Take no heed unto all words that are spoken, lest thou hear thy servant curse thee. For oftentimes, also, thine own heart knoweth, that thou thyself, likewise, hast cursed others.
The royal author of this book has been much and justly celebrated for his wise aphorisms and precepts on the conduct of human life. Among others of this sort, the text may deserve to be had in reverence; which, though simply and familiarly expressed, could only be the reflexion of a man who had great experience of the world, and had studied with care the secret workings of his own mind.
The purpose of it is, to disgrace and discountenance that ANXIOUS CURIOSITY (the result of our vanity, and a misguided self-love) which prompts us to inquire into the sentiments and opinions of other persons concerning us, and to give ourselves no rest till we understand what, in their private and casual conversations, they say of us.
“This curious disposition, says the preacher, is by all means to be repressed, as the indulgence of it is both FOOLISH and UNJUST; as it not only serves to embitter your own lives by the unwelcome discoveries ye are most likely to make; but at the same time to convict your own consciences of much iniquity; since, upon reflexion, ye will find that ye have, yourselves, been guilty at some unguarded hour or other, of the same malignity or flippancy towards other men.”
In these two considerations is comprised whatever can be said to discredit this vice: the one, you see, taken from the preacher’s knowledge of human life; the other, from his intimate acquaintance with the secret depravity and corruption of the human heart.
Permit me, then, to enlarge on these two topics; and, by that means, to open to you more distinctly the WISDOM, and the EQUITY of that conduct, which is here recommended to us, of not giving a sollicitous attention to the frivolous and unweighed censures of other men.
I. Take no heed, says the preacher, to all words that are spoken, LEST THOU HEAR THY SERVANT CURSE THEE. This is the FIRST reason which he assigns for his advice.
The force of it will be clearly apprehended, if we reflect (as the observing author of the text had certainly done) that nothing is more flippant, nothing more unreasonably and unaccountably petulant, than the tongue of man.
It is so little under the controul, I do not say of candour, or of good-nature, but of common prudence, and of common justice, that it moves, as it were, with the slightest breath of rumour; nay, as if a tendency to speak ill of others were instinctive to it, it waits many times for no cause from without, but is prompted as we may say, by its own restlessness and volubility to attack the characters of those who chance to be the subject of discourse. Without provocation, without malice, without so much as intentional ill-will, it echoes the voice of the present company; vibrates with the prevailing tone of conversation; or takes occasion from the slightest occurrence, from some idle conceit that strikes the fancy, from the impulse of a sudden and half-formed suggestion, that stirs within us, to exercise its activity in a careless censure of other men.
Nay, what is more to be lamented, the sagacious observer of mankind will find reason to conclude, that no zeal for our interests, no kindness for our persons, shall at all times restrain this unruly member, the tongue, from taking unwelcome freedoms with us. The dearest friend we have, shall at some unlucky moment be seduced by an affectation of wit, by a start of humour, by a flow of spirits, by a sudden surmise, or indisposition, by any thing, in short, to let fall such things of us, as have some degree of sharpness in them, and would give us pain, if they were officiously reported to us.
This appears to have been the sentiment of the wise preacher in the text. Avoid, says he, this impertinent curiosity, lest thou hear thy servant curse thee; lest the very persons that live under thy roof and are most obliged to thee, who are reasonably presumed to have the warmest concern for thy honour and interest, and on whose fidelity and gratitude the security and comfort of thy whole life more immediately depends, lest even these be found to make free with thy character. For there is a time, when even these may be carried to speak undutifully and disrespectfully of thee.
And would any man wish to make this discovery of those, who are esteemed to be, and, notwithstanding these occasional freedoms, perhaps are, his true servants and affectionate friends?
For think not, when this unlucky discovery is made, that the offended party will treat it with neglect, or be in a condition to consider it with those allowances, that, in reason and equity, may be required of him. No such thing: It will appear to him in the light of a heinous and unpardonable indignity; it will occasion warm resentments, and not only fill his mind with present disquiet, but most probably provoke him to severe expostulations; the usual fruit of which is, to make a deliberate and active enemy of him, who was, before, only an incautious and indiscreet friend: at the best, it will engender I know not what uneasy jealousies and black suspicions; which will mislead his judgment on many occasions; and inspire an anxious distrust, not of the faulty person himself only, but of others, who stand in the same relation to him, and, perhaps, of all mankind.
These several ill effects may be supposed, as I said, to flow from the discovery: and it will be useful to set the malignity of each in its true and proper light.
