H. NISBET AND CO., PRINTERS, STOCKWELL STREET, GLASGOW.
The LONDON SOCIETY for the ABOLITION of COMPULSORY VACCINATION,
114 VICTORIA STREET, WESTMINSTER, S.W.
OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY.
I.—The Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination.
II.—The Diffusion of Knowledge concerning Vaccination.
III.—The Maintenance in London of an Office for the Publication of Literature relating to Vaccination, and as a Centre of Action and Information.
ADDRESS OF THE SOCIETY.
Smallpox is a member of the group of diseases, described as zymotic which originate in unwholesome conditions of life, and in common are diminished and prevented by the reduction and removal of those conditions.
In times when the laws of health were imperfectly understood, it was believed that by poisoning the blood with the virus of smallpox, or cowpox, a future attack of smallpox might be escaped. While many kindred medical practices have been discredited and forgotten, Vaccination, endowed by the State, has survived, and has entered into legislation, and is enforced with fine and imprisonment. It is in vain for Nonconformists to plead that they do not believe that Vaccination has any power to prevent or to mitigate smallpox, or that it is attended by the risk of communicating foul diseases. They are told they may believe what they like, but that vaccinated they must be, for the benefit of the rite is settled beyond dispute, and that only fools and fanatics venture to question what has been irrevocably determined.
It is to attack and overthrow this monstrous tyranny that the London Society has been established. The members desire to enlighten the public mind as to the history of Vaccination, as to its injury in communicating and intensifying other diseases, and as to the failure of the compulsory law to stamp out or even diminish the ravages of smallpox. Many too, whilst disinclined to discuss Vaccination as a medical question, or to surrender confidence in its prophylaxy, are opposed to its compulsory infliction. They maintain that every remedy should be left to justify itself by its own efficacy, and that of all prescriptions the last which requires extraneous assistance is Vaccination; for its repute is based on the fact that its subjects are secure from smallpox, and in that security may abide indifferent to those who choose to neglect its salvation. Even nurses in smallpox hospitals, it is said, when efficiently vaccinated and revaccinated, live unaffected in the variolous atmosphere. Therefore, they hold that to compare an unvaccinated person to a nuisance, as is frequently done, is to make use of an epithet that implicitly denies the virtue asserted for Vaccination, a nuisance being a voluntary danger or annoyance which another cannot conveniently avoid. They also hold that to establish any medical prescription, and to create interests identified with that prescription, is to erect a bar to improvement; for it is obvious that any novelty in the treatment of smallpox must, in the constitution of human nature, meet with resistance from those whose emoluments are vested in the established practice.
The London Society, therefore, claims to enlist the energies, not only of those who resist Vaccination as useless and mischievous, but also of those who, true to their faith in liberty, would leave its acceptance to the discretion of the individual. In the controversy into which they enter, they propose to employ all the familiar agencies wherewith in England revolutions are effected in the public mind and in Parliament; and they appeal with confidence for the sympathy and support of their countrymen. The Vaccination Acts under which they suffer have not been enacted with the full cognizance of the nation, but have been forced through indifferent Parliaments by the persistency of medical faction. The members of the Society are confident that, as soon as the truth about Vaccination is fully known and appreciated, the freedom they contend for will be conceded without fear, and that posterity will view with amazement the outrage upon human right and reason that is at present committed under the shadow of English liberty.
Prejudice, which sees what it pleases, cannot see what is plain.—Aubrey De Vere.
He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that.—J. Stuart Mill.
The Vaccination Inquirer,
The Organ of the London Society for the Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination.
Published Monthly, price 1d., or 1s. 6d. per annum, post free.
I would earnestly invite the attention of those who are concerned for the repression of wrong, and the promotion of human welfare, to the great and growing question of Vaccination. We hear on every side that we cannot be secure from Smallpox unless we have our blood poisoned with Cowpox in infancy, in adolescence, and at stated periods throughout life. The prescription is so unnatural that only custom renders it tolerable; it excites suspicion and aversion wherever rationally considered; and dislike and disgust are justified by inquiry. Smallpox is not averted by Vaccination; and the virus introduced to the blood bears with it other diseases, even the worst of diseases, and enfeebles and predisposes the constitution to other maladies. In short, Vaccination under cover of maintaining the common health inflicts upon it serious and deadly injuries. And by a strange exercise of tyranny, this most mischievous superstition is made compulsory and enforced by fine and imprisonment; and Englishmen are dragged from their homes and treated as convicts because they refuse to submit their children to the abominable rite. Mr. Bright says, “The Law is monstrous, and ought to be repealed.” Yet is this monstrous law maintained!
