Fig. 28.—Sectional Plan and Elevation of Reverberatory Furnace at Anaconda.

Large Reverberatory Furnaces: Details of Construction.—The large furnaces at Anaconda were the first of the modern type to be constructed, they have met with enormous success in practice and constitute the standard form. Similar furnaces are now in operation or under construction at many of the large modern camps, and are of similar design and construction.

The hearth is 102 to 116 feet long by 19 feet wide.

Grate, 16 feet by 8 feet = 128 square feet grate area.

Ratio of hearth to grate area is 16 : 1.

Distance from hearth to level of fire-bridge, 26 inches; hearth to crown of arch, 6 feet 5 inches. Walls are 26 inches thick. Roof is 15 inches thick (except for 4 to 6 feet over the fire-bridge, where it is 20 inches). The bracing of the furnace is necessarily particularly strong (see Fig. 29). Lined inside with silica brick, said to be the finest in the world. The bed is of the finest Dillon sand (97·5 per cent. silica), ground to pass ¼-inch mesh; the bed has a slope of 8 inches towards the tap-holes, of which there are two. During the construction of the large furnace there are left in the roof ten expansion openings of 3 inches each, which by the time the furnace has attained its working temperature, become closed up (see Fig. 30). The conker plate which runs through the fire-bridge is 14 to 15 feet long, and is made thicker near the furnace side, where it is 3 inches thick. The air space through the plate is 2 feet 3 inches by 9 inches, and serves the purpose of keeping the fire-bridge cool; air passes through it continuously, and if the plate shows signs of becoming hot, a blast of cold high-pressure air is sent through it. Still further heating of the plate and signs of red heat are an indication that the 2 feet of silica of the fire-bridge wall are being burnt through.

Working of the Reverberatory Plant at Anaconda.—The plant consists of eight large furnaces, built parallel to one another, seven being usually at work whilst the eighth is undergoing repair. Each furnace treats 300 tons of hot calcines and flue-dust daily.

Charging.—The furnaces are charged every 65 to 70 minutes with 15-ton charges, and as soon as one charge is melted, another is added; with average running, 150 charges are worked in the seven furnaces daily. The charge train, consisting of an engine and three cars, each of which carries 5 tons of charge, travels from the roasters and enters the reverberatory building by an overhead track running above the charge bins of the furnaces. It discharges through hoppers into the bins which extend across the entire width of the hearth. Bins were formerly arranged at intervals all the way down the furnace, but now only the two bins nearest to the fire-bridge are employed. Into the back bin, 10 tons of charge are placed, and into the other, 5 tons. Each of these bins discharges through two hopper discharge openings, feeding the furnace through holes in the roof (Figs. 29, 30), which are closed, when not in use, by round firebrick tiles 20 inches in diameter and 2½ inches thick; these are moved in and out of position by means of levers operated from the fire-box platform.

The temperature maintained in the furnace is high, approximating to 1,500° C., and just previous to dropping in a fresh charge, a workman, by means of a rabble, feels about the hearth below the charging hopper in order to ensure that all of the previous charge has been melted, and that none of it is sticking to the furnace hearth. By employing only the comparatively small quantities of 15 tons, this sticking is avoided, since such charges are not heavy enough to sink unmelted through the 8 inches of slag and 8 inches of matte in the furnace. The former practice of feeding charges amounting to 45 tons through hoppers situated all the way along the furnace had given serious trouble in that respect, and had consequently to be discarded. When the examination of the hearth is completed, the time occupied being very short, the side door is closed, and sealed with sand; the covers to the holes in the roof are now withdrawn, the gates closing the hoppers pulled back, and first the 5-ton, then the 10-ton charge is dropped into the furnace. The whole operation, including the preliminary opening of the door to test the furnace bottom, occupies five minutes.

Very little hand labour is required round these enormous furnaces, except for the grating of the fires, for the charging of coal and calcines every hour by the operation of levers from the fire-box platform, for the skimming of slag at intervals of four hours, and for the tapping of matte when required. The whole of this work is conducted by the skimmer and two helpers to each furnace, one of the men also looking after the boilers.

