BOTANICAL FEATURES
OF THE
ALGERIAN SAHARA

CONTENTS.

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.

BOTANICAL FEATURES OF THE ALGERIAN SAHARA.

INTRODUCTION.

I wish to take this early opportunity to acknowledge my appreciation of assistance received from different persons during the course of the Algerian study, or as a means of preparing for it. I am especially indebted to Prof. H. J. Hall, of Leland Stanford University, who was my companion in Algeria and whose knowledge of the American deserts made his advice doubly valuable. Dr. Keltie, secretary of the Royal Geographical Society, provided letters and information of much use. Dr. Trabut, government botanist of Algeria, whose acquaintance with the country is extensive, very kindly identified all plants sent him and gave valuable aid in other ways. The map (plate A) was prepared expressly for this study by Mr. Godfrey Sykes.

In a country where travel away from the beaten path is not without discomfort, it is important that the way be made as smooth as possible, not alone for comfort but for personal safety as well, and it is therefore a pleasure to acknowledge the many kindnesses shown by the civil and military authorities of the French colony, as also by the American consul and vice-consul at Algiers.

GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALGERIA.

Very little study appears to have been given the soils of Algeria. It has been stated that there are vast areas of light, sandy soils, and also extensive tracts of marls, clays, and alluvial soils.[1] Gypsum is an important element in the soils, both those of the oases and probably of the open desert also; it occurs in great quantity in the large chotts of the desert, along with common salt and other salts. In the soils of the oases it acts as a cementing material, “uniting the finer soil-grains into aggregates which give the soil a much more sandy appearance than would be suspected from the results of mechanical analysis.” At Laghouat and at Ghardaia a light-colored, hard substance, closely resembling the “caliche” of the southwestern United States, was seen incrusting stones, filling cracks in rocks and crevices between rocks, and in places forming a stratum, horizontally placed (15 cm. more or less in thickness) underneath the superficial soils. This is extremely hard and can be broken or cut with difficulty. In the valley of the M’Zab, where it constitutes a heavy substratum, it appears to be impervious to water. This hardpan is used as threshing floors by removing the superficial soils.

An unexpectedly small amount of sand was observed over the route traversed. Near the southern edge of the High Plateau a sand belt was encountered and a long stretch of low dunes was seen leading to the eastward, which were said to reach nearly to Bou Saada; and again at Laghouat there are dunes to the east of town as well as to the west. Low dunes were seen in the valley of the Oued M’Zab, and sand mountains, possibly 250 meters high, were passed on the way from Ghardaia to Ouargla. Between Ouargla and Touggourt, also, sand was encountered and the way lay across about 12 miles of low dunes; to the north of Touggourt dunes are also to be seen; and finally, some sand is to be found in the neighborhood of Biskra. Although, thus, relatively little sand was met, much of the entire portion of southern Algeria is covered by sand. Large areas of sand-covered country lie to the east of the Oued Rirh, and especially southeast of Touggourt, and also to the west of Ghardaia there is said to be a large dune-covered territory. For the most part, however, the surface of the plains crossed is covered with large or small stones, mingled with which, or beneath which, there is a rather fine clay-like soil. This constitutes the hamada, or stony desert, of which the largest portion of the surface of the Sahara is probably composed. Where stones are largely absent and the soil is fine, usually of fluvian origin, the formation is known as “reg.” Reg desert was encountered at and north of Ouargla, in the drainage of the Igharghar or its tributaries, and south of Biskra. The latter may not, strictly speaking, be reg, but a wide-stretching bajada, and the soil is probably only in small part deposited by rivers.

CLIMATE OF ALGERIA.

The distribution in time and in space and the amount of precipitation are of the greatest importance as climatic features of Algeria. The rainfall is heaviest on the littoral, and especially heavy in the eastern portion of the littoral. An average of 1,000 mm. is reported from the immediate vicinity of the sea,[2] and as one goes southward the amount of precipitation rapidly becomes less. In the Tell the average rainfall is 570 mm., while on the High Plateau it is 310 mm. On the desert the rainfall is uncertain both in amount and in time, except that when rains occur the time coincides with the rainy season of northern Algeria. At Biskra the annual precipitation is 199 mm., at Laghouat it is 198 mm., at Ghardaia it is 114 mm., and at El Golea it is 47 mm. In many places in the western Sahara, five years or more go by without fall of rain.

The differences in the geographical distribution of precipitation vary from year to year, as may be illustrated by referring to that for the year 1908, which may be compared with the normal usual distribution as given above. In the northern portion of the country more rain than usual was reported; for example, there was over 1,000 mm. on the littoral east of Algiers, and over 500 mm. on the High Plateau, but on the desert the amount was somewhat less. At Laghouat it was 161 mm., at Ghardaia it was 89.2 mm., and at Ouargla it was 28 mm.

Besides the differences in amount of yearly rainfall, well-marked seasonal amounts of precipitation are also to be noted. In the northern portion of the colony rains are likely to occur in winter and spring, the summer and early autumn being dry; and as one goes south of the Saharan Atlas nearly the same conditions obtain; that is, the rains usually fall during the rainy season of the coast. The seasonal distribution of rain for the Tell, including the stations of the littoral, the High Plateau, the Saharan Atlas, and the desert, for a series of years including 1908, is given in table 1.

Table 1.—Seasonal distribution of rain.

The seasonal percentages of precipitation give a more graphic conception of the rainfall conditions for the four physiographic provinces. In the Tell this percentage in winter is 42, in spring 27, in summer 4, and in autumn 27. On the High Plateau the percentages are 30, 20, 16, and 34 for the four seasons respectively. In the Saharan Atlas 30 per cent of the rain occurs in winter, 24 in spring, 13 in summer, and 33 in autumn. In the desert the percentages of rainfall are 37, 39, 4, and 20[3] for the four seasons.

