Title: The Romance of Madame Tussaud's
Author: John Theodore Tussaud
Author of introduction, etc.: Hilaire Belloc
Release date: March 15, 2017 [eBook #54369]
Most recently updated: October 23, 2024
Language: English
Credits: Produced by deaurider and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)
Transcriber’s Note: Illustrations have been moved from the original position of the printed plates, in order to correspond better with the flow of the text. The List of Illustrations therefore isn’t strictly accurate in regard to where the illustrations may be found. It links directly to the illustration, rather than to the page number indicated.
THE ROMANCE OF MADAME TUSSAUD’S
JOHN THEODORE TUSSAUD
MADAME TUSSAUD AT THE AGE OF 85
From the portrait by Paul Fischer, Court painter to H. M. George IV.
THE ROMANCE
OF
MADAME TUSSAUD’S
BY
JOHN THEODORE TUSSAUD
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY
HILAIRE BELLOC
ILLUSTRATED
NEW YORK
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1920,
BY GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO
MY WIFE
THROUGH WHOSE KINDLY URGING THESE LEAVES
HAVE GROWN TO THE DIMENSIONS
OF A BOOK
The earliest information we have concerning Madame Tussaud is that she was born in Switzerland on the 7th of December, 1760, and was the only child of Joseph and Marie Grosholtz. Her mother was the daughter of a Swiss clergyman.
She married on the 20th of October, 1795, François Tussaud, who, it appears, was her junior by seven years. We are able to trace his family back as far as 1630, when his great-great-grandfather, one Denis Tusseaud—for that is how he spelt his name—was born.
There is documentary evidence that Denis was brought from Burgy to Mâcon in 1631, his family also coming from Burzy, close by, in 1658.
His descendants lived at Mâcon for more than a century, their occupation being generally that of workers in metal.
The great-grandfather of François was Henry Tusseaud (1684-1717), and his grandfather’s name was Claude (1716-1767).
François’ father (1744-1786) was the first of the family to adopt the present spelling of the name, although we find that various members of the family used the forms Tussot, Tusseau, Tuissiaud, Tussiaut, Tusseaut, Tussiau, or Thusseaud.
Madame Tussaud’s marriage does not appear to have been a happy one, for we learn that in 1800—two years before she came to England—she separated from her husband, of whom we hear nothing further, although he is known to have been living in Paris in the lifetime of his grandsons.
The foundress of the famous Exhibition had two sons, Joseph and Francis. Francis (1800-1873) had several sons, the eldest of whom, Joseph Randall (1831-1892), who was a student and exhibitor at the Royal Academy, was the father of the author of this book.
Mr. John Theodore Tussaud was born in Kensington on the 2nd of May, 1858, and at the age of six was sent to St. Charles’s College, London, where he came under the influence of Cardinal Manning, who took a keen personal interest in his welfare.
Some six years later he was transferred to Ramsgate, where he benefited by the training he received from the Benedictine monks at St. Augustine’s.
In the year 1889 he married Ruth Helena, daughter of Thomas Grew. There are seven sons and three daughters of the marriage.
Mr. Tussaud, like his father, has exhibited at the Royal Academy. His occasional contributions to literature have been welcomed by thoughtful readers, and he is a recognised authority on historical matters relating to the French Revolution and the First Empire.
Seventeen great-grandsons of Madame Tussaud took an active part in the war, all, without exception, serving in the British Army. Two were killed and most of the others wounded.
WILLIAM E. HURT.
