WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Agricultural prices cover

Agricultural prices

Chapter 36: Index to Tables in Appendix
Open in WeRead

About This Book

A practical guide for farmers and students that explains how prices for staple farm products are formed and recorded, emphasizing the interplay of supply, demand, and cost of production. It critiques existing price-registering mechanisms, including futures trading on commodity exchanges, and shows how market information and speculation influence farm returns. The author develops a ratio method to estimate cost of production for livestock and crops and applies it to hogs, cattle, milk, and grain as illustrative cases. Mathematical tools such as index numbers, correlation coefficients, and regression are presented for analyzing trends and forecasting, with discussion of their limitations. Practical teaching advice, recommended data sources, and appended tables support hands-on study and price monitoring.

Index to Tables in Appendix

  • Bacon prices, wholesale, 204
  • Bacon prices, retail, 200
  • Bran prices in Illinois, 197
  • Bran prices in Iowa, 195
  • Bran prices at Kansas City, 208
  • Bran prices at Minneapolis, 206
  • Butter prices on the farm, 198
  • Butter prices at Elgin and Chicago, 161
  • Cattle grades, percentage of each slaughtered at central markets, 184
  • Cattle prices, average native beef, 900 to 1,900 pounds, at Chicago, 147
  • Cattle prices, average native beef, 1,200 to 1,500 pounds, at Chicago, 148
  • Cattle prices, average fat cows and heifers, at Chicago, 149
  • Cattle prices, average canners and cutters, at Chicago, 150
  • Cattle prices, average native calves, at Chicago, 151
  • Cattle prices, average grass-fed westerns, at Chicago, 152
  • Cattle prices, average feeders and stockers, at Chicago, 153
  • Cattle prices in Illinois, 197
  • Cattle prices in Iowa, 195
  • Cattle receipts, monthly, at six markets, 172
  • Cattle receipts, monthly, at Chicago, 173
  • Cattle shipments of stockers and feeders from Omaha, 185–186
  • Cattle shipments of stockers and feeders from Kansas City, 189
  • Cattle weights at Chicago, 182
  • Chicago ten-year average daily prices, 126–133
  • Copper prices, 212
  • Corn exports, 193
  • Corn-hog ratios by decades, 120
  • Corn prices in Illinois, 196
  • Corn prices in Iowa, 194
  • Corn prices, monthly, at Chicago, 118–119
  • Corn prices in Argentina, 190
  • Corn receipts, monthly, at Chicago, 176
  • Cottonseed meal prices at Memphis, 205
  • Crude petroleum prices, 213
  • Daily prices, ten-year averages, at Chicago, 126–133
  • Dun’s index number, yearly, 134–135
  • Dun’s index number, by months since 1903, 135–139
  • Egg prices on the farm, 198
  • Exports of corn, 193
  • Exports of pork products, 191
  • Exports of wheat, 192
  • Greenback currency values, 125
  • Ham prices, wholesale, 204
  • Ham prices, retail, 200
  • Hog prices, in Illinois, 196
  • Hog prices in Iowa, 194
  • Hog prices, heavy, at Chicago, 116–117
  • Hog prices, average, at Chicago, 140
  • Hog prices, average, at Sioux City, 140
  • Hog prices, light, at Chicago, 141
  • Hog prices, pigs, at Chicago, 142
  • Hog prices, top, at Chicago, 143
  • Hog prices, top at St Louis, 144
  • Hog prices, top, at Omaha, 145
  • Hog prices, top, at Kansas City, 146
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at eleven markets, 164
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at six markets, 165
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at Chicago, 166
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at Kansas City, 169
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at Omaha, 167
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at St Louis, 168
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at Sioux City, 170
  • Hog receipts, monthly, at St Joseph, 171
  • Hog weights at Chicago, 178
  • Hog weights at Kansas City, St Joseph and Sioux City, 180–181
  • Hog weights at Omaha, 179
  • Hog weights at St Louis, 179
  • Horse prices on farms, 163
  • Horse prices, draft, at Omaha and Chicago, 163
  • Lard prices at Chicago, 160
  • Live stock movements, yearly, Bureau of Markets, 190
  • Lumber prices, 214
  • Middlings at Kansas City, 209
  • Middlings at Minneapolis, 207
  • Milk prices in Elgin-Chicago district, 162
  • Mill-feed price averages, 205
  • Oats prices in Illinois, 196
  • Oats prices in Iowa, 194
  • Oats prices, monthly, at Chicago, 121–122
  • Oats receipts, monthly, at Chicago, 177
  • Packers’ prices of ham and bacon, 204
  • Petroleum, crude, prices, 213
  • Pig iron prices, 211
  • Potato prices on the farm, 197
  • Pork exports, 191
  • Prices, daily ten-year averages, at Chicago, 126–133
  • Retail prices of bacon, 200
  • Retail prices of butter, 202
  • Retail prices of corn meal, 201
  • Retail prices of eggs, 202
  • Retail prices of flour, 201
  • Retail prices of ham, 200
  • Retail prices of lard, 201
  • Retail prices of milk, 202
  • Retail prices of pork chops, 200
  • Retail prices of potatoes, 203
  • Retail prices of rib roasts, 199
  • Retail prices of round steak, 199
  • Retail prices of sirloin steak, 199
  • Sheep prices, average of native lambs, at Chicago, 155
  • Sheep prices, average of native sheep, at Chicago, 156
  • Sheep prices, average of western lambs, at Chicago, 157
  • Sheep prices, average of western sheep, at Chicago, 158
  • Sheep prices, average of yearlings, at Chicago, 154
  • Sheep receipts, monthly, at Chicago, 175
  • Sheep receipts, monthly, at six markets, 174
  • Sheep, shipments of stockers and feeders from Omaha, 187–188
  • Sheep weights at Chicago, 183
  • Short-rib sides, prices at Chicago, 159
  • Shorts, prices at Kansas City, 209
  • Wages on city and farm, 210
  • Wheat exports, 192
  • Wheat prices at Chicago, 123–124
  • Wheat prices in Argentina, 190
  • Wool prices in Illinois, 197
  • Wool prices in Iowa, 195

