prayers for a sick child are desired: “Although I am greater in learning than Chaninah, he is more efficacious in prayer; I am indeed the Prince, but he is the Steward who has constant access to the King.” They have it because they live close to God. With a great price they have won this high prerogative. Ofttimes they are the humblest of men in earthly station and store. Very mechanical, surely, is the idea of Rabbi Isaac (Jebamoth, 64a), who says: “The prayer of the righteous is comparable to a pitchfork; as the pitchfork changes the position of the wheat so the prayer changes the disposition of God from wrath to mercy.”

James has a typical case to illustrate his point. “Elijah was a man of like passions with us,” “with a nature just like our own” (Moffatt). James emphasizes the human frailties of Elijah to show that he does not refer to ceremonial or sacramental rites when he urges prayer for the sick. Such prayer is the privilege not merely of the elders of the church but of any good man who has the ear of God. That power is not a function of ecclesiastical position but the reward of holy living and trust in God. Elijah had his weaknesses as we all have, but God heard him. The point for us is that if God heard Elijah, he will hear any of us who puts the same amount of spiritual energy into his prayer. “He prayed fervently.” There is no use to pray in any other way. Elijah prayed seven times before the rain came. Halfhearted prayer defeats itself (cf. doubting prayer in 1:6 ff.).

Many modern men have no faith in prayer of any kind save as a wholesome reaction on the mind of the one who prays. They scout the idea that the God of the universe would condescend to listen to the feeble chatter of such worms in the dust as men. They conceive it as impossible that God would alter his will in any particular because of such insignificant requests. Least of all do they admit the possibility that God would change the weather in response to the prayer of one or many individuals. They argue that the laws of the weather are fixed by the laws of nature and that God does not alter his own laws. A very pretty network of impossibilities is fixed up, but all the same, the experience of Christians breaks right through these entanglements.

A real God is greater than his own laws, and his own will is the chief law of his nature. God is not an absentee God; he is our Father and loves for us to tell him our troubles. Certainly God knows how to work his own laws. We do not have to think that Elijah had the matter of drought and rain in his own hands at his beck and call. Far from it. Elijah won by strenuous prayer and perseverance, not by lightly informing God of his wishes. Besides, when rain came in response to the prayer of Elijah, it came out of clouds, as rain always does. God made the clouds gather from the west (the Mediterranean) till the rain came. As the hot winds from the east and the south brought the drought, so the west winds brought rain. Many times in my own experience I have known people to pray for rain, and the rain came. The rain may not have come in response to the prayer; that I do not know. But it came the very night in which prayer was made for it at the prayer meeting. The difficulty in the matter of rain is no greater than in cases of sickness. The root of the trouble is the lack of trust in God, the broken relation with God, the loss of power with him.

Rescue Work or Restoring the Erring (5:19 f.)

James makes a last appeal to his readers, and it has a touch of tenderness—“My brethren.” In verse 5 he spoke of the case of a sick man who is brought to confess his sins and is led to God. Here he seems to refer specifically to the case of a brother who has fallen into error. There are such sad instances that puzzle many a pastor by their indifference, hardness, and even scorn of Christ. “If any among you err from the truth, and one convert him.”

The condition (third class) is put delicately only as a supposed case, not assumed as true and yet probable, alas. “Err” is from the Latin errare (to wander, to go astray). The Greek word here suggests the picture of one who is lost in the mountains, who has missed his path,[98] without passing on the question of his own part in the process. That is now neither here nor there, for he is lost. Our “planet” is this word, from the notion that these luminaries were wandering stars, not fixed like the rest. We now know that none of the stars are fixed, but they all move with great speed.

Whatever the cause, it is not impossible for brethren to go astray “from the truth.” One way to treat them is to kick them out of the way, down the hill. Another way is to go after them with hammer and tongs to beat them back into the path. Another course is to give them up in disgust and to wash our hands of all responsibility. It must be confessed that often it is very hard to do anything else, since brethren act with so much independence and resent any effort to show them a better way. When they start away, often they go the whole way. But there is a more excellent way—the way of love. See 1 Corinthians 13 and Galatians 6:1 ff.

