Fig. 21.—Embryo of Aphis. Copied from Mecznikow, Zeits. f. wiss. Zool.,
Bd. XVI., taf. xxx., fig. 30. References in text. × 220.
Though the jaws of the Cockroach are eminently primitive
with respect to those of most other Insects, they are themselves
derived from a far simpler arrangement, which is demonstrable
in all embryonic Insects. Fig. 21 shows an Aphis within the
egg. The rudiments of the antennæ (At), mandibles (Mn), and
maxillæ (Mx1, Mx2) form simple blunt projections, similar to
each other and to the future thoracic legs (L1, L2, L3). We
see, therefore, that all the appendages of an Insect are similar
in an early stage of growth; and we may add that a Centipede,
a Scorpion, or a Spider would present very nearly the same
appearance in the same stage. A Crustacean in the egg would
not resemble an Insect or its own parent so closely.57 Aquatic
life favours metamorphosis, and most Crustacea do not begin
life with their full quota of legs, but acquire them as they are
wanted.
Fig. 22.—Head of larva of Goat Moth, seen from behind.
Copied from Lyonnet.
Paired appendages of perfectly simple form are therefore the
first stage through which all Insect-jaws must pass. Our second
stage is a little more complex, and not nearly so universal as the
first. A caterpillar (fig. 22) has its own special wants, and these
are met by the unequal development of its jaws. The mandibles
are already as complete as those of the Cockroach, which they
closely resemble, but the maxillæ are stunted cylinders formed
mainly of simple rings, and very like the antennæ. They show,
however, the beginnings of three processes (palp, galea, and
lacinia), which are usually conspicuous in well-developed maxillæ.
The second pair of maxillæ (Lm) are coalesced, as usual, and
form the spinneret. The mouth-parts of the Caterpillar do not
therefore in all respects represent a universal stage of development,
but show important adaptive modifications. The mandibles
are rapidly pushed forward, and attain their full
development in the larva; the first pair of maxillæ are temporarily
arrested in their growth, and persist for a long time in a
condition which Orthopterous embryos quickly pass through;
the maxillæ of the second pair are not only arrested in their
growth, but converted to a special use, which seems to stop all
further progress. The labial palps, indeed, which are not at all
developed in the caterpillar, survive, and become important
parts in the moth; but the greater part of the labium disappears
when the time for spinning the cocoon is over.
Fig. 23.—Mouth-parts of Honey Bee.
Fig. 23A.—Diagram of Mouth-parts of Honey Bee.
We come next to the Orthopterous mouth, which is well
illustrated by the Cockroach. This is retained with little modification
in all the biting Insects (Coleoptera and Neuroptera).
The mandibles may become long and pointed, as in Staphylinus
and other predatory forms; in some larvæ of strong carnivorous
propensities (Ant-lion, Dytiscus,58 Chrysopa) they are perforate at
the tip, and through them the juices of the prey are sucked into
the mouth, which has no other opening. The labium undergoes
marked adaptive change, without great deviation from the common
plan, in the “mask” of the larva of the Dragon-fly. This
well-known implement has a rough likeness, in the arrangement
and use of its parts, to a man’s fore-limb. The submentum
forms the arm, the mentum the fore-arm. Both these are
simple, straight pieces, connected by an elbow-joint. The hand
is wider, and carries a pair of opposable claws, the paraglossæ.