1. First, then, consider that a likely, or rather infallible effect of this discovery, is, to fire the mind with quick and passionate resentments. And what is it to be in this state, but to lose the enjoyment of ourselves; to have the relish of every thing, we possess, embittered by pungent reflexions on the perfidy and baseness of those, with whom we live, and of whom it is our happiness to think well; to have the repose of our lives disturbed by the most painful of all sensations, that of supposed injury from our very friends? And for what is this wretchedness, this misery, encountered? For the idleness of an unweighed discourse; for something, which, if kept secret from us, had been perfectly insignificant; for a discourtesy, which meant nothing and tended to nothing; for a word, which came from the tongue, rather than the heart; or, if the heart had any share in producing it, was recalled perhaps, at least forgotten, in the moment it was spoken. And can it be worth while to indulge a curiosity which leads to such torment, when the object of our inquiry is itself so frivolous, as well as the concern we have in it?
2. Another mischief attending the gratification of this impertinent curiosity, is, That the unwelcome discoveries we make, naturally lead to peevish complaints and severe expostulations; the effect of which is, not only to continue and inflame the sense of the injury already received, but to draw fresh and greater indignities on ourselves, to push the offending party on extremes, and compell him, almost, whether he will or no, to open acts of hostility against us. The former ill treatment of us, whatever it might be, was perhaps forgotten; at least it had hitherto gone no further than words, and, while it was, or was supposed to be, undiscovered, there was no thought of repeating the provocation, and there was time and opportunity left for repenting of it, and for recovering a just sense of violated duty. But when the offence is understood to be no longer a secret, the discovery provokes fresh offences. Either pride puts the aggressor on justifying what he has done; or the shame of conviction, and the despair of pardon, turns indifference into hate; ready to break out into all sorts of ill offices, and the readier, because the strong resentment of so slight a matter, as a careless expression, is itself, in turn, accounted an atrocious injury. And thus a small discourtesy, which, if unnoticed, had presently died away, shall grow and spread into a rooted ill-will, productive of gross reciprocal hostilities, and permanent as life itself.
It is on this account that wise men have always thought it better to connive at moderate injuries, than, by an open resentment of them, to provoke greater: and nothing is mentioned so much to the honour of a noble Roman186, as that, when he had the papers of an enemy in his hands (which would certainly have discovered the disaffection of many persons towards the republic and himself) he destroyed them all, and prudently, as well as generously, resolved to know nothing of what they contained. And this conduct, which was thought so becoming a great man in public life, is unquestionably (on the same principle of prudence and magnanimity, to say nothing of higher motives) the duty and concern of every private man.
3. But, lastly, supposing the resentment conceived on the discovery of an ungrateful secret, should not break out into overt acts of hatred and revenge, still the matter would not be much mended. For, it would surely breed a thousand uneasy suspicions, which would prey on the hurt mind; and do irreparable injury to the moral character, as well as embitter the whole life of him who was unhappily conscious to them.
The experience of such neglect or infidelity in those whom we had hitherto loved and trusted, and from whom we had expected a suitable return of trust and love, would infallibly sour the temper, and create a constant apprehension of future unkindness. It would efface the native candour of the mind, and bring a cloud of jealousy over it; which would darken our views of human life. It would make us cold, and gloomy, and reserved; indifferent to those who deserved best of us, and unapt for the offices of society and friendship. The more we suppressed these sentiments, the more would they fester and rankle within us; till the mind became all over tenderness and sensibility, and felt equal pain from its own groundless surmises, as from real substantial injuries. In a word, we should have no relish of conversation, no sincere enjoyment of any thing, we should only be miserable in, and from ourselves.
And is this a condition to be officiously courted, and sought after? Or rather, could we suffer more from the malice of our bitterest enemy, than we are ready to do from our own anxious curiosity to pry into the infirmities of our friends?
Hitherto I have insisted on the danger of giving heed to all words that are spoken, LEST THOU HEAR THY SERVANT CURSE THEE; in other words, on the FOLLY of taking pains to make a discovery, which may prove unwelcome in itself, and dreadful in the consequent evils it may derive upon us.
II. It now remains that I say one word on the INJUSTICE, and want of equity, which appears in this practice. For oftentimes also thine own heart knoweth, that thou thyself, likewise, hast cursed others.
And as in the former case the preacher drew his remonstrance from his knowledge of the world; so in this, he reasons from his intimate knowledge of the human heart.