We are our brothers’ keepers in spite of all they say and all that we may feel. You that are spiritual have a call to mind the broken lives all about you. There is no nobler work than this rescue work, to turn a sinner “from the error of his way.” It is so hard to get a man back on the right track. He, like all lost men, wanders round and round in his old tracks of sin and error. He is the victim of his own logical fallacies and sinful delusions. Though a giant, he is bound by the cords of the Lilliputians, the bonds of habit which he does not break.

It is enough to discourage any social worker in the slums or in the tenement districts of our cities to see the hopeless conditions in which the victims live. Drugs have fastened some with clamps of steel; drink has fired the blood of others; cigarettes have deadened the will of others; and immorality has hurled still others into the pit. They stumble into the rescue halls, “cities of refuge” in our cities. Happy are those who know how to save souls like these who have known better days and who have gone down into the valley of sin and sorrow. But it is worthwhile to save souls like these for whom Jesus died. Let the rescue worker know (by personal experience, in truth) that he “shall save a soul from death,” from a living death in which such a soul already finds itself and from eternal death as well. That is the reward of the winner of souls.

But it is not alone those who go down into the depths of gross sin, the “pick-me-ups” of life, that are to be won back. There are many who live in accord with the outward ethical standards of life who turn away from the knowledge of Jesus, who go after the strange gods of gold, of so-called knowledge, of materialistic monism, of “new thought,” of Christian Science, of Russellism, of any new fad in science or philosophy or religion, of any new form of old wives’ fables that lead men astray. These are, in reality, more difficult to win back to the truth as it is in Jesus, for they have the pride of knowledge and look with compassionate condescension on those who still worship Jesus as God and Saviour from sin.

The worker for souls has one more joy. He learns to see the good side of human nature. The bad side is there beyond a shadow of doubt. No man knows that better than the worker for the redemption of human souls. But this fact does not make him a pessimist or a cynic. He sees the angel in the stone. He learns the love that “shall cover a multitude of sins,” “hides a host of sins” (Moffatt), that covers with a veil the sins of the poor soul who wandered away and is now brought back. See 1 Peter 4:8 for the same idea.

This is not the Jewish doctrine of merit in good works balancing evil ones, as Oesterley holds. Mayor also thinks that the man who rescues another saves his own soul. But this interpretation seems out of harmony with the teaching of Jesus and the whole trend of the gospel message. We do not need to go back to these “blind guides” of Pharisaism to find the key to this verse and that in 1 Peter 4:8, where we read that “love covers a multitude of sins.” It is the love that no longer sees the sins of the saved sinner. We see the true idea in Proverbs 10:12: “Hatred stirreth up strifes, but love covereth all transgressions.” See also Psalm 85:2: “Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy people; thou hast covered all their sin.” In Luke 7:47 Jesus speaks of the love of the converted woman as proof that she has been forgiven much.

James presents the joy of the winner of souls who throws the mantle of love over the sins of the repentant sinner, the joy of the Shepherd who has found the lost sheep out on the mountain and is returning with him in his arms, the joy of the Father who welcomes the prodigal boy home with the best robe and the fatted calf, the joy in the presence of the angels that one sinner has repented and turned unto God. That is heaven on earth. The preacher who has missed this joy of winning souls has missed the greatest reward in his ministry. If he has this, he can do without much else. He can stand many rebuffs, small salary, lack of help, if only there is this meat to eat that satisfied the soul of Jesus when he led one poor abandoned woman into the light and life of God.