In some Coleoptera the labium is reduced to a stiff spine, while
in the Stag-beetle it is flexible and hairy, and foreshadows the
licking tongue of the Bee. The maxillæ become long and hairy
in flower-haunting Beetles, and even the mandibles are flexible
and hairy in the Scarabæus-beetles. Fritz Müller has found a
singular resemblance to the proboscis of a Moth in a species of
Nemognatha, where the maxillæ are transformed into two sharp
grooved bristles 12 mm. long, which, when opposed, form a
tube, but are incapable of rolling up.59
In the Honey Bee (fig. 23) nearly all the mouth-parts of the
Cockroach are to be made out, though some are small and others
extremely produced in length. The mandibles (Mn) are not
much altered, and are still used for biting, as well as for kneading
wax and other domestic work. The mandibular teeth have
proved inconvenient, and are gone. The lacinia of the maxilla
(Mx′) forms a broad and flexible blade, used for piercing succulent
tissues, but the galea has disappeared, and there is only a
vestige of the maxillary palp (Mxp). In the second pair of
maxillæ the palp (Lp) is prominent; its base forms a blade,
while the tip is still useful as an organ of touch. The paraglossæ
(Pa) can be made out, but the laciniæ are fused to form
the long, hairy tongue. This ends in a spoon-shaped lobe (not
unlike the “finger” of an elephant’s trunk), which is used both
for licking and for sucking honey.
The proboscis of the Bee is therefore more like a case of
instruments than a single organ. The mandibles form a strong
pair of blunt scissors. The maxillæ are used for piercing, for
stiffening and protecting the base of the tongue, and when
closed they form an imperfect tube outside the tongue, which,
according to Hermann Müller, is probably suctorial. The labial
palps are protective and sensory. Lastly, the central part, or
tongue, is a split tube used for suction; it is very long, so as to
penetrate deep flower-cups, and hairy, so that pollen may stick
to it. When the proboscis is not in use it can be slid into the
mentum (M), while it and the mentum together can be drawn
out of the way downwards and backwards.60
Fig. 24.—Mouth-parts of Burnet Moth.
Fig. 24A.—Diagram of Mouth-parts
of Moth.
In the singular suctorial mouth of Moths and Butterflies we
observe, first of all, the great development of the maxillæ.
Each forms a half-tube, which can be accurately applied to its
fellow, so as to form an efficient siphon. In many species the
two halves can be held together by a multitude of minute
hooks.61 At the base of each maxilla is a rudimentary palp
(Mxp). The mandibles (Mn) are also rudimentary and perfectly
useless. The labium, which was so important to the larva as a
spinneret, has disappeared almost completely, but the labial
palps (Lp) are large and evidently important.
Fig. 25.—Mouth-parts of Gad-fly
(Tabanus).
Fig. 25A.—Diagram of Mouth-parts
of Gad-fly.
In Diptera both piercing and sucking parts are usually
present. The Gad-fly (fig. 25) is typical. Here we recognise
the labrum (Lbr), mandible (Mn), and maxilla (Mx′) of the
Cockroach transformed into stylets. The maxillary palp (Mxp)
is still sensory. A pointed process, stiffened by chitinous ribs,
is developed from the back of the labrum. This is the
epipharynx (Ep), a process undeveloped in the Cockroach,
though conspicuous in some Coleoptera. All these parts are
overtopped by the suctorial labium (Lm), which has a two-lobed
expansion at the end. In the more specialised Diptera
this becomes a kind of cupping-glass. The Gad-fly is intermediate
between the Gnat, in which all the mouth-parts are
converted into piercing organs of extraordinary length and
sharpness, and such flies as the House-fly and Blow-fly, where
the sucking labium forms an organ of the most elaborate kind,
the piercing organs undergoing a marked reduction. Except
where the labium is short, it is doubly or trebly hinged, so that
it can be readily tucked away under the chin.
In Hemiptera the long four-jointed labium (Lm) forms a
sheath for the stylets. When not in use the whole apparatus
is drawn up beneath the head and prothorax. The mandibles
(Mn) are sharp at the tip, and close like a pair of forceps, enclosing
the maxillæ (Mx). These are of unequal length, only
one reaching the end of the mandibular case. Both have saw
teeth on the free edge. Palps are entirely wanting.
Fig. 26.—Mouth-parts of Bug. Copied from
Landois, Zeits. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. XVIII.,
taf. xi., fig. 3.
Fig. 26A.—Diagram of Mouth-parts
of Bug.