As soon as the charge has been dropped on to the pool of molten material, the mass appears to spread out over the surface and float towards the skimming door, in a thin slow-moving stream which disappears when about half-way down, being usually melted within one hour. The former 40-ton charges required as much as eight hours for melting.

Owing to the great heating effect of the large bath of hot material below, and of the intense flame above, there is but little cooling action on adding the fresh charge; whilst with this length of furnace, practically all the dust is settled, and very little is carried into the flues.

Coaling.—The quantity of coal employed amounts to 20 to 25 per cent. of the charge, or about 50 to 60 tons per day per furnace, 1 ton of coal smelting rather less than 5 tons of calcines.

Fig. 29.—Fire-box End of Reverberatory Furnace, showing massive
Bracing, Charge Bins, and Charging Levers—Anaconda.


Fig. 30.—Interior of Reverberatory Furnace (looking towards Skimming Door),
showing Expansion Spaces in Roof, and Charging Holes—Anaconda.

Coal is charged every 40 minutes in quantities of 1½ tons at a time, from bins which extend across the entire width of the fireplace, feeding through four hoppers into openings 1 foot square in the roof of the fire-box, and the withdrawing of the gates is operated by means of levers at the platform. Over the fire-bridge are two rows of air-holes used for regulating the length and character of the flame in the furnace; the flame, however, plays a subordinate part in the smelting reactions. The coal employed is from Diamondsville, Wyoming, and gives a flame 125 feet in length, the appearance of which is gauged through the window fixed in the off-take flue, this being visible from the fire-box platform. The coal is run-of-mine quality, and considerable slack is used. It possesses a high calorific power and a large proportion of volatile constituents, but clinkers rather badly, and a clinker grate is worked with.

Grating.—The fire rests upon 3-inch round bars placed at 4½ to 6-inch centres, and is maintained at a depth of about 27 inches. Grating requires to be conducted at fairly frequent intervals, usually twice per shift, in order to keep the fire free and to prevent channelling, which is indicated on the draft gauge by a drop from 0·75 inch to 0·50 inch, due to airing. It serves further to prevent clinkering, which, when taking place in the fire, causes a rise of from 0·75 up to 1·0 inch on the gauge. The operation of grating usually occupies about half-an-hour; the work is arduous, and the heat to which the workman is exposed is itself very trying.

Coke Recovery.—A constant stream of half-burnt fuel and ashes falls through the bars, and during the clinkering operations large quantities are dropped. The material all falls down a bank inclined at 45°, into a channel where it is met by a stream of water which washes it along launders and through a grizzle, to a settling tank. The settled products are subsequently jigged, the recovered coke being washed over the tail-board to a trommel, and by this means 10 per cent. of the fuel charged into the furnace is recovered in a useful form. This coke is used up as a constituent of the briquettes.

TABLE VI.—Daily Report—Reverberatory Furnaces.
August 17th, 1908 (Good Day).

 
      Charge.
Furnace 
No.
Coal Total
 Smelted 
 Calcines   Macdougal 
Flue-Dust
Blast
Furnace
 Flue-Dust 
Main
 Flue-Dust 
 Extras   Residues
    Tons   Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons ‡  Tons
1 60·6 288·8 279·2 .. 8·9 .. 0·7 ..
2 57·2 277·7 262·7 .. 2·9 11·8 0·3 ..
3 64·1 286·7 253·2 12·0 8·9 11·8 0·8 ..
4 60·5 278·7 264·7 .. 2·6   3·9 0·2 7·3
5 57·3 245·9 221·7 12·0 11·2   .. 1·0 ..
6 57·3 273·1 264·4 .. 7·9 .. 0·8 ..
7 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
8 57·4 278·7 266·8 11·9 .. .. .. ..
Total 414·4   1929·6   1812·7   35·9 42·4   27·5 3·8 7·3
 
‡ = Fine lime rock. 
 
