Church and Rectory, Matadi.
These tables show what has provided the enemies of the Congo Free State with a great deal of puerile prattle—an excess of exports over imports which is more apparent than real. One of the bitter critics who write from Liverpool repeats the charge in the press that the Sovereign of the Free State is denuding the Congo of its natural resources by exporting more than he imports. In this respect a German writer in Der Tag, Berlin, September, 26, 1904, not at all friendly to the Congo State (because it is diverting the Zanzibar trade of the Fatherland), has some pertinent things to say of the excess of exports over imports in the British colonies of South Nigeria and Lagos. Herr Eberhard von Schkopp discusses the Congolese, British, French, and German trade statistics in the following concise manner:
In 1901 the Congo State importations reached twenty-three million francs whilst the exports attained fifty millions, and the transit trade seven millions. This excess of exports over imports has been turned to account to support the attacks—justified besides—upon the Congo State’s system of government.
If that circumstance is of a kind to weigh in the balance, it ought to be imputed as a ground of complaint against all nations carrying on a practical colonial policy, and whose possessions export more than they import. The Congo State is neither the only nor even the first colony where this excess has been exhibited.
The exports of the English colony of South Nigeria have always surpassed the imports. Here are the figures:
| 1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899 | 1900 | ||
| Imports | 750,000 | 655,000 | 640,000 | 732,000 | 723,000 | pounds ster. |
| Exports | 844,000 | 785,000 | 750,000 | 774,000 | 888,000 | pounds ster. |
Statistics of the trade of the English colony of Lagos:
| 1896 | 1897 | 1898 | 1899 | 1900 | ||
| Imports | 881,000 | 758,000 | 892,000 | 960,000 | 832,000 | pounds ster. |
| Exports | 975,000 | 810,000 | 882,000 | 915,000 | 885,000 | pounds ster. |
Here also, except for 1898 and 1899, the total of exports exceeds that of imports. The case is the same with the commerce of the Gold Coast and the Gambia.
The French colonies also—Ivory Coast, Dahomey, Guinea, and French Congo—can also boast of having frequently had their exports higher than their imports.
No one has ever yet pretended to make that a grievance against the English and the French, and it must appear astonishing that the favourable trade statistics of the Congo State should lead to an attack on the system of its administration.
It would be very desirable if, following the example of the Congo State, and as we have seen of the English and French colonies, our possessions [the German] across the sea were to show exports exceeding their imports. For a commercial firm that is the best proof of success, and it cannot in any way be concluded from this fact that the “poor” blacks of Africa are being exploited by Europeans devoid of conscience.
But let us see if the Congo State exports really do exceed the imports, and if so, by what sum. The exports of the State are estimated in the tables at their value in Antwerp, after they have been harvested, prepared for transport from remote parts of the Congo Basin, stood charges of porterage, freight, export duties, taxes, insurance, brokerage at the African and European terminals, and merchant profits of an indefinite measure—in all, at least half their European value. The original value of Central African ivory, rubber, palm oil, gum copal, and other exports is, in fact, less than half their market value in Europe. In other words, if the exports of the Congo State were estimated at their value as they left the forests or the native collector, instead of aggregating 54,597,835.21 francs for the year 1903, they would show but 27,298,917.16 francs.
On the other hand, the imports, also estimated at their European value, but having similar distances to undergo and similar charges to bear, represent when they reach their consumers at least double their invoiced European cost. On a proper basis of value in their ultimate African market the imports for the year 1903 would amount to 42,792,662.04 francs. Thus the exports would stand at 27,298,917.16 francs, and the imports at 42,792,662.04 francs for the year 1903.
But even this is not a just comparison with the exports and imports of the British colonies, inasmuch as in the colony of Lagos, for instance, the imports include about sixty-five per cent. of alcoholic liquors,[32] leaving the native the beneficiary of an aggregate import of really civilising products of only thirty-five per cent. of the total, while the Congo imports, containing only five per cent. of alcoholic liquors, bestows upon the native legitimate products for his civilisation to the extent of ninety-five per cent. of the total of all the imports of the State. Deducting, therefore, from the Lagos imports sixty of their sixty-five per cent. of gin, rum, and whisky, thereby placing them on an equation with the imports of the Congo, we find in Herr von Schkopp’s figures an arraignment of Lagos “civilisation” which indicates where the real curse of Central Africa abides.
