24.  Liefmann, H., and Lindemann, H., Die Lokalization der Sauglingsterblichkeit und ihre Beziehungen zur Wohnungsfrage. Med. Klinik 1912, pp. 8, 1074.

Respiratory diseases were reported as a cause of death with almost as great frequency as diarrheal diseases. As shown by Table 19, these deaths occurred principally in the colder months of the first and fourth quarters of the calendar year.

FEEDING

Food is recognized as of such importance in relation to infant mortality that studies of this subject frequently resolve themselves into studies of feeding only. Invariably these demonstrate the truth of the statement of Dr. G. F. McCleary[25] that “in human milk we have a unique and wonderful food for which the ingenuity of man may toil in vain to find a satisfactory substitute.” Many mothers, however, still fail to appreciate the risk their young babies face in being given any except the natural infant food, and consequently babies are in large numbers wholly or partly weaned from the breast in the earliest months of their lives.

25.  Infantile Mortality and Infants’ Milk Depots. London.

Breast feeding is far more general, comparatively, among the poorer mothers than among the well to do, as shown by the following summary which gives the number and per cent. of babies of mothers with husbands earning varying incomes, who had been completely weaned from the breast when they were 3, 6, or 9 months of age, respectively. For each of the periods indicated the percentage completely weaned from the breast is much greater in the groups where earnings are highest.

Table 20.—Distribution of Babies Alive at 3, 6, and 9 Months of Age by Type of Feeding at Each of Said Ages, According to Annual Earnings of Father and Nativity of Mother.
 
ANNUAL EARNINGS OF FATHER AND NATIVITY OF MOTHER. BABIES LIVING AT AGE OF—
3 months. 6 months. 9 months.
Total. Completely weaned from breast. Total. Completely weaned from breast. Total. Completely weaned from breast.
Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent.
Total 1,355 193 14.2 1,313 250 19.0 1,282 358 27.5
  Under $624 341 22 6.5 322 32 9.9 309 57 18.4
  $625 to $899 358 48 13.4 351 63 17.9 342 85 24.9
  $900 and over[26] 629 114 18.1 616 146 23.7 608 201 33.1
  Not reported[27] 27 9 33.3 24 9 37.5 23 10 43.3
                   
    Mother native 765 155 20.3 747 195 26.1 735 251 34.1
Under $624 69 10 14.5 66 13 19.7 65 18 27.7
$625 to $899 180 36 20.0 177 46 26.0 173 55 31.8
$900 and over[26] 491 100 20.4 482 127 26.3 476 168 35.3
Not reported[27] 25 9 36.0 22 9 40.9 21 10 47.6
                   
    Mother foreign 590 38 6.4 566 55 9.7 547 102 18.6
Under $624 272 12 4.4 256 19 7.4 244 39 16.0
$625 to $899 178 12 6.7 174 17 9.8 169 30 17.8
$900 and over[26] 138 14 10.1 134 19 14.2 132 33 25.0
Not reported[27] 2     2     2    

26.  Includes those reported as earning “ample.” “Ample,” as used in this report has a somewhat technical meaning; when information concerning the father’s earnings was not available and the family showed no evidences of poverty, the word “ample” was used. When, however, the family was clearly in a state of abject poverty, it was included in the group “Under $521.”

27.  Unmarried mothers’ babies also included.

Breast feeding, wholly or in part, is continued for a longer period by foreign than by native mothers, as indicated in the preceding table, showing that 20.3, 26.1, and 34.1 per cent. of the native mothers’ babies as compared with 6.4, 9.7, and 18.6 per cent. of the foreign mothers’ babies had been weaned from the breast at the age of 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively.

Table 25.—Distribution of All Births, Live Births, and Stillbirths and of Deaths During First Year, and Infant Mortality Rate, According to Sex of Baby and Nativity of Mother.
 
SEX OF BABY AND NATIVITY OF MOTHER. All births. Live births. STILLBIRTHS. DEATHS DURING FIRST YEAR.
Total. Rate per 1,000 births. Total. Infant mortality rate.
BABIES OF NATIVE MOTHERS.            
             