Comparing the four kinds of suctorial mouths, of which the
Bee, the Moth, the Fly, and the Bug furnish examples, we
observe that the sucking-tube is formed in the Moth out of the
two maxillæ, in the other three out of the labium. Of these
last the Bee has the edges of the labium turned down, so that
the siphon becomes ventral; in the Bug and Fly the edges
are turned up, and the siphon becomes dorsal. The more
specialised flies have the simple arrangement of the Bug complicated
by a system of branching tubes, which are probably a
special modification of the salivary duct. Similar as the
mouth-parts of the four types may be in regard to their mode
of working, they cannot be reduced to any common plan which
differs materially from that presented by the jaws of the
Cockroach.
Composition of Head.
In all Insects fusion of the primitive elements of the head
begins so early and is carried so far, that it is extremely difficult
to discover the precise way in which they are fitted together.
The following facts have been ascertained respecting the development
of the parts in question. At a very early stage of
embryonic life the body of the Insect becomes divided into a
series of segments, which are at fewest fourteen (in some
Diptera), while they are not known to exceed seventeen.62 Each
segment is normally provided with a pair of appendages. The
foremost segment soon enlarges beyond the rest, and becomes
divided by a median groove into two “procephalic lobes.”63 Of
the appendages the first eight pairs are usually more prominent
than the rest, and of different form; those of the eighth
segment, which may be altogether inconspicuous, never attain
any functional importance. The first four pairs of appendages
are budded off from the future head, while the next three pairs
form the walking legs, and are carried upon the thoracic segments.
All the existing appendages of the fore part of the body are
thus accounted for, but the exact mode of formation of the head
has not yet been made out. The chief part of its walls, including
the clypeus, the compound eyes, and the epicranial plates,
arise from the procephalic lobes, and represent the much altered
segment of which the antennæ are the appendages. The labrum
is a secondary outgrowth from this segment, and, in some cases
at least, it originates as a pair of processes which resemble true
appendages, though it is unlikely that such is their real
character. No means at present exist for identifying the terga
and sterna of the head, nor have the gena, the occipital frame,
and the cervical sclerites (described below) been assigned to
their segments.64 It is worthy of notice that in the stalk-eyed
Crustacea, the head, or what corresponds to the head of Insecta,
consists of either five or six somites, taking into account a
diversity of opinion with respect to the eyestalks, while only
four pairs of appendages can be certainly traced in the head of
the Insect. The mandibles and maxillæ exist to the same
number in both groups, and are homologous organs, so far as is
known; the numerical difference relates therefore to the antennæ,
of which the Crustacean possesses two pairs, the Insect only
one. Whether the pair deficient in the Insect is altogether
undeveloped, or represented by the pair of prominences which
give rise to the labrum,65 is a question of much theoretical
interest and of not a little difficulty.
The following table shows the appendages of the head and
thorax in the two classes. The homologies indicated are, however,
by no means established.66
| Crayfish. | Cockroach. |
| Antennæ. |
| —— | —— |
| Eyestalks. |
| Antennules. |
| Antennæ. |
| Mandibles. | Mandibles. |
| Maxillæ (1). | Maxillæ (1). |
| Maxillæ (2). | Maxillæ (2). |
| —— | —— |
| Maxillipeds (1). | Thoracic Legs (1). |
| Maxillipeds (2). | Thoracic Legs (2). |
| Maxillipeds (3). | Thoracic Legs (3). |
Neck.
The neck is a narrow cylindrical tube, with a flexible wall
strengthened by eight plates, the cervical sclerites, two of which
are dorsal, two ventral, and four lateral. The dorsal sclerites
lie immediately behind the head (fig. 14); they are triangular,
and closely approximated to the middle line. The inferior
plates (fig. 27) resemble segments of chitinous hoops set transversely,
one behind the other, rather behind the dorsal sclerites,
and close behind the submentum. There are two lateral
sclerites on each side of the neck (fig. 27), a lower squarish
one, which is set diagonally, nearly meeting its fellow across
the ventral surface, and an oblong piece, closely adherent to
the other, which extends forwards and upwards towards the
dorsal side.