Middle Temple, London
| PAGE | |
| Preface by William E. Hurt | vii |
| Introduction by Hilaire Belloc | 25 |
| CHAPTER I | |
| Mr. Tussaud First Enters His Father’s Studio—Reverie—Madame Tussaud’s Uncle Forsakes the Medical Profession for Art—Madame’s Birth and Parentage—A Prince’s Promise | 53 |
| CHAPTER II | |
| Curtius Leaves Berne for Paris—The Hôtel d’Aligre—The Court of Louis XV—Madame Arrives in Paris | 59 |
| CHAPTER III | |
| Life-size Figures—Museum at the Palais Royal—Exhibition on the Boulevard du Temple—Benjamin Franklin—Voltaire | 65 |
| CHAPTER IV | |
| Madame Elizabeth of France—Madame Tussaud Goes to Versailles—Foulon—Three Notable Groups—Gallery of Notorious Criminals | 70 |
| CHAPTER V | |
| Eve of the French Revolution—Necker and the Duke of Orléans—Louis XVI’s Fatal Mistakes—His Dismissal of the People’s Favourites | 77 |
| CHAPTER VI | |
| Madame Tussaud Recalled from Versailles—The Twelfth of July, 1789—Busts Taken from Curtius’s Exhibition—A Garde Française Slain in the Mêlée | 81 |
| CHAPTER VII | |
| Heads of the Revolution—Madame’s Terrible Experiences—The Guillotine in Pawn—Madame Acquires the Knife, Lunette and Chopper | 87 |
| CHAPTER VIII | |
| Madame Dines with the Terrorists Marat and Robespierre, Models their Figures and Subsequently Takes Casts of their Heads—She Visits Charlotte Corday in Prison—Death of Curtius—Madame Marries—Napoleon Sits for His Model | 92 |
| CHAPTER IX | |
| Madame Tussaud Leaves France for England, Never to Return—Early Days in London—On Tour—Some Notable Figures—Shipwreck in the Irish Channel | 98 |
| CHAPTER X | |
| The Bristol Riots—Narrow Escape of the Exhibition—A Brave Black Servant—Arrival at Blackheath | 103 |
| CHAPTER XI | |
| An Old Placard—Princess Augusta’s Testimonial—Great Success at Gray’s Inn Road—Madame Initiates Promenade Concerts—Bygone Tableaux | 108 |
| CHAPTER XII | |
| Placard (Continued)—The Old Exhibition—Celebrities of the Day—Tussaud’s Mummy—Poetic Eulogism—Removal to Baker Street—The Iron Duke’s Rejoinder—Madame de Malibran | 113 |
| CHAPTER XIII | |
| How the Waterloo Carriage was Acquired—A Chance Conversation on London Bridge—The Strange Adventures of an Emperor’s Equipage—Affidavit of Napoleon’s Coachman | 120 |
| CHAPTER XIV | |
| Napoleon’s Waterloo Carriage—Description of Its Exterior | 127 |
| CHAPTER XV | |
| Description of the Waterloo Carriage (Continued)—Its Interior and Peculiar Contrivances—Brought to England and Exhibited at the London Museum | 133 |
| CHAPTER XVI | |
| The St. Helena Carriage—Napoleon Alarms the Ladies—Certificates of Authenticity | 139 |
| CHAPTER XVII | |
| Father Matthew Sits for His Model—Tsar Nicholas I. Takes a Fancy to Voltaire’s Chair—A Replica Sent to Him—The Rev. Peter McKenzie’s Exorcism | 143 |
| CHAPTER XVIII | |
| Landseer and the Count D’Orsay Visit the Exhibition—A Fright—Norfolk Farmer’s Account of Queen Victoria’s Visit | 148 |
| CHAPTER XIX | |
| Wellington Visits the Effigy of the Dead Napoleon, and Sits to Sir George Hayter for Historic Picture—Paintings from Models—Is the Photograph “Taken from Life,” or—? | 153 |
| CHAPTER XX | |
| The Story of Colour-Sergeant Bates’s March Through England to Prove Anglo-American Goodwill—Start from Gretna—The Dove of Peace | 159 |
| CHAPTER XXI | |
| Sergeant Bates’s Journey Finishes in London Amid a Remarkable Demonstration—His Gift to Madame Tussaud’s | 164 |
| CHAPTER XXII | |
| My First Model—Beaconsfield’s Curl—Gladstone’s Collar—John Bright and the Chinaman | 171 |
| CHAPTER XXIII | |
| The Tichborne “Claimant”—Nearly an Explosion—The Big Man’s Clothes—The Real Heir—The Claimant’s Release from Prison—Confession and Death | 177 |
| CHAPTER XXIV | |
| H. M. Stanley Sits to Joseph Tussaud—The Story of His Life—How He Found Livingstone—A Mysterious Veiled Lady—The Prince Imperial | 181 |
| CHAPTER XXV | |
| Count Léon—The Shah of Persia’s Visit—A Weird Suggestion; No Response—King Koffee—Cetewayo | 184 |
| CHAPTER XXVI | |