The foregoing is an astonishing record of exports and imports for a country practically developed in the short period which has elapsed since 1886. Congolese products are largely sent to Antwerp and, as the tables show, Belgium is by far the largest exporter and importer. A few years ago England was the chief exporter to the Congo of its cotton stuffs and other goods, but the same laggard spirit which caused Englishmen once interested in the Anglo-Belgian India-Rubber Company (known as the Abir) and other undertakings to abandon their Congolese enterprises has lost England a large and growing market in Central Africa. That the Belgians have developed the Mid-African trade by dint of hard work, organisation, and the risk of capital, is a state of things intolerable to those who have neglected and lost it. The awkward English monetary system is alone responsible for a large percentage of the world-wide diminution of British trade. All other nations have shown greater adaptability to the characteristics of foreign markets, and the capabilities and peculiarities of the peoples who compose those markets. The Germans, French, and Americans circulate their catalogues and price lists in the language of the country where they seek a market and quote prices in its coin, giving the equivalents in francs, marks, and dollars. British merchants, on the other hand, have adhered to their ancient custom of employing a monetary system so needlessly cumbersome that it can hardly be attributed to intelligent origin.
Belgian manufacturers have patiently studied the needs of the natives and have successfully endeavoured to supply them with the textures and food stuffs, machinery, agricultural implements, and building material which, being of simple construction, they are capable of putting to intelligent use.
The mineral wealth of the country which prospecting during the last five years has revealed in many sections of the Congo Basin, it is not the purpose of this volume to more than mention. Fine outcroppings of gold, coal, and copper have been discovered in the Katanga district in the south-eastern corner of the State. It has lately been rumoured in Europe that foreign prospectors have discovered territory marvellously rich in gold near the borders of British East Africa in the south, and again in the Enclave of Lado in the north. On this subject, and the likelihood of early and interesting mineral developments in that region, the Congo State authorities appear to have considerable knowledge. They do not, however, discuss the matter with any degree of candour. When the secret of certain political phases of Congolese history shall have been revealed, a connexion may be found between the mining and rubber industry and the calumnious campaign now proceeding against the State. But with that story, the present volume has naught to do.
The State’s revenue, consisting of import and export dues, tolls, excise, and direct personal taxation, is indicated in the following table:
| 1902 | Nature of Receipts | 1903 | ||||
| Estimates | Estimates | |||||
| Frs. | Frs. | |||||
| 3,000.00 | Registration Taxes | 3,000.00 | ||||
| 70,000.00 | Sale and Letting of Domanial Land, Timber Felling, etc | 20,000.00 | ||||
| Customs Duties on Exports, | ||||||
| Frs. 4,550,000.00 | ||||||
| 6,055,000.00 | Customs Duties on Imports, including | 6,150,000.00 | ||||
| the Duties on Alcohol, | ||||||
| Frs. 1,600,000.00 | ||||||
| 580,000.00 | Direct Personal Taxation | 600,000.00 | ||||
| 1,000.00 | Road Tolls | 1,000.00 | ||||
| 125,000.00 | Taxes on Timber Felling | 140,000.00 | ||||
| 155,000.00 | Postal Receipts | 155,000.00 | ||||
| 55,000.00 | Maritime Rates | 60,000.00 | ||||
| 25,000.00 | Judicial Receipts | 25,000.00 | ||||
| 8,000.00 | Chancery Duties | 6,000.00 | ||||
| 4,160,000.00 | Transport, and Different Services of the State | 3,100,000.00 | ||||
| 60,000.00 | Taxes on Portage | 60,000.00 | ||||
| 15,452,000.00 | Proceeds from the Private Domain of the State, from Tributes and Taxes Paid in Kind by the Natives | 16,440,000.00 | ||||
| 1,703,000.00 | Interests and Dividends | 1,100,000.00 | ||||
| 122,000.00 | Fees for Licences Granted to Congolese Companies | 105,000.00 | ||||
| 135,000.00 | Extra and Casual Receipts | 125,000.00 | ||||
| 28,709,000.00 | Total Receipts | 28,090,000.00 | ||||
It will be observed that by far the greater proportion of the State’s revenue is derived from the State lands (Domaine privé), which is fully considered in a succeeding chapter. Direct personal taxation is a comparatively small item, being only 600,000 francs, or one forty-seventh part of the year’s budget. Import duties, including duties on alcohol, are only 1,600,000 francs, while duties on exports amount to 4,550,000 francs. These duties were, as hereinbefore stated, fixed by arrangement with France and Portugal on April 8, 1892, for a term of ten years, and by a protocol dated May 10, 1902, extended until July 2, 1905.
