This form or race has the widest distribution, namely, all over Europe with the exception of England, the northern half of France, the Rhine countries, Denmark, and Italy. Southwards it extends from France through Spain and Portugal into the Sahara, eastwards into Turkestan. It attains a larger size than the others, but only in certain localities in various countries, where circumstances favour its development. Eastern countries produce the largest of all; those of the Volga are said to be very large. German physiological laboratories prefer those from the Danube, from Bohemia, and from the lakes and broad expansions of the Spree, to specimens from other localities.
2. Var. typica (esculenta, Linnaeus).–The heels just meet, but do not overlap. The inner metatarsal tubercle is strong, compressed, and prominent. A small outer tubercle is present. The heel reaches to the eye or a little further; the hinder surface of the thighs is "marbled with black, usually with more or less bright yellow pigment" in the living specimens; the vocal sacs are white or feebly pigmented. This race inclines to rather more green than the others, the males especially are often dark grass-green, with scarcely any markings. The vertebral stripe is then yellowish, and the lateral stripes almost golden. The range extends over the whole of Central Europe and the kingdom of Italy. Its northern limit is the southern end of Sweden. In the greater portion of Germany, Poland, and Austria it overlaps the var. ridibunda, with which it does not seem to pair, owing to a difference in the time of spawning; the var. typica being about a fortnight later, and beginning to spawn when the other has finished.
3. Var. lessonae, Camerano.–Except that the inner tubercle is stronger, while the outer one is near the vanishing point, and that the fourth toe is proportionally longer, this variety is really not distinguishable from the typical form, and Boulenger himself confesses that the distinction is arbitrary. The var. lessonae seems to have a rather sporadic distribution. It has been found in Piedmont and other parts of Italy, in Hungary and Transylvania, near Vienna, Halle, Upper Bavaria, on the Rhine, near Brussels, Paris, and what is of especial interest to us, in a few places in the eastern counties of England.
According to Boulenger's "Notes on the Edible Frog in England,"[116] the individuals of R. esculenta which live in Foulmire Fen in Cambridgeshire, near Stow Bedon, and between Thetford and Scoulton in Norfolk, and are generally supposed to have been introduced from France, belong to the Italian form of var. lessonae. "It used to be found in Cambridgeshire, in Foulmire Fen, where it was discovered in 1844; and Bell[117] assures us that his father, who was a native of Cambridgeshire, had noticed the presence of these frogs many years before at Whaddon and Foulmire, where they were known from their loud croak as 'Whaddon organs' and 'Dutch nightingales.' The species was afterwards rediscovered in Norfolk, between Thetford and Scoulton, where it is now still very abundant, and from inquiries made by Lord Walsingham, must have existed for the last seventy (80) years at least. These frogs belong to the var. lessonae, and differ widely (by the much stronger inner metatarsal tubercle) from those found in a few other places in Norfolk, which are undoubtedly the descendants of a number imported from France and Belgium in 1837, 1841, and 1842, and turned loose in the Fens at Foulden and in the neighbourhood.... Within the last ten years large numbers of all the three forms have been imported from Brussels, Berlin, and Italy, and liberated in various localities in West Surrey and Hampshire. Berlin specimens of the var. ridibunda have also been introduced in Bedfordshire, and Italian ones in Oxfordshire."[118]
Leaving aside the question whether the so-called var. lessonae is merely sporadically developed out of the typical form, the inquiry of the possible origin of the English specimens of the var. lessonae is of special interest. Have they been introduced, as has been suggested, from Lombardy, or are they the last lingering descendants of native English frogs? The suggestion as to their Italian origin has naturally lost in value since similar specimens have been found in Belgium and near Paris; but we must remember that there existed considerable intercourse between East Anglia and the monks of Lombardy, who, to mention only one instance, came regularly to the old Priory of Chesterton, near Cambridge, in order to collect their rents. If the frogs were introduced by them for culinary purposes into various suitable localities their descendants would remain as local as they, and as the undoubtedly introduced French typical specimens actually are. On the other hand, if we assume the lessonae specimens to be the last living descendants of English natives, it is inconceivable why they should now be restricted to that eastern corner while there are hundreds of other suitable places in England and Wales which, if on the Continent, would be perfect paradises for Water-frogs. The same vegetation, the same insects, the same climate, and–an enormous advantage to the frogs–no storks.
