Zālim Singh retires to Mewār.
—It was not long after the
accession of Guman Singh to the sceptre of the Haras, that the
brave and handsome Major Domo, having dared to cross his
master’s path in love, lost his favour, and the office of Faujdar,
which he had attained in his twenty-first year. It is probable
he evinced little contrition for his offence, for the confiscation of
Nanta soon followed. This estate, on the west bank of the
Chambal, still enjoyed as a fief in perpetuity by the Jhala family,
was the original appanage of the Kotah State when a younger
branch of Bundi. From hence may be inferred the consideration
in which the Jhala ancestor of our subject was held, which conferred
upon him the heirloom of the house. Both the office and
the estate thereto attached, thus resumed, were bestowed upon
the maternal uncle of the prince, Bhopat Singh, of the Bhangrot
tribe. By this step, the door of reconciliation being closed
against the young Jhala, he determined to abandon the scene of
his disgrace, and court fortune elsewhere. He was not long in
determining the path he should pursue: Amber was shut against
him, and Marwar held out no field for his ambition. Mewar was
at hand, and a chief of his own tribe and nation then ruled the
councils of Rana Arsi, who had lately succeeded to power, but a
power paralysed by faction and by a pretender to the throne.
The Jhala chieftain of Delwara, one of the sixteen great barons
of Mewar, had headed the party which placed his sovereign on
the throne; and he felt no desire to part with the influence
which this service gave him. He entertained [520] foreign
guards about the person of his prince, and distributed estates at
pleasure among those who supported his measures; while from
the crown domain, or from the estates of those who were hostile
to his influence, he seized upon lands, which doubled his possessions.
Such was the court of Rana Arsi, when the ex-Major
Domo of Kotah came to seek a new master. His reputation at
once secured him a reception, and his talents for finesse, already
developed, made the Rana confide to him the subjection in which
he was held by his own vassal-subject. It was then that Zalim,
a youth and a stranger, showed that rare union of intrepidity
and caution which has made him the wonder of the age. By a
most daring plan, which cost the Delwara chief his life, in open
day and surrounded by attendants, the Rana was released from
this odious tutelage. For this service, the title of Raj Rana
[5] and
the estate of Chitarkhera on the southern frontier were conferred
upon Zalim, who was now a noble of the second rank in Mewar.
The rebellion still continued, however, and the pretender and
his faction sought the aid of the Mahrattas; but under the
vigorous councils of Zalim, seconded by the spirit of the Rana,
an army was collected which gave battle to the combined rebels
and Mahrattas. The result of this day has already been related.
[6]
The Rana was discomfited and lost the flower of his nobles when
victory was almost assured to them, and Zalim was left wounded
and a prisoner in the field. He fell into the hands of Trimbakrao,
the father of the celebrated Ambaji Inglia, and the friendship
then formed materially governed the future actions of his life.
Zālim Singh returns to Kotah.
—The loss of this battle left
the Rana and Mewar at the mercy of the conqueror. Udaipur
was invested, and capitulated, after a noble defence, upon terms
which perpetuated her thraldom. Zalim, too wise to cling to the
fortunes of a falling house, instead of returning to Udaipur, bent
his steps to Kotah, in company with the Pandit, Lalaji Balal,
the faithful partaker of his future fortunes. Zalim foresaw the
storm about to spread over Rajwara, and deemed himself equal
to guide and avert it from Kotah, while the political levity of
Mewar gave him little hopes of success at that court.
Raja Guman, however, had neither forgotten nor forgiven
his competitor, and refused to receive him: but in no wise daunted,
he trusted to his address, and thrust himself unbidden on the
prince. The moment he chose proved favourable; and he was
not only pardoned, but employed [521].
Gallant Death of Mādho Singh.
—The Mahrattas had now
reached the southern frontier, and invested the castle of Bakhani,
[7]
which was defended by four hundred Haras of the Sawant clan,
[8]
under its chief, Madho Singh. The enemy had been foiled in
repeated attempts to escalade, and it furnishes a good idea of the
inadequate means of the ‘Southrons’ for the operations of a siege,
when their besieging apparatus was confined to an elephant,
whose head was the substitute for a petard, to burst open the gate.
Repeated instances, however, prove that this noble animal is
fully equal to the task, and would have succeeded on this occasion,
had not the intrepidity of the Hara chieftain prompted one of
those desperate exploits which fill the pages of their annals.