      Delays.      
Furnace  
No.
 Copper Material 
Smelted per
Ton of Coal
Cost of Coal
per Ton of
 Metal Melted 
 Waiting 
for Coal
Waiting
 for Calcines 
 Miscellaneous  Total
 Delays 
Boilers
 Working 
Ladles of Matte in
Furnace
  at End of Day.
  Tons $ Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours  
1 4·77 0·95 —— No delays. —— 24 10
2 4·85 0·94 24 10
3 4·47 1·02 24 10
4 4·61 0·99 24 10
5 4·29 1·06 24 10
6 4·77 0·95 24 10
7 .. .. .. ..
8 4·85 0·94 24 10
 Total .. .. .. .. .. .. 168 70
 
Draft, 1·7 inches. Number of furnaces running,     7·00
All furnaces working slow. Number of charges, 140
Furnace No. 5, one bad charge.   Ladles matte tapped,   34
  Cupriferous material smelted per furnace,  275·6 tons.

 
DAILY REPORT—REVERBERATORY FURNACES. AUGUST 19TH, 1908.
      Charge.
Furnace 
No.
Coal Total
 Smelted 
 Calcines   Macdougal 
Flue-Dust
Blast
Furnace
 Flue-Dust 
Main
 Flue-Dust 
 Extras   Residues
    Tons   Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons Tons
1 55·4 143·0 143·0 .. .. .. .. ..
2 55·4 246·4 240·1 .. .. .. .. 6·3
3 62·1 250·7 236·9 .. .. 13·8 .. ..
4 58·9 262·7 262·9 .. .. .. .. ..
5 62·2 247·8 247·8 .. .. .. .. ..
6 59·1 241·9 241·9 .. .. .. .. ..
7 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
8 55·1 252·9 252·9 .. .. .. .. ..
 Total, 408·2   1645·6   1625·5   .. .. 13·8 .. 6·3
 
 
      Delays.      
Furnace  
No.
 Copper Material 
Smelted per
Ton of Coal
Cost of Coal
per Ton of
 Metal Melted 
 Waiting 
for Coal
Waiting
 for Calcines 
 Miscellaneous  Total
 Delays 
Boilers
 Working 
Ladles of Matte in
Furnace
  at End of Day.
  Tons $ Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours  
1 2·58 1·76 .. .. 8·00 8·00 22 2
2 4·45 1·02 .. .. .. .. 24 8
3 4·04 1·13 .. .. .. .. 24 6
4 4·46 1·02 .. .. .. .. 24 6
5 3·98 1·14 .. .. .. .. 24 8
6 4·09 1·11 .. .. .. .. 24 8
7 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
8 4·59 1·19 .. .. .. .. 24 8
 Total, .. .. .. .. 8·00 8·00 166 46
 
Draft, 1·7 inches. Number of furnaces running,     6·67
Furnace No. 1 delayed 8 hours tapping and claying.   Number of charges, 118
Furnace No. 7 down for repairs. Ladles matte tapped,   47
Bad coal on all furnaces. Cupriferous material smelted per furnace,  246·7 tons.

Tapping the Furnace.—Matte is usually withdrawn from these large stores upon such occasions as it is required for the converters, though sometimes when the supply has got ahead of the converters’ demands, the matte is tapped and run outside the reverberatory building, being cast into large matte-beds. The tap-holes are situated between the second and third doors, and between the fourth and fifth; and each consists essentially of a copper plate 2 inches thick and 25 inches square, which at first stands back 9 inches from the outside of the wall. Through this plate a 1-inch hole has been drilled. The tapping bar is maintained inserted up this hole, being passed through the conical clay plug which closes it. At the back of the plate is 21 inches of lining material through which the tapping-hole passes. When the copper plate shows signs of a red heat, it is an indication of the lining tending to burn through; this part of the furnace is then cooled, the plate taken out, a 9-inch layer of sand is rammed into position, and the plate is thus moved forward a corresponding distance. Such a tap-hole plate lasts for about five months.

The reverberatories are usually not tapped until they contain about 250 tons of matte. The operation of tapping is performed by withdrawing the rod by means of a wedge and ring, when the matte flows along the launders leading to the ladles for the converters; two ladles of about 8 tons capacity each are usually filled at once, each ladleful being sampled at the runner. The tap-hole is then stopped with a cone of clay, and the tapping-rod driven through it again.