These English specimens are "olive-brown or bronzy-brown above, with black spots, strongly marked on the flanks, where a light longitudinal area remains unspotted; glandular folds lighter; the sides of the head and the ground colour of the flanks are sometimes green; tympanum chestnut-brown; a pale yellow or pale green vertebral line, frequently edged with black; the dark cross-bands on the limbs usually very irregular, sometimes absent; lower surfaces more or less profusely spotted with blackish; iris golden. Length of a male from Stow Bedon, 64 mm. or 2½ inches; of a female, 78 mm. or 3 inches."[119]
4. Var. chinensis, Osb.–Distinguished by short glandular folds along the back, in addition to the long dorso-lateral pair. The metatarsal tubercle is large and shovel-shaped. Distribution from Corea and Japan to Siam.
All these Water-frogs are decidedly aquatic. They make short excursions on land when their homes are dried up, but as a rule they remain in the lake, pond, river, morass, or ditch in which they were born. Their favourite resorts are the broad floating leaves of water-plants, for instance water-lilies, or a prominent stone, a tussock of grass, or the banks of their homes, where they sit motionless, basking for hours in a half-erect, alert position, watching for insects and other small fry, which are secured by a jump, and then lapped up. Sunshine is sure to bring them out, and on our approach they make straight for the water, either by one tremendous leap or with quick bounds, but without the slightest hesitation or stopping on the way. With folded arms they take a header, swim, with the arms still folded, for some distance under water, and conceal themselves in the mud, between stones, or in the vegetation. We perhaps have not seen them at all, whilst their watchful eyes and keen ears have noticed our approach, and the pond might appear uninhabited if we had not heard the plumping noise. If we keep quite still, and they have not been disturbed previously, one after another will wriggle out of the mud, rise slowly to the surface under cover of the plants, and, without causing a ripple, rise just enough for the prominent eyes and the nose to clear the surface. Then one scrambles partly on to a leaf, but the sight of the huge human figure strikes him as uncanny, as it certainly does not belong to the scenery, and he doubles back, the broadly-webbed feet making a little splash. But another appears, jumps on to a leaf in the middle, or at the farther end of the pond, settles down, and utters a little croak, somewhat like "ooaar," and soon the whole company appear one after another, each taking up its favourite position. After all, their observing powers cannot be very great. If we ourselves keep still we may wield a rod and fish for them. There is no need of a hook, a piece of red cloth tied to the end of the line and skimmed over the water causes a lively commotion. The new bait is noticed at once, and arouses their curiosity; several jump at it, and the one which swallows the bait can be lifted out before it has time to let go. However, this is after all poor sport; the game is too eager. When a boy I have often caught them with a noose of slender wire at the end of a long hazel rod. They do not mind the rod at all, their attention being fixed on the person; they allow the noose to be slipped over their heads, and a sudden jerk secures the captive. In this way they can be singled out individually. Old frogs are more wary and experienced than the younger members; they take up safer positions, and by their sudden plunges give the alarm.
Fig. 51.–Rana esculenta. × 1. Three stages of the movement of the tongue.