Total number 860 815 45 52.3 85 104.3
Male:            
    Number 433 406 27 62.4 46 113.3
    Per cent. 50.3 49.8 60.0   54.1  
Female:            
    Number 427 409 18 42.2 39 95.4
    Per cent. 49.7 50.2 40.0   45.9  
             
BABIES OF FOREIGN MOTHERS.            
             
Total number 691 648 43 62.2 111 171.3
Male:            
    Number 380 355 25 65.8 59 166.2
    Per cent. 55.0 54.8 58.1   53.2  
Female:            
    Number 311 293 18 57.9 52 177.5
    Per cent. 45.0 45.2 41.9   46.8  

MOTHER’S HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, CESSATION AND RESUMPTION OF

The extent to which the native and foreign mothers in Johnstown relinquished a part of their household duties as the time for their confinement approached is shown below:

Table 26.—Distribution of Births According to Time of the Mother’s Relinquishment of Part of Household Duties Before Confinement, by Nativity of Mother.
 
TIME OF RELINQUISHMENT OF PART OF HOUSEHOLD DUTIES BEFORE CONFINEMENT. All births. To native mothers. To foreign mothers.
All mothers 1,551 860 691
No household duties relinquished to day of confinement 1,350 695 655
Part of duties relinquished:      
    Less than 7 days before confinement 3 1 2
    7 to 13 days before confinement 7 5 2
    2 weeks to 1 month before confinement 16 12 4
    1 month or more before confinement 174 146 28
Had no household duties 1 1  

Among the 174 babies of mothers who relinquished part of their household duties a month before confinement, the infant mortality rate was 112.5, as compared with 136.7 for those of other mothers.

Table 27.—Distribution of Births and of Deaths During First Year, and Infant Mortality Rate, According to Time of Relinquishment of Part of Household Duties of Mother Before Confinement.
 
TIME OF RELINQUISHMENT OF PART OF HOUSEHOLD DUTIES BEFORE CONFINEMENT. All births. Live births. Deaths during first year. Infant mortality rate.
All mothers 1,551 1,463 196 134.0
No cessation or less than 1 month 1,376 1,302 178 136.7
1 month or more 171 160 18 112.5
No housework 1 1    

To what extent the relinquishment of household duties at a given time directly affected the health of the child can not be definitely shown. A relation may exist, but on the other hand the difference in the mortality rate may be due to the fact that the mothers could afford to give consideration to their condition and escape some of their heaviest tasks as their pregnancy approached its end, and were members of families who were thoughtful of them and relieved them of these tasks or employed extra household assistance at such times.

Another indication of intelligence and of comfortable surroundings is the care given a mother in the early days of her baby’s life, particularly if she is a nursing mother. The duration of her rest period before the resumption of part of her household duties is one measure of this. The foreign mothers, with less education, more numerous and arduous tasks, less opportunity for leisure, and smaller incomes, begin to resume their housework sooner than the native mothers with young babies.

Table 28.—Distribution of Live Births and of Deaths During First Year, and Infant Mortality Rate, According to Time of Mother Resuming Part of Household Duties After Confinement, by Nativity of Mother.
 
TIME OF RESUMING PART OF HOUSEHOLD DUTIES AFTER CONFINEMENT. LIVE BIRTHS TO— DEATHS DURING FIRST YEAR.
All mothers. Native mothers. Foreign mothers. Total. Infant mortality rate.
Total 1,463 815 648 196 134.0
8 days or less 467 44 423 79 169.2
9 to 13 days 560 446 114 70 125.0
14 days or more 427 318 109 41 96.0
Mother died or not reported 9 7 2 6 ([28])

28.  Total number of live births less than 50; base therefore considered too small to use in computing an infant mortality rate.

The fact that a mother takes up her housework in the early days of her baby’s life does not necessarily increase the danger of its death. In some cases, however, mothers stated that the quantity of their breast milk was noticeably impaired when they got up and resumed their work too soon. Naturally this would affect the baby’s nutrition. In other cases a mother’s cares and duties may be so absorbing that she can not give the baby full attention. Whatever the exact explanation, attention should be called to the greater frequency of infant deaths when the mother resumed household duties very soon after childbirth.

A statement of the time of the mother’s resumption of household duties in full, like that giving the time of resumption in part, shows that the native mothers have the longer period of rest.