Armed with his dagger, Madho Singh leaped from the walls upon
the back of the elephant, stabbed the rider, and with repeated
blows felled the animal to the earth. That he should escape
could not be expected; but his death and the noble deed kindled
such enthusiasm, that his clan threw wide the gate, and rushing
sword in hand amidst the multitude, perished to a man. But
they died not unavenged: thirteen hundred of the bravest of the
Mahrattas accompanied them to Suryaloka, the warrior’s heaven.
The invaders continued their inroad, and invested Sohet: but
the prince sent his commands to the garrison to preserve their
lives for Kotah, and not again sacrifice them, as the point of
honour had been nobly maintained. Accordingly, at midnight,
they evacuated the place; but whether from accident or treachery,
the grass jungle which covered their retreat was set fire to, and
cast so resplendent a light, that the brave garrison had to fight
their way against desperate odds, and many were slain. Malharrao
Holkar, who had been greatly disheartened at the loss sustained
at Bakhani, was revived at this success, and prepared to follow
it up. Raja Guman deemed it advisable to try negotiation, and
the Bhangrot Faujdar was sent with full powers to treat with
the Mahratta commander; but he failed and returned.
Zālim Singh appointed Guardian of the Heir.
—Such was the
moment chosen by young Zalim to force himself into the presence
of his offended prince. In all probability he mentioned the day
at Bhatwara, where by his courage, and still more by his tact, he
released Kotah from the degradation of being subordinate to
Amber; and that it was by his influence with the same Malharrao
Holkar, who now threatened Kotah, he was enabled to succeed.
He was invested with full powers; the negotiation was renewed,
and terminated successfully: for the sum of six lakhs of rupees
the Mahratta leader withdrew his horde from the territory of
Kotah. His [522] prince’s favour was regained, his estate restored,
and the unsuccessful negotiator lost the office of Faujdar,
into which young Zalim was reinducted. But scarcely had he
recovered his rights, before Guman Singh was taken grievously
ill, and all hopes of his life were relinquished. To whom could
the dying prince look at such a moment, as guardian of his infant
son, but the person whose skill had twice saved the State from
peril? He accordingly proclaimed his will to his chiefs, and
with all due solemnity placed Ummed Singh, then ten years of
age, ‘in the lap’ of Zalim Singh.
Mahārāo Ummed Singh, A.D. 1771-1819.
—Ummed Singh was
proclaimed in S. 1827 (
A.D. 1771). On the day of inauguration,
the ancient Rajput custom of the
tika-daur was revived, and the
conquest of Kelwara
[9] from the house of Narwar marked with
éclat the accession of the Maharao of the Haras of Kotah, and
gave early indication that the genius of the regent would not
sleep in his office of protector. More than half a century of rule,
amidst the most appalling vicissitudes, has amply confirmed the
prognostication.
The retention of a power thus acquired, it may be concluded,
could never be effected without severity, nor the vigorous
authority, wielded throughout a period beyond the ordinary
limits of mortality, be sustained without something more potent
than persuasion. Still, when we consider Zalim’s perilous predicament,
and the motives to perpetual reaction, his acts of severity are
fewer than might have been expected, or than occur in the course
of usurpation under similar circumstances. Mature reflection
initiated all his measures, and the sagacity of their conception
was only equalled by the rapidity of their execution. Whether
the end in view was good or evil, nothing was ever half-done;
no spark was left to excite future conflagration. Even this excess
of severity was an advantage; it restrained the repetition of
what, whether morally right or wrong, he was determined not to
tolerate. To pass a correct judgment on these acts is most
difficult. What in one case was a measure of barbarous severity,
appears in another to have been one indispensable to the welfare
of the State. But this is not the place to discuss the character
or principles of the regent; let us endeavour to unfold both in
the exhibition of those acts which have carried him through the
most tempestuous sea of political convulsion in the whole history
of India. When nought but revolution and rapine stalked through
the land, when State after State was crumbling into dust, or sinking
into the abyss of ruin, he guided the vessel entrusted to his care
safely through all dangers, adding yearly to her riches, until he
placed her in security under the protection of Britain [523].
Zālim Singh Regent of Kotah.