Select Bibliography

Dibelius, M., and Greeven, H. “Der Brief des Jakobus,” Meyer Kommentar. 1956.
Easton, B. S., and Poteat, G. “James,” The Interpreter’s Bible. 1957.
Hauck, F. “Die Kirchenbriefe.” N. T. Deutsch. 1949.
Hort, F. J. A. The Epistle of St. James 1:1 to 4:7. 1909.
Knowling, R. J. “Commentary on the Epistle of St. James,” The Westminster Series. 1904.
Lenski, R. C. H. The Interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews and of the Epistle of James. 1946.
Marty, J. L’epitre de Jacques. 1935.
Mayor, J. B. The Epistle of St. James. 1910.
Moffatt, J. The General Epistles. 1928.
Oesterley, W. “The General Epistle of James,” Expositor’s Greek Testament. 1910.
Patrick, W. James, the Lord’s Brother. 1906.
Plummer, A. “The General Epistle of St. James,” Expositor’s Bible. 1891.
Ropes, J. H. “A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of St. James,” The International Critical Commentary. 1916.
Ross, A. “James and the Johannine Epistles,” New International Commentary. 1954.
Schlatter, A. Der Brief des Jakobus. 1932.
Tasker, R. V. G. “The General Epistle of James,” Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. 1957.
Windisch, H., and Preisker, H. “Die Katholischen Briefe,” Handbuch zum N. T. 1951.