Table 29.—Distribution of Live Births and of Deaths During First Year, and Infant Mortality Rate, According to Time of Mother Resuming all Household Duties After Confinement, by Nativity of Mother.
 
TIME OF RESUMING ALL HOUSEHOLD DUTIES AFTER CONFINEMENT. LIVE BIRTHS TO— DEATHS DURING FIRST YEAR.
All mothers. Native mothers. Foreign mothers. Total. Infant mortality rate.
Total 1,463 815 648 196 134.0
8 days or less 219 13 206 37 168.9
9 to 13 days 182 132 50 30 164.8
14 days or more 1,053 663 390 123 116.8
Mother died or not reported 9 7 2 6 ([29])

29.  Total live births less than 50; base therefore considered too small to use in computing an infant mortality rate.

The infant mortality rates for all mothers in the group just referred to, according to the time of resuming housework in full after childbirth, show fewer infant deaths proportionately when the mother has had a longer rest; that is, a rest of two weeks or more.

ECONOMIC FACTORS

EARNINGS OF FATHER

A grouping of babies according to the income of the father shows the greatest incidence of infant deaths where wages are lowest, and the smallest incidence where they are highest, indicating clearly the relation between low wages and ill health and infant deaths.

For all live babies born in wedlock the infant mortality rate is 130.7. It rises to 255.7 when the father earns less than $521 a year or less than $10 a week, and falls to 84 when he earns $1,200 or more or if his earnings are “ample.”[30] The variation in the infant mortality rate from one earnings group to another is not perfectly regular and consistent, but if any two or more consecutive groups are combined an invariable lowering of the infant mortality rate from one such combined group to that next higher results.

30.  “Ample” as used in this report has a somewhat arbitrary meaning. When information concerning the father’s earnings was not available and the family showed no evidences of actual poverty, the word “ample” was used. If no information concerning earnings was available when, on the other hand, the family was clearly in a state of abject poverty, then the income was tabulated as “Under $521.”

Table 30.—Distribution of Live Births and of Deaths During First Year, and Infant Mortality Rate, According to Annual Earnings of Father and Nativity of Mother, for Legitimate Live-Born Babies.
 
ANNUAL EARNINGS OF FATHER ACCORDING TO NATIVITY OF WIFE. Total live births. Deaths during first year. Infant mortality rate.
Total 1,431 187 130.7
  Under $625 384 82 213.5
    Under $521 219 56 255.7
    $521 to $624 165 26 157.6
       
  $625 to $899 385 47 122.1
    $625 to $779 224 24 107.1
    $780 to $899 161 23 142.9
       
  $900 or more 186 18 96.8
    $900 to $1,199 138 14 101.4
    $1,200 or more 48 4 83.3
       
  Ample[1] 476 40 84.0
       
    Husbands with native wives 785 76 96.8
Under $625 80 16 200.0
  Under $521 32 9 ([31])
  $521 to $624 48 7 145.8
       
$625 to $899 193 20 103.6
  $625 to $779 86 6 69.8
  $780 to $899 107 14 130.8
       
$900 or more 129 10 77.5
  $900 to $1,199 92 7 76.1
  $1,200 of more 37 3 ([31])
       
Ample[1] 383 30 78.3
       
    Husbands with foreign wives 646 111 171.8
Under $625 304 66 217.1
  Under $521 187 47 251.3
  $521 to $624 117 19 162.4
       
$625 to $899 192 27 140.6
  $625 to $779 138 18 130.4
  $780 to $899 54 9 166.7
       
$900 or more 57 8 140.6
  $900 to $1,199 46 7 152.2
  $1,200 or more 11 1 ([31])
       
Ample[32] 93 10 107.5

31.  Total live births less than 50; base therefore considered too small to use in computing an infant mortality rate.

32.  See note on page 45.

In considering the babies of native and of foreign mothers separately in the foregoing table, similar variations in mortality rates according to earnings of father are found, although the foreign infant death rate is higher in each group. The foreign are less numerous both actually and relatively in the higher wage groups.

The foreigners of a given wage group almost always live in a poorer neighborhood than the natives earning the same amount. The foreigners go where they find their own countrymen, most of whom are poor, and hence even those who earn a fair wage find themselves, until they become Americanized, surrounded by poor conditions and an ignorant class of people.