Thorax.
Fig. 27.—Ventral Plates of Neck and Thorax of Male Cockroach.
I, prosternum; II, mesosternum; III, metasternum. × 6.
The elements of the thoracic exoskeleton are simpler in the
Cockroach than in Insects of powerful flight, where adaptive
changes greatly obscure the primitive arrangement. There are
three segments, each defended by a dorsal plate (tergum) and a
ventral plate (sternum). The sterna are often divided into
lateral halves. Of the three terga the first (pronotum) is the
largest; it has a wide free edge on each side, projects forwards
over the neck, and when the head is retracted, covers this also,
its semi-circular fore-edge then forming the apparent head-end
of the animal. The two succeeding terga are of nearly equal
size, and each is much shorter than the pronotum, contrary to
the rule in winged Insects.67
All the terga are dense and opaque in the female; in the
male the middle one (mesonotum) and the hindmost (metanotum)
are thin and semi-transparent, being ordinarily overlaid
by the wing-covers. While the thoracic terga diminish backwards,
the sterna increase in extent and firmness, proportionally
to the size of the attached legs. The prosternum is small and
coffin-shaped; the mesosternum partly divided into lateral
halves in the male, and completely so in the female. The
metasternum is completely divided in both sexes, while a
median piece, carrying the post-furca, intervenes between its
lateral halves in the male. Behind the sterna, especially in the
case of the second and third, the flexible under-surface of the
thorax is inclined, so as to form a nearly vertical step. In the
two hinder of these steps a chitinous prop is fixed; each is
Y-shaped, with long, curved arms for muscular attachment, and
a central notch, which supports the nerve-cord. The hindmost
of these, known as the post-furca, lies immediately behind
the metasternum, and its short basal piece is attached between
the lateral halves of that plate. Behind the mesosternum is a
somewhat slighter prop, the medi-furca. A third piece of similar
nature (the ante-furca), which is well developed in some Insects—e.g.,
in Ants—is apparently wanting in the Cockroach, though
there is a transverse oval plate behind the prosternum, which
may be a rudimentary furca.
Fig. 27 shows two conical processes which lie in the middle
line of the ventral surface of the thorax, one in front of the
metasternum, the other in front of the mesosternum. These
are the thoracic pits, tubular apodemata, serving for the
insertion of muscles. The occurrence of stink-glands in
the thorax of Hemiptera,68 and of so-called poison-glands
in the thorax of Solpuga, led us to look for glands in
connection with these processes, but we have found none.
Thoracic Appendages. Legs; Wings.
Fig. 28.—The three Thoracic Legs of a Female Cockroach. I, s, sternum; cx, coxa;
tr, trochanter; fe, femur; tb, tibia; ta, tarsus. In IIIA the coxa is
abducted, and the joints a (episternum) and b slightly separated. × 4.
Three pairs of legs are attached to the thoracic segments;
they regularly increase in size from the first to the third, but
hardly differ except in size; the peculiar modifications which
affect the fore pair in predatory and burrowing Orthoptera
(Mantis, Gryllotalpa), and the third pair in leaping Orthoptera
(Grasshoppers, &c.), being absent in the cursorial Blattina. Each
leg is divided into the five segments usual in Insects (see fig. 28).
The coxa is broad and flattened. The trochanter is a small piece
obliquely and almost immovably attached to the proximal end
of the femur, on its inner side. The femur is nearly straight
and narrowed at both ends; along its inner border, in the
position occupied by the stridulating apparatus of the hind leg
of the Grasshoppers, is a shallow longitudinal groove, fringed
by stiff bristles. The tibia is shorter than the femur in the fore
leg, of nearly the same length in the middle leg, and longer in
the hind leg; it is armed with numerous stiff spines directed
towards the free end of the limb. There are usually reckoned
five joints in the tarsus, which regularly diminish in length,
except that the last joint is as long as the second. All the
joints bear numerous fine but stiff hairs upon the walking
surface. The extremity of the fifth joint is segmented off, and
carries a pair of equal and strongly curved claws.69
At the base of each leg are several chitinous plates (fig. 28),
upon which no small labour has been bestowed by different
anatomists. They are arranged so as to form two joints intermediate
between the coxa and the sternum, and these two joints
admit of a hinge-like movement upon each other, while their
other ends are firmly attached to the coxa and sternum respectively.
