Albumoses and Peptones.—Albumoses and peptones are determined in cheese by the following method:[527] A quantity of the sand mixture already described, corresponding to five grams of the cheese, is treated with about 100 cubic centimeters of water, heated to boiling, and the clear liquid above the sand poured into a flask of half a liter capacity. The extraction is continued with successive portions of water in like manner until the volume of the extract is nearly half a liter. When cold, the volume of the extract is completed to half a liter with water, the liquor filtered, 200 cubic centimeters of the filtrate treated with an equal volume of dilute sulfuric acid (one to three) and phosphotungstic acid added until no further precipitate takes place. The nitrogen is determined in the precipitate after filtration and washing with dilute sulfuric acid.

Casein and Albuminates.—The quantity of casein and albuminates in cheese is calculated by subtracting from the total nitrogen that corresponding to ammonia, amids, that in the indigestible residue and that corresponding to the albumose and peptone. In three samples of cheese, viz., camembert, swiss, and gervais, Stutzer found the nitrogen, determined as above, distributed as follows:[528]

   Camembert.   Swiss.   Gervais. 
N as ammonia 13.0 3.7 1.6
N as amids 38.5 9.0 5.2
N as albumose peptone 30.5 8.6 15.5 
N indigestible  4.0 2.4 8.6
N as casein, albuminates 14.0 76.3  69.1 

Ammoniacal Nitrogen.—The ammoniacal nitrogen is determined by mixing a quantity of the sand-cheese corresponding to five grams of cheese, with 200 cubic centimeters of water, adding an excess of barium carbonate and collecting the ammonia by distillation in the usual way.

Digestible Proteids.—The digestible proteids in cheese are determined by the process of artificial digestion, which will be described in the part of this volume treating of the nutritive value of foods.

These data show the remarkable changes which the proteids undergo where the ripening is carried very far as in the camembert cheese.

517. Koumiss.—Fermented mare milk has long been a favorite beverage in the East, where it is known as koumiss. In Europe and this country cow milk is employed in the manufacture of fermented milk, although it is less rich in lactose than mare milk. The process of manufacture is simple, provided a suitable starter is at hand. A portion of a previous brewing is the most convenient one, the fermentation being promoted by the addition of a little yeast. After the process of fermentation is finished the koumiss is placed in bottles and preserved in a horizontal position in a cellar, where the temperature is not allowed to rise above 12°.

518. Determination of Carbon Dioxid.—The carbon dioxid in koumiss is conveniently estimated by connecting the bottle by means of a champagne tap with a system of absorption bulbs.[529] The exit tube from the koumiss bottle passes first into an erlenmeyer, which serves to break and retain any bubbles that pass over. The water is next removed by means of sulfuric acid. The koumiss bottle is placed in a bath of water which is raised to the boiling point as the evolution of the gas is accomplished. The arrangement of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 113. At the end of the operation any residual carbon dioxid in the apparatus is removed by aspiration after removing the tap and connecting it with a soda-lime tube to hold the carbon dioxid in the air. A large balance suited to weighing the koumiss bottle is required for this determination. The carbon dioxid may also be determined, but less accurately, by loss of weight in the koumiss bottle after adding weight of water retained in the apparatus.

519. Acidity.—Although koumiss may contain a trace of acetic acid, it is best to determine the acid as lactic. The clarification is most easily accomplished by mixing the koumiss with an equal volume of ninety-five per cent alcohol, shaking and filtering. The first filtrate will usually be found clear. If not it is refiltered. In an aliquot part of the filtrate the acidity is determined by titration with tenth-normal sodium hydroxid solution, using phenolphthalein as indicator. The necessary corrections for dilution and volume of the precipitated casein are to be made. A linen filter may be used when paper is found too slow.

Fig. 113. Apparatus for Determining Carbon Dioxid in Koumiss.

520. Alcohol.—Half a liter of koumiss, to which 100 cubic centimeters of water have been added, is distilled until the distillate amounts to 500 cubic centimeters.

If the distillate be turbid 100 cubic centimeters of water are added and the distillation repeated. The alcohol is determined by the processes described hereafter.

521. Lactose.—The milk sugar may be determined by any of the methods described, but most conveniently by double dilution and polarization (86).

522. Fat.—Evaporate twenty grams of the sample to dryness and extract with pure ether or petroleum spirit in the manner already described (455).

The analysis is more quickly accomplished by the volumetric method of Babcock or Gerber (473-475).

523. Proteids.—The total proteids are most easily estimated by the official kjeldahl method.[530] The separation of the proteid bodies is accomplished by the methods described in paragraphs 475-489.