—Scarcely had Zalim assumed
the protectorate, when he was compelled to make trial of those
Machiavellian powers which have never deserted him, in order
to baffle the schemes devised to oppose him. The duties of
Faujdar, to which he had hitherto been restricted, were entirely
of a military nature; though, as it involved the charge of the
castle, in which the sovereign resided, it brought him in contact
with his councils. This, however, afforded no plea for interference
in the Diwani, or civil duties of the government, in which,
ever since his own accession to power, he had a coadjutor in Rae
Akhairam, a man of splendid talents, and who had been Diwan
or prime minister throughout the reign of Chhattarsal and the
greater part of that of his successor. To his counsel is mainly
ascribed the advantages gained by Kotah throughout these reigns;
yet did he fall a sacrifice to jealousies a short time before the death
of his prince, Guman Singh. It is not affirmed that they were
the suggestions of young Zalim; but Akhairam’s death left him
fewer competitors to dispute the junction in his own person of
the civil as well as military authority of the State. Still he had
no slight opposition to overcome, in the very opening of his career.
The party which opposed the pretensions of Zalim Singh to act
as regent of the State, asserting that no such power had been
bequeathed by the dying prince, consisted of his cousin, the
Maharaja Sarup Singh, and the Bhangrot chief, whose disgrace
brought Zalim into power. There was, besides, the Dhabhai
Jaskaran, foster-brother to the prince, a man of talent and credit,
whose post, being immediately about his person, afforded opportunities
for carrying their schemes into effect.
Murder of Sarūp Singh.
—Such was the powerful opposition
arrayed against the protector in the very commencement of his
career. The conspiracy was hardly formed, however, before it
was extinguished by the murder of the Maharaja by the hands of
the Dhabhai, the banishment of the assassin, and the flight of
the Bhangrot. The rapidity with which this drama was enacted
struck terror into all. The gaining over the foster-brother, the
making him the instrument of punishment, and banishing him
for the crime, acted like a spell, and appeared such a masterpiece
of daring and subtilty combined, that no one thought himself
secure. There had been no cause of discontent between the
Maharaja and the Dhabhai, to prompt revenge; yet did the
latter, in the glare of open day, rush upon him in the garden of
Brajvilas,
[10] and with a blow of his scimitar end his days. The
regent was the loudest in execrating the author of the crime, whom
he instantly seized and confined, and soon after expelled from
Haraoti. But however well acted, this dissimulation passed not
with the world; and, whether innocent or guilty, they lay to
Zalim’s charge the plot for the murder of the Maharaja. The
Dhabhai died in exile and contempt at [524] Jaipur; and in
abandoning him to his fate without provision, Zalim, if guilty of
the deed, showed at once his knowledge and contempt of mankind.
Had he added another murder to the first, and in the fury of an
affected indignation become the sole depository of his secret, he
would only have increased the suspicion of the world; but in
turning the culprit loose on society to proclaim his participation
in the crime, he neutralized the reproach by destroying the
credibility of one who was a self-convicted assassin when he had
it in his power to check its circulation. In order to unravel this
tortuous policy, it is necessary to state that the Dhabhai was
seduced from the league by the persuasion of the regent, who
insinuated that the Maharaja formed plans inimical to the safety
of the young prince, and that his own elevation was the true
object of his hostility to the person entrusted with the charge of
the minor sovereign. Whatever truth there might be in this,
which might be pleaded in justification of the foul crime, it was
attended with the consequences he expected. Immediately after,
the remaining member of the adverse junta withdrew, and at the
same time many of the nobles abandoned their estates and their
country. Zalim evinced his contempt of their means of resistance
by granting them free egress from the kingdom, and determined
to turn their retreat to account. They went to Jaipur and to
Jodhpur; but troubles prevailed everywhere; the princes could
with difficulty keep the prowling Mahratta from their own doors,
and possessed neither funds nor inclination to enter into foreign
quarrels for objects which would only increase their already
superabundant difficulties. The event turned out as Zalim
anticipated; and the princes, to whom the refugees were suitors,
had a legitimate excuse in the representations of the regent, who
described them as rebels to their sovereign and parties to designs
hostile to his rule. Some died abroad, and some, sick of wandering
in a foreign land dependent on its bounty, solicited as a boon
that “their ashes might be burned with their fathers'.” In
granting this request, Zalim evinced that reliance on himself,
which is the leading feature of his character. He permitted their
return, but received them as traitors who had abandoned their
prince and their country, and it was announced to them, as an
act of clemency, that they were permitted to live upon a part
of their estates; which, as they had been voluntarily abandoned,
were sequestrated and belonged to the crown.
Zālim Singh’s Triumph over his Opponents.
—Such was Zalim
Singh’s triumph over the first faction formed against his assumption
of the full powers of regent of Kotah. Not only did the
aristocracy feel humiliated, but were subjugated by the rod of
iron held over them; and no opportunity [525] was ever thrown
away of crushing this formidable body, which in these States too
often exerts its pernicious influence to the ruin of society. The
thoughtlessness of character so peculiar to Rajputs, furnished
abundant opportunities for the march of an exterminating policy,
and, at the same time, afforded reasons which justified it.