Typical daily reports of the furnaces are appended in Tables VI. and VII., and a monthly report on Table VIII.

TABLE VII.—From Daily Assay Report—Reverberatory Furnaces.
August 19, 1908.

 
Furnace
Number.
Per Cent Copper in Slag.
  Shift 1.     Shift 2.     Shift 3.  
1 0·30 0·30 0·30
2 0·30 0·35 0·25
3 0·30 0·30 0·35
4 0·45 0·30 0·25
5 0·30 0·40 0·35
6 0·30 0·20 0·20
7 .. .. ..
8 0·35 0·25 0·30
Average in slag,   0·35 0·30 0·30
 
Composition of calcines   SiO2, 29·5   per cent.
FeO, 37·3 "
S, 7·7 "
CaO, 2·7 "
Copper,   8·6 "

  Composition of slag,


SiO2,

39·4

  per cent.
FeO, 40·7 "
CaO, 4·3 "

  Copper in matte,


38·6
"

TABLE VIII.—Monthly Report—Reverberatory Furnaces.
Total Charge—All Furnaces.

 
   Charge.  SiO2. FeO.
  Tons.  Per cent.  Tons.  Per cent.  Tons.
Calcines and lime rock 50,054   27·20 13,616 39·40  19,721
M‘Dougal flue-dust, 977 30·50 298 21·90 214
Blast flue-dust, 1,639 35·90 588 22·00 361
Converter flue-dust, 132   1·90 2   6·60 9
Main flue-dust, 1,034 30·2   312 17·80 184
 Total, 53,836 .. 14,816 .. 20,489
Matte to converter, 10,950 .. .. 36·70 4,019
Matte chips to B.F., 74   8·20 6 38·10 28
Slag chips to B.F., 609 39·50 241 37·40 228
 Deduct from above total,   11,633 .. 247 .. 4,275
 Leaves for slag, .. .. 14,569 .. 16,214
 
 
  Lime. Sulphur. Copper.
   Per cent.  Tons.  Per cent.  Tons.  Per cent.  Lbs.
Calcines and lime rock, 2·30 1,150   8·40 4,205 8·266  8,274,799
M‘Dougal flue-dust, 1·30 13 14·00 137 7·884 152,295
Blast flue-dust, 4·30 70   6·70 110 5·698 186,782
Converter flue-dust, .. .. 12·10 16 68·743   181,482
Main flue-dust, 2·10 22   8·80 90 7·128 147,405
 Total, .. 1,256 .. 4,558 8·305 8,942,763
Matte to converter, .. .. 26·40 2,891 38·209   8,367,872
Matte chips to B.F., 0·20 .. 21·80 16 32·811   48,560
Slag chips to B.F., 2·30 14   2·20 13 35·597   43,357
 Deduct from above total, .. 14 ..  2,920 .. 8,459,789
 Leaves for slag, ..  1,242 .. .. .. ..
 
  Analysis.
 
Slag Calculation─      Calculated.  Actual. 
 SiO2  in slag,  14,569 ÷ 38,538 37·8 37·1
 FeO " 16,214 ÷ 38,538 42·1 43·2
 CaO "   1,242 ÷ 38,538 3·2 2·8
  ——————— ——— ———
  32,025 at 83·17 = 38,538 83·10 83·10
  ══════════ ════ ════

Fuels for Reverberatory Furnace Work.—The chief requirements of the fuel for good reverberatory work will now be apparent, particularly with regard to length of flame. This depends to a large extent upon the proportion of volatile hydrocarbons, but also on the conditions under which they are given off. For instance, a coal which rapidly parts with its hydrocarbons and leaves in the grate a dense layer of slow-burning coke would be unsuitable for reverberatory work, though some caking is necessary in order that the fuel should not burn away too rapidly, as it should yield a good bed of the required depth.

The great success of large reverberatory furnaces worked under suitable conditions, has had the tendency to tempt smelters in different parts of the world to erect furnaces of similar size independently of the character of the available fuel, and in several cases results have been unsatisfactory, at least in the earlier stages.

These preliminary failures have, however, served the purpose of developing the adaptation of other fuels for this work, and from the employment of oil for the purpose, important extensions in practice will undoubtedly develop in the future of reverberatory furnace working.