1. It is suggested that those who are especially interested in a study of speculative markets read “Braces’ Organized Speculation,” or “Emery’s Speculation on the Stock and Produce Exchanges of the United States.”

2. The following defense of the functions of the Board of Trade was compiled by Mr. John R. Mauff, the secretary: “The Chicago Board of Trade has exclusive characteristics, indispensable to the welfare of the producer and consumer. It offers the producer a constant and infallible fluctuating market, determined and regulated by the inexorable law of supply and demand. It creates, thru the trading of its large membership, representing the various branches of agricultural and industrial activity, continuous quotations that are collected and distributed generally and without cost to the public. There is thus presented the opportunity for the producer to determine at any time the exact value of his products. A further advantage is that he can dispose of these products at any time by making a future delivery ‘hedging’ contract to suit his inclination, regardless of bad roads or transportation problems. Another benefit is the large and daily open competitive market in which to display his wares before a multitude of buyers simultaneously, obviating the otherwise impossible task of communicating with this diversity of demands by personal effort. Protected at all times by a set of rules and regulations holding its members to a strict accountability for their proper conduct as commission merchants; mandatory for suspension or expulsion for any violation of the ethics of trade. Having at their disposal a variety of ability only to be found in a large membership, insuring in this way proper handling and attention because a strenuous effort is always masterful and resourceful where competition is rife. Dissemination of statistics relating to agriculture; the benefits of terminal elevators equipped with modern apparatus for the proper care of sample grades. For consumers, car shortage and other transportation difficulties productive of business stagnation overcome by the opportunity to purchase for future delivery the raw material where ‘short’ sales of product call for protection. Consummation of contracts possible at all times thru the machinery of a market for future delivery at continuous prices, reliable to the fluctuations of a small fraction—one-eighth of one cent per bushel. In conclusion, and by no means least, the facilities offered for thus establishing value in every part of the United States, with no inequality because of geographical location, and so a death knell to the exploiters of producers and consumers because of this knowledge widely disseminated and so easy of understanding.”

3. The skew curves of supply and demand, as derived by H. L. Moore, in his book on “Economic Cycles,” furnish mathematical proof of this statement so far as corn and oats are concerned.