The next combination was more formidable; it was headed by
Deo Singh of Aton,[11] who enjoyed an estate of sixty thousand
rupees rent. He strongly fortified his castle, and was joined by
all the discontented nobles, determined to get rid of the authority
which crushed them. The regent well knew the spirits he had
to cope with, and that the power of the State was insufficient.
By means of ‘the help of Moses’ (such is the interpretation of
Musa Madad, his auxiliary on this occasion), this struggle against
his authority also only served to confirm it; and their measures
recoiled on the heads of the feudality. The condition of society
since the dissolution of the imperial power was most adverse to
the institutions of Rajwara, the unsupported valour of whose
nobles was no match for the mercenary force which their rulers
could now always command from those bands, belonging to no
government, but roaming whither they listed over this vast
region, in search of pay or plunder. The ‘help of Moses’ was
the leader of one of these associations—a name well known in
the history of that agitated period; and he not only led a well-appointed
infantry brigade, but had an efficient park attached
to it, which was brought to play against Aton. It held out several
months, the garrison meanwhile making many sallies, which it
required the constant vigilance of Moses to repress. At length,
reduced to extremity, they demanded and obtained an honourable
capitulation, being allowed to retire unmolested whither they
pleased. Such was the termination of this ill-organized insurrection,
which involved almost all the feudal chiefs of Kotah in exile
and ruin, and strengthened the regent, or as he would say, the
state, by the escheat of the sequestrated property. Deo Singh of
Aton, the head of this league, died in exile. After several years
of lamentation in a foreign soil for the janam bhum, the ‘land of
their birth,’ the son pleaded for pardon, though his heart denied
all crime, and was fortunate enough to obtain his recall, and the
estate of Bamolia, of fifteen thousand rupees rent. The inferior
members of the opposition were treated with the same contemptuous
clemency; they were admitted into Kotah, but
deprived of the power of doing mischief. What stronger proof
of the political courage of the regent can be adduced, than his
shutting up such combustible materials within the social edifice,
and even living amongst and with them, as if he deserved their
friendship rather than their hatred [526].
In combating such associations, and thus cementing his power,
time passed away. His marriage with one of the distant branches
of the royal house of Mewar, by whom he had his son and successor
Madho Singh, gave Zalim an additional interest in the affairs of
that disturbed State, of which he never lost sight amidst the
troubles which more immediately concerned him. The motives
which, in S. 1847 (A.D. 1791), made him consider for a time the
interests of Kotah as secondary to those of Mewar, are related
at length in the annals of that State;[12] and the effect of this
policy on the prosperity of Kotah, drained of its wealth in the
prosecution of his views, will appear on considering the details
of his system. Referring the reader, therefore, to the Annals of
Mewar, we shall pass from S. 1847 to S. 1856 (A.D. 1800), when
another attempt was made by the chieftains to throw off the iron
yoke of the protector.
Conspiracy against Zālim Singh.
—Many attempts at assassination
had been tried, but his vigilance baffled them all; though
no bold enterprise was hazarded since the failure of that (in S.
1833) which ended in the death and exile of its contriver, the
chieftain of Aton, until the conspiracy of Mohsen, in S. 1856, just
twenty years ago.
[13] Bahadur Singh, of Mohsen, a chieftain of
ten thousand rupees’ annual rent, was the head of this plot, which
included every chief and family whose fortunes had been annihilated
by the exterminating policy of the regent. It was conducted
with admirable secrecy; if known at all, it was to Zalim
alone, and not till on the eve of accomplishment. The proscription-list
was long; the regent, his family, his friend and counsellor
the Pandit Lalaji, were amongst the victims marked for sacrifice.
The moment for execution was that of his proceeding to hold
his court, in open day; and the mode was by a
coup de main
whose very audacity would guarantee success. It is said that
he was actually in progress to darbar, when the danger was
revealed. The paegah or ‘select troop of horse’ belonging to his
friend, and always at hand, was immediately called in and added
to the guards about his person; thus the conspirators were
assailed when they deemed the prey rushing into the snare they
had laid. The surprise was complete; many were slain; some
were taken, others fled. Amongst the latter was the head of the
conspiracy, Bahadur Singh, who gained the Chambal, and took
refuge in the temple of the tutelary deity of the Haras at Patan.