(Compare III and IIIA, fig. 28.) These parts in the
Cockroach may be taken for two basal leg-joints which have
become adherent to the thorax. In other cases, however, they
plainly belong to the thorax, and not to the leg. In the Mole-cricket,
for instance, similar plates occur; but here they are
firmly united, and form the lateral wall of the thorax. In the
Locust they become vertical, and lie one in front of the other.
Most authors have looked upon them as regular elements of a
typical somite. They regard such a segment as including two
pleural elements—viz., a dorsal plate (epimeron), and a ventral
plate (episternum). We have already (p. 34) given reasons for
doubting the constancy of the pieces so named. It is not
inconvenient, however, to denote by the term episternum the
joint which abuts upon the sternum; for the joint which is
applied to the coxa no convenient term exists, and its occurrence
in Insects is so partial, that the want need not be supplied at
present.70 Both joints are incompletely subdivided. In the first
thoracic segment of the Cockroach they are less firmly connected
than in the other two.
Fig. 29.—Wings and Wing-covers of Male Cockroach. × 4.
Cockroaches of both sexes are provided with wings, which,
however, are only functional in the male. The wing-covers (or
anterior pair of wings) of the male are carried by the second
thoracic segment. As in most Orthoptera genuina, they are
denser than the hind wings, and protect them when at rest.
They reach to the fifth segment of the abdomen, and one
wing-cover overlaps the other. Branching veins or nervures
form a characteristic pattern upon the surface (figs. 4, 29), and
it is mainly by means of this pattern that many of the fossil
species are identified and distinguished. The true or posterior
wings are attached to the metathorax. They are membranous
and flexible, but the fore-edge is stiffened, like that of the wing-covers,
by additional chitinous deposit. When extended, each
wing forms an irregular quadrant of a circle; when at rest, the
radiating furrows of the hinder part close up fan-wise, and the
inner half is folded beneath the outer.71 The wing reaches back
as far as the hinder end of the fourth abdominal segment. The
wing-covers of the female are small, and though movable, seem
never to be voluntarily extended; each covers about one-third
of the width of the mesonotum, and extends backwards to the
middle of the metanotum. A reticulated pattern on the outer
fourth of the metanotum plainly represents the hind wing; it
is clearly rather a degeneration or survival than an anticipation
of an organ tending towards useful completeness.
The rudimentary wing of the female Cockroach illustrates
the homology of the wings of Insects with the free edges of
thoracic terga, and this correspondence is enforced by the study
of the development of the more complete wings and wing-covers
of the male. The hinder edges of the terga become produced
at the later moults preceding the completely winged stage, and
may even assume something of the shape and pattern of true
wings; it is not, however, true, though more than once stated,
that winged nymphs are common. Adults with imperfectly
developed wings have been mistaken for such.
Origin of Insect Wings.
The structure of the wing testifies to its origin as a fold of
the chitinous integument. It is a double lamina, which often
encloses a visible space at its base. The nervures, with their
vessels and tracheal tubes, lie between the two layers, which,
except at the base, are in close contact. Oken termed the wings
of an Insect “aerial gills,” and this rather fanciful designation
is in some degree justified by their resemblance to the tracheal
gills of such aquatic larvæ as those of Ephemeridæ, Perlidæ,
Phryganidæ, &c. In the larva of Chloeon (Ephemera) dipterum
(fig. 30), for example, the second thoracic segment carries a pair
of large expansions, which ultimately are replaced by organs
of aerial flight. The abdominal segments carry similarly
placed respiratory leaflets, the tracheal gills, which by their
vigorous flapping movements bring a rush of water against
their membranous and tracheated surfaces.