The export duty collected on India-rubber and ivory under these tariff agreements between the interested Powers are as follows:
| Ivory, in pieces or sticks | Frs. | 10 | per kilo. |
| Tusks of less weight than 6 kilos | ” | 16 | ” ” |
| Tusks above 6 kilos in weight | ” | 21 | ” ” |
| India-rubber | ” | 4 | ” ” |
“Personal taxes,” says Descamps, “are levied upon three bases: 1, The area of inhabited buildings and enclosures; 2, the number of employés in service; 3, the ships and boats used by tax-payers.” As to the taxes en nature, levied upon the natives and already referred to in a previous chapter, the Chevalier de Cuvelier, Secretary of State of the Congo Free State, says in his official capacity in the Bulletin Officiel for June, 1903, that “it is as legitimate as any other kind of tax. It does not impose upon the native obligations of a different nature or heavier than the system of taxation employed in neighbouring colonies, such, for instance, as the British hut-tax. It is the native’s contribution to the public charges incurred by the State in exchange for the protection given him. In the Congo State this participation in the State’s support is light, seeing that it represents on an average not more than forty hours of native labour in a month.” It is the payment of tax in this form that the State terms prestation, which, if literally translated, would mean enforced labour upon roads.
In 1902 a general reduction of direct taxation was decreed. At the same time the taxation of all religious, charitable, and scientific institutions and enterprises was reduced to 50 per cent. of the rate which prevailed when the State had no revenue from import dues or from its domain lands. By a decree of 25th June, 1902, all personal taxes are entitled to one-fifth reduction so long as the State lands (domaine), tributes, and taxes in kind, yield the sum of 17,000,000 francs annually. In order to develop and extend the public highways, and works increasing the facilities of commerce, religion, agriculture, etc., the native prestations and their proper distribution have formed the subject of numerous decrees, all seeking to equitably adjust this form of taxation. One of the later decrees, that of 18th November, 1903, provides, amongst other measures protective of the native, that “In order to fix the tax justly and equitably among the natives, the territorial chiefs must take into account the nature of the work to be done, the age and the skill of the natives subjected to the prestation, and finally the obligation of the State to remunerate the natives for all work done by them.”[33]
Native Carpenters at Work, Mission of New Antwerp, 1897.
The items constituting the State’s annual expenditure throw an interesting light on the subject of these native prestations in the Congo State. The State’s enemies found their charges of slavery largely upon the fact that the State enforces this labour upon the natives instead of imposing a tax in specie. In 1903 the State paid to its European officials and employés in the Congo force publique the sum of 1,800,000 francs, whereas during the same period the wages it paid to natives in the same service amounted to 2,050,000 francs. In developing the State lands at a cost of 6,014,790 francs during that year, the sum of 2,802,190 francs was paid to natives as wages. For extending agriculture and replanting India-rubber vines the sum of 1,373,932 francs was expended in 1903. The following items, taken from the table of expenditure for the same year, may be interesting:
Home Department
| Frs. | |
| The Administrative Service of Europe | 165,000.00 |
| The Administrative Service of Africa | 3,180,310.00 |
| The Army | 7,701,765.00 |
| Naval Expenditure | 2,023,376.00 |
| Sanitary Department | 504,120.00 |
| Public Works | 1,081,885.00 |
| Missions and Educational Establishments | 121,425.00 |
| Expenses relating to some Transports in Africa, not Drawn up in the Budget | 1,600,000.00 |
Financial Department
| The Administrative Service of Europe | 99,000.00 |
| The Administrative Service of Africa | 503,065.00 |
| Agriculture | 1,373,932.00 |
| Exploitation of the Domain | 6,041,790.00 |
| Savings-Bank, Interest of the Loans and Guaranteed Stock | 1,656,228.00 |
Foreign Office and Justice
| Administrative Service of Europe | 227,100.00 |
| Postal Department | 66,000.00 |
| Navigation | 140,200.00 |
| Justice | 910,000.00 |
| Worship | 250,000.00 |
The currency of the Congo Free State consists of copper, silver, and gold coins and paper notes. The former are issued under a decree of 27th July, 1887, which established the monetary system upon the gold standard. The gold coins are of the value of twenty francs; the silver coins are the five, two, one franc, and the fifty centime piece. The copper coins are the ten, five, two, and one centime pieces.