In addition to the methods already described for separating the soluble and suspended proteid bodies in milk, and which may be used also for koumiss, the following should also be mentioned as of especial worth:

Separation by Filtration through Porous Porcelain.—A purely physical method, and one which is to be recommended by reason of the absence of any chemical action upon the different proteid matters, is that proposed by Lehmann, depending upon the principle that when milk is forced through porous porcelain, the albumin passes through together with the milk, sugar and other soluble constituents as a clear filtrate, while the casein and fat are perfectly retained.[531]

By this method it is quite certain that the albumin and other perfectly soluble proteids of milk may be obtained in the purest form.

Separation by Precipitation with Alum.—Probably the best chemical method of separating the two classes of proteid matters is that proposed by Schlosmann, which is effected by means of precipitating the casein with a solution of alum.[532]

The principle of this separation rests upon the fact that a solution of potash alum, when added to milk diluted with four or five times its volume of water, will completely separate the casein without affecting the albumin or globulin. The operation is conducted as follows:

Ten cubic centimeters of the milk are diluted with from three to five times that quantity of water and warmed to a temperature of about 40°. One cubic centimeter of a concentrated solution of potash alum is added, the mixture well stirred and the coagula which are formed allowed to subside. If the coagulation of the casein does not take place promptly, a small addition of the alum solution is made, usually not exceeding half a cubic centimeter, until the precipitation is complete. The temperature during the process should be kept as nearly as possible 40°. After a few minutes, the mixture is poured upon a filter and the filtrate, if not perfectly clear, is poured back until it is secured free of turbidity. In difficult cases the filtration may be promoted by the addition of some common salt or calcium phosphate, the latter acting mechanically in holding back the fine particles of casein. The precipitate is washed with water at a temperature of 40°, and afterwards with alcohol, not allowing the alcohol wash water to flow into the filtrate. When the water has been chiefly removed from the precipitate by washing with alcohol, the fat of the precipitated casein is removed with ether and the residue used for the determination of nitrogen in the usual way. The albumin is removed from the filtrate by a tannin solution in the manner already described (480). If it be desired to separate the albumin and globulin, the methods described in paragraph 399 may be used.

524. Mercurial Method.—A volumetric method for determining the total proteid matter in milk has lately been proposed by Deniges.[533] It is based upon the observation that in the precipitation of proteid matter by mercury salts, a definite quantity of mercury in proportion to the amount of proteid, is carried down therewith. The precipitation is made with a mercurial salt of known strength and the excess of the mercurial salt in the filtrate is determined by titration. For the details of the manipulation, the paper cited above may be consulted.

525. Water and Ash.—From two to five grams of the koumiss are dried to constant weight in a flat platinum dish over ignited sand, asbestos or pumice stone, and the dried residue incinerated.

526. Composition of Koumiss.—The composition of koumiss varies with the character of the milk used and the extent of the fermentation. Some of the data obtained by analysts are given below:[534]

Composition of Koumiss.

Kind of milk. Water,
  Per cent.  
Sugar,
  Per cent.  
Alcohol,
  Per cent.  
Fat,
  Per cent.  
Proteid,
  Per cent.  
Carbon
dioxid,
  Per cent.  
Acidity,
  Per cent.  
Cow 89.32 4.38 0.76 2.08 2.56 0.83 0.47
Probably cow skim’d   3.95 1.38 0.88 2.89   0.82
Mare 91.87 0.79 2.89 1.19 1.91   1.04

From the above it is seen that koumiss is made either from whole or skim milk, and that the percentage of alcohol may vary within large limits, its proportion being inverse to that of the milk sugar.

Koumiss is a beverage which is very palatable, easily digested and one which is not appreciated in this country in proportion to its merits, especially for the use of invalids.

AUTHORITIES CITED IN PART SIXTH.

[400] Wiley; Proceedings of the Society for the Promotion of Agricultural Science, 1889, p. 84. (Omit “food” before idiosyncrasy.)

[401] Pharmaceutical Journal and Transactions, Series 3, Vol. 18, p. 479.

[402] The Analyst, 1892, p. 85.

[403] Henkel; Wiener Landwirtschaftliche Zeitung, 1888, S. 401: Bulletin No. 24, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 155.

[404] Die Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen, Band 35, S. 351: Bulletin No. 24, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 151.

[405] Baumeister; Milch und Molkerei-Producte, S. 16.

[406] Bulletins Nos. 9 and 25 of the Office of Experiment Stations, U. S. Department of Agriculture: Farmers’ Bulletins Nos. 9 and 29, U. S. Department of Agriculture.

[407] Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 3e Série, Tome 64, p. 61.