Let the friendliest, the best man living, explore his own conscience, and then let him tell us, or rather let him tell himself, if he can, that he has never offended in the instance here given. I suppose, on a strict inquiry, he will certainly call to mind some peevish sentiment, some negligent censure, some sharp reflection, which, at times, hath escaped him, even in regard to his second self, a bosom friend. Either he took something wrong, and some suspicious circumstance misled him; or, he was out of health and spirits; or, he was ruffled by some ungrateful accident; or, he had forgotten himself in an hour of levity; or a splenetic moment had surprised him. Some or other of these causes, he will find, had betrayed him into a sudden warmth and asperity of expression, which he is now ashamed and sorry for, and hath long since retracted and condemned.
Still further, at the very time when this infirmity overtook him, he had no purposed unfriendliness, no resolved disaffection towards the person he allowed himself to be thus free with. His tongue indeed had offended, but his heart had scarce consented to the offence. The next day, the next hour, perhaps, he would gladly have done all service, possibly he would not have declined to hazard his life, for this abused friend.
I appeal, as the wise author of the text does, to yourselves, to the inmost recollection of your own thoughts, if ye do not know and feel that this which I have described hath sometimes been your own case. And what then is the inference from this self-conviction? Certainly, that ye ought in common justice, to restrain your inclination of prying into the unguarded moments of other men. If your best friends have not escaped your flippancy, where is the equity of demanding more reserve and caution towards yourself from them? Without doubt the proper rule is to suppose, and to forgive, these mutual indiscretions, which we are all ready to commit towards each other. We should lay no stress on these casual discourtesies; we should not desire to be made acquainted with them; we should dismiss them, if some officious whisperer bring the information to us, with indifference and neglect. To do otherwise is not only to vex and disquiet ourselves for trifles: It is to be unfair, uncandid, and unjust, in our dealings with others; it is to convict ourselves of partiality and hypocrisy, For thine own heart knoweth, that thou thyself likewise hast done the same thing.
Ye have now, then, before you the substance of those considerations which the text offers, for the prevention of that idle and hurtful curiosity of looking into the secret dispositions and discourses of other men. Ye see how foolish, how dangerous, how iniquitous it is, to give heed to all words that are spoken.
It becomes a man indeed to lay a severe check and restraint on his own tongue. Far better would it be, if all men did so. But they who know themselves and others, will not much expect this degree of self-government, will not, if they be wise, be much scandalized at the want of it; since they know the observance of it is so difficult and sublime a virtue; since they know that nothing less than extraordinary wisdom can, at all times, prevent the tongue of man from running into excesses; since they are even told by an Apostle, That if any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man187.
Let us then allow for what we cannot well help. And let this consideration come in aid of the others, employed in the text, to expell an inveterate folly, which prompts us to lay more stress upon words, than such frivolous and fugitive things deserve. Let us regard them, for the most part, but as the shaking of a leaf, or the murmur of the idle air: they rarely merit our notice, and attention, more: or, when they do, we should find it better to indulge our charity, than our curiosity; I mean, to believe well of others, as long as we can, rather than be at the pains of an anxious inquiry for a pretence to think ill of them.
Nichols and Son, Printers,
Red Lion Passage, Fleet Street, London.
1 διὰ τοῦτο—referring to the good effect of this way of teaching on the disciples, whom it had enabled, as they confessed, to understand the things, which Jesus had taught them.
2 Tit. ii. 7.
3 Rom. xv. 2.
4 They did this with design, and on principle; as appears from St. Austin’s discourse de Doctrinâ Christianâ, in which he instructs the Christian preacher to employ, on some occasions, inelegant and even barbarous terms and expressions, the better to suit himself to the apprehensions of his less informed hearers—non curante illo, qui docet, quantâ eloquentiâ doceat, sed quantâ evidentiâ. Cujus evidentiæ diligens appetitus aliquando negligit verba cultiora, nec curat quid benè sonet, sed quid benè indicet atque intimet quod ostendere intendit—and what follows. L. iv. p. 74. Ed. Erasm. t. iii.
5 1 Cor. ii. 2.
6 Archbishop Tillotson.
7 Heb. iii. 2.
8 2 Cor. iv. 5.
9 Matt. xi. 15.
10 1 Pet. iii. 3.
11 1 Pet iii. 15.
12 Alphonsus the Wise—I go on the common supposition, that this Prince intended a reflexion on the system of nature itself; but, perhaps, his purpose was no more than, in a strong way of expression, (though it must be owned, no very decent one) to reprobate the hypothesis [the Ptolemaic], which set that system in so bad a light.