Footnotes

[1]Our “James” comes through the Italian “Giacomo.” The name is common enough in the first century A.D.
[2]For careful discussion of the authenticity of the epistle, see J. B. Mayor, The Epistle of St. James (New York: Macmillan and Co., 1910), pp. xlvii-lxvii; Alfred Plummer, “The General Epistles of St. James and St. Jude,” The Expositor’s Bible, ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (New York: Hodder & Stroughton, 1891), pp. 13-24.
[3]See Mayor, ibid., p. iv.
[4]Barnabas is also called an apostle in Acts 14:4, 14.
[5]William Patrick, James, the Lord’s Brother (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1906), p. 23.
[6]Ibid., p. 25.
[7]G. A. Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, trans. L. R. M. Strachan (New York: Macmillan and Co., 1913), p. 242.
[8]George Milligan, New Testament Documents, Their Origin and Early History (New York: George H. Doran Co., 1910), p. 111.
[9]Mayor, op. cit., pp. ccv-ccxiii.
[10]Milligan, loc. cit.
[11]Mayor, op. cit., p. cxcii.
[12]A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (New York: George H. Doran Co., 1915), p. 123.
[13]Charles Taylor, Saying of the Jewish Fathers (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1898), Appendix 97.
[14]Patrick, op. cit., p. 46.
[15]The tense expresses a long-standing attitude.
[16]Patrick, op. cit., p. 60.
[17]The same verb occurs here as in the other appearances of Jesus.
[18]J. A. Broadus (comp.), Harmony of the Gospels (New York: A. C. Armstrong & Son, 1893), p. 229.
[19]Patrick, op. cit., p. 67.
[20]R. W. Dale, The Epistle of James and Other Discourses (New York: Hodder & Stroughton, 1895), p. 5.
[21]Op. cit., p. xxxvii.
[22]James Orr, The Resurrection of Jesus (New York: George H. Doran Co., 1908); Thorburn, The Resurrection Narratives and Modern Criticism.
[23]Patrick, op. cit., p. 78.
[24]St. Paul, i., p. 233.
[25]See his commentary on James and his article on the epistle in James Hastings, A Dictionary of the Bible (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1899), II, 540-48.
[26]Plummer, op. cit., pp. 61 f.; Patrick, op. cit., chap. V.
[27]Cf. Maurice Jones, The New Testament in the Twentieth Century (New York: Macmillan and Co., 1914), p. 321.
[28]For a fuller presentation of the matter from the standpoint of Paul, see my Epochs in the Life of Paul (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1914), chapter VII. I identify the visit to Jerusalem in Galatians 2:1-10 and Acts 15, in spite of the arguments of Sir W. M. Ramsay to the contrary.
[29]Cf. J. B. Lightfoot, Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians (New York: Macmillan and Co., 1913).
[30]A hint that they had not always seen it this way.
[31]Op. cit., p. 188.
[32]Ibid., p. 191.
[33]F. J. A. Hort, Judaistic Christianity (New York: Macmillan and Co., n.d.), p. 81.
[34]Ibid., p. 106.
[35]This “informing” was done by the Judaizers, who dinned it into the ears of the people.
[36]Hypotyp. vii. apud Eusebius H. E., II. l. 3.
[37]Also preserved in Eusebius H. E., II. xxiii. 4-18.
[38]Ant. xx. ix. 1. It is interesting to note that Prof. F. C. Burkitt, of Cambridge University, has boldly championed the genuineness of Josephus’ testimony to Jesus.
[39]The Expositor, VII. iv. p. 45 ff.
[40]Op. cit., p. 112.
[41]A New Translation of the New Testament. Besides, in 3:9 James speaks of “the Lord and Father” (God).
[42]Plummer, op. cit., p. 47.
[43]Einl. i. 5, 6.
[44]Plummer, op. cit., p. 46.
[45]Op. cit., p. 316.
[46]Op. cit., p. 298.
[47]W. E. Oesterley, “The General Epistle of James,” The Expositor’s Greek Testament, ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, n.d.), IV, 63.
[48]Plummer, op. cit., p. 63.
[49]Lectures on the Epistle of James, p. 73.
[50]See Plummer, op. cit., pp. 72 f., for proof.
[51]The late J. Pierpont Morgan testified before a committee of the U. S. Senate that he loaned money primarily on character, not financial ability.
[52]Op. cit., p. 88.
[53]There is the utmost contrast between this use of “humble” and that in Epictetus, with whom humility is an object of scorn and contempt, a meanness unworthy of man. See bk. III, chap., ii, § 14. Cf. Sharp, Epictetus and the New Testament, pp. 130, 133.
[54]Cf. Deissmann, op. cit., p. 392; St. Paul: A Study in Social and Religious History, trans. by Lionel R. M. Strachan (New York: George H. Doran Co., 1912), p. 47.
[55]Acta Philippi, Apocal. Apocr. Cf. Resch, Agrapha, 1889, p. 254.
[56]Cf. Mayor, op. cit., p. 54 f. The devil tried to tempt even Christ, the Son of God.
[57]Bengel puts it thus: Peccatum morte gravidum nascitur. The Targum of Jonathan says that imagination of sin is sinful.
[58]“Wages” means literally the rations of a soldier. The pay of sin is death, and it is always paid.
[59]“Good” is here used in the sense of absolute, not relative goodness.
[60]But see Robertson, Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, op. cit., p. 1200.
[61]Bengel says: voluntate amantissima, liberrima, purissima, foecundissima.