[408] Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris, 3ᵉ Série, Tome 15-16, p. 248.

[409] Vid. op. cit. supra, p. 453.

[410] Central-Blatt für medicinische Wissenschaft, Band 34, S. 145.

[411] Conn; Farmers’ Bulletins 9 and 25, Office of Experiment Stations, U. S. Department of Agriculture: Farmers’ Bulletins 9 and 29, Department of Agriculture: Les Microbes et leur Rôle dans la Laiterie Freudenreich: Langlois, Le Lait, pp. 95 et seq.

[412] The Analyst, Vol. 20, p. 157.

[413] Vid. op. cit. supra, p. 152.

[414] Forschungs-Berichte über Lebensmittel etc., Band 2, S. 368.

[415] Vid. op. cit. supra, Band 1, S. 422.

[416] Vid. op. cit. supra, S. 372.

[417] Hopkins and Powers; Bulletin No. 47, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 127.

[418] Bulletin No. 38, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 118.

[419] Becke; Die Milchprüfungs-Methoden, S. 45: Rouvier; Le Lait, p. 45.

[420] The Analyst, 1890, Vol. 16, p. 170.

[421] Rouvier; Le Lait, p. 35.

[422] Central-Blatt für Nahrungs und Genussmittel Chemie, Band 13, S. 277.

[423] Bulletin No. 46, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 36.

[424] Journal für Landwirtschaft, 1882, S. 293; 1885, S. 251.

[425] Vid. op. cit. supra, 1879, S. 249.

[426] Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der Viehhaltung, 1879, S. 265.

[427] The Analyst, Vol. 7, p. 129.

[428] Vid. op. cit. supra, Vol. 13, p. 26.

[429] Bulletin No. 47, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 123.

[430] This work, Vol. 1, page 411.

[431] Bulletin No. 16, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 36.

[432] Sixth Annual Report Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 64.

[433] Fourth Annual Report New York (Geneva) Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 298.

[434] Woll; Seventh Annual Report Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 238.

[435] The Analyst, 1885, p. 46: Bulletin No. 13, Part 1, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 86.

[436] Haidlen; Die Milchprüfungs-Methoden, S. 12.

[437] Dingler’s polytechnisches Journal, Band 232, S. 461.

[438] Macfarlane; The Analyst, Vol. 18, p. 73.

[439] Duclaux; Le Lait, p. 176.

[440] Abraham; The Analyst, Vol. 9, p. 22.

[441] Gantter; Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, Band 26, S. 677.

[442] Morse, Piggot and Burton; American Chemical Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 108 and 222.

[443] Chemiker-Zeitung Repertorium, 1889, S. 228.

[444] Journal de Pharmacie et de Chimie, 1890, p. 460.

[445] Richmond; The Analyst, Vol. 17, p. 48: Bulletins 28, 31, 35, 38, 43, and 46, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture.

[446] Bulletin No. 28, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 31.

[447] Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, Band 27, S. 464.

[448] Chemical News, Nov. 1889.

[449] The Analyst, Vol. 16, p. 67.

[450] Vid. op. cit. supra, Vol. 18, p. 53.

[451] Vid. op. cit. supra, Vol. 17, p. 81.

[452] Chemiker-Zeitung, Band 15, S. 1833.

[453] Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 1888, Vol. 2, p. 371: Fifth Annual Report Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

[454] Molkerei Zeitung, 1892, No. 1; Chemisches Central-Blatt, 1892, Band 2, S. 429.

[455] Chemiker-Zeitung, Band 18, S. 1816; Band 19, S. 348.

[456] Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, Band 32, S. 168.

[457] Zeitschrift des Landwirtschaftlichen Vereins in Bayern, 1880; Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, Band 20, S. 452.

[458] Bulletin No. 13, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 92.

[459] Instruction sur l’Emploi du Lactobutyrometer, Paris, 1856 et 1878: Becke; Die Milchprüfungs-Methoden, S. 66.

[460] Bulletin No. 8, Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 295.

[461] Dingler’s polytechnisches Journal, Band 261, S. 219.

[462] Milch Zeitung, Band 21, S. 496.

[463] Op. cit. supra, Band 22, S. 85.

[464] Bulletin No. 24, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

[465] Bulletin No. 31, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

[466] The Analyst, Vol. 17, p. 83.

[467] Bulletin No. 21, Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station.

[468] Vid. op. cit. 67, Vol. 17, p. 144; Vol. 18, p. 130; Vol. 19, p. 62.

[469] Chemiker-Zeitung, Band 16, S. 1839.

[470] Vid. op. cit. supra, Band 19, S. 348; Band 18, S. 1816.

[471] Vid. op. cit. supra, Band 19, S. 348.