13 —μεταξὺ ἀλλήλων τῶν λογισμῶν κατηγορούντων ἢ καὶ ἀπολογουμένων. See the Paraphrase and Comment on this text by Mr. Taylor of Norwich, to whom I acknowledge myself indebted for the idea which governs the general method of this discourse.
14 Nat. Deor. l. ii. c. 66.
15 Sallust.
16 Plato’s Republic.
17 Xenophon’s Inst. of Cyrus.
18 Rom. ch. i. ver. 28-32.—ποιεῖν τὰ μὴ καθήκοντα—συνευδοκοῦσι τοῖς πράσσουσιν.
19 Cicero, passim.
20 Felix, Acts xxiv. 25.
21 Ch. ii. 26.
22 Ch. iii. 1.
23 Chap. iii.
24 Rom. vi. 23.
25 2 Cor. v. 15.
26 2 Cor. v. 19.
27 1 John ii. 2.
28 Rom. iii. 24.
29 1 Tim. iv. 10.
30 Rom. i. 9.
31 Rom. xv. 13.
32 Col. ii. 10.
33 Ephes. iii. 2.
34 John xii. 48.
35 Luke xix. 14.
36 2 Peter ii. 21.
37 St. John, xiii. 1.
38 Ch. xiv. 1.
39 St. John, xiv. 2.
40 Ch. xiv. 6.
41 Ch. xiv. 7.
42 1 Cor. ii. 5.
43 Matt. xxi. 27.—xxii. 46.—xxvii. 14.
44 Matt. xii. 38.—xvi. 1.
45 Mark iv. 34.
46 Mark iv. 34.
47 Mark iv. 11.
48 Matt. xiii. 58. Mark ix. 23.
49 Matt. vii. 6.
50 Mark iv. 25.
51 John xx. 29.
52 Isaiah lv. 8.
53 Wisdom, ix. 13.
54 1 Cor. ii. 11.
55 Rom. xiii. 3.
56 Φῶς ἀπρόσιτον. 1 Tim. vi. 16.
57 John xiv. 22.
58 Τὴν λογικὴν λατρείαν. Rom. xii. 1.
59 The dispute about Easter, in the second century.
60 The dispute about Images, in the eighth century.
61 Matt. xi. 29.
62 Matt. x. 34.
63 Job xxxii. 21.
64 Plutarch, or whoever was the author of a fragment, printed among his moral discourses, and entitled, πότερον τὰ τῆς ψυχῆς ἢ τὰ τοῦ σώματος πάθη χείρονα. Par. Ed. vol. ii. p. 500.
65 Called Æones. See Grotius in loc.
66 Ἀπεράντοις.
67 Dat nobis et Paulus brevem γενεαλογίαν, sed perutilem. Grotius.
68 Rom. xii. 15.
69 Rom. i. 32.
70 1 Peter iii. 16.
71 Les petites morales; as the French moralists call them.
72 Φιλανθρωπία.
73 Φιλαδελφία.
74 Τῆ φιλ. εἰς αλλ. ΦΙΛΟΣΤΟΡΓΟΙ.
75 The integrity of the upright shall guide them. Prov. xi. 3.
76 Δείπνου γενομένου—
77 See more on this subject in the Discourse on Christ’s driving the merchants out of the temple, at the end of the next volume.
78 Ver. 14.
79 If it be asked, why their feet? the answer is, that it was customary in the east for one to wash the feet of another. And this practice gave an easy introduction to the present enigmatical washing; which was equally expressive of the information designed, when performed on this part of the body, as on any other.
80 Grotius saw the necessity of looking beyond the literal meaning of those words—If I wash thee not. “Mos Christi, says he, est a rebus, quæ adspiciuntur, ad sensum sublimiorem ascendere.” His comment then follows. “Nisi te lavero, id est, nisi et sermone et spiritu eluero quod in te restat minus puri,” &c. Considering how near Jesus was to his crucifixion, when he said this, one a little wonders how the great commentator, when he was to assign the mystical sense of these words, should overlook that which lay before him. Surely his gloss should have been, Nisi sanguine meo te eluero, &c.—Let me just add, that the force of these words, as addressed to Peter, will be perfectly understood, if we reflect that he, who said to Jesus—Thou shalt never wash my feet—said on a former occasion to him, when he spoke, without a figure, of his death (though not, then, under the idea of a propitiatory sacrifice, or ablution)—Be it far from thee, Lord; this shall not be unto thee. Matt. xvi. 22. So little did Peter see the necessity of being washed by the blood of Christ! And so important was the information now given him in this mystical washing—If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me.