The males are great musicians, singing for sheer enjoyment not only during the pairing time, but throughout the months of June and July. Warm moonlit nights are the favourite times for the concert, which takes place in the water, beginning at sunset, and continuing until the early dawn. A few individuals here and there utter a single note, "gwarr, oo-arr," or "coarx," but these are only preliminaries. The precentor–the country-folk in North Germany firmly believe that in each pond one old male holds the dignified position of choir-master–begins with a sharp-sounding "brekeke," and this is the signal for all the others to chime in with the same notes, varied with all sorts of other sounds, bass, tenor, and alto, each performer filling its resounding vocal sacs to bursting size, and these bags then look as if they acted as floats. When there are several hundred of these sociable creatures, the din is continuous, and may be heard more than a mile off. There can be too much of this, just as there can be too many nightingales; and a well-stocked pond in the neighbourhood may become a perfect nuisance. There are accounts of servants having been employed in the Middle Ages for the sole purpose of keeping the noise down by beating the pond, throwing stones into the water, or otherwise disturbing the frogs. Sometimes more vigorous and lasting measures seem to have been taken; the monks exorcised them in order not to be disturbed in their vigils. Near the former monastery of Chorin, in the province of Brandenburg, the frogs have still the reputation of keeping very quiet on account of some powerful abbot who threatened them with awful consequences if they did not forego their concerts.
Fig. 52.–Rana esculenta. Male with inflated external vocal sacs. × 1.
The length of life which these frogs can attain is quite unknown. They do not reach maturity until the fourth or fifth year, but this is long before they stop growing, and it is no exaggeration to say that few, if any, frogs die of old age, since they have so many enemies. The stork is their king in the fable, and his daily visits to his realm strike dire distress amongst his subjects, which soon learn to know his conspicuous white and black garb, and seek imperfect safety at the bottom of shallow ponds and ditches, not too deep for the long-legged and long-billed despot. Numbers are taken by birds of prey; snakes and tortoises hunt them up in the water, and they are good bait for pike and other voracious fishes. The specific name esculenta needs no comment, and this species is as much a martyr to science as the brown Grass-frog. The destroyers of tadpoles and young frogs are unlimited. In their turn the frogs themselves, especially the old ones, are very rapacious, and eat any living creature they can master,–insects, worms and snails, other frogs, especially the brown kind, and the young brood of fishes.
Recently caught Water-frogs are wild beyond description, much more so than the Grass-frog, but even they calm down after some time, learn to know their keeper, and allow him to handle them without trying to commit suicide by jumping on to, into, and down anything. However, they do not thrive well in captivity, and it is rare that they can be induced to breed, unless their enforced new home affords them ample freedom, and plenty of water and fresh air.
The Water-frogs appear in Germany rather late in the year, not before the middle of April, first the younger, then the adult members. In Southern Europe they show themselves earlier, and still further south they do not hibernate at all. The breeding season begins in Germany towards the end of May and continues well into June, the var. ridibunda beginning mostly a fortnight earlier. The male clasps the female under the arms, throwing its own round her breast, the nuptial grey excrescences on his inner fingers pressing against her skin, the palms being turned outwards. The embrace does not last long, rarely extending over a few days. The eggs, to the astonishing number of 5000 to 10,000 in full-grown specimens, are expelled in several masses, which sink down and remain at the bottom. The eggs measure only 1.5 mm. and are yellowish-grey above, pale yellow below; their gelatinous cover swells to 7-8 mm. in width. The embryo escapes on the fifth or sixth day as a very small larva, in which, however, the mouth, eyes, and beginnings of the external gills are already discernible. At the age of two weeks the gills have shrunk away, the left-sided "spiracle" is completed, and the well-tailed tadpoles, olive brown above, yellowish white below, still hang with their suckers on to plants and stones, or lie at the bottom, nibbling away at any rotting animal matter or scraping off the green algae.
It may here be mentioned that small tadpoles of any kind can with advantage be used as cleaners of delicate and small skeletons. The object is put into a vessel, and the tadpoles will soon nibble and rasp away all the edible portions, leaving the skeletal framework beautifully cleaned. But they require attention lest they rasp away the cartilage.