[472] Comptes rendus, Tome 107, p. 772; Hoppe-Seyler’s Handbuch der Physiologisch- und Pathologisch-Chemischen Analyse, S. 479.

[473] Proceedings of the Society for the Promotion of Agricultural Science, 1888, p. 13.

[474] Journal of Physiology, Vol. 11, p. 459.

[475] Die Land wirtschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen, Band 31, S. 131.

[476] Sixth Annual Report of the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 64.

[477] Bulletin No. 46, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 36.

[478] Zeitschrift für Biologie, Band 33, S. 43.

[479] Journal für praktische Chemie, {2}, Band 15, S. 329.

[480] Vid. op. cit. 79, Band 33, {Neue Folge, 15}, S. 55.

[481] Stenberg; Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie, Band 13, S. 138.

[482] Vid. op. cit. supra, S. 137.

[483] Vid. op. cit. supra, S. 160.

[484] Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 15, p. 644.

[485] Handbuch der Physiologisch- und Pathologisch-Chemischen Analyse, S. 285. (Read, Makris instead of Makeris.)

[486] Zeitschrift für Biologie, Band 23, S. 64.

[487] Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris, 3ᵉ Série, Tome 11, p. 152.

[488] Vid. op. cit. 86, S. 487.

[489] Zeitschrift für Nahrungsmittel-Untersuchung, Band 10, S. 104.

[490] Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie, Band 9, S. 445.

[491] American Chemical Journal, Vol. 6, p. 289.

[492] Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 18, p. 428.

[493] Journal de Pharmacie et de Chimie, 6e Série, Tome 4, p. 65.

[494] Contribution à l’Étude des Lactoses, Thèse pour le diplôme supérieure de Pharmacie, Paris, 1892. (Read Thibault instead of Thibonet.)

[495] Journal für praktische Chemie, Neue Folge, Band 15, S. 348.

[496] Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie, 1896, S. 72.

[497] Chemisches Central-Blatt, 1892, Band 2, S. 1028.

[498] Vid. op. cit. supra, Band 21, S. 753.

[499] Vid. op. cit. 90, S. 86.

[500] Bulletin No. 13, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 29 et seq.

[501] Vid. op. cit. supra, pp. 73-75: Bulletin No. 46, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 26.

[502] Benedikt and Lewkowitsch; Oils, Fats and Waxes, p. 490.

[503] Forsuchungs-Berichte über Lebensmittel, 1895, Band 2, S. 424; Chemiker-Zeitung Repertorium, 1896, Band 20, S. 15.

[504] Revue Internationale des Falsifications, Mai, 1893, p. 157.

[505] Chemiker-Zeitung, 1893, Band 17, S. 468.

[506] Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie, 1896, S. 177.

[507] Vid. op. cit. 90, Aug. 26, 1894, S. 219; Le Stazioni Sperimentali Agrarie Italiane, 1893, pp. 25-77.

[508] Farmers’ Bulletin No. 12, U. S. Department of Agriculture.

[509] Bulletin de l’Association Belge des Chimistes, Tome 9, p. 279.

[510] Vid. op. cit. 101, p. 26.

[511] Vid. op. cit. supra, p. 27: Chemical News, Vol. 55, p. 49.

[512] Vid. op. cit. 111, p. 28.

[513] Vid. op. et. loc. cit. supra.

[514] Russell; Dairy Bacteriology.

[515] Woll; Dairy Calendar, p. 223.

[516] Van Slyke; Bulletin 82, New Series, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 654.

[517] Babcock; Twelfth Annual Report Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, p. 133.

[518] Woll; Dairy Calendar, 1895, p. 220.

[519] Bulletin No. 46, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 37.

[520] Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch, 1872, part 1.

[521] Molkerei Zeitung, 1893, Nos. 20, 22.

[522] This work, Vol. 2, p. 204.

[523] Vid. op. cit. 120, p. 24.

[524] Milch Zeitung, 1895, Band 24, S. 729: Chemiker-Zeitung Repertorium, Band 19, S. 372.

[525] Chemiker-Zeitung, 1895, S. 554.

[526] Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, Band 35, S. 497.

[527] Vid. op. cit. supra, S. 499.

[528] Vid. op. cit. supra, S. 502.

[529] Bulletin No. 13, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 118, 293.

[530] This work, Vol. 2, p. 204.

[531] Pflüger’s Archiv, Band 56, S. 558.

[532] Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie, Band 22, S. 213.

[533] Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris, Tomes 15-16, p. 1126.

[534] American Chemical Journal, Vol. 8, p. 200: Bulletin 13, Division of Chemistry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, p. 120.