| The Berlin Congress—Lord Beaconsfield and the “Turnerelli Wreath”—“The People’s Tribute” Finds a Home at Tussaud’s—The Sculptor’s Despair—He Constructs His Tombstone and Dies | 190 |
| CHAPTER XXVII | |
| The Phœnix Park Murders—We Secure the Jaunting-Car and Pony—Charles Bradlaugh—General Boulanger—Lord Roberts Inspects the Model of Himself | 197 |
| CHAPTER XXVIII | |
| My Favourite Portrait—Lord Tennyson Poses Unconsciously Before My Wife—“This Beats Tussaud’s”—Sir Richard Burton—His Widow Clothes the Model | 203 |
| CHAPTER XXIX | |
| Removal of the Exhibition to the Present Building—Sleeping Figures—History of the Portman Rooms—The Cato Street Conspiracy—Baron Grant’s Staircase | 208 |
| CHAPTER XXX | |
| The King of Siam’s Visit—The Shahzada’s Clothing—The King of Burmah’s War Elephant—Tale of Two Monkeys | 215 |
| CHAPTER XXXI | |
| Queen Victoria’s Copperplates—Another Royal Persian Visit—“Perished by Fire”—“Viscount Hinton” and His Organ—The Coquette’s Jewels Lost and Found | 220 |
| CHAPTER XXXII | |
| Royal Visitors—King Alphonso and Princess Ena—The Late Emperor Frederick—A Penniless Trio—Princess Charles—The Prince of Wales and Prince Albert | 225 |
| CHAPTER XXXIII | |
| The Begum of Bhopal Pays Us a Visit—Lord Rosebery and Lord Annaly—Lord Randolph Churchill—Lady Beatty—Lady Jellicoe and Mrs. Asquith | 231 |
| CHAPTER XXXIV | |
| Tussaud’s as Educator—Queer Questions—Wanted, a “Model” Wife—Quaint Extract from an Indian’s Diary | 236 |
| CHAPTER XXXV | |
| Stars of the Stage in My Studio—Miss Ellen Terry Has a Cup of Tea—Sir Squire and Lady Bancroft—Sir Henry Irving and the Cabby—We Comply with a Strange Request | 242 |
| CHAPTER XXXVI | |
| Literary Sitters—George R. Sims’ Impromptu—His Ordeal in the Chamber of Horrors. George Augustus Sala’s Masterpiece | 249 |
| CHAPTER XXXVII | |
| G. A. Sala on Marie Antoinette—The Royal Family—The Queen—Her “Trial,” Condemnation and Death—The Sansons—Sala’s Impressions | 254 |
| CHAPTER XXXVIII | |
| More Sitters—Mr. John Burns Walks and Talks—We Buy His Only Suit—Mr. George Bernard Shaw Has to Work for His Living—Four Leading Suffragettes—Christabel’s Model “Speaks”—The Channel Swimmer—General Booth | 275 |
| CHAPTER XXXIX | |
| Bank Holiday Queues—Cup-Tie Day—Gentlemen from the North—Bachelor Beanfeasts—The Member for Oldham—A Scare | 282 |
| CHAPTER XL | |
| The Mysterious Sun Yat Sen’s Visit—His Escape from the Chinese Legation—The Dargai Tableau—Sir William Treloar Entertains His Little Friends | 287 |
| CHAPTER XLI | |
| A Miscellany of Humour—Our Policeman—The Mysterious Lantern—The Danger of Old Catalogues—Stories of Children—Sir Ernest Shackleton’s Model | 291 |
| CHAPTER XLII | |
| The Lure of Horrors—Beginnings of the “Dead Room”—Sir Thomas Lawrence, P.R.A., Sketches a Suicide—Burke and Hare—Fieschi’s Infernal Machine—Greenacre—Executions in Public—“Free at Last!” | 297 |
| CHAPTER XLIII | |
| The Chamber of Horrors Rumour—No Reward has been or will be Offered—The Constable’s Escapade—A Nocturnal Experience—Dumas’s Comedy of the Chamber—Yeomen of the Halter | 307 |
| CHAPTER XLIV | |
| Anecdotal—“Which is Peace?”—Mark Twain at Tussaud’s—Dr. Grace’s Story—Mr. Kipling’s Model—Filial Pride—Bishop Jackson’s Sally—German Inaccuracy | 315 |
| CHAPTER XLV | |
| Enemy Models—A Hostile Public—Banishment of Four Rulers—Our Reply to John Bull—Attacks on the Kaiser’s Effigy—Story of an Iron Cross | 320 |
| CHAPTER XLVI | |
| Tussaud’s during the War—Chameleon Crowds—The Psychology of Courage—Men of St. Dunstan’s—Poignant Memories—Our Watchman’s Soliloquy | 326 |
| CHAPTER XLVII | |
| Three Heroes of the War: Nurse Cavell, Jack Cornwell, V.C., Captain Fryatt—Lords Roberts and Kitchener—Queen Alexandra’s Stick and Violets—The Duke of Norfolk’s Tip | 335 |
| CHAPTER XLVIII | |
| A Crinoline Comedy—Mr. Bruce Smith’s Story—An American Lady’s Shilling—My Father’s Meeting with Barnum—The “Cherry-coloured” Cat—“Paganini” and the Tailor—George Grossmith Poses | 341 |
| CHAPTER XLIX | |