But he mistook the character of the regent when he supposed
that either the sanctuary (
sarana) of Keshorai,
[14] or the respect
due to the prince in whose dominions (Bundi) it lay, could shield
him from his fate. He was dragged forth, and expiated his crime
or folly with his life [527].
According to the apologists of the regent, this act was one of
just retribution, since it was less to defend himself and his immediate
interests than those of the prince whose power and existence
were threatened by the insurrection, which had for its object
his deposal and the elevation of one of his brothers. The members
of the Maharao’s family at this period were his uncle Raj Singh,
and his two brothers, Gordhan and Gopal Singh. Since the
rebellion of Aton, these princes had been under strict surveillance;
but after this instance of reaction, in which their names were
implicated as having aspired to supplant their brother, a more
rigorous seclusion was adopted; and the rest of their days was
passed in solitary confinement. Gordhan, the elder, died about
ten years after his incarceration; the younger, Gopal, lived many
years longer; but neither from that day quitted the walls of their
prison, until death released them from this dreadful bondage.
Kaka Raj Singh lived to extreme old age; but, as he took no
part in these turmoils, he remained unmolested, having the range
of the temples in the city, beyond which limits he had no wish to
stray.
We may in this place introduce a slip from the genealogical
tree of the forfeited branch of Bishan Singh, but which, in the
person of his grandson Ajit, regained its rights and the gaddi.
The fate of this family will serve as a specimen of the policy
pursued by the regent towards the feudal interests of Kotah.
It is appalling, when thus marshalled, to view the sacrifices which
the maintenance of power will demand in these feudal States,
where individual will is law.
The plots against the existence and authority of the Protector
were of every description, and no less than eighteen are enumerated,
which his never-slumbering vigilance detected and baffled.
The means were force, open and concealed, poison, the dagger—until
at length he became sick of precaution. “I could not always
be on my guard,” he would say. But the most dangerous of all
was a female conspiracy, got up in the palace, and which discovers
an amusing mixture of tragedy and farce, although his habitual
wariness would not have saved him from being its victim, had
he not been aided by the boldness of a female champion, from a
regard for the personal attractions of the handsome regent. He
was suddenly sent for by the queen-mother of one of the young
princes, and while waiting in an antechamber, expecting every
instant ‘the voice behind the curtain,’ he found himself encircled
by a band of Amazonian Rajputnis, armed with sword
and dagger, from whom, acquainted as he was with the nerve,
physical and moral, of his countrywomen, he saw no hope of
salvation [528]. Fortunately, they were determined not to be
satisfied merely with his death, they put him upon his trial; and
the train of interrogation into all the acts of his life was going on,
when his preserving angel, in the shape of the chief attendant of
the dowager queen, a woman of masculine strength and courage,
rushed in, and, with strong dissembled anger, drove him forth
amidst a torrent of abuse for presuming to be found in such a predicament.
While bathing, and during the heat of the chase, his favourite
pursuit, similar attempts have been made, but they always
recoiled on the heads of his enemies. Yet, notwithstanding the
multitude of these plots, which would have unsettled the reason
of many, he never allowed a blind suspicion to add to the victims
of his policy; and although, for his personal security, he was
compelled to sleep in an iron cage, he never harboured unnecessary
alarm, that parent of crime and blood in all usurpations. His
lynx-like eye saw at once who was likely to invade his authority,
and these knew their peril from the vigilance of a system which
never relaxed. Entire self-reliance, a police such as perhaps no
country in the world could equal, establishments well paid,
services liberally rewarded, character and talent in each department
of the State, himself keeping a strict watch over all, and
trusting implicitly to none, with a daily personal supervision of
all this complicated state-machinery—such was the system which
surmounted every peril, and not only maintained but increased
the power and political reputation of Zalim Singh, amidst the
storms of war, rapine, treason, and political convulsions of more
than half a century’s duration.
CHAPTER 7
Legislation of Zālim Singh.
—We are now to examine the
Protector in another point of view, as the legislator and manager
of the State whose concerns he was thus determined to rule.
For a series of years Kotah was but the wet-nurse to the child
of his ambition, a design upon Mewar [529], which engulfed as in
a vortex all that oppression could extort from the industry of the
people confided to his charge. From this first acquaintance
with the court of the Rana, in S. 1827 to the year 1856, he never
relinquished the hope of extending the same measure of authority
over that State which he exerted in his own. To the prosecution
of this policy Haraoti was sacrificed, and the cultivator lowered
to the condition of a serf. In the year 1840, oppression was at
its height; the impoverished ryot, no longer able to pay the
extra calls upon his industry, his cattle and the implements of
his labour distrained, was reduced to despair. Many died from
distress; some fled, but where could they find refuge in the
chaos around them? The greater part were compelled to plough
for hire, with the cattle and implements once their own, the very
fields, their freehold, which had been torn from them. From this
system of universal impoverishment, displayed at length in
unthatched villages and untilled lands, the regent was compelled
to become farmer-general of Kotah.