4. The chart printed in connection with the chapter, “Pork Exports, the Barometer of Corn Belt Prosperity,” gives forty-four years of profit and loss areas per acre of corn in the twelve north central states, the method used being the ratio method as described in the above.

5. It may be argued that the price of hogs determines the price of corn, and that the price of corn determines the price of land. This to a large extent may be true, and yet not interfere with the usefulness of the ratio method for purposes of price judging.

6. The link relative method of finding the normal seasonal variation, as used by Warren M. Persons, in the January, 1919, Review of Economic Statistics, is far more difficult than the method here used, and for our purposes is not worth while.

7. Warren M. Persons, in a footnote on page 35 of the January, 1919, Review of Economic Statistics, expresses the method of ascertaining percentage departure from the secular trend in mathematical symbols as follows: “Let the original series beginning with January be X1, X2, X3, ... Xn, the ordinates of secular trend be O1, O2, O3, ... On, and the adjusted indices of seasonal variation for twelve months be S1, S2, S3, ... S12 per cent, respectively. Then the items for secular trend and seasonal variation are:

X1 − S1O1/O1, X2 − S2O2/O2, X3 − S3O3/O3, ... X3 − S1O13/O13 etc.”

8. These figures are based on seasonal correction factors as follows: January, 96; February, 100; March, 105; April, 104; May, 101; June, 101; July, 103; August, 101; September, 103; October, 100; November, 94; December, 92. These factors are practically the same as those used on page 84.

9. Since the chapter, “Limitations of the Mathematical Method,” was written, it has been discovered that hog receipts at eleven markets are a more accurate indicator of hog prices than receipts at Chicago, and that prices of Connelsville coke are a better indicator of the demand for hogs than bank clearings outside New York City. The multiple coefficient of correlation between hog prices on the one hand and Chicago hog receipts and bank clearings outside New York City on the other hand is .65, whereas between hog prices and hog receipts at eleven markets and coke prices the multiple coefficient of correlation is .70.

10. This is the average as given in the Drovers’ Journal Year Books. It evidently is a weighted average based on varying receipts.

11. This is a simple average and not strictly comparable with the Chicago averages, which are weighted on the basis of varying receipts.

12. Interpolated from Kansas City market, on account of foot-and-mouth disease closing Chicago market.

13. Omaha prices, 1903 to 1907, inclusive; Chicago prices after 1907.

14. Prices for both wheat and corn are taken from the Year Books of the Rosario Board of Trade. Rosario is the Chicago of Argentina. The Argentine unit of weight, the quintal, is taken as equivalent to 3.67 bushels of wheat and 3.936 bushels of corn. The Argentine dollar is taken as equivalent to 42.6 cents. After July of 1918, prices are taken from the International Institute of Agriculture.

15. Flour exports converted into wheat at the rate of four and one-half bushels of wheat to a barrel.

16. These figures, previous to 1917, were taken from charts furnished by Dr. L. D. H. Weld, of Swift & Company. Since 1917, the source has been the Daily Trade Bulletin of Howard Bartels. The top price for the month is used in every case.

17. These figures, previous to 1917, were taken from charts furnished by Dr. L. D. H. Weld, of Swift & Company. Since 1917, the source has been the Daily Trade Bulletin of Howard Bartels. The top price for the month is used in every case.

18. The Milwaukee prices were compiled by Professor F. A. Pearson, of the University of Illinois, from the reports of the Western Feed Bureau.

19. From 1860 to 1890, wages are based on the investigation made by the Department of Labor for the senate committee investigating prices and wages, and reported in Senate Document 1394. Wages from 1890 to 1907 are based on Bulletin 77 of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and from 1907 to 1913 on unpublished data of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, prepared for the San Francisco Exposition. Figures since 1913 are estimated from reports of manufacturing establishments in New York state, reports of wages paid by the United States Steel Corporation, and reports of the Bureau of Labor Statistics as to wages existing in cotton goods, men’s clothing, lumber, and furniture industries. It is believed that the figures since 1913 are roughly accurate, but that they may have to be revised to make them comparable with the preceding series. Farm-hand wages are derived from the December, 1919, Monthly Crop Reporter of the Bureau of Crop Estimates.


TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
  • Typos fixed; non-standard spelling and dialect retained.