| We Visit the Old Bailey for Mementoes—A Mock Trial—Relics of Old Newgate—Two Famous Cells—The Newgate Bell | 346 |
| CHAPTER L | |
| Tussaud’s in Verse—Tom Hood’s Quatrain—“Alfred among the Immortals”—A Refuge for Cabinet Ministers—Two Dialogues—“This is Fame” | 352 |
| CHAPTER LI | |
| Last Scene of All—Madame Tussaud’s Appearance and Character—Her Memoirs Published in 1838—Her Last Words | 356 |
| Madame Tussaud at the age of 85 | Frontispiece |
| PAGE | |
| John Theodore Tussaud | 32 |
| Christopher Curtius | 56 |
| Louis XVI and the Duke of Orléans | 56 |
| Three Views of Voltaire’s Head | 57 |
| “The Dying Socrates” | 57 |
| Benjamin Franklin | 57 |
| Madame Tussaud at the age of 20 | 72 |
| Marie Antoinette, the Dauphin, and the Duchesse D’Angoulême | 72 |
| Madame Elizabeth of France | 73 |
| Madame Elizabeth of France, Sister of Louis XVI | 73 |
| Model of the Bastille | 73 |
| M. Necker | 73 |
| Camille Desmoulins | 88 |
| Thomas Carlyle | 88 |
| Marie Antoinette | 88 |
| Jean Baptiste Carrier | 88 |
| Knife, Lunette and Chopper of the Original Guillotine | 88 |
| The Guillotine | 89 |
| Charlotte Corday | 89 |
| Jean Paul Marat | 89 |
| Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre | 89 |
| The Princess de Lamballe | 89 |
| Danton | 89 |
| Madame Tussaud at the age of 42 | 112 |
| Her Royal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales and Saxe-Coburg | 112 |
| The Bristol Riots | 112 |
| Sir Charles Wetherell | 112 |
| Her Most Excellent Majesty Queen Adelaide | 113 |
| Interior of the Exhibition | 113 |
| Daniel O’Connell | 113 |
| Madame de Malibran | 113 |
| Joseph Tussaud | 113 |
| Thorwaldsen’s Celebrated Bust of the Great Napoleon | 128 |
| Napoleon’s Military Carriage General View | 128 |
| Napoleon’s Military Carriage Scene of its capture at Jenappe | 128 |
| The Empress Josephine | 128 |
| Napoleon’s Military Carriage The Interior | 129 |
| Articles Found in Napoleon’s Carriage | 129 |
| Napoleon’s Barouche | 129 |
| Father Mathew | 144 |
| Nicholas I | 144 |
| Voltaire’s Chair | 145 |
| Sir Edwin Landseer, R.A. | 145 |
| Wellington Visiting the Effigy of Napoleon | 160 |
| Sir George Hayter | 160 |
| Colour-Sergeant Gilbert H. Bates | 161 |
| William Cobbett | 161 |
| Richard Cobden | 161 |
| John Bright | 178 |
| Tichborne Claimant | 178 |
| Dr. Livingstone | 179 |
| The Prince Imperial | 179 |
| Napoleon III | 179 |
| Count Léon | 192 |
| Edward Tracy Turnerelli | 192 |
| The Turnerelli Wreath | 192 |
| King Cetewayo | 193 |
| General Boulanger | 193 |
| Lord Frederick Cavendish | 208 |
| Charles Bradlaugh | 208 |
| Sir Richard Burton | 209 |
| Head of Lord Tennyson | 209 |
| Viscount Hinton and His Organ | 240 |
| The Surrender of General Cronje | 240 |
| William Makepeace Thackeray | 241 |
| Sir Squire Bancroft | 241 |
| Bust of George Augustus Sala | 288 |
| George Augustus Sala | 288 |
| T. W. Burgess The Channel Swimmer | 288 |
| Effigy of Dr. Sun Yat Sen | 289 |
| Dr. Sun Yat Sen | 289 |
| The Children’s Lord Mayor | 289 |
| Charles Peace | 320 |
| Marquis of Hartington | 320 |
| Burke and Hare | 320 |
| Sir Thomas Lawrence | 320 |
| Key of the Bastille | 320 |
| John Williams | 320 |
| William Marwood The Hangman | 321 |
| Dr. Jackson Bishop of London | 321 |
| Count Zeppelin | 321 |
| Bismarck | 321 |
| Jack Sheppard | 321 |
| The Old Newgate Bell | 321 |
| Edith Cavell | 352 |
| Jack Cornwell, V. C. | 352 |
| Captain Fryatt | 352 |
| Field-Marshal Earl Kitchener | 352 |
| Alfred Austin | 353 |
| Tom Hood | 353 |
| Francis Tussaud | 353 |
INTRODUCTION
BY
HILAIRE BELLOC
This is a fascinating book and its fascination consists in two things attaching to its subject: first that the famous collection of modelled portraits which has become a sort of national institution in England under the name of “Madame Tussaud’s” has its roots in the greatest period of modern history, the French Revolution; second, in that the complete and growing record has passed through so many changes and has yet survived.