Fortunately for his subjects, and for his own reputation, his
sense of gratitude and friendship for the family of Inglia—whose
head, Bala Rao, was then a prisoner in Mewar—involved him, in
the attempt to obtain his release, in personal conflict with the
Rana, and he was compelled to abandon for ever that long-cherished
object of his ambition. It was then he perceived he
had sacrificed the welfare of all classes to a phantom, and his
vigorous understanding suggested a remedy, which was instantly
adopted.
Superstition of Zālim Singh.
—Until the conspiracy of Mohsen
in 1856, the regent had resided in the castle, acting the part of
the Maire du palais of the old French monarchy; but on his
return from the release of Bala Rao, in S. 1860 (A.D. 1803-4),
when the successes of the British arms disturbed the combination
of the Mahrattas, and obliged them to send forth their disunited
bands to seek by rapine what they had lost by our conquests,
the regent perceived the impolicy of such permanent residence,
and determined to come nearer to the point of danger. He had
a double motive, each of itself sufficiently powerful to justify
the change: the first was a revision of the revenue system; the
other, to seek a more central position for a disposable camp,
which he might move to any point threatened by these predatory
bodies. Though these were doubtless the real incentives to the
project, according to those who ought to have known the secret
impulse of his mind, the change from the castle on the Chambal
to the tented field proceeded from no more potent cause than an
ominous owl [530], telling his tale to the moon from the pinnacle
of his mansion. A meeting of the astrologers, and those versed
in prodigies, was convened, and it was decided that it would be
tempting honhar (fate) to abide longer in that dwelling. If this
were the true motive, Zalim Singh’s mind only shared the grovelling
superstition of the most illustrious and most courageous of
his nation, to whom there was no presage more appalling than a
ghugghu on the house-top. But, in all likelihood, this was a
political owl conjured up for the occasion; one seen only in the
mind’s eye of the regent, and serving to cloak his plans.
His Permanent Camp.
—The soothsayers having in due form
desecrated the dwelling of the Protector, he commenced a perambulation
and survey of the long-neglected territory, within
which he determined henceforth to limit his ambition. He then
saw, and perhaps felt for, the miseries his mistaken policy had
occasioned; but the moral evil was consummated; he had
ruined the fortunes of one-third of the agriculturists, and the
rest were depressed and heart-broken. The deficiency in his
revenues spoke a truth no longer to be misinterpreted; for his
credit was so low in the mercantile world at this period, that his
word and his bond were in equal disesteem. Hitherto he had
shut his ears against complaint; but funds were necessary to
forward his views, and all pleas of inability were met by confiscation.
It was evident that this evil, if not checked, must ultimately
denude the State of the means of defence, and the fertility
of his genius presented various modes of remedy. He began by
fixing upon a spot, near the strong fortress of Gagraun, for a
permanent camp, where he continued to reside, with merely a
shed over his tent; and although the officers and men of rank
had also thrown up sheds, he would admit of nothing more. All
the despatches and newspapers were dated “from the Chhaoni,”
or camp.
The situation selected was most judicious, being nearly equidistant
from the two principal entrances to Haraoti from the
south, and touching the most insubordinate part of the Bhil
population; while he was close to the strong castles of Shirgarh
and Gagraun, which he strengthened with the utmost care,
making the latter the depot of his treasures and his arsenal.
He formed an army; adopted the European arms and discipline;
appointed officers with the title of captain to his battalions,
which had a regular nomenclature, and his ‘royals’ (Raj Paltan)
have done as gallant service as any that ever bore the name.
These were ready at a moment’s warning to move to any point,
against any foe. Moreover, by this change, he was extricated
from many perplexities and delays which a residence in a capital
necessarily engenders [531].
Land Revenue Collections.
—Up to this period of his life, having
been immersed in the troubled sea of political intrigue, the
Protector had no better knowledge of the systems of revenue
and landed economy than other Rangra
[1] chieftains; and he
followed the immemorial usage termed
lattha and
batai,
[2] or rent
in kind by weight or measure, in proportion to the value of the
soil or of the product. The regent soon found the disadvantages
of this system, which afforded opportunity for oppression on the
part of the collectors, and fraud on that of the tenant, both
detrimental to the government, and serving only to enrich that
vulture, the Patel. When this rapacious yet indispensable
medium between the peasant and ruler leagued with the collectors—and
there was no control to exaction beyond the conscience
of this constituted attorney of each township, either for
the assessment or collection—and when, as we have so often
stated, the regent cared not for the means so that the supplies
were abundant, nothing but ruin could ensue to the ryot.