The tadpole stage lasts three to four months; but cold, absence of sunshine, and scarcity of food delay the metamorphosis well into the end of summer, or force them to hibernate in the unfinished condition. They are very gregarious, and when the tadpoles of several families combine, they make imposing shows. By the time that their hind-limbs begin to sprout, they frequently combine into large shoals, and instead of always feeding they swim about in their tens of thousands, all moving in the same direction, and making almost regular evolutions. Mill-ponds with steep banks are good places for watching these peculiar habits. The tadpoles reach a considerable size, the total length averaging 2½ inches, or some 60 mm. the tail taking up ⅔ of the whole length. Specimens which measure more than 3 inches are rare. The baby-frogs hop on land while still provided with a stumpy tail; when this is resorbed the little creature is scarcely half-an-inch long, and for the rest of the available season leads a rather more terrestrial life than ever after.
Ex Africa semper aliquid novi! Quite recently Boulenger has received a consignment of Anura from the French Congo, amongst which were several new, remarkable genera, notably Trichobatrachus and Gampsosteonyx. Both are true Ranidae. Pupil vertical, with vomerine teeth. Omosternum with a bony style. The outer metatarsals are bound together. In Trichobatrachus robustus the toes are webbed, and both sexes have the flanks and corresponding portions of the thighs covered with numerous darkly pigmented, filamentous, cutaneous excrescences; these are several millimeters in length, giving the flanks and thighs a "hairy" appearance. Mr. F. F. Laidlaw has examined these structures. Their most remarkable feature is the presence in them of a great number of ordinary flask-shaped cutaneous glands, whilst such glands are scarce on the surrounding skin. They differ in no way from those seen in sections of the skin of the Common Frog. The fibrous connective tissue is dense and vascular; the pigment-cells are most plentiful at the base. Contrary to expectation no nerve-endings were found in these filaments.
Gampsosteonyx has free toes. The terminal joints of the digits stand out beyond the skin, and end in sharp, bony claws, like those of a cat.
Sub-Fam. 3. Dendrobatinae.–About one dozen arboreal little frogs have been separated from the Raninae proper on account of the entire absence of teeth. This mere loss of teeth, and the geographical distribution suggest that these frogs do not form a natural group, but have been developed independently from other Ranidae, the Neotropical Dendrobates from some likewise Neotropical genus like Prostherapis, the Malagasy Mantella from an African form like Megalixalus.
The sacral diapophyses are cylindrical. The omo- and meta-sternum are well developed. The fingers and toes are free, their terminal phalanges are T-shaped and carry regular, round, adhesive discs. The tympanum is distinct, although sometimes, in Dendrobates, very small. The pupil is horizontal.
Dendrobates.–The tongue is elongate, entire and free behind. The omosternum has a weak, semi-ossified style, but the metasternum remains cartilaginous. The males have a subgular vocal sac. Seven closely-allied species inhabit tropical America.
D. tinctorius.–This pretty little species, scarcely 1½ inch in length, is quite smooth, varies much in coloration, and forms local races to a certain extent. Some are quite black, others are grey above, black on the sides and under parts; or they are grey with large black patches. A fourth variety is black above with several white or pink longitudinal stripes, while the under parts are grey, spotted with black. In others, again, the ground-colour is black, with white stripes and spots above, marbled below. But this enumeration does not exhaust the list, since living specimens are sometimes much more conspicuously coloured, some being black with large patches of saturated yellow on the head and back, while the limbs are orange red and black. This species has a wide range, from Panama to Ecuador and to the mouth of the Amazon. It owes its specific name to the peculiar use made by man of the strongly poisonous secretion of the tiny glands of the otherwise smooth skin. Other species are doubtless employed in the same way. The poison is mainly used for "dyeing" the green Amazon-parrots. This is done as follows:–The green and blue feathers on the head and neck, or other parts, according to the fancy of the operator, are plucked out, and these places are rubbed with the poison, often simply with the living frog, certainly not with its blood, as is sometimes asserted. This operation may be repeated when the new, young feathers begin to bud. The result is that these appear yellow instead of green, and since the Brazilians, and to a certain extent the Portuguese, are rather partial to these artificially-produced freaks or "contrafeitos" as they call them, the industry is kept up. That the poison is also used for arrows has been mentioned on p. 38.