Paper Currency. By a decree of February 7, 1896, with the object of facilitating business transactions between the different parts of the State, banknotes of the State, payable to the bearer at the General Treasury of the Congo Free State, in Brussels, were issued. This decree sanctioned a first issue of notes to the value of 400,000 francs.
An order of the Secretary of State of February 8, 1896, limited the value of the issued notes to a sum of 269,850 francs, comprising 2,000 notes of 100 francs each, and 6,985 ten franc notes.
Formerly, in the Lower Congo, agents of the State and merchants were accustomed to give the natives, in exchange for their services, a mokande or cheque, which enabled them to purchase what they required at the factories.
It is evident that silver, copper, and paper currency of the State have a great advantage over the mokande or cheque system, these latter often being only payable at a fixed date and by certain persons. At first the circulation of money was slow and difficult. It was only with a good deal of trouble that foreign money was displaced in the Lower Congo, and in the interior there was the same difficulty in abolishing the custom of barter, and the usage of the mitako, or brass wire.
Finally, to accelerate the introduction of State currency, the Government decreed:
1. To pay the soldiers and native workmen in cash, and also to pay in the same manner for all goods bought from the natives by the State;
2. To stop all payments in kind at the stations of the Lower Congo;
3. To substitute for the rations formerly issued by the State to the agents, an equivalent in cash, and so forth.
Immediately after the enforcing of these measures the State currency began to circulate rapidly, and merchants no longer hesitated to open retail stores, where the natives in the employment of the State and commercial companies, and other natives as well, came to exchange their money for European goods.
At the present time, in the region south of Stanley Pool, the greater part of the commercial transactions between Europeans and natives is carried on through the medium of the State currency, and in the native markets it is no longer possible to purchase anything except with the silver or copper Congolese money—the preference being given to silver.[34]
The native’s love of tinsel causes a large quantity of the silver and copper coins put into circulation to disappear from the sphere of commerce. Congolese vanity manifests itself in many forms. Necklaces, earrings, bracelets, anklets, and other ornaments are made of the State coins, and worn by the men and women of all the tribes which come in touch with the Congo coinage. Powerful chiefs are often buried with many coins placed upon their bodies.
[26] Descamps.
[27] About twenty-two gallons.
[28] Reported in the Bulletin Officiel, 1898.
[29] 1 kilogramme equals 2.20 lbs.
[30] Statistics of exports were not taken until after July 1, 1886.
[31] The collection of import duty commenced May 9, 1892.
[32] The revenue of the British colony of Lagos for the last three years available was derived as follows:
| 1898 | 1899 | 1900-1 | |
| Fcs. | Fcs. | Fcs. | |
| Alcohol | 3,386,450.00 | 3,288,250.00 | 3,345,850.00 |
| Tobacco | 273,250.00 | 266,125.00 | 379,150.00 |
| Salt | 40,075.00 | 43,750.00 | 140,800.00 |
| Cotton Goods | 428,075.00 | 382,850.00 | 432,450.00 |
| Other Articles | 366,650.00 | 661,350.00 | 799,775.00 |
The following is a comparison between the alcoholic liquor imported into Lagos and the Congo Free State:
| Lagos | Congo Free State | ||
| Gin | 463,380 | gallons | |
| Rum | 129,780 | ” | |
| Whiskey | 8,100 | ” | |
| 601,260 | ” | Total consumption = 43,300 gallons. | |
Thus for every gallon of alcohol imported into the Congo Free State (1,000,000 square miles in area,) there are imported into British Lagos (3,460 square miles in area), thirteen and seven-tenths gallons, or as 5 per cent. is to 68½ per cent. of total revenue.
[33] Report of Vice-Governor-General, July 1904.
[34] Descamps.