Gegenbaur72 has argued from the resemblance of these
appendages to wings, that the wing and the tracheal leaflet are
homologous parts, and this view has been accepted as probable
by so competent an observer as Sir John Lubbock.73
The leaflets placed most advantageously for propulsion seem
to have become exclusively adapted to that end, while the
abdominal gills have retained their respiratory character. At
the time of change from aquatic to terrestrial life, which takes
place in many common Insects when the adult condition is
assumed, and which, according to Gegenbaur, was a normal
event among primitive Insects, the tracheal gill is supposed to
disappear, and in its place, at the next moult, an opening, the
stigma, is formed by the rupture of an air-tube. Gegenbaur
supposes that the primitive Insects were aquatic, and their
tracheal system closed. The tracheal gill he takes to be the
common structure which has yielded organs so unlike as the
wing and the stigma.
Fig. 30. Chloeon (Chloeopsis) dipterum. Larva in eighth stage, with wings
and respiratory leaflets. × 14. Copied from Vayssière (loc. cit.).
Fig. 31.—Tricorythus. Adult larva, with three functional leaflets. The next
leaflet in front is converted into a protective plate. × 7.
A, protective plate of Tricorythus larva, seen from the outside. × 26.
B, the same from within, showing the attached respiratory appendage.
C, protective plate of Cœnis larva, without respiratory appendage.
All the figures are copied from Vayssière.
The zoological rank of the Insects (Ephemeridæ, Perlidæ,
and Libellulidæ), in which tracheal gills are most usual, is not
unfavourable to such an explanation. Lubbock has given
reasons for regarding Campodea and the Collembola (of the
order Thysanura) as surviving and not very much altered
representatives of the most primitive Insects, and he has shown
that no great amount of modification would be required to
convert the terrestrial Campodea into the aquatic Chloeon-nymph.74
We must not forget, however, that tracheal gills
are by no means restricted to these families of low grade.
Trichoptera, a few Diptera, two Lepidoptera (Nymphula and
Acentropus), and two Coleoptera (Gyrinus and Elmis),75 have
tracheal gills, and a closed tracheal system in the larval condition.
We cannot suppose that these larvæ of higher orders
represent an unbroken succession of aquatic forms, but if we
refuse to adopt this alternative, we must admit that the closed
tracheal system with tracheal gills may be an adaptive modification
of the open system with stigmata.
It is well known76 that in certain Ephemeridæ (e.g., Tricorythus
and Cœnis) a pair of anterior tracheal gills may become transformed
into large plates, which partly protect the gills behind
(fig. 31). A similar modification of the second and third
thoracic gills in Prosopistoma and Bætisca brings all the
functional respiratory organs under cover, and these enlarged
plates resemble stiff and simple wings very closely.
Palmén77 has subjected Gegenbaur’s hypothesis to a very
searching examination. He observes that:—
1. In Campodea, and presumably in other primitive Insects,
the tracheal system is not closed and adapted for aquatic
respiration, but open. Tracheal gills are not by any means
confined to the lowest Insects. (See above, p. 65.)
2. Tracheal gills are not always homodynamous or morphologically
equivalent. In Ephemeridæ, some are dorsal in
position, some ventral (first abdominal pair in Oligoneuria and
Rhithrogena); they may be cephalic, springing from the base of
the maxilla, as in Oligoneuria and Jolia; Jolia has a branchial
tuft at the insertion of each of the fore legs.78 In Perlidæ the
tracheal gills may have a tergal, pleural, sternal, or anal
insertion. In some Libellulidæ also, anal leaflets occur.79
3. Tracheal gills never perfectly agree in position and
number with the stigmata throughout the body. Sometimes
they occur on different rings, sometimes on different parts of
the same ring. Gegenbaur’s statements on this point are
incorrect.
4. Tracheal gills may co-exist with stigmata. In Perlidæ
the tracheal gills persist in the imago, and may be found, dry
and functionless, beneath the stigmata. In Trichoptera they
gradually abort at successive moults, and in some cases remain
after the stigmata have opened.