The device of using pulverised coal as a fuel has attracted attention at several smelters where the local coal as mined was proved to be unsuitable for use. In practice, however, the method has, up to the present, given unsatisfactory results, for although a longer flame and higher temperature have been obtained in the furnace, difficulties in working have arisen which appear to bar its use. One of the chief drawbacks has been due to the fine ash from the fuel, which is deposited in the flues in large quantities and even causes considerable slagging in them, impeding the working of the furnace and preventing the recovery of heat from the furnace gases. Further difficulty, though not quite so serious, was caused by the dust being blown upon the charge and tending to settle upon it; forming a non-conducting blanket which retarded the melting of the material by the flames. The method does not appear at present to offer much promise of extended application to copper smelting.

Oil Fuel in Reverberatory Practice.—The successful application of oil as a fuel marks a useful advance in reverberatory practice, particularly in connection with the working of large furnaces.

On several of the smaller plants, oil fuel has been in use with considerable success for some time, but within recent years the building of large-sized furnaces without having at hand suitable coal resources has led to attempts to employ oil in its place, and the preliminary difficulties appear to have been to a large extent successfully overcome. The work at the Cananea Smelter with oil fuel, and the discussion on Ricketts’ first report of his experience, afford valuable indications of the possibilities of this method. Working on charges consisting to a large extent of flue-dust, several thousand tons of material have been smelted in furnaces yielding 245 tons daily output, at a cost which compares very favourably with that of ordinary practice. This success is particularly noteworthy in view of certain features in the preliminary system of working which will doubtless be altered at no very distant date, and of the fact that flue-dust is sometimes a difficult material to melt in a reverberatory furnace, even when good coal is available as a fuel.

Fig. 31.—Shelby Oil-burner for Reverberatory Furnace Use.

The chief difficulties in working appear to have been largely in connection with the regulation of the flame and the management of the oil-burners. In endeavouring to obtain the requisite high temperature over the entire length of the furnace-hearth, an intense local action was caused near the place where the oil in the form of a spray entered the furnace, resulting in the burning out of the roof-arch on several occasions. These difficulties will doubtless be overcome with further experience in the design and management of the burners constructed for this class of work.

At Cananea, four oil burners of the Shelby type are employed on each furnace, and this form is stated to project the flame further into the furnace, and to prevent its impinging on the roof, more successfully than the other types tried. The waste heat fires three Stirling boilers of 664 H.P. Less than one barrel (42 gallons, or 310 lbs.) of oil is consumed per dry ton of charge, and of this quantity 0·43 barrel is chargeable to steam-raising under the boilers. The manner of working the charges, and the furnace construction in other respects, follow very closely the methods of operation already described.

Costs of Oil-fired Reverberatory Working.—Ricketts has contributed a useful analysis of the costs of reverberatory work using oil as fuel, under the conditions prevailing at Cananea, Mexico. He noted that the use of too much oil should be avoided. This precaution led to a decrease in the amount of repairs necessary. 550 barrels of oil were required to get the furnace into fairly good condition, and 8 barrels per furnace per hour to keep it going well. It is hoped ultimately to reduce the oil consumption to 0·8 barrel gross per ton of charge.

Analysis of Oil-fired Reverberatory Furnace Costs—Cananea—
February to July, 1911, inclusive.

Furnace Days, 312·5.

TONNAGE CHARGED— Dry Tons.   Per cent.
of Total.
  Flue-dust, 21,019   34·99
  Calcines, 35,533   59·15
  Ores, 3,040   5·06
  Limestone, 479     0·80
    60,071   100·00
  ══════   ══════
DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS—    Amount.   Per
Dry Ton.
  Operating expenses, $ 111,687·17   $ 1·8593
  Slag and matte expense, 5,111·07   0·0851
  Boiler-house, 11,468·77   0·1909
  General expense, 4,218·58   0·0702
  Cost of flux, 817·46   0·0136
    $ 133,303·05   $ 2·2192
  Steam credit, 48,861·86   0·8134
  Operating cost, $ 84,441·19 $ 1·4057
  ════════   ══════