Possibly you are opposed to Vaccination, or indifferent, or a believer. In any case, I ask you to subscribe for the Vaccination Inquirer. If you are opposed to Vaccination, it will stimulate and inform your opposition; if indifferent, it will remove your indifference; if you are a believer in the rite, it may convert you to a better mind.
WILLIAM YOUNG, Secretary,
114 Victoria Street, Westminster.
WORKS ON VACCINATION.
William White.
Sir Lyon Playfair taken to Pieces and disposed of: likewise Sir Charles W. Dilke, Bart.: being a Dissection of their Speeches in the House of Commons on 19th June, 1883, in defence of Compulsory Vaccination. Second Edition. 6th thousand. 1s.
“It is a very dainty pamphlet of two hundred pages, so printed that it is a luxury to read. There are six pages of index, which will give some idea of its fulness of matter. Mr. White does all his work in a workmanlike way, and this work is no exception. He gives the two speeches of Playfair and Dilke in full, and fully answers them. They are literally taken to pieces and disposed of. Read William White on Playfair and Dilke. It is the end of controversy. Reply is impossible.”—Herald of Health.
“Mr. White has done what has never been done before,—that is, he has taken to pieces Sir Lyon Playfair’s speech, analysed his arguments, and exposed much of what is untrustworthy. The book ought to be in the hands of all who desire to understand the question of Vaccination.”—Newcastle Weekly Chronicle.
“This is a clever and most reasonable criticism and overhauling of Playfair and Dilke’s opinions, of which the best idea can be gained from a study of the book itself, which will be found complete in every detail.”—Brighton Gazette.
“The official vindication of vaccination was contained in Sir Lyon Playfair’s speech backed up by Sir Charles Dilke, and Mr. White has taken the various points of both speeches, item by item, and has replied to them with a clearness and effectiveness which must go far to shake the foundation of vaccination itself; whilst, in our view, it effectually disposes of the plea for compulsory vaccination.”—Northamptonshire Guardian.
“Anti-Vaccinationists will gloat over these pages. It is said that anything can be done with figures. We certainly at the time thought that Sir Lyon Playfair showed they were in favour of vaccination. On reading Mr. White’s book we are just as keenly impressed with an opposite view. We recommend the work to our readers.”—Eastern Daily Press.
“A remarkably well-written book by a practised hand. The subject is an unlovely one, and the proverbial ‘both sides’ have much to say; but this book ought to interest, amuse, and inform both sides. It everywhere tells of patient thought, industrious research, and a keen mind.”—The Truthseeker.
Alfred Russel Wallace, LL.D.
Author of The Malay Archipelago, the Land of the Orang-Utan and Bird of Paradise, 1869; Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection, 1871; The Geographical Distribution of Animals, 1876; Island Life, or The Phenomena and Causes of Island Faunas and Floras, 1880; Land Nationalisation, its Necessity and Aims, 1882; etc.
To Members of Parliament. Forty-Five Years of Registration Statistics; proving Vaccination to be both Useless and Dangerous. 6d.
William Tebb.
Compulsory Vaccination in England: with Incidental References to Foreign States. 1s.
“Not only crowds but Sanhedrims are infected with public lunacy.”—Dryden.
Contents:—Vaccination Results. Vaccination in the Workhouse. Vaccination in Public Schools. Vaccination in the Post Office. Vaccination in the Police Force. Vaccination in the Army. Vaccination in the Navy. Vaccination in the Prisons. Vaccination in Life Assurance. Vaccination amongst Emigrants.
P. A. Siljeström.
A Momentous Education Question for the Consideration of Parents and Others who desire the well-being of the Rising Generation. Translated from the Swedish by Dr. Garth Wilkinson. 4d.
P. A. Taylor, late M.P. for Leicester.
Current Fallacies about Vaccination. A Letter to Dr. W. B. Carpenter, C.B. 1d.