[62]The inscriptions (Ditt., Syll., 587268) use the word for the first fruits to Demeter and Kore, but James Hope Moulton and George Milligan, Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (New York: George H. Doran Co., 1915), p. 54, give many examples from the papyri and the inscriptions where “gift” or “sacrifice” seems sufficient.
[63]J. Rendel Harris, “The Elements of a Progressive Church,” Present Day Papers, May, 1901.
[64]Taylor, op. cit., p. 63.
[65]The Hebrew (Psalm 82:2) originally had the idea of lifting the face with a view to comfort. Partiality was a subordinate development. Cf. H. St. John Thackeray, Grammar of the Old Testament Greek According to the Septuagint (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1909), pp. 43 ff. The Greek idiom has only the bad meaning and comes from taking off the mask. See Luke 20:21; Gal. 2:3 f. for the full idiom.
[66]Deissmann, St. Paul: A Study in Social and Religious History, loc. cit., p. 47.
[67]Ibid.
[68]The Gospel of Jesus and the Problems of Democracy (New York: Macmillan and Co., 1914), p. 46.
[69]Codex D adds to Luke 6:4: “On the same day seeing a certain man working on the Sabbath, he said to him, ‘Man, if you know what you are doing you are blessed; if you do not know you are accursed and a transgressor of the law.’” But this logion does not compare sabbath-breaking with other sins, though it does emphasize insight into the motive of the act.
[70]Maim. on Mishnah, Sanhedrin xi. 1.
[71]The article here has almost the original demonstrative force. James means the kind of faith that rests on mere assertion without works to prove it.
[72]One may compare Paul’s habit of answering an imaginary objector in the development of his argument. See Romans 2:1; 9:20.
[73]Aorist tense and so punctiliar—know once for all—with almost a touch of impatience in the tense.
[74]See Lightfoot, loc. cit.
[75]In Hermas (Sim. 9:22) we read of teachers who “wish to be self-appointed teachers, fools though they are.”
[76]Cf. Hermas, Mand. 12. 1.
[77]Cf., however, John 3:8 and 1 Peter 3:17.
[78]The Midr. Rabb. on Levit. (xiv. 2) xvi has quanta incendia lingua excitat (Mayor).
[79]Cf. Jude 23. Cf. also James 1:27 and 2 Peter 2:13. One thinks of the smoke and soot of slander, besmirching all that it touches.
[80]Seneca (Ep. XIII. 2. 25) says: Non nascitur itaque ex malo bonun, non magis quam ficus ex olea.
[81]Cf. Jude 19. See also 1 Cor. 15:45 for a distinction between these words.
[82]The verb means to distinguish, but the resultant idea is extremely variable.
[83]The Vulgate has sine simulatione. The Greek word is used of the actor’s mask and then for mere imitation, hypocrisy.
[84]See both terms also in 4 Macc. 5:23. See also Philo, M. 1, p. 445.
[85]Cf. Swete, Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek, ed. H. St. John Thackeray (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1900), p. 567.
[86]See Robertson, Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, op. cit., p. 805. In prayer one must seek with passion. Since the middle voice denotes more earnestness, it is quite frequent in the papyri.
[87]The cosmos was originally “order.” The order and beauty of God’s world are attractive to the right-minded man (Rom. 1:20). It is applied to the people of the earth (John 1:29) and then to the believers who are alienated from God (John 8:23; 12:31), to this world which the devil rules (John 14:30; 1 John 5:19), whose spirit is hostile to that of Christ (1 Cor. 2:12), against which James has already (1:25) warned his readers.
[88]Moulton and Milligan, op. cit., p. 2.
[89]Westcott and Hort read in the margin, “the things of the to-morrow day.”
[90]At harvest time there is always special demand for laborers at higher wages than usual, to save the ripe grain before it perishes.
[91]Note Heb. 4:1. The word occurs in the papyri for “a bath insufficiently warmed.”
[92]Eusebius, H. E. ii. 23 (taken from Hegesippus).
[93]Deissmann, Bible Studies: Contributions Chiefly from Papyri and Inscriptions (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1901), p. 198.
[94]Plummer notes that the Epistle of James shows more coincidences with the words of Jesus than all of Paul’s epistles and that all of them deal with the morality of the gospel, with conduct and life. This is all as the circumstances would lead us to expect.
[95]The use of the present imperative in prohibition rather than the aorist subjunctive implies that the thing was being done. That is probably true, for church members have been known to be guilty of this sin. However, it is possible for this tense to prohibit the habit rather than the single act. “Keep on not swearing.” See Robertson, Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, op. cit., pp. 851-54.
[96]Deissmann, Bible Studies: Contributions Chiefly from Papyri and Inscriptions, op. cit., pp. 154 f., 233 f.
[97]See extensive discussion in Mayor. The New Testament usage favors the middle, but the passive is also in use, and either makes good sense.
[98]The passive voice does not have its technical force here as in Rev. 18:23 but rather is more like the middle in sense as in Deut. 22:1 and probably (Mayor) in Luke 21:8; 2 Peter 2:15. The passive is constantly making inroads on the middle in Koine Greek.

Transcriber’s Notes