Even though the famous collection had dealt with nothing more than the main figures of the Revolution and of the great wars that followed it, it would have been a possession of permanent and lasting historical value. I am not sure that if it had so remained, stopped short at the effigies of those now long dead, it would not now receive a greater respect. It might well in that case have become something recognised as a national possession, protected and preserved by the national government. For the prolongation of the record right on into our own time, while it very greatly increases the real value of the collection as a piece of historical evidence, yet deprives it of that illusion which men cannot avoid where history is concerned: the illusion that things thoroughly passed are in some way greater and of more consequence than contemporary things.
This continuity of the great collection—so long as it is maintained with judgment in selection and without too much yielding to momentary fame is none the less a thing to be very thankful for. Already those of us who, like the present writer, are well on into middle age, can judge how the younger generation is beginning to regard as historical these simulacra, which, when they were first modelled, seemed in our own youth insignificant because they were contemporary. To our children (who are now grown and are young men and women), Disraeli, Gladstone, Bismarck—all the group that were old but living men in the eighties (Disraeli died at the beginning of them, Bismarck long after their close)—are what to us were Louis-Philippe, Garibaldi, Palmerston, and the process properly continued will be invaluable. We have already more than 130 years of record. There is no reason why it should not extend to the two centuries.
It often happens that a thing of great value to history, a piece of evidence which we now find invaluable, has come to us by an accident, the motive of its creation not historical at all nor really connected with record. Indeed of the bulk of historical evidence which we use to-day for the reconstruction of the past only a small proportion—official documents—are of the nature of deliberate records. And that proportion of evidence is on the whole the worst as material, for official documents always have a motive underlying them, and they never give one a vivid picture. The great bulk of the material with which we used to build up the past and make it live again for ourselves is accidental. And so it is with this great collection.
The motive at first was merely that of a waxwork show. The remarkable woman who created the collection did so as a matter of business. The exhibits were intended to satisfy no more than contemporary curiosity. But they have become a piece of historical evidence which increases in value with every year. Whatever you may read (and the accounts are always contradictory) of some man prominent in the past, whatever picture or sculpture you may find of him (and these are often deliberately flattering or in some other way untrue) the physical impression of him will never be so full and so exact as in the case of an effigy made by a contemporary who saw him, watched him, knew him, and whose whole motive was exactitude in reproduction.
Here there does indeed arise the question of the medium. You cannot conceive of a better medium than wax among all the known mediums for production of effigies of human beings. Yet it is not perfect. And it is precisely because the likeness is so great, precisely because the effect is so parallel to that of reality, that we note the minor details in which illusion is not achieved. When a man sees a bust of marble he does not expect to find illusion. The greatest portrait statuary can never be more than a symbol. But the wax effigy aims at exact reproduction. To put it in extreme terms, the ideal of the modeller in wax would be to reproduce a figure such that one knowing the original could be deceived and think he had found again his friend dead or sleeping. When a wax effigy reproduces a known and real person, especially a person whom we ourselves have come across, the discrepancy between reality and its copy is clearer. But there is this strong evidence in support of the success which modelling in wax has reached, that where we are dealing with something unknown, some imaginary person, it is possible to create, in spite of the immobility of the figure, an illusion of life. Everyone who has visited these collections will testify to that. With a person whom one has seen in the flesh the little details in which the wax does not tally with the flesh nor immobility with life, stand out clear. That is especially the case with those whose complexion is difficult to imitate. It is also the case in the attachment of the hair. And I have further noticed that the direction of the eyes makes a difference, the figure being more lifelike as a rule when the eyes are cast down or averted, than when a direct look is imitated. But it remains true that with an imaginary person when you are free to suppose that the person had a complexion of the sort easily imitated in wax, and where you are further free to presume the pose, you can get as near to reality in this medium as it is possible for human art to achieve.