5. Stigmata do not form by the breaking off of tracheal
appendages, but by the enlargement of rudimentary tracheal
branches, which open into the main longitudinal trunks. In
larvæ with aquatic respiration these branches exist, though they
are not functional.
Palmén’s objections must be satisfactorily disposed of before
Gegenbaur’s explanation, interesting as it is, can be fully
accepted. Palmén has proved, what is on other grounds clear
enough, that stigmata are more ancient than tracheal gills,
aerial tracheate respiration than aquatic. But there is nothing
as yet to contradict the view that the first Insect-wings were
adapted for propulsion in water, and that they were respiratory
organs before they became motor. It is Gegenbaur’s explanation
of the origin of stigmata, and not his explanation of the
origin of wings, which is refuted by Palmén.
Abdomen.
In the abdomen of the female Cockroach eight terga (1–7;
10) are externally visible. Two more (8, 9) are readily displayed
by extending the abdomen; they are ordinarily
concealed beneath the seventh tergum. The tenth tergum is
notched in the middle of its posterior margin. A pair of
triangular “podical plates,” which lie on either side of the
anus, and towards the dorsal surface, have been provisionally
regarded by Prof. Huxley as the terga of an eleventh segment.
Seven abdominal sterna (1–7) are externally visible. The first
is quite rudimentary, and consists of a transversely oval plate;
the second is irregular and imperfectly chitinised in front; the
seventh is large, and its hinder part, which is boat-shaped, is
divided into lateral halves, for facilitating the discharge of the
large egg-capsule.
Fig. 32.—Under side of Abdomen of Male and Female Cockroach. × 4.
In the male Cockroach ten abdominal terga are visible
without dissection (fig. 33, p. 70), though the eighth and
ninth are greatly overlapped by the seventh. The tenth
tergum is hardly notched. Nine abdominal sterna are readily
made out, the first being rudimentary, as in the female. The
eighth is narrower than the seventh, the ninth still narrower,
and largely concealed by the eighth; its covered anterior part
is thin and transparent, the exposed part denser. This forms
the extreme end of the body, except that the small sub-anal styles
project beyond it. The podical plates resemble those of the
female.
Pleural elements are developed in the form of narrow
stigmatic plates, with the free edge directed backwards. These
lie between the terga and sterna, and defend the spiracle.80
The modifications of the hindmost abdominal segments will
be more fully considered in connection with the reproductive
organs.
The high number of abdominal segments found in the Cockroach
(ten or eleven) is characteristic of the lower orders of
Insecta. It is never exceeded; though in the more specialised
orders, such as Lepidoptera and Diptera, it may be reduced to
nine, eight, or even seven. The sessile abdomen of the Cockroach
is primitive with respect to the pedunculate abdomen
found in such insects as Hymenoptera, where the constricted
and flexible waist stands in obvious relation to the operations
of stinging and boring, or to peculiar modes of oviposition.
The first abdominal segment, which is especially liable to dislocation
and alteration in Insects, occupies its theoretical
position in the Cockroach, though both tergum and sternum
are reduced in size. The sternum is often altogether wanting,
while the tergum may unite with the metathorax.
Fig. 33.—Profile of Male and Female Cockroach. × 4.
The externally visible appendages of the abdomen are the
cerci and the styles of the male Cockroach. The cerci are found
in both sexes; they are composed of sixteen rings each, and
project beneath the edge of the tenth tergum. They are
capable of erection by special muscles, and are supplied by large
nerves.81 The sub-anal styles are peculiar in their insertion,
being carried upon the sternum of their segment (the ninth).
The abdominal segments are never furnished with functional
legs in adult Insects, but representatives of the lost appendages
are often met with in larvæ. According to Bütschli,82 all the
abdominal segments are provided with appendages in the
embryo of the Bee, though they disappear completely before
hatching. Some Hymenopterous larvæ have as many as eight
pairs of abdominal appendages, Lepidopterous larvæ at most
five (3–6; 10).83
CHAPTER V.