Fig. 53.–Dendrobates tinctorius, three colour-variations. × 1.
D. trivittatus, chiefly in Northern Brazil, has the first finger slightly longer than the second. It likewise varies considerably in its coloration, being either quite black, or spotted with white and brown, or with a whitish forehead and several white patches on the back and hind-limbs. D. typographus of Central America is vermilion red, with small dark marks on the back; the legs are black.
The various species of Dendrobates take remarkable care of their young. D. braccatus lives in Brazil in "varzeas," i.e. moist but waterless places, and carries its tadpoles on its back, to which they are attached by a peculiar secretion. The same is said to be true of D. trivittatus, which sits down in a drying-up puddle, lets the little tadpoles, when they are only 6-7 mm. long, fasten themselves on, and conveys them to a safer locality, where the water is calculated not to evaporate before the metamorphosis is completed.
Mantella.–Both omo- and meta-sternum possess a bony style. The tongue is free and distinctly mitred or cut out behind. The skin is very granular. Several species, in Madagascar, were formerly put into the same genus as the American forms, until Boulenger established the genus Mantella for them. The coloration is strikingly pretty. M. madagascariensis is a rare instance of difference in colour between the two sexes. The male is bluish black, with light blue spots on the belly, while the thighs and the inner sides of the legs are beautifully red. The female is deep black, with a light green spot at the base and in front of the limbs; the rest is coloured like the male.
Cardioglossa gracilis, quite recently discovered at the Gaboon, has likewise to be added to the Dendrobatinae, on account of the absence of teeth. It is a small, slender, arboreal frog, bearing an unmistakable resemblance to the other genera by its general appearance and conspicuous, contrasting coloration of black and white.
REPTILIA
"Cada uno es como Dios le hizo,
y aun peor muchas vezes."
"We are all as God made us
and many even worse."
Sancho Panza,
Don Quixote.
REPTILIA
DEFINITION AND CHARACTERS–POSITION OF THE CLASS REPTILIA IN THE PHYLUM VERTEBRATA–CLASSIFICATION–SKULL AND VERTEBRAE.
The recent Reptiles comprise, broadly speaking, the Crocodiles, Tortoises, Lizards, and Snakes. They are the only Vertebrates which are cold-blooded, breathe by lungs, and have a median occipital condyle. Another equally sufficient diagnosis is the following:–Tetrapoda, with a median occipital condyle, with nucleated red blood-corpuscles, and with complete right and left functional aortic arches. A still shorter diagnosis is:–Monocondylia with a scaly skin.
If our diagnosis is to include the fossil Reptiles we have not only to discard the characters drawn from the soft parts as unavailable, but we are forced to treat the condition of the occipital condyle with caution, since there exist, or must have existed, transitional stages between Reptiles and Amphibia and Mammals; and the winged class Pterosauria does not permit us to use the wings as a differential character for the Birds. In fact, while the Reptilia are sufficiently separated from the Amphibia by their absolutely gastrocentrous vertebrae, it is difficult to distinguish them as a class from the Birds; hence the term Sauropsida, which is intended to indicate the close relationship of the Reptiles to the Birds in opposition to the Mammalia, and to the Ichthyopsida or Amphibia and Fishes. However, the Reptilia take up a very central position in the evolution of the main classes of the Vertebrata. On the one hand, there is not the slightest doubt that they are evolved from some branch of the Stegocephali, whilst on the other hand the Reptiles, probably through some branch of the Theromorpha, have given rise to the Mammals; some other Reptilian branch, at present unknown, has blossomed out into the Birds.
Principal Characters of the Reptilia.
1. The vertebrae are gastrocentrous.
2. The skull articulates with the atlas by one condyle, which is formed mainly by the basioccipital.
3. The mandible consists of many pieces and articulates with the cranium through the quadrate bones.
4. There is an auditory columellar apparatus fitting into the fenestra ovalis.
5. The limbs are of the tetrapodous, pentadactyle type.
6. There is an intracranial hypoglossal nerve.
7. The ribs form a true sternum.
8. The ilio-sacral connexion is post-acetabular.
9. The skin is covered (a) with scales, but (b) neither with feathers nor with hairs; and there is a great paucity of glands.