Therein, then, lies the great value of this thing. It is a witness to history, and as I have said, one increasingly valuable as time proceeds.
Still it is with what is chiefly historical in this gallery of figures and especially with the tradition of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars, that we are most concerned. And the Tussaud collection has this added interest that it sprung as it were from the revolutionary time. Its origins lay in that. Its first fame was due to an emigration from France into England, and it still remains much the best effort at physical reconstruction which we have to-day.
The reason is that the lady who founded this institution was not only herself a contemporary of but an actor in the principal events of that time. She came by a series of accidents into direct touch with one personality after another. She left a record of each. She was a personal and convincing witness and her work remains. She is just as much a person of the Revolution and of the Napoleonic period as any one of those whom she modelled for our benefit. And that is (let us remember) of special value in that one is in the spirit of one’s time.
The artist deliberately reconstructing a bust through plastic art is always in danger of failing through a lack of the necessary sympathy between the time in which he lives and the time in which his subject lived. The truth of this is expressed very sharply in modern attempts at reconstructing mediæval sculpture. It has been done. It is singularly successful, for instance, in the central porch of Notre Dame in Paris. But as a rule it fails. The modern man either works from a modern model, or at any rate with modern expressions and modern features at the back of his mind. One conspicuous instance occurs to me, the modern figures upon Lichfield. They are as grievously out of their supposed time as are the figures of Tennyson’s “Idylls of the Kings.” The Knights of the Round Tables of Tennyson’s version are the gentlemen of pegtopped trousers who were contemporary with the poet. They have been to public schools and to universities. They would be horrified at the dropping of aitches, and they have often attended at services which were fully choral. They would have called the inhabitants of the country which they visited “natives.” That is what Tennyson made of Geraint and Launcelot and his odious Arthur.
I am afraid one cannot say much more for the sculptures that I have in my mind. They are dressed in mediæval armour, but the faces that look out from the helmets are the faces to be seen in the London clubs to-day. They are faces devoid of simplicity and strength. They are not the faces of the Middle Ages.
You have the same thing in historical painting, and that is why historical painting usually looks so ridiculous in the generation after it was made. We all know those historical paintings which our grandfathers bought and which still disfigure the large rooms of private houses, where you have Richard I of England charging the Saracens (he, an Angevin!), his face glowing with the emotions of the football field.
Now this prime difficulty and error in pictorial and plastic record in the past you can only avoid by the advantage of contemporary work, and this is where the great value of this collection comes in. All its work is contemporary, and we can to-day, after an interval of more than a hundred years, weigh the importance of that point. The revolutionary figures sometimes look odd to us precisely because their real aspect has been so vividly preserved. The hand that modelled Marat was a hand of Marat’s age. It touched the flesh of the dead man. The eyes that received the conception reproduced by the hands, gazed upon Marat himself as he lay back dead.
And here it is convenient to introduce that essential character in the great collection—the genius of its originator.
The whole thing, its character, long tradition and establishment—is the creation of one remarkable woman, and of her we ought to have some full biography. I know of none. She has at least the rare advantage of having propagated her name justly and the thing she created is identified with her. It is not often that history acts with so little irony and with so much generosity. Her energy was much more remarkable than that of those very few women who have created and organised permanent businesses, for it was not only her judgment and initiative which created the commercial side of the collection: it was also her own talent and industry, the work of her own hands, that laid the foundation of it all. Most of the early portraits were the direct product of her skill and it is from her that the continuous tradition of the place descends. Her sons learnt their art from their mother and carried it on to the third generation which still continues it. It was she who took all the critical decisions, she who steered the fortunes of the family through the crisis of the Revolution, who determined to take the collection over to England, who conceived the idea of making it a permanent record by adding contemporaries year after year.
It is not often that one has this intimate admixture of personality with an institution, and when one gets it it has an astonishing effect in vivifying the whole. When an institution is thus the product of a character at once highly energetic and highly individual, it is as though a living thing continued on long beyond the term of a human life. It is, in the strict and original sense of the word, “inspired.” You get that quality, of course, in all literature, and in some of the corporations which remarkable men and women have founded, but very rarely in a piece of business in an institution of affairs. Here you get it, and the more you read of the woman’s life and character the more you understand the success of her effort and its vitality.