The Muscles; the Fat-Body and Cœlom.
SPECIAL REFERENCES.
Viallanes. Histologie et Développement des Insectes. Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool.,
Tom. XIV. (1882).
Kühne in Stricker’s Histology, Vol. I., chap. v.
Plateau. Various Memoirs in Bull. Acad. Roy. de Belgique (1865, 1866, 1883,
1884). [Relative and Absolute Muscular Force.]
Leydig. Zum feineren Bau der Arthropoden. Müller’s Archiv., 1855.
Weismann. Ueber zwei Typen contractilen Gewebes, &c. Zeits. für ration.
Medicin. Bd. XV. (1862).
Structure of Insect Muscles.
The muscles of the Cockroach, when quite fresh, appear
semi-transparent and colourless. If subjected to pressure or
strain they are found to be extremely tender. Alcohol hardens
and contracts them, while it renders them opaque and brittle.
The minute structure of the voluntary or striped muscular
fibres of Vertebrates is described in common text-books.84 Each
fibre is invested by a transparent elastic sheath, the sarcolemma,
and the space within the sarcolemma is subdivided by transverse
membranes into a series of compartments. The compartments
are nearly filled by as many contractile discs,
broad, doubly refractive plates, which are further divisible
into prismatic columns, the sarcous elements, each being as
long as the contractile disc. Successive sarcous elements,
continued from one compartment to another, form the
primitive fibrils of the muscle. In cross-section the fibrils
appear as polygonal areas bounded by bright lines. Outside
the fibres, but within the sarcolemma, are nuclei, imbedded in
the protoplasm, or living and formative element of the tissue.
The muscular fibres of Insects present some important
differences from the fibres just described. The nuclei are often
found in the centre, and not on the surface of the fibres in both
Insects and Crustacea. In both classes the fibrils are frequently
subdivided into longitudinal strands, which have not been
distinguished in Vertebrate muscles (Viallanes). The sarcolemma
is often undeveloped. Lastly, Insects, like other
Arthropoda, exhibit the remarkable peculiarity that not only
their voluntary muscles, but all, or nearly all, the muscles of
the body, even those of the digestive tube, are striated.85
General Arrangement of Insect Muscles.
The arrangement of the muscles in an Insect varies greatly
according to situation and mode of action. Some of the
abdominal muscles consist solely of straight parallel bundles,
while the muscles of the limbs usually converge to tendinous
insertions. In certain larvæ, where the segments show hardly
any differentiation, the muscles form a sheet which covers the
whole body, and is regularly segmented in correspondence with
the exo-skeleton. As the movements of the body and limbs
become more varied and more energetic, the muscles become
grouped in a more complicated fashion, and the legs and wings
of a flying Insect may be set in motion by a muscular apparatus
almost as elaborate as that of a bird.
Muscles of the Cockroach.
The following short notes on the muscles of the Cockroach,
aided by reference to the figures, will render the more noteworthy
features intelligible. A very lengthy description, far
beyond our space or the reader’s patience, would be required to
explain in detail the musculature of the head, limbs, and other
specialised regions.
Sternal Muscles of Abdomen.—The longitudinal sternal
muscles (fig. 34) form a nearly continuous transversely segmented
sheet, covering the ventral surface between the fore-edge
of the second abdominal sternum and the fore-edge of the
seventh. These muscles, in conjunction with the longitudinal
tergal muscles, tend to telescope the segments.
The oblique sternal muscles (fig. 34), which are very short,
connect the adjacent edges of the sterna (2–3, 3–4, 4–5, 5–6,
6–7). They extend inwards nearly to the middle line, but, like
the longitudinal sternal muscles, they are not developed beneath
the nerve-cord. Acting together, the oblique sternal muscles
would antagonise the longitudinal, but it is probable that they
are chiefly used to effect lateral flexion of the abdomen, and
that only the muscles of one side of the abdomen contract at
once.