It is of interest also to note the number of days on which the rain fell on an average each year over a period running from 7 to 12 years. Thus at two typical stations on the Tell rain was reported on 102 and 118 days; at two stations on the High Plateau it rained 65 and 83.8 days; at a station in the Saharan Atlas rain was reported on 70 days; at desert stations, at Ouargla rain fell on an average 14.2, and at Laghouat 49 days each year. As a comparison, it may be mentioned that for ten years at Wady Halfi, Egyptian Sudan, there were only 22 days on which rain-drops were seen to fall. (Engler, loc. cit.)

The amount of precipitation varies greatly for the different desert stations, usually becoming less as one goes south from the High Plateau. As has already been mentioned, the average rainfall at Laghouat, which lies at the southern base of the Saharan Atlas, is 198 mm., the average at Ghardaia is 114 mm., while that at El Golea is 47 mm. The latter station is about 225 miles south of Laghouat, in the midst of the Sahara. The amount of rainfall, however, is greatly influenced by altitude, although lack of adequate precipitation data for the desert makes impossible a detailed presentation of this phase of the subject. As the amount of the yearly precipitation is less in the extreme southern part of Algeria than it is nearer the Saharan Atlas, where the altitude also is greater, it might be expected that the number of rainy days would vary in a like manner. Such records as are at hand, however, do not show this to be the case. For instance, at Ouargla rain falls on an average 14.2 days, average of 7 years, while the rainfall is 90.2 mm.; yet at El Golea, with a rainfall of 47 mm., there are 23.4 rainy days each year.[4]

On the desert the rains are often of a torrential nature, as facts presented above would indicate, and sometimes as much rain falls within a few hours, or even a few minutes, as usually occurs in an entire year. How much of the annual precipitation is of this character and how much is of the non-torrential kind the usual summaries leave entirely out of the account. It is well known that the former type of storm is more destructive and less useful to plants than the latter type. To illustrate the irregularity of the rainfall in the northern Sahara the monthly precipitation at Ouargla for several years is presented in table 2.

Table 2.—Rainfall at Ouargla, in millimeters.

The seasonal distribution of rainfall at four desert stations shows also marked irregularities. The distribution (in percentages) is given in table 3.

Table 3.—Seasonal distribution, in percentages, of rain.

The relative humidity at the desert stations is often very low, sometimes running in midsummer between 7 and 9 per cent for 6 days, and occasionally being too low to measure with the instruments employed. The mean relative humidity (table 4) shows the general very dry condition of the air of the desert as contrasted with a station in the Tell, and also indicates something of the monthly variations in this factor experienced among the desert stations themselves. The averages given are from 4 to 8 years, except the mean annual for In Salah, which is for 2 years only.

Table 4.—Mean relative humidity, in percentages.

A consideration of the evaporation statistics of Algeria for the year 1908 shows some interesting relations. It has already been observed that the rainfall along the coast is less in the west than in the east, and it will appear below that as a rule the temperature of the western portion is lower than that of the corresponding regions lying to the east. In both rainfall and temperature, however, the greatest variation is to be found as one goes inland, when decreasing rainfall and higher temperatures are encountered. A similar relation obtains in evaporation, which becomes continuously greater as the distance from the coast increases; that is, the average evaporation for stations on the High Plateau is greater than for stations in the Tell, and the evaporation at desert stations is greater than the evaporation on the High Plateau. The total average evaporation for the year, in millimeters, for 5 stations on the littoral, was 1,365.3; for 7 stations in the Tell it was 1,378.6; for 4 stations on the High Plateau 2,352.2, and for 3 stations in the desert, 3,977.5. The least evaporation reported was at Bouzarea, which was 989.9 mm., and the greatest was at Ghardaia, 5,309.7 mm.[5]

Table 5 gives in detail the monthly as well as the total evaporation for the year at three desert stations and at Algiers for 1908.

Table 5.—Evaporation in millimeters, 1908.

For a better personal appreciation of the rate of evaporation, as well as for the purpose of comparison, I arranged an apparatus to tell the water-loss from a free water-surface. It was also desirable to determine the relative evaporation of the day and night. As employed, the apparatus consisted of a flat tin dish, with parallel sides, 10 cm. in diameter. To the side was attached, by means of a rubber stopper, a bent glass tube of small diameter. The water-loss was read on this tube. Observations were made at Laghouat and at Ghardaia. Following is a summary of the results obtained at Ghardaia: For a period of 7 days, after November 10, the daily water-loss between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. was as follows: 5, 8, 8.5, 10.5, 13, 9, and 7.5 mm. The evaporation between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. was so slight, 1 mm. more or less, that it could not be well determined by the apparatus used.

A good idea of the intensely arid character of the Algerian climate, taken as a whole, is to be obtained by a study of the relation between the total rainfall and the total evaporation, based on the official climatic reports. In tables 6 and 7 the report for the year 1908 is used. The figures represent the ratio (^e⁄_r) between evaporation and rainfall, in which the amount of evaporation is used as the numerator and the amount of precipitation as the denominator. In the monthly evaporation-rainfall table (table 6), in all cases where no rainfall was reported for the month it was called 1 mm. In table 7, however, which gives the seasonal evaporation-rainfall ratio, the actual figures of the government report were in all cases employed, since there was no season during the year 1908, even in southern Algeria, when no precipitation occurred.[6]

Table 6.—Evaporation-rainfall ratio, monthly, 1908.

Table 7.—Evaporation-rainfall ratio, seasonal, 1908.