81 A remarkable instance will be given, in the Discourse referred to above, at the close of the next volume.
82 Mark iv. 33. John xvi. 12.
83 John xiv. 26.
84 1 John i. 7.
85 Rev. i. 5.
86 Eph. i. 7. Coloss. i. 14.
87 1 Cor. v. 7.
88 1 Pet. i. 12. 1 Cor. vi. 11. and elsewhere, passim.
89 Rom. iii. 25.
90 Luke xii. 46.
91 Rev. vii. 14.
92 1 John. vi. 7.
93 Matt. xviii. 7.
94 Matt. vi.
95 Ver. 12.
96 Phil. iv. 18.
97 See Whitby in loc.
98 See passages cited by Dr. Hammond.
99 1 Cor. iii. 13.
100 1 Pet. i. 7.
101 1 Pet. iv. 12.
102 Eccles. ii. 5.
103 Heb. xii. 1.
104 Heb. vi. 4, 5, 6.
105 The difficulty in the two concluding verses of this chapter, arises from a vivacity of imagination in the pursuit and application of metaphors; a faculty, in which the Orientals excelled, and delighted. They pass suddenly from one idea to another, nearly, and sometimes, remotely, allied to it. They relinquish the primary sense, for another suggested by it; and without giving any notice, as we should do, of their intention. These numerous reflected lights, as we may call them, eagerly catched at by the mind in its train of thinking, perplex the attention of a modern reader, and must be carefully separated by him, if he would see the whole scope and purpose of many passages in the sacred writings.
106 1 Cor. iv. 7.
107 1 Cor. xiii.
108 As in the case of the real presence in the sacrament of the altar.
109 As in the case of good works.
110 An ingenious writer, who appears not to have been hackneyed in the ways of controversy, and is, therefore, the more likely to see the truth, in any plain question of religion, as well as to declare it, expresses himself, fully, to the same effect—“It is very weakly urged, that religion should keep pace with science in improvement; and that a subscription to articles must always impede its progress: for nothing can be more absurd than the idea of a progressive religion; which, being founded upon the declared, not the imagined, will of God, must, if it attempt to proceed, relinquish that Revelation which is its basis, and so cease to be a religion founded upon God’s word. God has revealed himself; and all that he has spoken, and consequently all that is demanded of us to accede to, is declared in one book, from which nothing is to be retrenched, and to which nothing can be added. All that it contains, was as perspicuous to those who first perused it, after the rejection of the papal yoke, as it can be to us NOW, or as it can be to our posterity in the FIFTIETH GENERATION.” See A Scriptural Confutation of Mr. Lindsey’s Apology. Lond. 1774. p. 220.
111 Rom. xi. 33.
112 Rom. x. 17.
113 1 Cor. ix. 16.
114 Heb. iv. 12.
115 1 Cor. xii. 7.
117 John xii. 48.
118 2 Cor. iv. 7.
119 Matth. x. 16.
120 Cic. Off. L. i. c. 31.
121 See the Story of Musonius Rufus in Tacitus, Hist. L. iii. c. 81.
122 Cic. de Or. L. ii. c. 18.
123 Bene præcipiunt, qui vetant quidquam agere, quod dubites, æquum sit an iniquum: æquitas enim lucet ipsa per se; dubitatio cogitationem significat injuriæ.
124 Matth. v. 8.
125 To the same purpose, Seneca, of the old heathen philosophers: “Antiqua sapientia,” says he, “nihil aliud, quàm FACIENDA et VITANDA, præcepit: et tunc longè meliores erant viri: postquam docti prodierunt, boni desunt. Simplex enim illa et aperta virtus in obscuram et solertem scientiam versa est, docemurque disputare, non vivere.” Senec. Ep. xcv.
126 Corrumpere et corrumpi, sæculum vocatur. Tacitus.
127 Frequens imitatio transit in mores. Quinctil. L. I. c. XI.
128 Vitam impendere vero. His motto.
129 Mes ennemies auront beau faire avec leurs injures; ils ne m’ôteront point l’honneur d’être un homme véridique en touts chose, d’être le seul auteur de mon siecle, & de beaucoup d’autres, qui ait écrit de bonne foi.