Having made himself master of the complicated details of the
batai, and sifted every act of chicanery by the most inquisitorial
process, he convoked all the Patels of the country, and took their
depositions as to the extent of each pateli, their modes of collection,
their credit, character, and individual means; and being
thus enabled to form a rough computation of the size and revenues
of each, he recommenced his tour, made a chakbandi, or measurement
of the lands of each township, and classified them, according
to soil and fertility, as piwal, or irrigated; gorma, or good soil,
but dependent on the heavens; and mormi, including pasturage
and mountain-tracts. He then, having formed an average from
the accounts of many years, instituted a fixed money-rent, and
declared that the batai system, or that of payment in kind, was
at an end. But even in this he showed severity; for he reduced
the jarib,[3] or standard measure, by a third, and added a fourth
to his averages. Doubtless he argued that the profit which the
Patels looked forward to would admit of this increase, and determined
that his vigilance should be more than a match for their
ingenuity.
Having thus adjusted the rents of the fisc, the dues of the
Patel were fixed at one and a half annas per bigha, on all the lands
constituting a pateli; and as his personal lands were on a favoured
footing and paid a much smaller rate than the ryot’s, he was led
to understand that any exaction beyond what was authorized
would subject him to confiscation. Thus the dues on collection
would realize to the Patel from five to fifteen thousand rupees
annually. The anxiety of these men to be reinstated in their
trusts [532] was evinced by the immense offers they made, of ten,
twenty, and even fifty thousand rupees. At one stroke he put
ten lakhs, or £100,000 sterling, into his exhausted treasury, by
the amount of nazaranas, or fines of relief on their reinduction
into office. The ryot hoped for better days; for notwithstanding
the assessment was heavy, he saw the limit of exaction, and that
the door was closed to all subordinate oppression. Besides the
spur of hope, he had that of fear, to quicken his exertions; for
with the promulgation of the edict substituting money-rent for
batai, the ryot was given to understand that 'no account of the
seasons’ would alter or lessen the established dues of the State,
and that uncultivated lands would be made over by the Patel to
those who would cultivate them; or if none would take them,
they would be incorporated with the khas or personal farms of
the regent. In all cases the Patels were declared responsible
for deficiencies of revenue.
Hitherto this body of men had an incentive, if not a licence,
to plunder, being subject to an annual or triennial tax termed
patel-barar. This was annulled; and it was added, that if they
fulfilled their contract with the State without oppressing the
subject, they should be protected and honoured. Thus these
Patels, the elected representatives of the village and the shields
of the ryot, became the direct officers of the crown. It was the
regent’s interest to conciliate a body of men on whose exertions
the prosperity of the State mainly depended; and they gladly
and unanimously entered into his views. Golden bracelets and
turbans, the signs of inauguration, were given, with a “grant
of office,” to each Patel, and they departed to their several
trusts.
Possibility of Representative Government.
—A few reflections
obtrude themselves on the contemplation of such a picture. It
will hardly fail to strike the reader, how perfect are the elements
for the formation of a representative government in these regions;
[4]
for every State of Rajwara is similarly constituted;
ex uno disce
omnes. The Patels would only require to be joined by the representatives
of the commercial body, and these are already formed,
of Rajput blood, deficient neither in nerve nor political sagacity,
compared with any class on earth; often composing the ministry,
or heading the armies in battle. It is needless to push the parallel
farther; but if it is the desire of Britain to promote this system
in the east to enthrone liberty on the ruins of bondage, and call
forth the energies of a grand national Panchayat, the materials
are ample without the risk of innovation beyond the mere extent
of members. We should have the aristocratic Thakurs (the
Rajput barons), the men of wealth, and the representatives of
agriculture, to [533] settle the limits and maintain the principles
of their ancient patriarchal system. A code of criminal and civil
law, perfectly adequate, could be compiled from their sacred
books, their records on stone, or traditional customs, and sufficient
might be deducted from the revenues of the State to maintain
municipal forces, which could unite if public safety were endangered,
while the equestrian order would furnish all State
parade, and act as a movable army.
A Revenue Board.