ANALYSIS OF COSTS—
     
(1) Operating Amount.   Per
Dry Ton.
  Labour, $ 17,829·42   $ 0·2968
  Power, 592·36   0·0099
  Fuel oil, 88,028·99   1·4654
  Coal, 243·61   0·0041
  Water, 91·68   0·0015
  Transportation, 380·45   0·0063
  Sundries, 315·64   0·0053
  Flux, 817·46   0·0136
    $ 108,299·61   $ 1·8029
    ════════   ══════
(2) Repairs      
  Labour, $ 11,063·93   $ 0·1842
  Supplies, 12,425·30   0·2068
  Shop expense, 1,514·21   0·0252
    $ 25,003·44   $ 0·4162
  Total, $ 133,303·05   $ 2·2191
  Steam credit, 48,861·86   0·8134
    Net total, $ 84,441·19   $ 1·4057
    ════════   ══════

Gaseous Fuel.—The proposal to employ gaseous fuel in copper smelting dates from the introduction of this method of furnace-firing by Siemens 50 years ago. It is, however, not in general use, although at several smelters gas-firing is employed in furnaces for the refining of the metal.

The chief difficulties have been in connection with the control of the flame, burning-out of the roof having been a not infrequent occurrence when employing gaseous fuel, and the method has been tried and given up at the Great Falls Smelter in Montana, and at several other works.

The practical difficulties ought not, however, to be insuperable should gas-firing be otherwise found most practicable for the particular conditions at the smelter, although there appear to be certain physical characteristics of such flames which may be responsible for some of the difficulties met with in employing this type of fuel for the working of very large reverberatory furnaces.

The Condition of the Charge for Good Reverberatory Work.— The considerations which decide the advisability or otherwise of installing at a smelter, any particular types of furnace, whether reverberatory or blast furnace or both, cover a very wide field, and will be more apparent when blast-furnace practice has been reviewed in detail. It is clear that the blast furnace is unsuited for the direct smelting of fine materials as such, and that the reverberatory form of furnace is best fitted for their treatment when large quantities of this material require to be dealt with. Actual practice has shown, however, that the reverberatory does not give equally satisfactory results on all classes of fines, and that there are certain physical and chemical conditions of the charge which appear to be necessary for the most successful and rapid smelting. When such conditions are not adhered to, less satisfactory working has resulted. Recent experience has, to some extent, defined more clearly the nature of these requirements, and has indicated the procedure which is necessary in order to avoid an undue supply of the less suitable material for the reverberatory charge.

It is usual to smelt in the reverberatory furnaces, where such are available, the greater portion of the dust which accumulates in very large quantities in the flues at the smelter. The reverberatory is the only type of furnace in which such material could be treated directly, under the present conditions of working. In practice, however, it has been found in several instances, though not universally, that such dust is considerably more difficult to treat in the furnace, and entails considerably more expense in smelting than does the ordinary roasted concentrate. It is estimated by Ricketts that this extra cost is practically equivalent to the expense of roasting an equal weight of concentrate.

Flue-dust, as a rule, consists mainly of material in a minute state of division, in which condition, as is well known, a much higher temperature is required for its fusion than if it were in the form of coarser particles. This is largely due to the poor conductivity for heat which generally characterises such dust, and to the insulation by the air envelopes surrounding the individual grains, which thus prevents the heat passing from particle to particle, and retards their clotting, even when the prevailing temperature would otherwise be sufficient to cause fusion. The particles of flue-dust moreover, have been blown from the surface of the charge, especially in the blast-furnace process, and are thus rapidly and often almost completely oxidised in passing through the oxidising atmosphere which prevails above the charge and in the flues. Such oxides clot only with the greatest difficulty, and are characterised by comparative infusibility and poor conducting power, and hence are found to melt with considerable difficulty when treated in the reverberatory furnace.[10]

