[Contents]

III.

Edw. Ducpetiaux.

One of the parts of his “Paupérisme dans les Flandres” treats of the criminality in the two provinces of that name. We quote the following from it: [34]

“Criminality is the inseparable companion of poverty. As the number of indigent persons increases, we see the number of crimes also increase. Hunger is a bad counselor. In the midst of crushing destitution, a man gradually loses the notion of justice and injustice, of good and bad; beset by needs that he cannot satisfy, he disregards the laws, and ends by recoiling from no attempt that appears capable of bettering his condition. Visiting a prison is enough to convince one of the influence of this cause upon the number and the nature of the offenses, and before even questioning the statistics that attest the progress of criminality in Flanders, we could be assured that this progress had coincided with that of pauperism. It is not then a demonstration (which we judge quite unnecessary) that we are about to offer here, it is only a series of facts that may serve to make the reader appreciate the greatness of the evil and the urgent necessity of attacking its source.

“The first of these facts is the high figure for convicts belonging to East and West Flanders, when compared with the total number of convicts in the central prisons.… In the ten years between 1838 and 1847, 23,075 convicts were received in the central prisons of the kingdom; 10,308 belonged to the two Flanders and 12,767 to the other provinces; the proportion, to 1000 convicts, was 447 for the first two provinces, and 553 for the seven others. Now this proportion is considerably in excess of that of the respective populations of the two divisions, since, to the thousand inhabitants, there are only 331 in Flanders and 669 in the rest of the kingdom. In other words, during the decennial period in question, one prisoner was received to 139 inhabitants in Flanders, and to 227 in the seven other provinces.

“The second fact is the increase in the number of persons arraigned and convicted in the Flemish provinces during the last few of these years, and particularly since the food shortage of 1845. In a space of seven years, the number of those arraigned in the two Flanders increased about in the ratio of 7 to 17; that of those condemned to imprisonment grew, during the same period from 35 to 123, or nearly quadrupled.

“These data are confirmed by an abstract of the numbers received into the jails and prisons of the two provinces, as well as by the average population of these establishments, during the period from 1839 to 1848: [35]

Years. Persons Received into the Jails and Prisons of Totals. Average Population of the Prisons.
West Flanders.
Bruges. Courtrai. Ypres. Furnes.
1839 1,578 592 572 169 2,911 233
1840 1,502 643 821 196 3,162 238
1841 1,377 795 599 175 2,946 311
1842 1,489 863 836 271 3,459 346
1843 1,478 922 790 298 3,488 374
1844 1,502 941 696 270 3,409 379
1845 1,876 935 600 254 3,665 376
1846 2,378 1,108 935 601 5,022 574
1847 3,751 2,012 1,238 909 7,910 820
1848 2,859 1,960 1,070 690 6,579 694
East Flanders.
Ghent. Audenarde. Termonde.
1839 2,094 842 754 3,690 289
1840 2,311 919 852 4,082 357
1841 2,163 771 852 3,786 351
1842 2,171 844 905 3,920 333
1843 3,610 991 870 5,471 408
1844 2,548 760 718 4,026 345
1845 2,579 1,061 1,461 5,101 360
1846 5,499 2,732 2,092 0,323 619
1847 7,491 6,943 3,240 7,674 972
1848 6,309 4,462 2,829 3,600 698

“The increase in the numbers received into the jails and prisons of the two provinces took place especially in the years 1845, 1846, and 1847; in 1848 we note quite a pronounced decrease, which continues in 1849. Of all the signs to prove the existence and progress of pauperism, this is perhaps the most certain. During the disastrous years that had just elapsed, the prisons became in a sense annexes of the hospitals and almshouses; a great number of offenses were committed with the sole object of finding asylum.…

“As to the children, we shall understand the imminence of the danger when we realize that in the short space of three years, from 1845 to 1847, 26,247 children and young persons of both sexes under 18, were incarcerated in prison or were inmates of workhouses. Most of these children belonged to the two provinces of Flanders, and a great number were arrested outside the limits of their province. Here is the increase in the number of those received into the prisons [36]of Ghent and Bruges, and the jails of Audenarde, Termonde, Courtrai, Ypres, and Furnes:

Cities. Young Prisoners (under 18) Received in Total during the 3 Yrs.
1845. 1846. 1847. Boys. Girls. General Total.
Prisons of E. Flanders.
Ghent 350 1,345 1,898 2,671 922 3,593
Audenarde 207 315 674 929 267 1,196
Termonde 123 235 406 616 148 764
Prisons of W. Flanders.
Bruges 459 299 550 1,110 198 1,308
Courtrai 116 170 331 560 57 617
Ypres 70 184 250 414 90 504
Furnes 43 139 57 151 88 239
Totals 1,368 2,687 4,166 6,451 1,770 8,221

“This deplorable fact of the increase of criminality among the young is explained by the statistics of indigence. We see in fact that, among the indigent persons aided in East Flanders, in 1847, there were:

In the Cities. In the Country. Total.
Indigent persons under 6 yrs. 6,693 34,637 41,530
Indigent,, persons,, under,, 12 yrs.,, 8,327 37,437 45,764
Indigent,, persons,, under,, 18 yrs.,, 5,597 20,060 25,653
General total 112,947

“Supposing that West Flanders, which has more dependents in proportion than East Flanders, has the same proportion of children, we arrive at a total for the two provinces, of 225,894 indigent persons whose age is not above 18. In this number there are 174,588 who have not passed their twelfth year! And there are thousands of orphans!

“Notwithstanding the improvement that begins to make itself felt, thanks to the resumption of work and the low price of provisions, many of these young unfortunates continue to give themselves up to begging and vagrancy. But lately driven from their homes by cold and hunger, they form a wandering population, incessantly buffeted from almshouse to almshouse, from prison to prison. [37]

“In Brussels at this present moment (July, 1849) there are still to be found in the annex of the prison, about 250 mendicants, among whom are 97 children below the age of 17. In the prisons of Ghent and Bruges their number is equally great.”6

“It is an established fact, then, that the increase of criminality in Flanders has gone hand in hand with the extension of poverty. The latter brings about the abandonment of homes; … from this come mendicity, vagrancy, marauding, and theft. The incarceration of so great a number of unfortunates brings the most disastrous consequences. The germs of corruption, brutality, and crime are continually injected into a large fraction of the population. The habit of working is lost, energy is relaxed, idleness becomes incurable. When we think especially of the mass of children who, during the last few years, have passed through the prisons and almshouses, we cannot picture without pity, mingled with fear, the future of this generation, initiated at an early age into the existence of criminals, and condemned to the dangers and evils inseparable from the abandonment and degradation to which they are a prey.”7