130 “Une preuve de sa bonne foi, c’est qu’il [M. Newton] a commenté l’Apocalypse. Il y trouve clairement que le Pape est l’Antichrist, et il explique d’ailleurs ce livre comme tous ceux qui s’en sont mêlés. Apparemment qu’il a voulu par ce commentaire CONSOLER LA RACE HUMAINE de la supériorité qu’il avoit sur elle.” Œuvres de Voltaire, T. v. c. 29. 1757.
“If he [K. James I.] has composed a commentary on the Revelations, and proved the Pope to be Antichrist; may not a similar reproach be extended to the famous Napier; and even to Newton, at a time when learning was much more advanced than during the reign of James? From the grossness of its superstitions, we may infer the ignorance of an age; but never should pronounce concerning the FOLLY OF AN INDIVIDUAL, from his admitting popular errors, consecrated with the appearance of religion.” Hume’s Hist. of Great Britain, Vol. VI. p. 136. Lond. 1763. 8vo.
131 Nil actum credens, dum quid superesset agendum.
132 Hippias, the Elean. Cic. de Oratore, c. 32.
133 Socrates.
134 2 Cor. xii. 2.
135 1 Cor. xiii. 2.
136 Philip. iii. 6.
137 Matt. v. 17.
138 Bayle, Comm. Phil. Part II. Ch. IV. Locke on Toleration, Letter I. Warburton, D. L. B. v. S. 11.
139 1 Tim. i. 15.
140 1 Cor. xv. 9.
141 De se tromper en croyant vraie la religion Chrétienne, il n’y a pas grand’ chose à perdre: mais quel malheur de se tromper en la croyant fausse! M. Pascal, p. 225.
142 Plutarch. Brutus.
143 Of opening private letters, and employing spies of state. Clarendon.
144 John x. 32.
145 “Illa in illo homine mirabilia fuerunt, comprehendere multos amicitiâ, tueri obsequio, cum omnibus communicare quod habebat, servire temporibus suorum omnium, pecuniâ, gratiâ, labore corporis, scelere etiam, si opus esset, et audaciâ: versare suam naturam, et regere ad tempus, atque huc et illuc torquere et flectere; cum tristibus severè, cum remissis jucunde; cum senibus graviter, cum juventute comiter; cum facinorosis audacter, cum libidinosis luxuriosè vivero. Hâc ille tam variâ multiplicique naturâ, &c.” Cicero pro M. Cælio, c. iii.
146 Juventus pleraque, sed maximè nobilium, Catilinæ incœptis favebat. Sallust. c. 17. And again: omnino cuncta plebes, Catilinæ incœpta probabat. c. 37.
147 1 John iii. 21.
148 St. Ambrose. Apud Whitby.
149 John xviii. 31.
150 Rom. iii. 4.
151 The words ταπεινὸς, and humilis, are observed to be generally, if not always, used in a bad sense by the Greek and Latin writers.
152 Philipp. ii. 5. 8.
153 Matthew xvi. 24.
154 Matth. xxiii. 33.
155 Mark x. 21.
156 For it is with propositions, as with characters, in relation to which the language of the true moralist is: “Explica, atque excute intelligentiam tuam, ut videas quæ sit in eâ species, forma, et notio viri boni.”
157 Prov. ii. 4.
158 1 Tim. v. 6.
159 Prov. ix. 8.
160 Queis humana sibi doleat natura negatis.
161 Eccles. v. 11.
162 Prov. xvi. 25.
163 Prov. xxiii. 5.
164 Si hoc est explere, quod statim profundas.
165 Quid sumus, et quidnam victuri gignimur. Persius.
166 1 Tim. vi. 9.
168 Matth. xix. 23.
169 Ps. lxii. 10.
170 Luke xvi. 9.
171 2 Cor. xiii. 14.
172 1 Thess. iv. 8.
173 Acts xi. 16.
174 Eph. i. 13.
175 It was the easier to do this, as the Heathens had their Minerva and Diana, as well as grosser deities; and their vestal virgins too; though, I doubt, in less numbers than the shameless votaries of the Corinthian Venus.
176 Ps. xlvi. 4.—lxxx. 1.—xxvi. 8.
177 Nullis POLLUITUR casta domus stupris. Hor.
Cum castum amisit POLLUTO CORPORE florem. Catul.
178 Dr. Whitby on the place.
179 Rom. vi. 21.
180 Job xx. 11.
181 Prov. xxi. 17.
182 The poet says well of such stains, as these;
183 Suet. J. Cæsar, c. 45.
184 Ps. xxxvii. 38.
185 Eccles. c. xi. 9.
186 Pompey, who burnt the papers of Sertorius.
187 James iii. 2.