Roasted fine concentrate, on the other hand, constitutes an ideal material for the reverberatory furnace charge, and the system of passing both the concentrate and the flux through the roasters has been shown to possess numerous advantages. In addition to the thorough mixing and the preheating of the furnace charge, it was found that its chemical and physical conditions were particularly well suited for the subsequent reverberatory furnace treatment. The particles of concentrate, being gradually heated and constantly stirred in the presence of the small proportion of flux usually required, roast well, and lose the desired quantity of sulphur without an undue amount of preliminary clotting which would otherwise interfere with the operation, whilst any residual sulphide in the product is uniformly distributed through the roasted charge. In addition, at the higher temperatures which prevail in the later stages of the roasting process when almost as much sulphur as was desired has been driven off, the materials are raised to a point approaching incipient fusion and slagging. The heat in the reverberatory furnace is sufficient to complete this effect, and enable the necessary chemical combinations and physical separations to be readily accomplished.

The roasted concentrate should therefore form the main proportion of the reverberatory charge, working in with it, in moderate quantities, such flue-dust as is made at the smelter. Of this flue-dust, it is naturally desirable to produce as small an amount as possible, not only on account of the difficulties in subsequent treatment, but also on account of the actual losses in the economy of the furnace processes and the cost of rehandling, etc. In modern smelting, naturally, every effort is made to reduce the quantity of dust to the lowest practicable limit.

The greater portion of the dust results from the treatment of unsuitably fine material in the blast furnace, and by decreasing the quantity of this constituent the flue-dust problem will be largely overcome. The smelting of fine concentrate in the blast furnace has up to the present been considered judicious where circumstances have rendered imperative the addition of sulphides to the charge irrespective of their physical condition (either to act as a base for the matte, or on account of their fuel values), though naturally the proportion of fines has been kept as low as possible.

The recent developments in sintering processes, however, suggest the possibility of the future successful treatment, after preliminary agglomeration, of fine concentrate in the blast furnace, and if it be found possible to conduct the sintering by utilising the heat of oxidisation of the more free sulphur atom of the pyrites, and thus leave the bulk of the iron-sulphide fuel values in the sintered product, as suggested by Peters, the difficulties in connection with excessive flue-dust production from the above causes will be largely overcome, and the reverberatories will thus be relieved of this difficult constituent of their charge.

It therefore appears desirable, when circumstances permit, either to agglomerate fine concentrates and then treat them in the blast furnace, or else to roast them and smelt the product in the reverberatories.

So far as present experience has gone, it appears that—other circumstances being equally favourable—the correct scheme of treatment depends almost entirely upon the composition of the concentrate, there being for each process a particular class of fines for which it is best suited. The sintering process deals most satisfactorily with one class of concentrate, whilst the roasting process seems more particularly suited for a different type of material.

Thus the higher the iron and sulphur values, and the lower the silica content, the more successful, cheap, and efficient is the roasting process—the Anaconda material for example roasts well, requires practically no external fuel or heating, and with the added flux, works very successfully in the reverberatories.

As the silica content increases, however, and the iron and sulphur contents diminish, there is a consequent decrease in the natural fuel values of the material, and as a result, the roasting is neither so efficient nor so cheaply operated, owing to the need of external fuel for giving the required roasting temperatures. On the other hand, it appears to be just this class of material which is best suited for blast-roasting.

It is found in actual working practice that material which does not contain a certain proportion of silica does not work well in the blast-roasting or sintering processes, the resulting product being found to be more irregular in composition and more difficult to operate in the sintering plant. It would therefore appear that a certain class of fine concentrate higher in silica and lower in iron and sulphur contents, which is not quite so suitable for ordinary roasting (owing to the necessity for external heating, due to lower fuel values) is eminently suited for blast roasting or sintering processes, yielding lump products very suitable for subsequent blast-furnace treatment.

The reverberatory furnace thus deals most successfully with fine table concentrates high in iron and sulphur, moderately low in silica; roasted, with its required flux, to the necessary extent, and then charged whilst still red hot into the furnaces. To relieve the reverberatories of the greater bulk of the blast-furnace flue-dust, which it treats with more difficulty, fine concentrates, as such, require to be kept out of the blast-furnace charge, either by subjecting the more siliceous material to a preparatory sintering process, or by reserving the highly pyritic variety for roasting and subsequent reverberatory treatment.