—But to return to our subject. Out of this
numerous body of Patels, Zalim selected four of the most intelligent
and experienced, of whom he formed a council attached to
the Presence. At first their duties were confined to matters of
revenue; soon those of police were superadded, and at length
no matter of internal regulation was transacted without their
advice. In all cases of doubtful decision they were the court of
appeal from provincial panchayats, and even from those of the
cities and the capital itself. Thus they performed the threefold
duties of a board of revenue, of justice, and of police, and perhaps
throughout the world there never was a police like that of Zalim
Singh: there was not one Fouché, but four; and a net of espionage
was spread over the country, out of whose meshes nothing
could escape.
Such was the Patel system of Kotah. A system so rigid had
its alloy of evil; the veil of secrecy, so essential to commercial
pursuits, was rudely drawn aside; every transaction was exposed
to the regent, and no man felt safe from the inquisitorial visits of
the spies of this council. A lucky speculation was immediately
reported, and the regent hastened to share in the success of the
speculator. Alarm and disgust were the consequence; the spirit
of trade was damped; none were assured of the just returns of
their industry; but there was no security elsewhere, and at
Kotah only the Protector dared to injure them.
The council of Venice was not more arbitrary than the Patel
board of Kotah; even the ministers saw the sword suspended
over their heads, while they were hated as much as feared by all
but the individual who recognized their utility.
It would be imagined that with a council so vigilant the regent
would feel perfectly secure. Not so: he had spies over them.
In short, to use the phrase of one of his ministers—a man of acute
perception and powerful understanding, when talking of the
vigour of his mental vision—when his physical organs had failed,
pani pina, aur mut tolna, which we will not translate.
The Bohra.
—The Patel, now the virtual master of the peasantry,
was aware that fine and confiscation would follow the discovery
of direct oppression of the ryots; but there were [534] many
indirect modes by which he could attain his object, and he took
the most secure, the medium of their necessities. Hitherto, the
impoverished husbandman had his wants supplied by the Bohra,
the sanctioned usurer of each village; now, the privileged Patel
usurped his functions, and bound him by a double chain to his
purposes. But we must explain the functions of the Bohra, in
order to show the extent of subordination in which the ryot was
placed.
The Bohra of Rajputana is the Métayer of the ancient system
of France. He furnishes the cultivator with whatever he requires
for his pursuits, whether cattle, implements, or seed; and supports
him and his family throughout the season until the crop is
ready for the sickle, when a settlement of accounts takes place.
This is done in two ways: either by a cash payment, with stipulated
interest according to the risk previously agreed upon; or,
more commonly, by a specified share of the crop, in which the
Bohra takes the risk of bad seasons with the husbandman. The
utility of such a person under an oppressive government, where
the ryot can store up nothing for the future, may readily be
conceived; he is, in fact, indispensable. Mutual honesty is
required; for extortion on the part of the Bohra would lose him
his clients, and dishonesty on that of the peasant would deprive
him of his only resource against the sequestration of his patrimony.
Accordingly, this monied middleman enjoyed great consideration,
being regarded as the patron of the husbandman. Every peasant
had his particular Bohra, and not unfrequently from the adjacent
village in preference to his own.
Such was the state of things when the old system of lattha
batai was commuted for bighoti, a specific money-rent apportioned
to the area of the land. The Patel, now tied down to the simple
duties of collection, could touch nothing but his dues, unless he
leagued with or overturned the Bohra; and in either case there
was risk from the lynx-eyed scrutiny of the regent. They,
accordingly, adopted the middle course of alarming his cupidity,
which the following expedient effected. When the crop was
ripe, the peasant would demand permission to cut it. “Pay
your rent first,” was the reply. The Bohra was applied to; but
his fears had been awakened by a caution not to lend money to
one on whom the government had claims. There was no alternative
but to mortgage to the harpy Patel a portion of the produce
of his fields. This was the precise point at which he aimed; he
took the crop at his own valuation, and gave his receipt that the
dues of government were satisfied; demanding a certificate to
the effect “that having no funds forthcoming [535] when the rent
was required, and being unable to raise it, the mortgager voluntarily
assigned, at a fair valuation, a share of the produce.” In
this manner did the Patels hoard immense quantities of grain,
and as Kotah became the granary of Rajputana, they accumulated
great wealth, while the peasant, never able to reckon on the
fruits of his industry, was depressed and impoverished. The
regent could not long be kept in ignorance of these extortions;
but the treasury overflowed, and he did not sufficiently heed the
miseries occasioned by a system which added fresh lands by
sequestration to the home farms, now the object of his especial
solicitude.