10. Reptiles are poikilothermous.
11. The red blood-corpuscles are nucleated, biconvex, and oval.
12. The heart is divided into two atria and an imperfectly divided ventricle. It has no conus, but semilunar valves exist at the base of the tripartite aortic trunk.
13. The right and left aortic arch are complete and remain functional.
14. Respiration is effected by lungs; and gills are entirely absent, even during embryonic life.
15. Lateral sense-organs are absent.
16. The kidneys have no nephrostomes. Each kidney has one separate ureter.
17. There is always a typical cloaca.
18. The eggs are meroblastic.
19. Fertilisation is internal, and is effected, with the single exception of Sphenodon, by means of male copulatory organs.
20. An amnion and an allantois are formed during development.
The evolution of the classification of the Reptiles has to a certain extent been already treated on pp. 7-9. For a long time only Chelonia or Tortoises, Ophidia or Snakes, and Saurii were recognised as their principal divisions. Then the Crocodiles were separated from the Lizards; later the Coeciliae were removed from the Snakes and referred to the Amphibia, and ultimately Sphenodon was recognised as deserving a separate position, equal in rank to the other groups. Stannius showed that the Crocodiles and Tortoises are relatively near allies in opposition to the likewise closely allied Lizards and Snakes (Sphenodon was then unknown), and he expressed this by the term Monimostylica, or creatures with fixed quadrate bones, for the former, and Streptostylica, creatures with movable quadrates, for the latter combination. The fossil Reptiles were hardly allowed proper places in the system. In various zoological text-books they were, or are even now, treated as inconvenient, outlying, or supernumerary members. A long time elapsed before, thanks to the labours of H. von Meyer, Owen, Huxley, Marsh, Cope, Zittel, and Seeley, it was recognised that the extinct groups form the preponderant mass of Reptiles, and that it is the recent groups which, in spite of the bewildering number of species of Lizards and Snakes, are the comparatively few and much-reduced members of a once flourishing class. With the exception of the Lizards and Snakes, which are on the ascending branch, the modern Sphenodon, the Crocodiles and the Tortoises are a mere fraction, comprising a few survivals of richly-developed groups, while all the others, the overwhelming majority, have died out.
The classification adopted in this volume is as follows:–
Class Reptilia.
Sub-Class IIIII. Proreptilia.
Sub-"ClasIII II. Prosauria. Orders: Microsauri, Prosauri.
Sub-"ClasII III. Theromorpha. Orders: Pareiasauri, Theriodontia, Anomodontia, Placodontia.
Sub-"ClasII IV. Chelonia. Orders: Athecae, Thecophora.
Sub-"ClasIII V. Dinosauria. Orders: Sauropoda, Theropoda, Orthopoda, Ceratopsia.
Sub-"ClasII VI. Crocodilia. Orders: Pseudosuchia, Parasuchia, Eusuchia.
Sub-"ClasI VII. Plesiosauria. Orders: Nothosauri, Plesiosauri.
Sub-"Clas VIII. Ichthyosauria.
Sub-"ClasII IX. Pterosauria.
Sub-"ClasIII X. Pythonomorpha. Orders: Dolichosauri, Mosasauri.
Sub-"ClasII XI. Sauria. Orders: Lacertilia, Ophidia.
The eleven principal groups are here called "sub-classes" to emphasise the undeniable fact that these Reptilian groups are of much greater morphological value than those which are most generally called "Orders" in the Mammalia, that class which we consider as the standard or model of classificatory units.
Fig. 54.–Diagrams of skulls, showing especially the composition of the bony arches of the orbito-temporal region.
A, C, D, E, Theromorpha. A, Elginia, p. 305; C, Cynognathus, p. 306; D, Gordonia, p. 310; E, Dicynodon, p. 310.