It is of interest to note what per cent. of the native and what per cent. of the foreign are in the several earnings groups. The next table shows this for all married mothers and not simply for those of live-born babies as in the foregoing table.

Table 31.—Number and Per Cent of Mothers by Nativity, According to the Annual Earnings of Husband.
 
ANNUAL EARNING OF HUSBAND. ALL MOTHERS. NATIVE MOTHERS. FOREIGN MOTHERS.
Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent.
Total 1,491 100.0 816 100.0 675 100.0
Under $521 233 15.6 36 4.4 197 29.2
$521 to $624 174 11.7 50 6.1 124 18.4
$625 to $779 229 15.4 86 10.5 143 21.2
$780 to $899 166 11.1 108 13.2 58 8.6
$900 to $1,199 146 9.8 98 12.0 48 7.1
$1,200 and over 50 3.4 39 4.8 11 1.6
Ample[33] 493 33.1 399 48.9 94 13.9

33.  See note on page 45.

The 1,491 married mothers included in the foregoing table bore 1,517 babies in 1911, the excess being due to plural births. The 33 unmarried mothers and their 34 babies (one mother had twins), although included in some of the general tables, are not included in those relative to the earnings of the husband.

GAINFUL WORK OF MOTHER

In localities where large numbers of women are engaged in industrial work, comparisons are frequently made of the death rates among their babies with those of the babies of mothers not so engaged. In Johnstown, however, industrial occupations are not open to women, and but 3.1 per cent. of the mothers visited went outside their homes to earn money. All mothers who gained money by keeping lodgers or in any other way are, for convenience, designated “wage-earning” mothers, even though their earnings were not in the form of a definite wage at stated periods.

Although not industrially engaged, nearly one-fifth of the mothers did resort to some means of supplementing the earnings of their husbands. Usually they kept lodgers. This was done by the foreign mothers principally, exactly one-third of whom had lodgers, as compared with less than 1 per cent. of the native women. Usually work done outside the home consisted either of char work or of assisting husbands in their stores. Generally these stores were in the same building with the home.

When a mother of a young baby does not give her full time to her duties within the home but resorts to means of earning money, it generally indicates poverty. This is true to a greater degree in Johnstown than in places which have many inducements for women to work. In Johnstown, with its excess of males, especially in the foreign population, the woman’s services are particularly needed to make the home.

In the group where the husband earns $10 a week or less—that is, under $521 a year—many of the women are wage earners. In each group showing better earnings for the husband the number and percentage of wage-earning wives decline. Such a tabulation as the following almost automatically fixes the minimum wage on which a man, wife, and a child or two can live with any degree of comfort in Johnstown at about $780 a year. When the husband’s wage is less than $780 a year, it is shown that the wives, in considerable number, must be wage earners. As shown in the next table, in nearly half of the families where the husband earns $10 a week or less (less than $521 a year), the wife resorted to some means of earning money; when he earned as much as $900 a year, only 8.9 per cent. of the wives worked, and in the small group where the man earns as much as $1,200 a year, only 1 in 50.

Table 32.—Number and Per Cent of Husbands with Wage-Earning Wives, by Nativity of Wife and Annual Earnings of Husband.
 
ANNUAL EARNINGS OF HUSBAND. TOTAL HUSBANDS. HUSBANDS HAVING NATIVE WIVES. HUSBANDS HAVING FOREIGN WIVES.
Number. Husbands with wage-earning wives. Number. Husbands with wage-earning wives. Number. Husbands with wage-earning wives.
Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent.
Total 1,491 278 18.6 816 26 3.2 675 252 37.3
Under $521 233 111 47.6 36 9 25.0 197 102 51.8
$521 to $624 174 57 32.8 50 3 6.0 124 54 43.5
$625 to $779 229 51 22.3 86 4 4.7 143 47 32.9
$780 to $899 166 25 15.1 108 6 5.6 58 19 32.8
$900 to $1,199 146 13 8.9 98 1 1.0 48 12 25.0
$1,200 and over 50 1 2.0 39     11 1 9.1
“Ample”[34] 493 20 4.1 399 3 .8 94 17 18.1