Speeches of Mr. P. A. Taylor and Mr. C. H. Hopwood in the House of Commons on 19th June, 1883. 6d.
Personal Rights. 6d.
Alexander Wheeler.
Vaccination until 1883. 6d.
This Essay is dedicated to those whose minds are sufficiently loyal to Science to be free to examine without prejudice, the most prejudiced question of the day.
J. J. Garth Wilkinson, M.D., and Wm. Young.
Vaccination Tracts with Preface and Supplement. 2s. 6d.
1. Letters and Opinions of Medical Men.
2. Facts and Figures showing that Vaccination has failed to stamp out, arrest, or mitigate Smallpox.
3 & 4. Opinions of Statesmen, Politicians, Publicists, Statisticians, and Sanitarians.
5. Cases of Disease, Suffering, and Death reported by the Injured Families.
6. The Vaccination Laws a Scandal to Public Honesty and Religion.
7. Vaccination a sign of the Decay of the Political and Medical Conscience of the Country.
8. The Propagation of Syphilis to Infants and Adults by Vaccination and Re-Vaccination.
9. Vaccination evil in its Principles, false in its Reasons, and deadly in its Results.
10. Vaccination subverts Dentition, and is the Cause of the prevalent Deformity and Decay of the Teeth.
11. Compulsory Vaccination a Desecration of Law, a Breaker of Homes, and Persecutor of the Poor.
12. Historical and Critical Summary in Three Parts. Part I.—The Imposture of the current Smallpox Lymph called Vaccine, and the new Imposture of Calf Lymph. Also, the Chaos of Statute Law dealing with Vaccine Substance.
13. Part II.—The Cry of the People against Vaccination is seconded by the Registrar-General’s Returns, and justified by the Evidence of Pathology.
14. Part III.—Pro Aris et Focis. The Religious Nature and Political Necessity of the Vaccination War.
E. W. Allen, 4 Ave Maria Lane, London, E.C.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE
Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources.
Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text,
and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained.
Pg vi: ‘L’Envoi ... xlix’ replaced by ‘L’Envoi ... l’.
Pg vii: ‘XV ... Physicans’ replaced by ‘XV ... Physicians’.
Pg xiv: ‘afflicted with with what’ replaced by ‘afflicted with what’.
Pg xxix: ‘records of the the Smallpox’ replaced by ‘records of the
Smallpox’.
Pg xxxiv: ‘In the the words’ replaced by ‘In the words’.
Pg xxxviii: ‘two or or three’ replaced by ‘two or three’.
Pg 3: The date of ‘March 10th, 172½’ reflects the fact that it is an
Old Style (Julian) date.
Pg 49: the term ‘efficiency’ here (and at the four other occurrences in
the book) should probably be ‘efficacy’. These have not been changed.
Pg 126: ‘did subequently fall’ replaced by ‘did subsequently fall’.
Pg 148: ‘slow to repond’ replaced by ‘slow to respond’.
Pg 175: ‘not everflow when’ replaced by ‘not overflow when’.
Pg 221: ‘embarassments were’ replaced by ‘embarrassments were’.
Pg 317: ‘un-unwearied exertions’ replaced by ‘unwearied exertions’.
Pg 322: ‘CHARTER XXIV’ replaced by ‘CHAPTER XXIV’.
Pg 350: ‘than sauvity’ replaced by ‘than suavity’.
Pg 363: ‘13th February, 1823’ replaced by ‘13th January, 1823’ (see
previous page 362, where it is stated that he died on the 26th of January).
Pg 376: ‘including a physican’ replaced by ‘including a physician’.
Pg 410: ‘from 1774 to 1708’ replaced by ‘from 1774 to 1798’.
Pg 468: ‘is tranferred to’ replaced by ‘is transferred to’.
Pg 483: ‘medica practitioner.’ replaced by ‘medical practitioner.’.
Pg 503: ‘and, inoculcated’ replaced by ‘and, inoculated’.
Pg 519: ‘which, by resaon’ replaced by ‘which, by reason’.
Pg 551: ‘repeatedy before’ replaced by ‘repeatedly before’.
Pg 611-613: a few ‘——.’ replaced by ditto mark (”), for
consistency.
Footnote [261] (anchored on page 406): ‘History o Vaccination’ replaced by
‘History of Vaccination’.