B, G, Prosauria. B, Sphenodon, p. 294; G, Palaeohatteria, p. 291.
F, Crocodilia, p. 434.
H, I, K, Chelonia, p. 316. H, Chelydra, p. 338; I, Chrysemys, p. 346; K, Cistudo, p. 361.
E, Epiotic; F, frontal; IT, infratemporal fossa; J, jugal, shaded vertically; L, lacrymal; M, maxillary; N, nasal groove; Na, nasal bone; O, orbit; P, parietal; Po, postorbital, dotted; Pf, post-frontal; Pm, premaxillary; Pr, prefrontal; Ptg, pterygoid; Q, quadrate; Qj, quadrato-jugal; So, supra-occipital; Sq, squamosal, shaded obliquely; St (in B-E), supratemporal fossa; St (in A), Supratemporal bone.
Fig. 55.–Diagrams of skulls, showing especially the composition of the bony arches of the orbito-temporal region.
L, Pythonomorpha. Clidastes, p. 490.
M, N, O, Lacertilia, p. 496. M, Varanus, p. 543; N, Uromastix, p. 524; O, Lacerta, p. 550.
P, Ichthyosauria, p. 479. Ichthyosaurus, p. 483.
Q, Pterosauria, p. 484. Dimorphodon, p. 486.
R, Aves, generalised, for comparison.
S, Mammalia, generalised, for comparison.
T, Ophidia, p. 581.
C, Condyle of mandible; Col, columella cranii; F, frontal; I, interparietal or pineal foramen; I.A, Inner angle of mandible; J, jugal, shaded vertically; L, lacrymal; M, maxillary; N, nasal groove; Na, nasal bone; O, orbit; O1, preorbital fossa; P, parietal; Pf, postfrontal; Pm, premaxillary; Pr, prefrontal; Ptg, pterygoid; Q, quadrate; Qj, quadrato-jugal; Sq, squamosal, shaded obliquely; St, supratemporal bone.
The families cannot well be changed, and terms like super-families and super-orders are sometimes resorted to by those who do not like to look stern facts in the face.
The sequence of the groups, although arranged as much as possible in ascending order, is of necessity as unnatural as that of the maps in an atlas. We cannot yet construct a satisfactory phyletic tree of the Reptiles. The Proreptilia connect them with the Amphibia. Next follow the Prosauria with Sphenodon among the Prosauri as the key to most other groups. Then follow the Theromorpha, and it is probable that from various branches of these have arisen the Chelonia, Dinosauria, Crocodilia, and Plesiosauria. The descent of the Ichthyosauria is very problematic. The same applies to the Pterosauria and to the Pythonomorpha, but it is possible that they, together with the Sauria, are connected with the Prosauria.
With all reserve these hypothetical affinities may be expressed by the following diagram:–
The eleven sub-classes of the Reptilia present so many important differences that it is not advisable to give here a further general account of their structure. The diagrammatic figures A to T on pp. 280, 281, representing various types of skulls, are intended to explain their chief modifications, all referable to Proreptilian and to certain Theromorphous conditions. One of the most important features is that the mandible, which is always composed of many pieces (cf. Fig. 142, p. 550), is invariably carried by the quadrate bone. Diagrams of the generalised skulls of a Bird and a Mammal have been added for comparison.
Fig. 56.–Composition of vertebrae of Reptiles, illustrated by the first and second cervical vertebrae. (1) Atlas (first cervical) and axis (second) vertebra of Crocodilus. (2) Atlas and axis of Metriorhynchus, a Jurassic Crocodile. (3) Analysis of the first two cervical vertebrae of a Crocodile; 2, second basiventral complex or "intercentrum" continued upwards into the meniscus or intervertebral pad. (4) Diagram of the fundamental composition of a Reptilian vertebra; compare this and (6) with Fig. 1 (8 and 9) on p. 13. (5) The first three cervical vertebrae of Sphenodon. (6) Trunk-vertebrae of Eryops, a Permian Proreptile; typically temnospondylous; cp, articular facet of the capitulum of a rib. (7) The complete atlas of an adult Trionyx hurum; the second basiventral (intercentrum) is attached to the posterior end of the first centrum, which, not being fused with the second centrum, is not yet an odontoid process. (8) The complete atlas of an adult Trionyx gangeticus; still typically temnospondylous. (9) The first and second cervical vertebrae of an adult Platemys. (10) The complete atlas of a Chelys fimbriata. Az, Anterior zygapophysis; B.D, basidorsal; B.V, basiventral; C1, C2, C3, first, second, and third centra, formed by the interventralia; Cp1, Cp2, articular facets of the capitular portions of the first and second ribs; I.V, interventral; N1, N2, N3, first, second, and third neural arch, formed by basidorsalia (B.D); Od, odontoid process = first centrum; Pz, posterior zygapophysis; R1, R2, ribs; Sp, detached spinous process of the first neural arch; t1, t2, tubercular attachments of the first and second ribs; 1, 2, 3, 4, "intercentra" = basiventrals; I, II, III, position of the exit of the first, second, and third spinal nerves.
As mentioned on p. 278 the vertebrae of the Reptilia and those of all other Amniota are gastrocentrous; that is to say the centra or bodies of the vertebrae are formed by the pairs of interventralia, while the basiventralia are reduced, persisting either as so-called intercentra or wedge-bones, or as intervertebral pads, or disappearing altogether. At the earlier stages of development the gastrocentrous vertebrae behave in the same way as that described on p. 12 (Fig. 1), except that the interdorsal elements are suppressed from the beginning. If the remaining three pairs of constituent elements of each vertebra (the basidorsalia, forming the neural arch; the interventralia, forming the body or centrum; and the basiventralia) remain separate, the vertebrae are called temnospondylous (τέμνω, I cut, σπόνδυλος, a vertebra). If the neural arches and the centra are suturally united or are fused with each other, the vertebrae are called stereospondylous (στερεός, solid). In many Amniota the atlas or first vertebra remains in a relatively primitive, embryonic condition, and is temnospondylous but for the usual modification that its centrum becomes attached to that of the second vertebra, and forms the odontoid process of the latter. The composition of gastrocentrous vertebrae (cf. p. 282) is best illustrated by the first and second cervical vertebrae of the Crocodile (Fig. 56, 3, p. 283).
Concerning geographical distribution, even a cursory study shows that the sub-classes have come into existence at very different geological periods, and have each followed their own lines of dispersal.
PROREPTILIA–PROSAURIA–THEROMORPHA
Sub-Class I.–PROREPTILIA.
Permian Temnospondylous Reptiles with well-developed limbs and girdles of the terrestrial type.
The two genera Eryops and Cricotus of the North-American Permian formation had until recently[120] been relegated to the Stegocephali. By grouping them and their nearest allies together as Proreptilia it is intended to indicate that they are the lowest known Reptiles and that they probably link this class to the Amphibia. The superficial resemblance of their tri- or bi-partite vertebrae, and their occurrence in the Lower Permian, have caused the error of classing them with the Stegocephali, but the composition of their typically gastrocentrous vertebrae leaves no doubt as to their affinities. After all, we feel certain that Reptiles have arisen from Stegocephalous Amphibia, and it is in the Lower Permian, exactly where these debatable creatures lived side by side with Stegocephali, undoubtedly likewise temnospondylous, that the change from Amphibia into Reptiles seems to have taken place. Both are referable to Amphibia with quadripartite vertebrae. The condition of the occipital condyles determines nothing. This greatly exaggerated character has lost in importance since we have known the condylar modifications of the Theromorpha; moreover, Cricotus itself seems to have possessed a single condyle. We should even expect the Proreptilia to present many Stegocephalous inheritances, for instance the condition of the skull roofed in by dermal bones, a ventral dermal armour, a very complete pectoral arch still without a sternum, and only one sacral vertebra.